Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial literacy influences stakeholder’s recognition and mapping of peri-urban and urban ecosystem services

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are several spatial valuation and ecosystem service mapping studies using participatory methods in North America, Australia, Europe and Japan. But, there is much less information from urban areas in the Global South using these approaches, particularly regarding the influence of spatial literacy on such methods. Accordingly, we tested how two-dimensional (2D) maps and three-dimensional models (3DCM) influence the identification of urban and peri-urban ecosystem services by different stakeholders near forested landscapes adjacent to Bogotá, Colombia. We used on-site interviews, quantitative machine-learning statistics, and qualitative methods to identify predictors and assess the ability of different stakeholders to identify: peri-urban forest ecosystem services, threats to forest ecosystems, and in locating points of interest. We found that age, residential proximity to the study sites, and education were the best predictors for estimating the number of ecosystem services. Older and non-local interviewees less than 20 years old recognized a greater number of ecosystem services. Using 2D maps to locate predesignated sites resulted in better results than when using a 3DCM; particularly with younger respondents. However, respondents were able to locate more predesignated sites with the 3DCM when they had a higher level of education. As opposed to other studies, our stakeholders more frequently identified regulating as opposed to cultural ecosystem services. Our study identified socio-demographic predictors that could be used to assess different stakeholder’s abilities in recognizing different processes from landscapes as well as their difficulty in accurately locating areas of interest. Such low cost and participatory approaches can be used to design more context-relevant survey instruments for ecosystem service valuation research and assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abram N, Meijaard E, Ancrenaz M, Runting R, Wells J, Gaveau D, Pellier A, Mengersen K (2014) Spatially explicit perceptions of ecosystem services and land cover change in forested regions of Borneo. Ecosyst Serv 7:116–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagstad KJ, Reed JM, Semmens DJ, Sherrouse BC, Troy A (2016) Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystem service assessments: a case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains. Reg Environ Chang 16(7):2005–2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker TJ, Cullen B, Debevec L, Abebe Y (2015) A socio-hydrological approach for incorporating gender into biophysical models and implications for water resources research. Appl Geogr 62:325–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Board C, Taylor RM (2006) Perception and maps: human factors in map design and interpretation. T I Brit Geogr 19–36 https://doi.org/10.2307/622191

  • Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and regression tree. Chapman & Hall/CRC

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G (2005) Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Soc Nal Res 18(1):17–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G (2012) An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Appl Geogr 34:289–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Kyttä M (2014) Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Appl Geogr 46:122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan BA, Raymond CM, Crossman ND, King D (2011) Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies. Conserv Biol 25(1):172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke D (2007) Impact of map literacy on development planning in south africa. university of Stellenbosch. https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/1233. Accessed 18 July 2019

  • Clerici N, Cote-Navarro F, Escobedo FJ, Rubiano K, Villegas JC (2019) Spatio-temporal and cumulative effects of land use-land cover and climate change on two ecosystem services in the Colombian Andes. Science of The Total Environment 685:1181–1192

  • Cohen J (1960) A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46

  • De’Ath G, Fabricius KE (2000) Classification and regression trees: A powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecol 81(11):3178–3192

  • Dobbs C, Hernández-Moreno Á, Reyes-Paecke S, Miranda MD (2018) Exploring temporal dynamics of urban ecosystem services in Latin America: The case of Bogota (Colombia) and Santiago (Chile). Ecol Indic 85:1068–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs C, Escobedo FJ, Clerici N, de la Barrera F, Eleuterio AA, MacGregor-Fors I, Reyes-Paecke S, Vásquez A, Camaño JDZ, Hernández HJ (2019) Urban ecosystem Services in Latin America: mismatch between global concepts and regional realities? Urban ecosyst 22(1):173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwamena E, Banaynal R, Kemausuor F (2011) Participatory three dimensional model mapping (P3DM): expanding rural horizons and decision making for food security planning, climate change adaptation and flood risk reduction in Ghana. Res J Agric Sc 43(4):186–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman FH (2001) Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. Ann Statis 29(5):1189–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2013) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): consultation on version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003. Download at: www.cices.euo

  • Hartter J (2010) Resource use and ecosystem services in a forest park landscape. Soc Nat Res 23(3):207–223

  • Jankowski P, Czepkiewicz M, Młodkowski M, Zwoliński Z (2016) Geo-questionnaire: A Method and Tool for Public Preference Elicitation in Land Use Planning. T GIS 20(6):903–924

  • Kuhn M (2008) R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://cran. r-project. org/package = caret

  • Landuyt D, Broekx S, D’hondt R, Engelen G, Aertsens J, Goethals PL (2013) A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling. Environ Modell Softw 46:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Amo D, Gómez-Baggethun DG, Oteros-Rozas E, Palacios-Agundez E, Willaarts I, B. and González JA (2012) Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLOS ONE 7(6):e38970

  • O’Flaherty RM, Davidson-Hunt IJ, Manseau M (2008) Indigenous knowledge and values in planning for sustainable forestry: Pikangikum first nation and the whitefeather forest initiative. Ecol Soc 13(1):6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ooms K, De Maeyer P, Dupont L, Van Der Veken N, Van de Weghe N, Verplaetse S (2016) Education in cartography: what is the status of young people’s map-reading skills? Cartogr Geogr Inf Sc 43(2):134–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otero I, Castellnou M, González I, Arilla E, Castell L, Castellví J, Sánchez F, Nielsen J (2018) Democratizing wildfire strategies. Do you realize what it means? Insights from a participatory process in the Montseny region (Catalonia, Spain). PLOS ONE 13(10):e0204806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb003648. Accessed 18 July 2019

  • Ramirez-Gomez SOI, Torres-Vitolas CA, Schreckenberg K, Honzák M, Cruz-Garcia GS, Willcock S, … Poppy GM (2015) Analysis of ecosystem services provision in the Colombian Amazon using participatory research and mapping techniques. Ecosyst Serv 13:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rautenbach V, Coetzee S, Çöltekin A (2017) Development and evaluation of a specialized task taxonomy for spatial planning – A map literacy experiment with topographic maps. ISPRS J Photogramm 127:16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond CM, Bryan BA, MacDonald DH, Cast A, Strathearn S, Grandgirard A, Kalivas T (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68(5):1301–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson E, van Kerkhoff L, Cork S (2019) Understanding citizen perceptions of the Eastern Hills of Bogota: a participatory place-based ecosystem service assessment. Urban Ecosyst 22(1):19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Frau A, Edwards-Jones G, Kaiser MJ (2011) Mapping stakeholder values for coastal zone management. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 434:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen TF, MacCabe CL (1995) World patterns of geographic literacy based on sketch map quality. Prof Geogr 47(2):196–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeidi S, Mohammadzadeh M, Salmanmahiny A, Mirkarimi SH (2017) Performance evaluation of multiple methods for landscape aesthetic suitability mapping: a comparative study between multi-criteria evaluation, logistic regression and multi-layer perceptron neural network. Land Use Policy 67:1–12

  • Salliou N, Vialatte A, Monteil C, Barnaud C (2019) First use of participatory Bayesian modeling to study habitat management at multiple scales for biological pest control. Agron Sustain Dev 39(1):7

  • Sandhu HS, Crossman ND, Smith FP (2012) Ecosystem services and Australian agricultural enterprises. Ecol Econ 74:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrouse BC, Clement JM, Semmens DJ (2011) A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl Geogr 31(2):748–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto JR, Escobedo FJ, Khachatryan H, Adams DC (2018) Consumer demand for urban forest ecosystem services and disservices: examining trade-offs using choice experiments and best-worst scaling. Ecosystem Serv 29:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therneau T, Atkinson B, Ripley B, Ripley MB (2015) rpart: recursive partitioning and regression trees. R Package Version 4.1–10

  • Washington Post (2019) The idea that most people can’t find themselves on a map during severe weather is flawed. https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2019/04/29/idea-that-most-people-cant-find-themselves-map-during-severe-weather-is-flawed/?utm_term=.9d66fd0473ab. Accessed 18 July 2019

  • Willcock S, Martínez-López J, Hooftman DA, Bagstad KJ, Balbi S, Marzo A, Prato C, Sciandrello S, Signorello G, Voigt B, Villa F (2018) Machine learning for ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 33:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff N, Masuda Y, Meijaard E, Wells J, Game E (2018) Impacts of tropical deforestation on local temperature and human well-being perceptions. Global Environ Chang 52:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie M, Vacher HL, Reader S, Walton E (2018) Quantitative map literacy: a cross between map literacy and quantitative literacy. Numeracy 11(1):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Colombian Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation (COLCIENCIAS; Grant 122274558511). We thank Natalia Ballesteros, Andres Linares, David Martinez, Juan Pablo Mongui, Miguel Rendon, Luisa Vargas, Laura Vega and Michelle Vera from the Universidad del Rosario’s Socio-Ecological Systems and Ecosystem Services courses for assisting us with interviews and data entry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Kr 26 No 63B-48, Bogotá, Colombia

    Francisco J. Escobedo, Marius Bottin & Daniela Cala

  2. Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales, Cl. 222 #55 - 37, Bogotá, Colombia

    Diego L. Sandoval Montoya

Authors
  1. Francisco J. Escobedo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marius Bottin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniela Cala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Diego L. Sandoval Montoya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco J. Escobedo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Escobedo, F.J., Bottin, M., Cala, D. et al. Spatial literacy influences stakeholder’s recognition and mapping of peri-urban and urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosyst 23, 1039–1049 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00962-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00962-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation