Abstract
Purpose
Although the largely used life cycle assessment (LCA) was initially targeted for products, it can also be adapted to the organizational level. The resulting methodology is the so-called organizational LCA (O-LCA), introduced by ISO/TS 14072 and being developed by several initiatives. O-LCA’s object of study is the organization and its value chain; it adopts a life cycle approach and assesses a multi-set of environmental impacts. This paper introduces the methodological framework of O-LCA to researchers and practitioners and focuses particularly on the scoping phase.
Methods
Here, we discuss the solutions adopted for each identified challenge when accommodating product LCA to organizations. Those critical elements are analyzed and contrasted with main baseline initiatives: primarily product LCA standards and also Organisation Environmental Footprint and GHG Protocol. Additionally, small deviations from ISO/TS 14072 that are proposed by the authors are pointed out and explained. An example was made up to illustrate and support the explanations.
Results and discussion
O-LCA also follows a four-phase approach, including goal and scope definition, inventory, impact assessment, and interpretation. Although product and O-LCA are comparable, main differences are mostly at the scope level, which is very relevant for the subsequent phases of O-LCA. Function is the main basis for the definition of the unit of analysis in product LCA, while in O-LCA, are the organization and its portfolio, which is unique for each organization. The reporting organization should be described in terms of subject of study, sites that are to be partially or totally considered, and period when the organization is depicted. Finally, as in product LCA, the boundary of the studied system is defined that includes direct and indirect activities along the value chain of the organization.
Conclusions
Most principles, requirements, and guidelines of product LCA apply for O-LCA, and the major identified differences are at the unit of analysis and boundary definition level. A cross-divergence that affects the perspective of the two methods is that O-LCA is not foreseen for comparative assertions intended to be disclosed to the public.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ADEME (2010) Bilan Carbone Companies and Local Authorities Version. Methodological guide Version 6.1: objectives and principles for the counting of greenhouse gas emissions. French Agency for the Environment and Energy Management, http://www.associationbilancarbone.fr/sites/default/files/guide_methodologique_v6_euk-v.pdf
CDP (2014) Carbon Disclosure Project—water program guidance website. https://www.cdp.net/en-US/Pages/guidance-water.aspx
CDP (2014) Carbon Disclosure Project—climate change program guidance website. https://www.cdp.net/en-US/Pages/guidance-climate-change.aspx
DEFRA (2013) Environmental Reporting Guidelines: including mandatory greenhouse gas emissions reporting guidance. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/environmental-reporting-guidelines-including-mandatory-greenhouse-gas-emissions-reporting-guidance
Downie J, Stubbs W (2011) Evaluation of Australian companies’ scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions assessments. J Clean Prod 56:156–163
Draucker L (2013) GHG Protocol: moving corporate accounting beyond GHGs. Abstr. B. SETAC North Am. 34th Annu. Meet. Nashville, USA
European Commission (2013) Organisation Environmental Footprint Guide. European Commission-Joint Research Centre-Institute for Environment and Sustainability, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:124:SOM:EN:HTML
European Commission (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—general guide for life cycle assessment—detailed guidance. European Commission-Joint Research Centre-Institute for Environment and Sustainability, http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/international-reference-life-cycle-data-system-ilcd-handbook-general-guide-for-life-cycle-assessment-detailed-guidance-pbLBNA24708/
Finkbeiner M (2013) Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:266–271
Finkbeiner M (2014) The International Standards as the Constitution of Life Cycle Assessment: the ISO 14040 Series and its Offspring. In: Klöpffer W (ed) Backgr. Futur. Prospect. Life Cycle assessment. Ser. LCA Compend.–Complet. World Life Cycle Assess. Springer, Netherlands, pp 85–106
Finkbeiner M, König P (2013) Carbon footprint and life cycle assessment of organizations. J Environ Account Manag 1:55–63
Galatola M, Pant R (2014) Reply to the editorial “Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment?” written by Prof. Finkbeiner (Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):266–271). Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1356–1360
GRI (2013) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, G4. Global Reporting Initiative, https://www.globalreporting.org/reporting/g4/Pages/default.aspx
Huang YA, Weber CL, Matthews HS (2009) Categorization of scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting. Environ Sci Technol 43:8509–8515
ISO (2004) ISO 14001: environmental management systems—requirements with guidance for use. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
ISO (2006a) ISO 14044: environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
ISO (2006b) ISO 14040: environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
ISO (2013) ISO/TR 14069: greenhouse gases—quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions for organizations—guidance for the application of ISO 14064-1. Switzerland, Geneva
ISO (2014) ISO/TS 14072: environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines for organizational life cycle assessment. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
ISO (2006c) ISO 14064-1: greenhouse gases—part 1: specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
Makower J, Mattison R, Salo J, Kelley D (2014) State of Green Business 2014. GreenBiz Group and Trucost, http://www.trucost.com/_uploads/publishedResearch/SOGB2014.pdf
Martínez-Blanco J, Inaba A, Finkbeiner M (2015) Half-way point in the flagship project “LCA of Organizations” by UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan 11(2):1–7. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/lca
Milà i Canals L, Sim S, García-Suárez T, Neuer G, Herstein K, Kerr C, Rigarlsford G, King H (2010) Estimating the greenhouse gas footprint of Knorr. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:50–58
Pelletier N, Allacker K, Pant R, Manfredi S (2013) The European Commission Organisation Environmental Footprint method: comparison with other methods, and rationales for key requirements. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:387–404
Suh S, Lenzen M, Treloar GJ, Hondo H, Horvath A, Huppes G, Jolliet O, Klann U, Krewitt W, Moriguchi Y (2004) System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. Environ Sci Technol 38:657–664
UNEP/SETAC (2015) Guidance on Organizational Life Cycle Assessment. Life-Cycle Initiative, United Nations Environment Programme and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Paris, France, http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/resources/reports/
WRI and WBCSD (2004) GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/public/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf
WRI and WBCSD (2011) Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard–Supplement to the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/public/Corporate-Value-Chain-Accounting-Reporing-Standard_041613.pdf
Acknowledgments
The authors want to thank all the participants of the flagship project “LCA of organizations” of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Particularly, we want to acknowledge the support from the initiative’s secretariat and the contribution of the working group to the project.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Compliance with ethical standards
The first author assures that the manuscript does not include any research involving human participants and/or animals and has the informed consent from the co-authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Thomas Swarr
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martínez-Blanco, J., Inaba, A. & Finkbeiner, M. Scoping organizational LCA—challenges and solutions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 829–841 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0883-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0883-x