Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Covariance averaging for improved estimation and portfolio allocation

  • Published:
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a new method for estimating the covariance matrix of a multivariate time series of financial returns. The method is based on estimating sample covariances from overlapping windows of observations which are then appropriately weighted to obtain the final covariance estimate. We extend the idea of (model) covariance averaging offered in the covariance shrinkage approach by means of greater ease of use, flexibility and robustness in averaging information over different data segments. The suggested approach does not suffer from the curse of dimensionality and can be used without problems of either approximation or any demand for numerical optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that the \(\displaystyle \widehat{\alpha }_{1}\) estimate of the smoothing parameter is, by construction, less than 1 and positive.

  2. This is the average cost that one of the major online brokerage houses charges the individual investor.

  3. We perform a standard estimation and test for zero mean differences using a GMM-based approach and standard errors. Details of the calculations and many other statistics beyond those presented are available on request.

  4. The maximum drawdown is defined as the largest peak-to-trough drop in the portfolio value during the underlying evaluation period.

  5. Counting the number of times that a table entry is greater than 50 %.

References

  • Bajeux-Besnainou, I., Bandara, W., Bura, E.: A Krylov subspace approach to large portfolio optimization. J. Econ. Dynam. Control 36(11), 1688–1699 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauwens, L., Laurent, S., Rombouts, J.V.K.: Multivariate GARCH models: a survey. J. Appl. Econ. 21(1), 79–109 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, P., Thomakos, D.D.: Improving forecasting performance by window and model averaging. Quantf Research, Working Paper Series, Forthcoming, 2011

  • Chan, L.K.C., Karceski, J., Lakonishok, J.: On portfolio optimization: forecasting covariances and choosing the risk model. Rev. Financial Stud. 12(5), 937–974 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T.E., McCracken, M.W.: Improving forecast accuracy by combining recursive and rolling forecasts. Int. Econ. Rev. 50(2), 363–395 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., Uppal, R.: Optimal versus naive diversification: how inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Rev. Financ. Stud. 22(5), 1915–1953 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., Nogales, F.J., Uppal, R.: A generalized approach to portfolio optimization: improving performance by constraining portfolio norms. Manag. Sci. 55(5), 798–812 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R.: Dynamic conditional correlation: a simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 20(3), 339–350 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., Fan, Y., Lv, J.: High dimensional covariance matrix estimation using a factor model. J. Econ. 147, 186–197 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo, L., Tae-Hwan, K., Kim, Y.: Robust estimation of covariance and its application to portfolio optimization. Finance Res. Lett. 9(3), 121–134 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, R., Ma, T.: Risk reduction in large portfolios: why imposing the wrong constraints helps. J. Finance 50(4), 1651–1684 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, R., Zhou, G.: Optimal portfolio choice with parameter uncertainty. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 42, 621–656 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtis, A., Dotsis, G., Markellos, R.N.: Parameter uncertainty in portfolio selection: shrinking the inverse covariance matrix. J. Bank. Finance 36(9), 2522–2531 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, C.C.Y.: Estimation error in the average correlation of security returns and shrinkage estimation of covariance and correlation matrices. Finance Res. Lett. 5, 236–244 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoit, O., Santa-Clara, P., Wolf, M.: Flexible multivariate GARCH modeling with an application to international stock markets. Rev. Econ. Stat. 85, 735–747 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoit, O., Wolf, M.: Improved estimation for the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection. J. Empir. Finance 10(5), 603–621 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoit, O., Wolf, M.: Honey, I shrunk the sample covariance matrix. J. Portf. Manag. 31(1), 110–119 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7, 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Martellini, L., Ziemann, V.: Improved estimates of higher-order comoments and implications for portfolio selection. Rev. Financial Stud. 23–4, 1467–1502 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, A.J., Sheppard, K.: Evaluating volatility and correlation forecasts. In: Handbook of Financial Time Series Analysis, pp. 801–838. Springer, Berlin (2009).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, D.: Regime switching for dynamic correlations. J. Econom. 131(1–2), 445–473 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M.H., Schuermann, T., Smith, L.V.: Forecasting economic and financial variables with global VARs. Int. J. Forecast. 25(4), 642–675 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, B., Inoue, A.: Out-of-sample forecast tests robust to the choice of window size. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 30(3), 432–453 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvennoinen, A., Terasvirta, T.: Modeling multivariate autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with the double smooth transition conditional correlation GARCH model. J. Financ. Econ. 7(4), 373–411 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z.: A shrinkage approach to model uncertainty and asset allocation. Rev. Financ. Stud. 18(2), 673–705 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful for helpful comments from the editor and an anonymous referee. Any remaining errors are our responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fotis Papailias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papailias, F., Thomakos, D.D. Covariance averaging for improved estimation and portfolio allocation. Financ Mark Portf Manag 29, 31–59 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-014-0242-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-014-0242-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation