Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

PIQET: the design and development of an online ‘streamlined’ LCA tool for sustainable packaging design decision support

  • LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim and scope

‘Streamlined’ life cycle assessment (LCA) tools hold out the possibility of providing LCA information quickly and easily in order to support a variety of decision-making environments and situations. The utility of such tools is closely related to the accuracy needs and possibilities, and the particular decisions to be supported. In order to facilitate the provision and application of LCA information in decision making during packaging design, development and utilisation, there is a prima facia case for a ‘streamlined’ LCA tool, provided it meets a set of requirements, including functionality, accuracy, validity, reliability and usability.

Methods

One such ‘streamlined’ LCA tool, Packaging Impact Quick Evaluation Tool (PIQET), has been designed to allow for packaging system scenarios to be evaluated. Utilising embedded life cycle inventory data for material manufacture, converting, filling, cleaning of returnables, transport and end-of-life waste management processes, PIQET presents life cycle environmental impacts for the different levels of packaging. These life cycle environmental impacts are combined with packaging-specific indicators, such as product/packaging ratio and number of packaging materials per format, to provide the user, typically a packaging technologist, designer, environmental manager or marketer, a comprehensive assessment of the packaging format being assessed.

Results and discussion

This paper introduces the case for a streamlined LCA tool for sustainable packaging design and evaluation, and describes the design and development of PIQET. Particular reference is made to the tool development model, including the involvement of industry partners' input. Goal and scope, functional unit, system boundary, characterisation and impact assessment in PIQET, and key algorithms and data sources are described. The functionality, application and limitations of the tool are also highlighted in the paper, along with ideas for further research and development.

Conclusions

The paper concludes with the discussion of the inevitable trade-offs between functionality, cost and accuracy in streamlined LCA tools in comparison to more detailed and specific LCAs. The authors contend that the two approaches are not alternatives but occupy different parts of the necessary innovation niche of sustainable packaging system change. While streamlined LCA tools are compromises, they can be potentially useful and have their own unique role in furthering the use of LCA data in decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Other packaging tools have been released since PIQET was commercialised in 2008. These tools include COMPASS by SPC (2009) and Pack-In by Envirowise (2009) which were both publically released in 2009.

  2. Recycling processes usually generate net environmental benefits; however, in some cases, they generate net impacts.

References

  • Bond S (2007, 24 April) Tesco to slash own brand packaging. Retrieved 14 March, 2009, from http://www.edie.net/news/news_story.asp?id=12932&channel = 0

  • Byggeth S, Hochschorner E (2005) Handling trade-offs in ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. J Clean Prod 14(15–16):1420–1430

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes C (2009, 23 February) Tesco to promote its packaging reduction at Pro2Pac. Retrieved 14 March, 2009, from http://www.packagingnews.co.uk/News/MostEmailed/882065/Tesco-promote-its-packaging-reduction-Pro2Pac

  • ECR Europe and EUROPEN (2009) Packaging in the sustainability agenda: a guide for corporate decision makers. ECR Europe and the European Organization for Packaging and the Environment, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Envirowise (2002) Packaging design for the environment: reducing costs and quantities. Harwel International Business Centre, Didcot, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Envirowise (2009) PACK-IN - The Packaging Indicator tool for eco-design. Retrieved 15 January, 2010, from (http://www.envirowise.gov.uk/uk/Our-Services/Tools/PACK-IN-The-Packaging-Indicator-tool-for-eco-design.html

  • Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2001) The Eco-Indicator 99—a damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Methodology Report. Amersfoort, PRé Consultants B.V.

  • Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, W. S. A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn JA, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ (2001) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

  • Heijungs R, Guinée JB, Huppes G, Lankreijer HM, de Haes HA Udo, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R, de Goede HP (1992a) Environmental life cycle assessment of products: guide. Centre for Environmental Science (CML), Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R, Guinée JB, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R, de Goede HP (1992b) Environmental life cycle assessment of products: backgrounds. Centre for Environmental Science (CML), Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne RE, Verghese K (2009) Accelerating life cycle assessment uptake: life cycle management and 'quick' LCA tools. In: Horne RE, Grant T, Verghese K (eds) Life cycle assessment: principles, practice and prospects. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne R, James K, Fitzpatrick L, Jordan R, Sonneveld K (2005) Developing PIQET©—a tool for rapid packaging sustainability assessment. Proceedings of the APRSPC Life Cycle Management Conference. Asia Pacific Roundtable on Sustainable Production and Consumption, Melbourne

  • Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K (1996) Climate Change 1995. The science of climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff D (2005) Paper or plastic. Searching for solutions to an overpackaged world. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • INCPEN (2003) Responsible packaging code of practice for optimising packaging and minimising waste. The Industry Council for Packaging and the Environment, Reading, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1999) ISO 14021—environmental labels and declarations—self-declared environmental claims (type II environmental labelling). International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • J Sainsbury plc (2008) Corporate responsibility—respect for our environment—packaging. Retrieved 15 March, 2009, from http://www.j-sainsbury.com/cr/index.asp?pageid = 90

  • James K, Fitzpatrick L, Lewis H, Sonneveld K (2005) Sustainable packaging systems development. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Handbook of sustainability research. Peter Lang Scientific Publishing, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedlicka W (2009) Packaging sustainability. Tools, systems and strategies for innovative package design. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahy T, Polman P (2009) Briefing papers: sustainability projects—progress report. Retrieved 11 September, 2009, from http://www.ecrnet.org/08-Global_Standards/global_packaging/Global%20CEO%20Forum%20brief%20-%20Packaging%20&%20Sustainability%20Metrics.pdf

  • Lewis H, Fitzpatrick L, Verghese K, Sonneveld K, Jordon R (2007) Sustainable packaging redefined, draft. Sustainable Packaging Alliance, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofthouse V (2006) Ecodesign tools for designers: defining the requirements. J Clean Prod 14:1386–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks and Spencer (2009) Packaging—our approach. Retrieved 15 March, 2009, from http://plana.marksandspencer.com/we-are-doing/waste/packaging/approach

  • NPCC (2005) The national packaging covenant - strategic partnerships in packaging. A Commitment to the Sustainable Manufacture, Use and Recovery of Packaging, 15 July 2005 to 30 June 2010. Melbourne, National Packaging Covenant Council

  • PCA (2005) Australian packaging: issues and trends. Issues paper 18. Retrieved 18 March, 2010, from http://www.pca.org.au/site/cms/documents/issues/issues18.html

  • Pira and University of Brighton (2005) Packaging's place in society—resource efficiency of packaging in the supply chain for fast moving consumer goods. Retrieved 15 March, 2009, from http://www.incpen.org/pages/userdata/incp/PackagingsPlace.pdf.

  • Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Maqruis M, Averyt K, Tignor MMB, Miller HL Jr, Chen Z (eds) (2007) Climate Change 2007—the physical science basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SPA (2002) Towards sustainable packaging. A discussion paper. Retrieved 28 September, 2008, from http://www.sustainablepack.org/database/files/filestorage/Towards%20Sustainable%20Packaging.pdf

  • SPC (2005) Definition of sustainable packaging, version 1.0. Retrieved 19 October 2007, from http://www.sustainablepackaging.org/about_sustainable_packaging.asp

  • SPC (2009) COMPASS—comparative packaging assessment. Retrieved 15 March, 2009, from http://www.sustainablepackaging.org/pdf/SPC_COMPASS_Brochure.pdf

  • Sterling S (2007) Field guide to sustainable packaging. Summit Publishing Company, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Packaging Coalition (2006) Design guidelines for sustainable packaging, version 1. GreenBlue Institute, Charlottesville, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesco (2008) Packaging. Retrieved 14 March, 2009, from http://www.tescocorporate.com/plc/corporate_responsibility/caring_environment/waste_recycling/packaging/

  • UNEP and EEA (2007) Sustainable consumption and production in South East Europe and Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia. Joint UNEP-EEA report on the opportunities and lessons learned. Copenhagen, United Nations Environment Program and the European Environment Agency

  • UNEP and SETAC LC Initiative (2007) Life cycle management. A business guide to sustainability. UNEP and Danish Standards, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Verghese K (2008) Environmental assessment of food packaging and advanced methods for choosing the correct material. In: Chiellini E (ed) Environmentally compatible food packaging. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Verghese K, Horne RE, Fitzpatrick L, Jordan R (2006) PIQET—a packaging decision support tool. 5th Australian life cycle assessment conference. Australian Life Cycle Assessment Society (ALCAS), Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Wal-Mart (2007, 12 March) Wal-Mart announces initial results of packaging scorecard. Retrieved 14 March, 2009, from http://walmartstores.com/FactNews/NewsRoom/6328.aspx

  • Woolworths Limited (2008a) Corporate responsibility report 2008—environmental sustainability—packaging. Retrieved 15 March, 2009

  • Woolworths Limited (2008b) Corporate responsibility report 2008—summary. Retrieved 15 March, 2009, from http://crreport08.woolworthslimited.com.au/summary.php

  • WRAP (2009) UK Packaging Benchmark—search the database. Retrieved 15 January, 2010, from http://www.wrap.org.uk/retail/tools_for_change/uk_best_in_class/index.html

Download references

Acknowledgements

Additional members of the research team are Robert Jordan, Leanne Fitzpatrick, Kees Sonneveld, John Cameron, Juin Majumdar, Glenn Di-Mauro Hayes, Amit Kapur, Bryce Hedditch and Paul-Antoine Bontinck. Industry sponsors were Cadbury Schweppes Australia, Lion Nathan, Masterfoods Australia New Zealand, Nestle Australia and Simplot Australia who supported the development of PIQET. Financial support was also received from the Australian Government's Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts and the Department of the Environment and Heritage; and Sustainability Victoria.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Design, RMIT University, P.O. Box 2476V, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia

    Karli L. Verghese, Ralph Horne & Andrew Carre

Authors
  1. Karli L. Verghese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ralph Horne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew Carre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karli L. Verghese.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verghese, K.L., Horne, R. & Carre, A. PIQET: the design and development of an online ‘streamlined’ LCA tool for sustainable packaging design decision support. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15, 608–620 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0193-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0193-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation