Skip to main content
Log in

Single STE-MR Acquisition in MR-Based Attenuation Correction of Brain PET Imaging Employing a Fully Automated and Reproducible Level-Set Segmentation Approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Molecular Imaging and Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to introduce a fully automatic and reproducible short echo-time (STE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation approach for MR-based attenuation correction of positron emission tomography (PET) data in head region.

Procedures

Single STE-MR imaging was followed by generating attenuation correction maps (μ-maps) through exploiting an automated clustering-based level-set segmentation approach to classify head images into three regions of cortical bone, air, and soft tissue. Quantitative assessment was performed by comparing the STE-derived region classes with the corresponding regions extracted from X-ray computed tomography (CT) images.

Results

The proposed segmentation method returned accuracy and specificity values of over 90 % for cortical bone, air, and soft tissue regions. The MR- and CT-derived μ-maps were compared by quantitative histogram analysis.

Conclusions

The results suggest that the proposed automated segmentation approach can reliably discriminate bony structures from the proximal air and soft tissue in single STE-MR images, which is suitable for generating MR-based μ-maps for attenuation correction of PET data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zaidi H, Montandon M-L, Slosman DO (2004) Attenuation compensation in cerebral 3D PET: effect of the attenuation map on absolute and relative quantitation. Eur Journal Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zaidi H, Del Guerra A (2011) An outlook on future design of hybrid PET/MRI systems. Med Phys 38:5667–5689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zaidi H (2007) Is MR-guided attenuation correction a viable option for dual-modality PET/MR imaging? 1. Radiology 244:639–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pichler BJ, Wehrl HF, Kolb A, Judenhofer MS (2008) Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: the next generation of multimodality imaging? Semin Nucl Me 38:199–208P

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schlemmer H-PW, Pichler BJ, Schmand M et al (2008) Simultaneous MR/PET imaging of the human brain: feasibility study 1. Radiology 248:1028–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagenknecht G, Kaiser H-J, Mottaghy FM, Herzog H (2013) MRI for attenuation correction in PET: methods and challenges. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med 26:99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Keereman V, Mollet P, Berker Y et al (2013) Challenges and current methods for attenuation correction in PET/MR. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med 26:81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Navalpakkam BK, Braun H, Kuwert T, Quick HH (2013) Magnetic resonance–based attenuation correction for PET/MR hybrid imaging using continuous valued attenuation maps. Invest Radiol 48:323–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hofmann M, Pichler B, Schölkopf B, Beyer T (2009) Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques. Eur Journal Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Akbarzadeh A, Ay MR, Ahmadian A et al (2013) MRI-guided attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MR: assessment of the effect of bone attenuation. Ann Nucl Med 27:152–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kops ER, Herzog H (2008) Template based attenuation correction for PET in MR-PET scanners. In: 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, IEEE, Dresden, Germany, pp 3786–3789

  12. Malone IB, Ansorge RE, Williams GB et al (2011) Attenuation correction methods suitable for brain imaging with a PET/MRI scanner: a comparison of tissue atlas and template attenuation map approaches. J Nucl Med 52:1142–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Catana C, van der Kouwe A, Benner T et al (2010) Toward implementing an MRI-based PET attenuation-correction method for neurologic studies on the MR-PET brain prototype. J Nucl Med 51:1431–1438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Khateri P, Rad HS, Jafari AH et al (2015) Generation of a four-class attenuation Map for MRI-based attenuation correction of PET data in the head area using a novel combination of STE/Dixon-MRI and FCM clustering. Mol Imaging Biol 17:884–892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hofmann M, Steinke F, Scheel V et al (2008) MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI: a novel approach combining pattern recognition and atlas registration. J Nucl Med 49:1875–1883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reza Ay M, Akbarzadeh A, Ahmadian A, Zaidi H (2014) Classification of bones from MR images in torso PET-MR imaging using a statistical shape model. Nucl Instrum Meth A 734:196–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Keereman V, Fierens Y, Broux T et al (2010) MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI using ultrashort echo time sequences. J Nucl Med 51:812–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Khateri P, Rad HS, Fathi A, Ay MR (2013) Generation of attenuation map for MR-based attenuation correction of PET data in the head area employing 3D short echo time MR imaging. Nucl Instrum Meth A 702:133–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kazerooni AF, Ahmadian A, Saberi H, Alirezaie J, Rad HS (2012) An efficient algorithm for registration of pre-and intra-operative brain MRI images to correct intensity inhomogeneity. In: Information Science, Signal Processing and their Applications (ISSPA), 2012 11th International Conference, IEEE, Montreal, Canada, pp 253–258

  20. Chan TF, Vese LA (2001) Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process 10:266–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ronfard R (1994) Region-based strategies for active contour models. Int J Comput Vision 13:229–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li C, Huang R, Ding Z, Gatenby J, Metaxas DN, Gore JC (2011) A level set method for image segmentation in the presence of intensity inhomogeneities with application to MRI. IEEE Trans Image Process 20:2007–2016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Leemput K, Maes F, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P (1999) Automated model-based bias field correction of MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:885–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kazerooni AF, Aarabi MH, Ay M, Rad HS (2014) A fully automated and reproducible level-set segmentation approach for generation of MR-based attenuation correction map of PET images in the brain employing single STE-MR imaging modality. EJNMMI Physics 1:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aarabi MH, Kazerooni AF, Khateri P, Ay MR, Rad HS (2014) A robust MR-based attenuation map generation in short-TE MR images of the head employing hybrid spatial fuzzy C-means clustering and intensity inhomogeneity correction. EJNMMI Physics 1:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kazerooni AF, A’arabi MH, Ay M, Rad HS (2015) Generation of MR-based attenuation correction map of PET images in the brain employing joint segmentation of skull and soft-tissue from single short-TE MR imaging modality. In Computational Methods for Molecular Imaging. Springer, Switzerland 22: 139–147

  27. Keereman V (2011) MRI-based attenuation correction for emission tomography. Ghent University, Ghent

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mohamed NA, Ahmed MN, Farag A (1999) Modified fuzzy c-mean in medical image segmentation [abstract]. Engin Med 6:3429–3432P

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hu Q, Qian G, Aziz A, & Nowinski WL (2006) Segmentation of brain from computed tomography head images. In: 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference, IEEE, Shanghai, China, pp 3375–3378

  30. An HJ, Seo S, Kang H, Choi H, Cheon GJ, Kim HJ (2016) MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI using multiphase level-set method. J Nucl Med 57(4):587–593

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamidreza Saligheh Rad.

Ethics declarations

Study approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (License number 1432), and the subjects were included if they provided written informed consent.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences research committee with the Ethics License Number 1432.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic Supplementary Materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 383 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fathi Kazerooni, A., Ay, M.R., Arfaie, S. et al. Single STE-MR Acquisition in MR-Based Attenuation Correction of Brain PET Imaging Employing a Fully Automated and Reproducible Level-Set Segmentation Approach. Mol Imaging Biol 19, 143–152 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-016-0990-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-016-0990-5

Key words

Navigation