Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Indiana bat roosting behavior differs between urban and rural landscapes

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urbanization may negatively affect forest obligate bat species. We compared the roosting behavior of federally endangered Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) in a fragmented site, located on the leading edge of a developing urban area (Indianapolis, IN), with a site of relatively contiguous forest cover in Indiana, USA, during the summers of 2013–2015. Bats in both sites used large standing dead trees and bat boxes with low levels of overhead canopy closure (fragmented site: 26.1 ± 11.0%, contiguous site: 20.1 ± 7.3%) as primary roosts (large groups of bats resident over many days). Between the 2 sites, secondary roosts (individual bats or small groups resident for only a few days) differed in canopy closure at the roost-scale (fragmented site: 66.9 ± 5.1%, contiguous site: 37.1 ± 9.3%); secondary roosts in the contiguous site resembled solar-exposed primary roosts. Bats in the fragmented site switched roosts less often (1.7 ± 0.5 switching events/bat, 5.8 ± 1.7 days of use/roosts) and traveled shorter distances between roosts (702 ± 211 m) than bats in the contiguous site (2.3 ± 0.6 switching events/bat, 2.4 ± 0.4 days of use/roosts; 1216 ± 337 m between roosts). This suggests that the fragmented site may have had low densities of available roosts, which may help explain the heavy use of bat boxes by bats in the fragmented site. These data suggest that urban populations of Indiana bats behave differently than those in rural areas, which managers should consider while managing for this species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge HDJN, Brigham RM (1988) Load carrying and maneuverability in an insectivorous bat: a test of the 5% “rule” of radio-telemetry. J Mammal 69:379–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Badin, HA (2014) Habitat selection and roosting ranges of northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis) in an experimental hardwood forest system. Thesis, Ball State University

  • Beasley TM, Zumbo BD (2009) Aligned rank tests for interactions in split-plot designs: distributional assumptions and stochastic heterogeneity. J Appl Stat Methods 8:16–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Belwood, JJ (2002) Endangered bats in suburbia: observations and concerns for the future. In: Kurta, A, and J Kennedy (eds). The Indiana bat: biology and management of an endangered species. Bat Conservation International, Austin, Texas, pp 193–198

  • Bergeson SM (2017) Multi-scale analysis of roost characteristics and behavior of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). Indiana State University, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeson SM, Carter TC, Whitby MD (2013) Partitioning of foraging resources between sympatric Indiana and little brown bats. J Mammal 94:1311–1320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeson SM, Carter TC, Whitby MD (2015) Adaptive roosting gives little brown bats an advantage over endangered Indiana bats. Am Midl Nat 174:321–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeson SM, O’Keefe JM, Haulton GS (2018) Managed forests provide roosting opportunities for Indiana bats in south-Central Indiana. For Ecol Manag 427:305–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Blewett CM, Marzluff JM (2005) Effects of urban sprawl on snags and the abundance and productivity of cavity-nesting birds. Condor 107:678–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondo KJ, Brooks DR, Brigham RM (2017) Quantifying relative levels of solar radiation at bat roosts using pyranometers. Wildlife Soc B 41:376–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkin KM, O’Donnell C, Parsons S (2011) Bat colony size reduction coincides with clear-fell harvest operations and high rates of roost loss in plantation forest. Biodivers Conserv 20:3537–3548

    Google Scholar 

  • Braatne JH, Rood SB, Heilman PE (1996) Life history, ecology, and conservation of riparian cottonwoods in North America. In: Bradshaw T, Heilman P, Hinckley T (eds) Stettler, R. Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, pp 57–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Britzke ER, Harvey MJ, Loeb SC (2003) Indiana bat, Myotis sodalis, maternity roosts in the southern United States. Southeast Nat 2:235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Broders HG, Forbes GJ (2004) Interspecific and intersexual variation in roost-site selection of northern long-eared and little brown bats in the greater Fundy National Park Ecosystem. J Wildlife Manage 63:602–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchkoski CM, Hassinger JD (2002) Ecology of a maternity colony roosting in a building. In: Kurta, A, and J Kennedy (eds). The Indiana bat: biology and management of an endangered species. Bat Conservation International, Austin, Texas, pp 153–159

  • Callahan EV, Drobney RD, Clawson RL (1997) Selection of summer roosting sites by Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) in Missouri. J Mammal 78:818–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter TC, Feldhamer GA (2005) Roost tree use by maternity colonies of Indiana bats and northern long-eared bats in southern Illinois. For Ecol Manag 219:259–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers C, Mast JN (2014) Snag dynamics and cavity excavation after bark beetle outbreaks in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. For Sci 60:713–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaverri G, Kunz TH (2011) Response of a specialist bat to the loss of a critical resource. PLoS One 6 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0028821. Accessed 7 Sep 2019

  • Chruszcz BJ, Barclay RMR (2002) Thermoregulatory ecology of a solitary bat, Myotis evotis, roosting in rock crevices. Funct Ecol 16:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JL, Barclay RM (2011) Influence of urbanization on demography of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) in the prairies of North America. PLoS One 6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020483

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton LH, Barclay RMR (1998) Selection of roosting and foraging habitat by bats in different-aged aspen mixedwood stands. Conserv Biol 12:1347–1358

    Google Scholar 

  • Cryan PM, Bogan MA, Yanega GM (2001) Roosting habits of four bat species in the Black Hills of South Dakota. Acta Chiropterol 3:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Czech B, Krausman PR (1997) Distribution and causation of species endangerment in the United States. Sci 277:1116–1117

    Google Scholar 

  • Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States: associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States reflect the integration of economic sectors, supporting the theory and evidence that economic growth proceeds at the competitive exclusion of nonhuman species in the aggregate. BioScience 50:595–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon MD (2011) Relationship between land cover and insectivorous bat activity in an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 15:683–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchamp JE, Swihart RK (2008) Shifts in bat community structure related to evolved traits and features of human-altered landscapes. Landsc Ecol 23:849–860

    Google Scholar 

  • Evelyn MJ, Stiles DA, Young RA (2004) Conservation of bats in suburban landscapes: roost selection by Myotis yumanensis in a residential area in California. Biol Conserv 115:463–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Everette AL, O’Shea TJ, Ellison LE, Stone LA, McCance JL (2001) Bat use of a high-plains urban wildlife refuge. Wildlife Soc B 29:967–973

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner JE, Garner JD, Hofman JE (1991) Summer roost selection and roosting behavior of Myotis sodalis (Indiana bat) in Illinois. Illinois Department of Conservation, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrt SD, Chelsvig JE (2003) Bat activity in an urban landscape: patterns at the landscape and microhabitat scale. Ecol Appl 13:939–950

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrt SD, Chelsvig JE (2004) Species-specific patterns of bat activity in an urban landscape. Ecol Appl 14:625–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, JS (1962) A life history and taxonomic study of the Indiana bat, Myotis sodalis. Gallery Publication 12. Reading Public Museum, Reading, Pennsylvania, USA

  • Hamilton IM, Barclay RMR (1994) Patterns of daily torpor and day-roost selection by male and female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). Can J Zool 72:744–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper KA, Macdonald SE (2002) Structure and composition of edge next to regenerating clear-cuts in mixed-wood boreal forest. J Veg Sci 13:535–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson LE, Broders HG (2008) Movements and resource selection of the northern long-eared myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) in a forest-agriculture landscape. J Mammal 89:952–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeh JPS, Bakken GC, Mitchell WA, O’Keefe JM (2018) In artificial roost comparison, bats show preference for rocket box style. PLoS One 13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205701

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Homer CG, Dewitz JA, Yang L, Jin S, Danielson P, Xian G, Coulston J, Herold ND, Wickham JD, Megown K (2015) Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States-representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogramm Eng Rem S 81:345–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey SR, Richter AR, Cope JB (1977) Summer habitat and ecology of the endangered Indiana bat, Myotis sodalis. J Mammal 58:334–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachowski DS, Rota CT, Dobony CA, Ford WM, Edwards JW (2016) Seeing the forest through the trees: considering roost-site selection at multiple scales. PLoS One 11 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150011. Accessed 7 Sep 2019

  • Jenkins MA (2013) The history of human disturbance in forest ecosystems of southern Indiana. In: Swihart, RK, MR Saunders, RA Kalb, S Haulton, and CH Michler (eds) the hardwood ecosystem experiment: a framework for studying responses to forest management. U.S. Forest Service, Northern Forest and Experiment Station, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, pp 2–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings SB, Brown ND, Sheil D (1999) Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover, and other measures. Forestry 72:59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JS, Lacki MJ (2014) Effects of reproductive condition, roost microclimate, and weather patterns on summer torpor use by a vespertilionid bat. Ecol Evol 4:157–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JB, Gates JE, Ford WM (2008) Distribution and activity of bats at local and landscape scales within a rural-urban gradient. Urban Ecosyst 11:227–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung K, Threlfall CG (2016) Urbanization and its effects on bats–a global meta-analysis. In: Voigt, CC, and T Kingston (eds) Bats in the Anthropocene: Conservation of Bats in a Changing World. Springer Cham, pp 13–33

  • Kalb RA, Mycroft CJ (2013) The hardwood ecosystem experiment: goals, design, and implementation. In: Swihart, RK, MR Saunders, RA Kalb, S Haulton, and CH Michler (eds) The Hardwood ecosystem experiment: a framework for studying responses to forest management. U.S. Forest Service, Northern Forest and Experiment Station, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, pp 36–59

  • Kalcounis-Rüppell MC, Psyllakis JM, Brigham RM (2005) Tree roost selection by bats: an empirical synthesis using meta-analysis. Wildlife Soc B 33:1123–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchell ME (2002) Roost selection and landscape movements of female Indiana bats at the great swamp National Wildlife Refuge, New Jersey. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurta A, Teramino JA (1992) Bat community structure in an urban park. Ecography 15:257–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurta A, King D, Teramino JA, Stribley JM, Williams KJ (1993) Summer roosts of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) on the northern edge of its range. Am Midl Nat 140:132–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurta A, Murray SW, Miller DH (2002) Roost selection and movements across the summer landscape. In: Kurta, A, and J Kennedy (eds). The Indiana bat: biology and management of an endangered species. Bat Conservation International, Austin, Texas, pp 118–129

  • Lacki MJ, Cox DR, Dodd LE, Dickinson MB (2009) Response of northern bats (Myotis septentrionalis) to prescribed fires in eastern Kentucky forests. J Mammal 90:1165–1175

    Google Scholar 

  • Lausen CL, Barclay RMR (2003) Thermoregulation and roost selection by reproductive female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) roosting in rock crevices. J Zool 260:235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Lausen CL, Barclay RMR (2006) Benefits of living in a building: big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) in rocks versus buildings. J Mammal 87:362–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis SE (1995) Roost fidelity of bats: a review. J Mammal 76:481–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Reynolds JF (1993) A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landsc Ecol 8:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden LF, Bennett AF, Silins JE (2002) Location of roosts of the lesser long-eared bat Nyctophilus geoffroyi and Gould’s wattled bat Chalinolobus gouldii in a fragmented landscape in South-Eastern Australia. Biol Conserv 106:237–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcelo T, Lopes AV, Peres CA (2008) Edge-effects drive tropical forest fragments towards an early-successional system. Biotropica 40:657–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Ewing K (2001) Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: a general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restor Ecol 9:280–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlack GR (1993) Microenvironment variation within and among forest edge sites in the eastern United States. Biol Conserv 66:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Chusman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. Accessed 14 Mar 2017

  • Medley KE, McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1995) Forest-landscape structure along an urban-to-rural gradient. Prof Geogr 47:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel MA, Menzel JM, Carter TC, Ford WM, Edwards JW (2001) Review of the forest habitat relationships of the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). U.S. Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania

  • Norberg UM, Rayner JMV (1987) Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philos T R Soc B 319:335–427

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe JM, Loeb SC (2017) Indiana bats roost in ephemeral, fire-dependent pine snags in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. For Ecol Manag 391:264–274

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV, Krummel JR, Gardner RH, Sugihara G, Jackson B, DeAngelis DL, Milne BT, Turner MG, Zygmunt B, Christensen SW, Dale VH, Graham RL (1988) Indices of landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 1:153–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Paletto A, Tosi V (2009) Forest canopy cover and canopy closure: comparison of assessment techniques. Eur J Forest Res 128:265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Patriquin KJ, Leonard ML, Broders HG, Ford WM, Britzke ER, Silvis A (2016) Weather as a proximate explanation for fission–fussion dynamics in female northern long-eared bats. Anim Behav 122:47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Racey PA (1973) Environmental factors affecting the length of gestation in heterothermic bats. J Reprod Fertil 19:175–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Racey PA, Swift SM (1981) Variations in gestation length in a colony of pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) from year to year. J Reprod Fertil 61:123–129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard JD, Kunz TH (2009) White-nose syndrome inflicts lasting injuries to the wings of little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus). Acta Chiropterol 11:457–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Rintoul JLP, Brigham RM (2014) The influence of reproductive condition and concurrent environmental factors on torpor and foraging patterns in female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). J Comp Physiol B 184:777–787

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzi CM, Everson BL, Whitaker JO (2005) Use of bat boxes by a maternity colony of Indiana myotis (Myotis sodalis). Northeast Nat 12:217–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Roby PL, Gumbert MW, Lacki MJ (2019) Nine years of Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) spring migration behavior. J Mammal. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyz104

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueegger N (2016) Bat boxes – a review of their use and application, past, present, and future. Acta Chiropterol 18:279–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders MR, Arseneault JE (2013) Pre-treatment analysis of woody vegetation composition and structure on the hardwood ecosystem experiment research units. In: Swihart, RK, MR Saunders, RA Kalb, S Haulton, and CH Michler (eds) the hardwood ecosystem experiment: a framework for studying responses to forest management. U.S. Forest Service, Northern Forest and Experiment Station, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, pp 96–125

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgeley JA (2001) Quality of cavity microclimate as a factor influencing selection of maternity roosts by a tree-dwelling bat, Chalinolobus tuberculatus, in New Zealand. J Appl Ecol 38:425–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgeley JA, O’Donnell CFJ (2004) Roost use by long-tailed bats in South Canterbury: examining predictions of roost-site selection in a highly fragmented landscape. New Zeal J Ecol 28:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikes RS, the Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists (2016) Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education. J Mammal 97:663–688

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Silvis A, Ford WM, Britzke ER, Beane NR, Johnson JB (2012) Forest succession and maternity day roost selection by Myotis septentrionalis in a mesophytic hardwood forest. Int J Forestry Res 2012:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/148106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvis A, Kniowski AB, Gehrt SD, Ford WM (2014) Roosting and foraging social structure of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). PLoS One 9 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096937. Accessed 7 Sep 2019

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1997) Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DW, Ritzi CM, Duchamp JE, Whitaker JO (2005) Foraging habitat of the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) at an urban-rural interface. J Mammal 86:713–718

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Germain MJ, Kniowski AB, Silvis A, Ford WM (2017) Who knew? First Myotis sodalis (Indiana bat) maternity colony in the coastal plain of Virginia. Northeast Nat 24:N5–N10. https://doi.org/10.1656/045.024.0110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timpone JC, Boyles JG, Murray KL, Aubrey DP, Robbins LW (2010) Overlap in roosting habits of Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) and northern bats (Myotis septentrionalis). Am Midl Nat 163:115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Tole L (1998) Sources of deforestation in tropical developing countries. Environ Manag 45:1312–1331

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle MD (1976) Population ecology of the gray bat (Myotis grisescens): factors influencing growth and survival of newly volant young. Ecol 57:587–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonhof MJ, Barclay RMR (1996) Roost-site selection and roosting ecology of forest-dwelling bats in southern British Columbia. Can J Zool 74:1797–1805

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonhof MJ, Barclay RMR (1997) Use of tree stumps as roosts by the western long-eared bat. J Wildlife Manage 61:674–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Watrous KS, Donovan TM, Mickey RM, Darling SR, Hicks AC, Oettingen SLV (2006) Predicting minimum habitat characteristics for the Indiana bat in the Champlain Valley. J Wildlife Manage 70:1228–1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker JO, Sparks DW (2008) Roosts of Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) near the Indianapolis international airport (1997–2001). P Indiana Acad Sci 117:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickramasinghe LP, Harris S, Gareth J, Vaughan Jennings N (2004) Abundance and species richness of nocturnal insects on organic and conventional farms: effects of agricultural intensification on bat foraging. Conserv Biol 18:1283–1292

    Google Scholar 

  • Wobbrock JR, Findlater L, Gergle D, Higgins JJ (2011) The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analysis using only ANOVA procedures. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Vancouver, pp 143–146

  • Zahn A (1999) Reproductive success, colony size, and roost temperature in attic-dwelling bat Myotis myotis. J Zool 247:275–280

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is a contribution of the Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment, a partnership of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Purdue University, Ball State University, Indiana State University, and Drake University. Funding for this project was provided by the Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Indiana State University, and the Indiana Space Grant consortium. We would like to thank the numerous technicians and volunteers that helped collect field data used in this research, especially H. Badin, C. Byrne, K. Caldwell, T. Carter, T. Divoll, J. Karsk, J. Hoeh, J. Pettit, and J. Weber for their management of mist-net surveys and field crews. We would also like to thank G. Bakken, M. Brigham, S. Haulton, S. Lima, and W. Mitchell for comments on early drafts of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott M. Bergeson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bergeson, S.M., Holmes, J.B. & O’Keefe, J.M. Indiana bat roosting behavior differs between urban and rural landscapes. Urban Ecosyst 23, 79–91 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00903-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00903-4

Keywords

Navigation