Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Planning for active management of future invasive pests affecting urban forests: the ecological and economic effects of varying Dutch elm disease management practices for street trees in Milwaukee, WI USA

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Author Correction to this article was published on 28 September 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

The effects of Dutch elm disease (DED, Ophiostoma novi-ulmi) on 106,738 American elm (Ulmus americana L.) trees in Milwaukee WI, USA was contrasted through ecologic and economic results of an Actual Outcome to management alternatives of No Control, three sanitation intensities (Best, Good, Fair), and No DED over 40 years. No Control was like the Actual Outcome with over 99% of trees dead. The greatest loss of ecosystem values and lowest net present value (NPV) and benefit to cost ratio (B/C) occurred with the Actual ($8 to $80 million NPV, 0.8 to 1.1 B/C) and No Control ($-7 to $57 million NPV, 0.7 to 0.9 B/C) alternatives. Best Control (1.0% annual mortality) retained the highest tree population (50% survival) and ecosystem value ($161 to $175 million NPV, 1.2 to 2.5 B/C). Good Control (3.5% annual mortality) and Fair Control (5.0% annual mortality) were better alternatives than No Control or the Actual Outcome with 21% and 12% of trees respectively surviving. Not surprising, a No DED scenario retained the highest ecosystem value ($202 to $257 Million NPV, 2.0 to 3.4 BC) with 70% tree survival. The value of stormwater maintained by trees under the Best Control was like the annual cost of this alternative. All other ecosystem values (e.g., air pollution, energy conservation, carbon uptake and storage) were thus retained at no additional cost. This study provides forest pest and disease management strategies for other serious pest problems such as emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) threatening urban tree populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 28 September 2020

    In Table 4, the column headings that explain the table data was not included in the published version

References

  • Anonymous (2008) i-Tree ecosystem analysis Milwaukee. https://www.itreetools.org/resources/reports.php. Assessed 29 Feb 2020

  • Ball, J, Mason S, Kiesz A, McCormick D, Brown C (2007). Assessing the hazard of emerald ash borer and other exotic stressors to community forests. Arboricult Urb For 33(5):350–359

  • Baughman MJ (1985) Economics of Dutch elm disease control: a model and case study. J For 83:554–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland A, Shiflett SA, Shuster WD, Garmestani AS, Goddard HC, Hermann DL, Hopton ME (2017) The role of trees in urban stormwater management. Landsc Urban Plan 162:167–177

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Biello D (2008) Sewer diving: a journey inside Milwaukee's deep water tunnel. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sewer-diving-milwaukee-tunnel/. Accessed 29 Feb 2020

  • Bragg DC (2003) Optimal diameter growth equations for major tree species of the midsouth. S J App Sci 27(1):5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (n.d.-aa) CPI Detailed Report Data for November (2014) https://www.bls.gov/cpi/data.htm. 29 Accessed Feb 2020

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (n.d.-bb) (2019) data file wp.data.1.AllCommodities. https://www.bls.gov/ppi/#data. Accessed M 29 Feb 2020

  • Campana, RJ, Stipes, RJ (1981) Dutch elm disease in North America with particular reference to Canada: success or failure of conventional control methods. Can Jour Plant Path 3:252–259

  • Cannon WN Jr., Worley DP (1976) Dutch elm disease control: performance and costs. USDA Forest Service research paper NE-345. pp 7

  • Cannon WN Jr., Worley DP (1980) Dutch elm disease control: performance and costs, cost updated to 1979 and reaffirmed. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-457. pp 8

  • CTLA (2000) Guide for Plant Appraisal (9th ed.). Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers Champaign, IL:International Society of Arboriculture

  • Cullen S (2005) Tree appraisal: chronology of north American industry guidance. J Arboric 31(4):157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorney JR, Gutenspergen GR, Keough JR, Stearns F (1984) Composition and structure of an urban woody plant community. Urban Ecol 8:69–90

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson EG (1994) Benefits and Cost of Tree Planting and Care in Chicago. In: EG MP, Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA (eds) Chicago's urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago urban Forest climate project. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-186. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, p 201

    Google Scholar 

  • French DW (1993) History of Dutch elm disease in Minnesota. University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Report 229-(1993) p 49

  • Groth L, Krawczyk J, Kostichka CJ (1982) Wisconsin Dutch elm disease control demonstration program accomplishment report 1981. Wisconsin department of natural resources, University of Wisconsin-Extension, Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Cooperating Municipalities. pp 119

  • Hafstad, GE, Libby J, Worf GL (1965) Dutch elm disease manual for Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Extension and Wisconsin Department of Agriculture Madison. p 92

  • Hanson, DL (2009) Stratified random sample analysis of Minneapolis, Minnesota’s urban forest: status of the urban forest and applying lessons learned from Ulmus americana. M.S. Thesis. University of Minnesota. pp 119

  • Hanson, DL, Hauer RJ, Johnson GR (2008) Ulmus americana in Minneapolis, MN: stratified sample analysis and age to diameter at breast height (dbh) biometrics. International Society of Arboriculture 84th Annual Conference. Poster Presentation. Saint Louis, MO July 26–30, 2008

  • Harwood TD, Tomlinson I, Potter CA, Knight JD (2011) Dutch elm disease revisited: past, present and future management in Great Britain. Plant Pathol 60(3):545–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselkus, E (n.d.) Species Factors for Establishing Values of Trees in Wisconsin

  • Hauer RJ (2012) Emerald ash borer economics, management approaches, and decision making. Tree Care Industry 23(8):14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer RJ (2015) Dutch elm disease PLANning simulator (DED-PLANS©) version MKE. College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point

  • Hauer RJ, Peterson WD (2016) Municipal tree care and Management in the United States: A 2014 urban and community forestry census of tree activities. Special Publication 16-1, College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point. pp 71 https://www.uwsp.edu/cnr/Pages/Forestry%2D%2D-MTCUS.aspx, Assessed 29 Feb 2020

  • Hauer RJ, Peterson WD (2017) Effects of emerald ash borer on municipal forestry budgets. Landsc Urban Plan 157:98–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer RJ, Miller RW, Ouimet DM (1994) Street tree decline and construction damage. J Arboric 20:94–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer RJ, Hauer AJ, Hartel DR, Johnson JR (2011) Rapid assessment of tree debris following urban forest ice storms. Arboricult Urb For 37(4):237–224

  • Hauer RJ, Vogt JM, Fischer BC (2014) What is the cost of not maintaining the urban forest. Arborist News 24(1):12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer R., Koeser A, Parbs S, Kringer J, Krouse R, Ottman K, Miller R, Sivyer D, Timilsina N, Werner L. (2020). Effects of a tree preservation program on tree survival, condition, and growth in Milwaukee, WI, USA. Landscape & Urban Planning. Volume 193, January 2020, 103670

  • Herms DA, McCullough DG (2014) Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. Annu Rev Entomol 59:13–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert DR, Koeser AK, Roman L, Hamilton K, Landry SM, Hauer RJ, Campanella H, McLean D, Andreu M, Perez H (2019) Development practice and ordinances as predictors of urban canopy coverage in Florida cities. LandscUrban Plan 190(2019):103603

    Google Scholar 

  • King KL, Locke DH (2013) A comparison of three methods for measuring local urban tree canopy cover. Arboricult Urban For 39(2):62–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeser A, Hauer R, Norris K, Krouse R (2013) Factors influencing long-term street tree survival in Milwaukee, WI, USA. Urban For Urban Green 12(4):562–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostichka CJ, Cannon WN Jr (1984) Costs of Dutch elm disease management in Wisconsin communities. J Arboric 10:250–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Maco SE, McPherson EG (2003) A practical approach to assessing structure, function, and value of street tree populations in small communities. J Arboric 29(2):84–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Magasi LP, Harrison KJ, Urquhart DA, and Murray DM. (1993) Three Decades of Dutch elm Disease in Fredericton, N.B.: 1961-1990 Natural Resources Canada, Information Report M-X-185E. pp 39. http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/6260.pdf. Assessed 29 Feb 2020

  • McHale MR, Burke IC, Lefsky MA, Peper PJ, McPherson EG (2009) Urban forest biomass estimates: is it important to use allometric relationships developed specifically for urban trees? Urban Ecosyst 12:95–113

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson EG (2007) Benefit-based tree valuation. Arboricult Urban For 33(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson EG, Nowak D, Heisler G, Grimmond S, Souch C, Grant R, Rowntree R (1997) Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago urban Forest climate project. Urban Ecosyst 1(1):49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson EG, Simpson JR, Peper PJ, Maco SE, Xiao Q (2005) Municipal forest benefits and costs in five US cities. J For 103(8):411–416

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson EG, van Doorn NS, Peper PJ (2016) Urban tree database and allometric equations. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-253. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, p 86

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RW, Schuman SP (1981) Economic impact of Dutch elm disease control as determined by computer simulation. In. Proceedings of the Dutch elm disease symposium and workshop, E.S. Kondo, Y. Hiratsuka, and W.B.G. Denver (eds). October 5-9, 1981, Winnipeg, Manitoba. Manitoba Department of Natural Resources; Winnipeg; pp 325-344

  • Miller RW, Sylvester WA (1979) Report on the use of UW/SP URBAN FOREST computer inventory program as part of the Dutch elm disease demonstration project in Wisconsin. In: Wisconsin Dutch elm disease demonstration project 1979 accomplishment report. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, pp 65–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RW, Hauer RJ, Werner LP (2015) Urban forestry planning and managing urban greenspaces (3rd edition). Waveland Press, Long Grove, p 560

    Google Scholar 

  • MMSD (2009) Fresh coast green solutions weaving Milwaukee’s green & grey infrastructure into a sustainable future. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, Milwaukee, WI, 27 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenroth J, Östberg J, Konijnendijk van den Bosch C, Nielsen AB, Hauer RJ, Sjöman H, Chen WY, Jansson M (2016) Urban tree diversity - taking stock and looking ahead. Urban For Urban Green 15(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.(2015)11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ (1993) Compensatory value of an urban forest: an application of the tree-value formula. J Arboric 19(3):173–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ (2008) Assessing urban forest structure: summary and conclusions. Arboricult Urban For 34(6):391–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA, McPherson EG, Sisinni SM, Kerkmann ER, Stevens JC (1996) Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover. Landsc Urban Plan 36:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Dwyer JF (2002) Compensatory value of urban trees in the United States. J Arboric 28(4):194–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Hoehn RE, Walton JT, Bond J (2008) A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboricult Urban For 34(6):386–390

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Herrin K, Hauer RJ, Vander Weit WJ, Miller RW (2016) Home-builder practices and perceptions of construction on the wooded lot: a quarter century later follow-up assessment. Arboricult Urban For 42(5):285–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Peper PJ, McPherson EG, Mori SM (2001) Equations for predicting diameter, height, crown width, and leaf area of San Joaquin valley street trees. J Arboric 27(6):306–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson KS, Straka TJ (2011) Specialized discounted cash flow analysis formulas for valuation of benefits and costs of urban trees and forests. Arboricult Urban For 37(5):200–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson KS, Straka TJ (2012) Urban forest and tree valuation using discounted cash flow analysis: impact of economic components. Open Journal of Forestry 2(3):174–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillsbury NH, Reimer JL, Thompson RP (1998) Tree volume equations for fifteen urban species in California (technical report number 7). California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D (2005) Environmental consequences and economic costs of alien species. pp. 269–276. In. S. Inderjit (editor). Invasive Plants: Ecological and Agricultural Aspects. Birkhäuser Basel. Switzerland

  • Pommerening A, Muszta A (2015) Methods of modelling relative growth rate. Forest Ecosystems 2:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-015-0029-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuman SP (1984) Analysis of street tree species adaptability to urban conditions. M.S. Thesis. University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, 93 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood SC, Betters DR (1981) Benefit-cost analysis of municipal Dutch elm disease control programs in Colorado. J Arboric 7:291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons K (2009) Minnesota supplement to the guide for plant appraisal with regional tree appraisal factors. Minnesota Society of Arboriculture. http://msa-live.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/mn_plant_appraisal_supplement-1.pdf. pp 24. Accessed 22 Mar 2019

  • Sinclair WA (1978) Epidemiology. In. Dutch elm disease perspectives after 60 years W.A. Sinclair, R.J. Campana (eds.). NE Regional Research Publication, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station. 8(5):27–30

  • Sinclair, W.A., R.J. Campana. (1978) Dutch elm disease perspectives after 60 years. In. Dutch elm disease perspectives after 60 years W.A. Sinclair, R.J. Campana (eds.). NE Regional Research Publication, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station 8(5):5–6

  • Sivyer, D. 2014. Elm loss records 1956 to 1996. City of Milwaukee Forestry Operations

  • Souci JS, Hanou I, Puchalski D (2009) High-resolution remote sensing image analysis for early detection and response planning for emerald ash borer. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 75(8):905–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipes, RJ (2000) The management of Dutch elm disease. in. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. C.P. Dunn (ed.) KluwerAcad. Pub. Boston, MA. pp. 157–172

  • Tomlinson I, Potter C (2010) ‘Too little, too late’? Science, policy and Dutch elm disease in the UK. J Hist Geogr 36(2):121–131

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Government. 2013. Technical Support Document: Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis.Under Executive Order 12866. Produced by the Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-12/documents/sc_co2_tsd_august_2016.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2020

  • VanNatta AR, Hauer RH, Schuettpelz NM (2012) Economic analysis of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) management options. J Econ Entomol 105(1):196–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt JM, Hauer RJ, Fischer BC (2015) The costs of maintaining and not maintaining the urban forest: a review of the urban forestry and arboriculture literature. Arboricult Urban For 41(6):293–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Westwood AR (1991) A cost benefit analysis of Manitoba’s integrated Dutch elm disease management program 1975 – (1990) Proceedings entomological Society of Manitoba. 47:44-59

  • WIDNR (1980) Wisconsin Dutch elm disease control demonstration program 1980 accomplishment report. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, p 141

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolter J (2015) Personal communication

  • Xiao Q, McPherson EG, Simpson JR, Ustin SL (1998) Rainfall interception by Sacramento’s urban forest. J Arboric 24(4):235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, La Sorte FA, Pyšek P, Yan P, Nowak D, McBride J. (2015) The compositional similarity of urban forests among the world’s cities is scale dependent. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.12376. Accessed 29 Feb 2020

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for funding a significant portion of this research. Funds were in part a financial grant to the WIDNR U&CF program through the USDA-FS U&CF program. We thank the TREE Fund Grant#: 17-HJ-01 for funding a portion of this work. We also dedicate this research paper to the memory of Mr. Mark Stennis who inspired many to actively manage elm tree populations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urban Forestry, University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point, 800 Reserve Street, Stevens Point, WI, 54481, USA

    Richard J. Hauer

  2. PlanIt Geo, LLC, 7878 Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 340, Arvada, CO, 80003, USA

    Ian S. Hanou

  3. City of Milwaukee, Department of Public Works Operations Division, 841 N. Broadway Rm. 620, Milwaukee, WI, 53202, USA

    David Sivyer

Authors
  1. Richard J. Hauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ian S. Hanou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Sivyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Hauer.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM1

(DOCX 50 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hauer, R.J., Hanou, I.S. & Sivyer, D. Planning for active management of future invasive pests affecting urban forests: the ecological and economic effects of varying Dutch elm disease management practices for street trees in Milwaukee, WI USA. Urban Ecosyst 23, 1005–1022 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00976-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00976-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation