Abstract
Environmental problems, including extreme weather phenomena, unprecedented global warming, and environmental disasters caused by increasing levels of CO2 and other toxic emissions, along with rapidly increasing economic development and energy consumption, require global development and policies to meet sustainable development goals. The traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) model has limited practical applicability for measuring environmental performance, as it lacks the computational capacity to deal with undesirable outputs. The current study employs “radial” and “non-radial” DEA technology, and acknowledges the associations of a mathematical foundation to increase the analytical capability of the environmental performance of DEA. Results show that in the measurement of environmental performance analysis, the non-radial DEA model has a higher discriminating power compared to radial DEA. Results show that the average values of radial and non-radial environmental performance are highest for Latin America and the Caribbean, at 0.99 and 0.96, respectively, while the former USSR has the lowest values of 0.22 and 0.32, respectively. The South Asian region shows relatively stable values of about 0.58 to 0.65, and Latin America & Caribbean countries and sub-Saharan Africa also show a stable radial environmental performance ranging from 0.82 to 1.00. These results indicate a considerable difference among the eight world regions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
11 September 2020
The correct affiliation of the 1st Author is shown in this paper.
References
Aghayi N, Maleki B (2018) Corrigendum to efficiency measurement of DMUs with undesirable outputs under uncertainty based on the directional distance function: application on bank industry. Energy 153:476–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.086
Ali A, Amjad M, Mehmood A et al (2015) Cost effective power generation using renewable energy based hybrid system for Chakwal, Pakistan. Sci Int 27:6017–6022
Álvarez-Herránz A, Balsalobre D, Cantos JM, Shahbaz M (2017) Energy innovations-GHG emissions Nexus: fresh empirical evidence from OECD countries. Energy Policy 101:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.030
Amer M, Daim TU (2011) Selection of renewable energy technologies for a developing county: a case of Pakistan. Energy Sustain Dev 15:420–435
Asbahi AAMHA, Gang FZ, Iqbal W et al (2019) Novel approach of principal component analysis method to assess the national energy performance via energy Trilemma index. Energy Rep 5:704–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.06.009
Charnes A, Cooper WW (1963) Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisficing under chance constraints. Oper Res 11:18–39. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.11.1.18
Chen C, Zhu J, Yu J-Y, Noori H (2012) A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 221:348–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.03.043
Cooper WW, Huang Z, Li SX (1996) Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints. Ann Oper Res 66:279–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187302
D’Inverno G, Carosi L, Romano G, Guerrini A (2018) Water pollution in wastewater treatment plants: An efficiency analysis with undesirable output. Eur J Oper Res 269:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.028
Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C (2004) In search of a natural systems sustainability index. Ecol Econ 49:401–405
Ding Z, Gong W, Li S, Wu Z (2018) System dynamics versus agent-based Modeling: a review of complexity simulation in construction waste management. Sustainability 10:2484. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072484
Dogan E, Inglesi-Lotz R (2020) The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07878-2
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085
Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5323-8
Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK (2019) Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ 30:1065–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X19834279
Falchi F, Furgoni R, Gallaway TA et al (2019) Light pollution in USA and Europe: the good, the bad and the ugly. J Environ Manag 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.128
Fukuyama H, Weber WL (2014) Two-stage network DEA with bad outputs. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, In, pp 451–474
Galán-Marín C, Martínez-Rocamora A, Solís-Guzmán J, Rivera-Gómez C (2018) Natural stabilized earth panels versus conventional façade systems. Economic and environmental impact assessment. Sustain 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041020
Gustavsson L, Johansson B, Bülow-Hübe H (1992) An environmentally benign energy future for Western Scania. Sweden Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(92)90099-L
Harijan K, Uqaili MA, Mirza UK (2015) Assessment of solar PV power generation potential in Pakistan. J Clean Energy Technol 3:54–56
Ikram M, Mahmoudi A, Shah SZA, Mohsin M (2019) Forecasting number of ISO 14001 certifications of selected countries: application of even GM (1,1), DGM, and NDGM models. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04534-2
INDEPENDENT (2016) Nearly 50 countries vow to use 100% renewable energy by 2050
Iqbal W, Yumei H, Abbas Q et al (2019) Assessment of wind energy potential for the production of renewable hydrogen in Sindh Province of Pakistan. Processes 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040196
IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers, In: climate change 2014, Mitigation of climate change. contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324
Ishaque H (2017) Is it wise to compromise renewable energy future for the sake of expediency? An analysis of Pakistan’s long-term electricity generation pathways. Energy Strateg Rev 17:6–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2017.05.002
Kakakhel S (2012) Environmental challenges in South Asia. National University of Singapore, Institute of South Asian Studies
Karagoz S, Bakirci K, Bakirci K (2010) Sustainable energy development in Turkey. Energy Sources, Part B 5:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240802053343
Kelkar U, Bhadwal S (2007) South Asian regional study on climate change impacts and adaptation: implications for human development. Hum Dev Rep 2008
Kucukvar M, Egilmez G, Tatari O (2016) Life cycle assessment and optimization-based decision analysis of construction waste recycling for a LEED-certified university building. Sustain 8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010089
Kumar Singh B (2013) South Asia energy security: challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy 63:458–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2013.07.128
Liu T, Pan W (2017) The regional inequity of CO2 emissions per capita in China. Int J Econ Financ 9:228. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v9n7p228
Mahdiloo M, Tavana M, Farzipoor Saen R, Noorizadeh A (2014) A game theoretic approach to modeling undesirable outputs and efficiency decomposition in data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Comput 244:479–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.07.035
Mandal SK (2010) Do undesirable output and environmental regulation matter in energy efficiency analysis? Evidence from Indian cement industry. Energy Policy 38:6076–6083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.063
Meng FY, Fan LW, Zhou P, Zhou DQ (2013) Measuring environmental performance in China’s industrial sectors with non-radial DEA. Math Comput Model 58:1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2012.08.009
Mishra A, Kelkar U, Dorji L et al (2014) Climate risks in the SAARC region: ways to address the social, economic & environmental challenges
Mohsin M, Rasheed AK, Saidur R (2018a) Economic viability and production capacity of wind generated renewable hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy
Mohsin M, Zhou P, Iqbal N, Shah SAA (2018b) Assessing oil supply security of South Asia. Energy 155:438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.116
Mohsin M, Abbas Q, Zhang J et al (2019a) Integrated effect of energy consumption, economic development, and population growth on CO2 based environmental degradation: a case of transport sector. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06372-8
Mohsin M, Rasheed AK, Sun H et al (2019b) Developing low carbon economies: An aggregated composite index based on carbon emissions. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments 35:365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2019.08.003
Mohsin M, Zhang J, Saidur R et al (2019c) Economic assessment and ranking of wind power potential using fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05564-6
Moss D (2013) 100% Renewable Energy: Becoming the New Normal?
Mostafaee A, Saljooghi FH (2010) Cost efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis with data uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 202:595–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.06.007
Moutinho V, Madaleno M, Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) Factors affecting CO2 emissions in top countries on renewable energies: a LMDI decomposition application. Renew Sust Energ Rev 90:605–622
Pardo-Bosch F, Cervera C, Ysa T (2019) Key aspects of building retrofitting: strategizing sustainable cities. J Environ Manag 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.018
Raheem A, Abbasi SA, Memon A et al (2016) Renewable energy deployment to combat energy crisis in Pakistan. Energy Sustain Soc 6:16
Shabani A, Torabipour SMR, Farzipoor Saen R, Khodakarami M (2015) Distinctive data envelopment analysis model for evaluating global environment performance. Appl Math Model 39:4385–4404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.12.053
Shah SAA, Zhou P, Walasai GD, Mohsin M (2019) Energy security and environmental sustainability index of south Asian countries: a composite index approach. Ecol Indic 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105507
Shahbaz M, Benkraiem R, Miloudi A, Lahiani A (2017a) Production function with electricity consumption and policy implications in Portugal. Energy Policy 110:588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.056
Shahbaz M, Sarwar S, Chen W, Malik MN (2017b) Dynamics of electricity consumption, oil price and economic growth: global perspective. Energy Policy 108:256–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.006
Shahbaz M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Sinha A (2019a) Foreign direct investment–CO 2 emissions nexus in Middle East and north African countries: importance of biomass energy consumption. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.282
Shahbaz M, Gozgor G, Adom PK, Hammoudeh S (2019b) The technical decomposition of carbon emissions and the concerns about FDI and trade openness effects in the United States. Int Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2019.05.001
Shahbaz M, Gozgor G, Hammoudeh S (2019c) Human capital and export diversification as new determinants of energy demand in the United States. Energy Econ 78:335–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.016
Shahbaz M, Kumar Mahalik M, Jawad Hussain Shahzad S, Hammoudeh S (2019d) Testing the globalization-driven carbon emissions hypothesis: international evidence. Int Econ 158:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2019.02.002
Shi G-M, Bi J, Wang J-N (2010) Chinese regional industrial energy efficiency evaluation based on a DEA model of fixing non-energy inputs. Energy Policy 38:6172–6179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2010.06.003
Shiraz RK, Hatami-Marbini A, Emrouznejad A, Fukuyama H (2018) Chance-constrained cost efficiency in data envelopment analysis model with random inputs and outputs. Oper Res 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0378-1
Shukla AK, Sudhakar K, Baredar P (2016) Design, simulation and economic analysis of standalone roof top solar PV system in India. Sol Energy 136:437–449
Simar L, Zelenyuk V (2011) Stochastic FDH/DEA estimators for frontier analysis. J Product Anal 36:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0170-6
Song M, An Q, Zhang W et al (2012) Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:4465–4469. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2012.04.052
Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2010) Should the US clean air act include CO2 emission control?: examination by data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy 38:5902–5911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.044
Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2012a) Returns to scale and damages to scale on U.S. fossil fuel power plants: radial and non-radial approaches for DEA environmental assessment. Energy Econ 34:2240–2259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.024
Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2012b) Returns to scale, damages to scale, marginal rate of transformation and rate of substitution in DEA environmental assessment. Energy Econ 34:905–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.04.003
Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2012c) DEA environmental assessment of coal fired power plants: methodological comparison between radial and non-radial models. Energy Econ 34:1854–1863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.008
Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2012d) DEA radial and non-radial models for unified efficiency under natural and managerial disposability: theoretical extension by strong complementary slackness conditions. Energy Econ 34:700–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.12.013
Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2012e) Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry. Eur J Oper Res 216:668–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.046
Sueyoshi T, Sekitani K (2007) Computational strategy for Russell measure in DEA: second-order cone programming. Eur J Oper Res 180:459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.02.042
Sueyoshi T, Yuan Y, Li A, Wang D (2017) Methodological comparison among radial, non-radial and intermediate approaches for DEA environmental assessment. Energy Econ 67:439–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.07.018
Sun HP, Tariq G, Haris M, Mohsin M (2019) Evaluating the environmental effects of economic openness: evidence from SAARC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05750-6
Sun H, Mohsin M, Alharthi M, Abbas Q (2020) Measuring environmental sustainability performance of South Asia. J Clean Prod 251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119519
Tan Y, Zhang Y, Khodaverdi R (2017) Service performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis and balance scorecard approach: an application to automotive industry. Ann Oper Res 248:449–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2196-2
Valasai GD, Uqaili MA, Memon HUR et al (2017) Overcoming electricity crisis in Pakistan: a review of sustainable electricity options. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:734–745
Wang K, Wei Y-M, Huang Z (2016) Environmental efficiency and abatement efficiency measurements of China’s thermal power industry: a data envelopment analysis based materials balance approach. Eur J Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.053
Wang K, Wei Y-M, Huang Z (2018) Environmental efficiency and abatement efficiency measurements of China’s thermal power industry: A data envelopment analysis based materials balance approach. Eur J Oper Res 269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.053
World Bank (2015) World Development Report 2015
Yan Q, Wang X, Baležentis T, Streimikiene D (2018) Energy–economy–environmental (3E) performance of Chinese regions based on the data envelopment analysis model with mixed assumptions on disposability. Energy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X18757057
Yasmeen H, Wang Y, Mohsin M, Zameer H (2018) Profiling and assessment of the wind power potential in Pakistan. Acta Tech CSAV (Ceskoslovensk Akad Ved) 63:857–876
Yeh T-L, Chen T-Y, Lai P-Y (eds) (2010) A comparative study of energy utilization efficiency between Taiwan and China. Energy Policy 38:2386–2394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.030
Yeh C-C, Lin C-S, Huang C-H (2018) The Total economic value of sport tourism in belt and road development—An environmental perspective. Sustainability 10:1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041191
Zameer H, Wang Y (2018) Energy production system optimization: evidence from Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:886–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.089
Zeb R, Salar L, Awan U et al (2014) Causal links between renewable energy, environmental degradation and economic growth in selected SAARC countries: progress towards green economy. Renew Energy 71:123–132
Zhang YJ, Peng YL, Ma CQ, Shen B (2017) Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy 100:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.005
Zhou P, Ang BW (2009) Comparing MCDA aggregation methods in constructing composite indicators using the Shannon-spearman measure. Soc Indic Res 94:83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9338-0
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2006) Comparing aggregating methods for constructing the composite environmental index: An objective measure. Ecol Econ 59:305–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2005.10.018
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2008) Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Econ 30:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.05.001
Zhou P, Ang BW, Zhou DQ (2010) Weighting and aggregation in composite indicator construction: a multiplicative optimization approach. Soc Indic Res 96:169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9472-3
Zhou P, Poh KL, Ang BW (2016) Data envelopment analysis for measuring environmental performance
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anser, M.K., Iqbal, W., Ahmad, U.S. et al. Environmental efficiency and the role of energy innovation in emissions reduction. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 29451–29463 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09129-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09129-w