Abstract
Researchers have often focused on weaknesses in the instruction offered to Black and Latinx students with dis/abilities, and not on what it looks like when teachers seem to get it right. The purpose of this case study was to understand the instruction and co-teaching partnership in one inclusive, urban high school classroom where the teachers sought to deliver responsive, empowering instruction. Working together, the teachers supported students’ academic success, demonstrated cultural competence, and infused sociopolitical consciousness into lessons while being responsive to students’ dis/abilities. They balanced teaching practices known to be culturally sustaining with those that were responsive to students’ dis/abilities. The findings have implications for how we prepare and support teachers of Black and Latinx students with dis/abilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annamma, S. A. (2015). Whiteness as property: Innocence and ability in teacher education. The Urban Review, 47(2), 293–316.
Annamma, S. A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31.
Annamma, S., & Morrison, D. (2018). DisCrit classroom ecology: Using praxis to dismantle dysfunctional education ecologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 70–80.
Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206.
Bonner, E. (2014). Investigating practices of highly successful mathematics teachers of traditionally underserved students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 377–399.
Bottge, B. A., Cohen, A. S., & Choi, H. J. (2018). Comparisons of mathematics intervention effects in resource and inclusive classrooms. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 197–212.
Brinkmann, J., & Twiford, T. (2012). Voices from the field: Skill sets needed for effective collaboration and co-teaching. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 7(3), 1–14.
Burks-Keeley, R.G., Brown, M.R. (2014). Student and teacher perceptions of the five co-teaching models: A pilot study. Journal of American Academy of Special Education Professionals. Fall, 149–185.
Chang, R., Fukuda, E., Durham, J., & Little, T. D. (2017). Enhancing students’ motivation with autonomy-supportive classrooms. In M. Wehmeyer, K. Shogren, T. Little, & S. Lopez (Eds.), Development of self-determination through the life-course (pp. 99–110). Springer.
Choi, Y. (2013). Teaching social studies for newcomer English language learners: Toward culturally relevant pedagogy. Multicultural Perspectives, 15(1), 12–18.
Chu, S., & Garcia, S. (2018). Collective teacher efficacy and culturally responsive teaching efficacy of inservice special education teachers in the United States. Urban Education, 56, 1–27.
Cook, S. C., Mcduffie-Landrum, K. A., Oshita, L., & Cook, B. G. (2017). Co-teaching for students with disabilities: A critical and updated analysis of the empirical literature. In Handbook of special education (pp. 233–248). Routledge.
Cook, B., McDuffie-Landrum, K., Oshita, L., & Cook, S. (2011). Co-teaching for students with disabilities: A critical analysis of the empirical literature. In J. Kauffman & D. Hallahan (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 147–159). Routledge.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
Cruz, R. A., Manchanda, S., Firestone, A. R., & Rodl, J. E. (2020). An examination of teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(3), 197–214.
Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. (1995). Writing ethnographic field notes. University of Chicago Press.
Fisher, A. E., Fisher, B. W., & Railey, K. S. (2021). Disciplinary disparities by race and disability: Using DisCrit theory to examine the manifestation determination review process in special education in the United States. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 24(6), 755–769.
Fluijt, D., Bakker, C., & Struyf, E. (2016). Team-reflection: The missing link in co-teaching teams. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 31(2), 187–201.
Freeman-Green, S., Driver, M. K., Wang, P., Kamuru, J., & Jackson, D. (2021). Culturally sustaining practices in content area instruction for CLD students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(1), 12–25.
Friedman, T. E., Hallaran, A. E., & Locke, M. A. (2020). Rubberbanding in a liminal space: Teachers contemplate intersections of dis/ability and race in inclusive classrooms. Race Ethnicity and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2020.1753677
Friend, M., Cook, L., Hurley-Chamberlain, D., & Shamberger, C. (2010). Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 9–27.
Gay, G. (2002). Culturally responsive teaching in special education for ethnically diverse students: Setting the stage. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(6), 613–629.
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hackett, J., Kruzich, J., Goulter, A., & Battista, M. (2020). Tearing down the invisible walls: Designing, implementing, and theorizing psychologically safer co-teaching for inclusion. Journal of Educational Change, 22, 103–130.
Hancock, C. L., Morgan, C. W., & Holly, J., Jr. (2021). Counteracting dysconscious racism and ableism through fieldwork: Applying DisCrit classroom ecology in early childhood personnel preparation. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 41(1), 45–56.
Harkins Monaco, E. A., Brusnahan, L. S., & Fuller, M. (2022). Guidance for the antiracist educator: Culturally sustaining pedagogies for disability and diversity. Teaching Exceptional Children. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599211046281
King-Sears, M. E., Stefanidis, A., Berkeley, S., & Strogilos, V. (2021). Does co-teaching improve academic achievement for students with disabilities? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 34, 100405.
Kourea, L., Gibson, L., & Werunga, R. (2018). Culturally responsive reading instruction for students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(3), 153–162.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The Dream-keepers: Successful teachers of African-American children (2nd ed.). Josey-Bass.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: aka the remix. Harvard Education Review, 84(1), 74–84.
Lecompte, M., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
Lightfoot, S. L. (2004). The essential conversation: What parents and teachers can learn from each other. Ballantine Books.
Martell, C. C. (2018). Teaching race in US history: Examining culturally relevant pedagogy in a multicultural urban high school. Journal of Education, 198(1), 63–77.
Martell, C. C., & Stevens, K. M. (2019). Culturally sustaining social studies teachers: Understanding models of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102897.
McLeskey, J., Barringer, M.-D., Billingsly, B., Brownell, M., Jackson, D., Kennedy, M., Lewis, T., Maheady, L., Rodriguez, J., Scheeler, M., Winn, J., & Ziegler, D. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Morrison, K., Robbins, H., & Rose, D. (2008). Operationalizing culturally relevant pedagogy: A synthesis of classroom-based research. Equity and Excellence in Education, 41(4), 433–452.
Murawski, W., & Swanson, H. L. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research. Remedial and Special Education, 22(5), 258–267.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). Status dropout rates. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_coj.asp
Newman, L., Wagner, M., Huang, T., Shaver, D., Knokey, A.-M., Yu, J., Contrera, E., Ferguson, K., Greene, S., Nagale, K., & Cameto, R. (2011). Secondary school programs and performance of students with disabilities: A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2012-3000). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Special Education Research.
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2020). 42nd Annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2020. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2019/parts-b-c/41st-arc-for-idea.pdf
Oh, K., Murawski, W., & Nussli, N. (2017). An international immersion into co-teaching: A wake-up call for teacher candidates in general and special education. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 6(1), 2.
Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researchers, 41(3), 93–97.
Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100.
Pesonen, H. V., Rytivaara, A., Palmu, I., & Wallin, A. (2021). Teachers’ stories on sense of belonging in co-teaching relationship. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(3), 425–436.
Powell, R., Chambers Cantrell, S., Malo-Juvera, V., & Correll, P. (2016). Operationalizing culturally responsive instruction: Preliminary findings of CRIOP research. Teachers College Record, 118(1), 1–46.
Pratt, S. (2014). Achieving symbiosis: Working through challenges found in co-teaching to achieve effective co-teaching relationships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41(1), 1–12.
Rytivaara, A., Pulkkinen, J., & de Bruin, C. L. (2019). Committing, engaging and negotiating: Teachers’ stories about creating shared spaces for co-teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 225–235.
Scruggs, T., Mastropieri, M., & McDuffie, K. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392–416.
Shamberger, C., Williamson-Henriques, K., Moffee, N., & Brownlee-Williams, Y. (2014). Special educators speak out on co-teaching knowledge and skills. Journal of Research Initiatives, 1(2), 1–9.
Shogren, K. A., Palmer, S. B., Wehmeyer, M. L., Williams-Diehm, K., & Little, T. D. (2012). Effect of intervention with the self-determined learning model of instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 320–330.
Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Rifenbark, G. G., & Little, T. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256–267.
Skiba, R. J., Arredondo, M. I., & Rausch, M. K. (2014). New and developing research on disparities in discipline. The Equity Project at Indiana University. Retrieved from http://rtpcollaborative.indiana.edu/briefing-papers/
Smith, P. (2020). “Mr. Wang doesn’t really care how we speak!”: Responsiveness in the practice of an exemplary Asian-American teacher. The Urban Review, 52(2), 351–375.
Thomas, C. A., & Berry III, R. Q. (2019). A qualitative metasynthesis of culturally relevant pedagogy & culturally responsive teaching: Unpacking mathematics teaching practices. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 10(1), 21–30.
Waitoller, F. R., & King Thorius, K. A. (2016). Cross-pollinating culturally sustaining pedagogy and universal design for learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for dis/ability. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 366–389.
Walker, S., & Hutchison, L. (2021). Using Culturally Relevant Pedagogy to influence literacy achievement for middle school Black male students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 64(4), 421–429.
Wexler, J., Kearns, D. M., Lemons, C. J., Mitchell, M., Clancy, E., Davidson, K. A., ... & Wei, Y. (2018). Reading comprehension and co-teaching practices in middle school English language arts classrooms. Exceptional Children, 84(4), 384–402.
Yin, R. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks the Education and Human Development Doctoral Student Dissertation IDEAs program at the University of Virginia for providing financial support for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Codebook
Code | Definition |
---|---|
Socio-political consciousness | |
Creating change | Observations and interview comments that focus on impacting students’ lives outside of the classroom or giving them opportunities to have an impact outside of the classroom, including discussion of college, empowerment in personal lives, and academic projects with a community focus or impact |
Identifying inequity and resistance | Observations and interview comments relating to teachers’ discussion of misogyny, racism, or structural inequalities and any discussion of historical figures who resisted misogyny, racism, or other structural inequalities or who broke barries/created change |
Academic success | |
Caring | Observations and interview comments pertaining to emotional support for individual students including mentoring, providing counselling, out of class supports for students, building relationships with and knowledge of individual students, and positive reinforcement offered to students |
Classroom environment | Observations and interview comments pertaining to the classroom environment including the physical space, how students are greeted, the establishment and maintenance of classroom norms, student participation, and peer to peer relationships in the classroom |
Expectations for students | Observations and interview comments about being a warm demander, including expectations for students, feedback given to students, or partnerships built with home and community, including references made during class to students’ families |
Academic skills | Observations and interview comments on the explicit teaching of academic skills including academic language, metacognitive skills, writing skills, and reading strategies |
Instructional formats | Observations and interview comments on the format of the instruction including instructional modality, activities, and structure. Includes strategies to build comprehension of content such as spiral review, connections to earlier content, and first language supports |
Cultural competence | |
Relevance | Observations and interview comments about the relevance of the academic content to students’ lived experiences and to current events, including the use of students in examples, connections made by students, students’ comments on relevance, and attempts by the instructors to highlight the importance of the content |
Student leadership and voice | Observations and interview comments about ways in which students’ voices and power are elevated or suppressed in the classroom, including freedoms offered/not offered to students, extent of student choice in activities, ways in which power is shared or maintained by the instructor, and instructional activities that offer students’ leadership |
Co-teaching partnership | |
Roles | Observations and interview comments about the roles each co-teacher takes in instruction, planning, assessing students, and interacting with students. Includes discussion and observation of challenges with co-teaching and in their partnership |
Relationship | Observations and interview comments about the relationship between the two teachers including time spent together outside of co-teaching times, personal conversations between the teachers, non-verbal interactions like smiles/frowns/high-fives, and references to the other co-teacher made during interviews |
Communication | Observations and interview comments about communication between the two co-teachers including the value of communication, non-verbal communication between the teachers, and conversations between the teachers about students or the course |
Beliefs and characteristics | Observations and interview comments about the individual teachers’ own backgrounds, beliefs about education, students, classroom management, and society, and experiences with co-teaching |
School environment | Observations, document analysis, and interview comments about the school context including state records on student achievement at the school, observation of the school structure and schedule, and comments made by the teachers or students during class about the school or district. Includes the history of the program and constraints or supports perceived by the teachers |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sebastian, R. “If You Want to Go Far”: A Case Study of Culturally Sustaining Co-teaching. Urban Rev 55, 27–49 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-022-00639-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-022-00639-0