Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring the influence of contributing factors and impact degree on bus emissions in real-world conditions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Buses in urban have environmental problems because they are mostly having higher emission factors and pollution levels. This study analyzed the contributing factors on bus emissions including NOX, CO, HC, and CO2 and further evaluated the impact degree of these factors. A back-propagation neural network (BPNN) was applied, and the results showed that the composition of pollutant emissions for different fuel types was various. BPNN can be utilized to solve the multifactor, uncertainty, and nonlinearity problems without making any prior presumptions about the data distribution. Among them, diesel buses under EURO-IV and EURO-V emission standards were more likely to produce higher emissions of CO and NOX. By contrast, the emission level of CO and NOX for compressed natural gas bus was lower, but the emission level of CO2 and HC was heavier. In this study, nine variables, namely, speed, acceleration, passenger load, past speed, past acceleration, acceleration time, delay time, stops, and location were selected to investigate their effects on bus emissions. The results showed that factors delay time, location, and stops had the strongest impacts on bus emissions. By contrast, bus emissions were not sensitive to past speed and passenger load. In addition, to fully understand the influence of contributing factors, the impact degree of all these factors on bus emissions was summarized in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • American Public Transportation Association. (2013). More than 35% of public transit buses use alternative fuels or hybrid technology, Transit News, 4/22/13. http://www.apta.com/mediacenter/pressreleases/2013/Pages/130422_Earth-Day.aspx.

  • Antanasijević DZ, Pocajt VV, Perić-Grujić AA, Ristić MĐ (2018) Multiple-input-multiple-output general regression neural networks model for the simultaneous estimation of traffic-related air pollutant emissions. Atmosph Pollut Res 9(2):388–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baidu baike. (2013). Table of standard body weight, http://baike.baidu.com/view/93890.html. accessed July 10, 2018.

  • Bel G, Bolancé C, Guillén M, Rosell J (2015) The environmental effects of changing speed limits: a quantile regression approach. Transp Res D 36:76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bel G, Holst M (2018) Evaluation of the impact of bus rapid transit on air pollution in Mexico City. Transp Policy 63:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bel G, Rosell J (2013) Effects of the 80 km/h and variable speed limits on air pollution in the metropolitan area of Barcelona. Transp Res D 23:90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitzan JD, Ripplinger DG (2016) Public transit and alternative fuels—the costs associated with using biodiesel and CNG in comparison to diesel for U.S. public transit systems. Transp Res A 94:17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, Yin Y, Xie M (2009) Prediction of hourly air pollutant concentrations near urban arterials using artificial neural network approach. Transp Res D 14(1):32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen D (2017) Research on traffic flow prediction in the big data environment based on the improved RBF neural network. IEEE Trans Indust Inform 13(4):2000–2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreier D, Silveira S, Khatiwada D, Fonseca KVO, Nieweglowski R, Schepanski R (2018) Well-to-wheel analysis of fossil energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for conventional, hybrid-electric and plug-in hybrid-electric city buses in the BRT system in Curitiba, Brazil. Transp Res D 58:122–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, H.C., Rouphail, N.M., Unal, A., Colyar, J.D. (2002). Emission reductions through better traffic management: an empirical evaluation based upon on-road measurements. FHWY/NC/2002-001, prepared by Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University for North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, NC.

  • Fu X, Lam WHK (2018) Modeling joint activity-travel pattern scheduling problem in multi-modal transit networks. Transportation 45:23–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves M, Jiménez-Guerrero P, López E, Baldasano JM (2008) Air quality models sensitivity to on-road traffic speed representation: effects on air quality of 80 km/h speed limit in the Barcelona Metropolitan area. Atmos Environ 42:8389–8402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaikumar R, Shiva Nagendra SM, Sivanandan R (2017) Modal analysis of real-time, real world vehicular exhaust emissions under heterogeneous traffic conditions. Transp Res D 54:397–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Y, Fan Y, Ermagun A, Cao X, Wang W, Das K (2017) Public bicycle as a feeder mode to rail transit in China: the role of gender, age, income, trip purpose, and bicycle theft experience. Int J Sustain Transp 11(4):308–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kho FWL, Law PL, Ibrahim SH, Sentian J (2007) Carbon monoxide levels along roadway. Int J Environ Sci Technol 4(1):27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HH (2020) Characteristics of exposure and health risk air pollutants in public buses in Korea. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:37087–37098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09792-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leong LV, Azai TA, Goh WC, Mahdi MB (2020) The development and assessment of free-flow speed models under heterogeneous traffic in facilitating sustainable inter urban multilane highways. Sustainability 12:3445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Liu Z, Jia R (2019) DeepPF: a deep learning based architecture for metro passenger flow prediction. Transp Res C 101:18–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Martínez JM, Jiménez F, Páez-Ayuso FJ, Flores-Holgado MN, Arenas AN, Arenas-Ramirez B, Aparicio-Izquierdo F (2017) Modelling the fuel consumption and pollutant emissions of the urban bus fleet of the city of Madrid. Transp Res D 52:112–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nghiem TD, Nguyen YLT, Le AT, Bui ND, Pham HT (2019) Development of the specific emission factors for buses in Hanoi, Vietnam. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(23):24176–24189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Chen S, Qiao F, Ukkusuri SV, Tang K (2019) Estimation of real-driving emissions for buses fueled with liquefied natural gas based on gradient boosted regression trees. Sci Total Environ 660:741–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park DC, Ei-Sharkawi MA, Marks RJ (1991) Electric load forecasting using an artificial neural network. IEEE Trans Power Syst 6(2):442–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi Y, Teng H, Yu L (2004) Microscale emission models incorporating acceleration and deceleration. J Transp Eng 130(3):348–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasool Y, Zaidi SAH, Zafar MW (2019) Determinants of carbon emissions in Pakistan's transport sector. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(22):22907–22921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323(9):533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp M, Handschuh N, Rieke C, Kuperjans I (2019) Contribution of country-specific electricity mix and charging time to environmental impact of battery electric vehicles: a case study of electric buses in Germany. Appl Energy 237:618–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah IH, Dawood UF, Jalil UA, Adnan Y (2019) Climate co-benefits of alternate strategies for tourist transportation: The case of Murree Hills in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(13):13263–13274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahinian VD (2007) On-vehicle diesel emission analyzer: SEMTECH-DS User Manual: Revision 1.14. Sensors, Inc., Saline

    Google Scholar 

  • Song G, Zhou X, Yu L (2015) Delay correction model for estimating bus emissions at signalized intersections based on vehicle specific power distributions. Sci Total Environ 514:108–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Z, Wang C, Ye Z, Bi H (2020) Long short-term memory network-based emission models for conventional and new energy buses. Int J Sustain Transp 15:229–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1734887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suski CA, Mader MM (2020) NOX and CO gas emissions in collective transport buses to diesel S50 and S10 with EGR system added with dienitro. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(14):16686–16693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Unal A, Rouphail NM, Frey HC (2003) Effect of arterial signalization and level of service on measured vehicle emissions. Transp Res Rec 1842:47–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Benthem A (2015) What is the optimal speed limit on freeways? J Public Econ 124:44–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Sun Z, Ye Z (2020) On-road bus emission comparison for diverse locations and fuel types in real-world operation conditions. Sustainability 12(5):1798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Wu Y, Jiang L, Zhang S, Li Z, Zheng X, Hao J (2015) Impacts of load mass on real-world PM1 mass and number emissions from a heavy-duty diesel bus. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(4):1261–1268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Ye Z, Chen E, Xu M, Wang W (2019) Diffusion approximation for exploring the correlation between failure rate and bus-stop operation. Transportmetr A: Transport Sci 15(2):1306–1320

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Ye Z, Wang W, Jin M (2016) Traffic-related heavy metal contamination in urban areas and correlation with traffic activity in China. Transp Res Rec 2571:80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Ye Z, Yu Y, Gong W (2018) Estimation of bus emission models for different fuel types of buses under real conditions. Sci Total Environ 640-641:965–972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wardoyo AYP, Juswono UP, Noor JAE (2020) The association between the diesel exhaust particle exposure from bus emission and the tubular epithelial cell deformation of rats. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(18):23073–23080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Zhao J, Liu P (2019) A geographically weighted regression approach to investigate the effects of traffic conditions and road characteristics on air pollutant emissions. J Clean Prod 239:118084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Ye Z, Wang Y, Wang C, Sun C (2018) Evaluating the influence of road lighting on traffic safety at accesses using an artificial neural network. Traffic Injury Prevent 19(6):601–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye Z, Xu Y, Veneziano D, Shi X (2014) Evaluation of winter maintenance chemicals and crashes with an artificial neural network. Transp Res Rec 2440:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Q, Li T (2014) Evaluation of bus emissions generated near bus stops. Atmos Environ 85:195–203

  • Yu Q, Li T, Li H (2016) Improving urban bus emission and fuel consumption modeling by incorporating passenger load factor for real world driving. Appl Energy 161:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Y, Yang M, Wu J, Rasouli S, Lei D (2019a) Assessing bus transit service from the perspective of elderly passengers in Harbin, China. Int J Sustain Transp 13(10):761–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Z, Ou X, Peng T, Yan X (2019b) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of multi-pathways natural gas vehicles in China considering methane leakage. Appl Energy 253:113472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Wu L, Yang Z, Zou C, Liu X, Zhang K, Mao H (2016) Characteristics of gaseous and particulate pollutants exhaust from logistics transportation vehicle on real-world conditions. Transp Res D 43:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y (2019) Analyzing truck fleets' acceptance of alternative fuel freight vehicles in China. Renew Energy 134:1148–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Jiangsu Province Science Fund for Key Research and Development Program (BE2020690), National Natural Science Foundation of China (52072066), Jiangsu Province Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (BK20200014), and Science and Technology Innovation Project for Overseas Scholars of Nanjing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Chao Wang, Zhirui Ye; data collection: Chao Wang, Hui Bi; analysis and interpretation of results: Chao Wang, Zhirui Ye, Hui Bi; draft manuscript preparation: Chao Wang, Zhirui Ye, Hui Bi. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Ye, Z. & Bi, H. Exploring the influence of contributing factors and impact degree on bus emissions in real-world conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 36092–36101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12945-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12945-3

Keywords

Navigation