Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Win–win urban ecology: near-home fishing promotes diversity of Odonata

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is generally thought that increased human activity or infrastructure automatically translates to decreased wildlife activity or abundance. We surveyed dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) at fourteen urban parks with water features to determine factors that promote or hinder species richness or overall abundance. We constructed basic decision trees with either richness or abundance as a response variable and a suite of park characteristics (e.g., size, footprint of the water feature(s), habitat heterogeneity, presence and extent of infrastructure) as predictors. We found that the key predictor of both higher odonate richness and higher odonate abundance was the presence and extent of fishing activities. Despite higher human use at parks that promoted angling, as well as more infrastructure and increased management at these parks—factors that typically are thought to be correlated negatively with biodiversity—odonates and humans benefit from maintaining them and, we suggest, ensuring proper water quality persists. If it is good for fish, it is good for aquatic insects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blair RB, Launer AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban grandient. Biol Conserv 80:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cam E, Nichols JD, Sauer JR, Hines JE, Flather CH (2000) Relative species richness and community completeness: birds and urbanization in the mid-Atlantic states. Ecol Appl 10:1196–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas-Yáñez K, Benítez M, Rocha M, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2017) Large-scale human environmental intervention is related to a richness reduction in Mexican odonates. Rev Mex Biodivers 88:664–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De’ath G, Fabricius KE (2000) Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178–3192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppink FV, van den Bergh JCJM, Rietveld P (2004) Modelling biodiversity and land use: urban growth, agriculture and nature in a wetland area. Ecol Econ 51:201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gledhill DG, James P, Davies DH (2008) Pond density as a determinant of aquatic species richness in an urban landscape. Landsc Ecol 23:1219–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goertzen D, Suhling F (2013) Promoting dragonfly diversity in cities: major determinants and implications for urban pond design. J Insect Conserv 17:399–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale R, Coleman R, Pettigrove V, Swearer SE (2015) Review: identifying, preventing and mitigating ecological traps to improve the management of urban aquatic ecosystems. J Appl Ecol 52:928–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassall C, Anderson S (2015) Stormwater ponds can contain comparable biodiversity to unmanaged wetlands in urban areas. Hydrobiologia 745:137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill MJ, Wood PJ (2014) The macroinvertebrate biodiversity and conservation value of garden and field ponds along a rural–urban gradient. Fundam Appl Limnol 185:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtmann L, Juchem M, Brüggeshemke J, Möhlmeyer A, Fartmann T (2018) Stormwater ponds promote dragonfly (Odonata) species richness and density in urban areas. Ecol Eng 118:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Hornik K, Zeileis A (2006) Unbiased recursive partitioning: a conditional inference framework. J Comput Graph Stat 15:651–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt LM (2005) Recreational fishing site choice models: insights and future opportunities. Hum Dimens Wildl 10:153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Viol I, Mocq J, Julliard R, Kerbiriou C (2009) The contribution of motorway stormwater retention ponds to the biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates. Biol Conserv 142:3163–3171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW (2007) A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity. Biol Rev 82:607–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May ML (2019) Odonata: who they are and what they have done for us lately: classification and ecosystem services of dragonflies. Insects 10:62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RI, Marcotullio PJ, Güneralp B (2013) Urbanization and global trends in biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: Elmqvist T et al (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Springer, pp 31–52

  • Monteiro-Júnior CDS, Juen L, Hamada N (2015) Analysis of urban impacts on aquatic habitats in the Central Amazon basin: adult odonates as bioindicators of environmental quality. Ecol Indic 48:303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller Z, Jakab T, Tóth A, Dévai G, Szállassy N, Kiss B, Horváth R (2003) Effect of sports fisherman activities on dragonfly assemblages on a Hungarian river floodplain. Biodivers Conserv 12:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (2004) Monitoring the success of metropolitan wetland restorations: cultural sustainability and ecological function. Wetlands 24:756–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen AB, van den Bosch M, Maruthaveeran S, van den Bosch CK (2014) Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: a review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosyst 17:305–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oertli B, Parris KM (2019) Review: toward management of urban ponds for freshwater biodiversity. Ecosphere 10(7):e02810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oertli B, Joye DA, Castella E, Juge R, Cambin D, Lachavanne JB (2002) Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol Conserv 104:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pautasso M, Fontaneto D (2008) A test of the species–people correlation for stream macro-invertebrates in European countries. Ecol Appl 18:1842–1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott VA, Eason PK (2018) Lentic and lotic odonate communities and the factors that influence them in urban versus rural landscapes. Urban Ecosyst 21:737–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remsburg AJ, Turner MG (2009) Aquatic and terrestrial drivers of dragonfly (Odonata) assemblages within and among north-temperate lakes. J N Am Benthol Soc 28:44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theischinger G, Endersby I (2014) Australian dragonfly (Odonata) larvae: descriptive history and identification. Mem Mus Victoria 72:73–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalobos-Jiménez G, Dunn AM, Hassall C (2016) Dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) in urban ecosystems: a review. Eur J Entomol 113:217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Liermann CR, Davies PM (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willigalla C, Fartmann T (2012) Patterns in the diversity of dragonflies (Odonata) in cities across Central Europe. Eur J Entomol 109:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley WJ (1983) Terrestrial larvae of Odonata from New Caledonia (Zygoptera: Megapodagrionidae; Anisoptera: Synthemistidae). Odonatologica 12:389–395

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Brett Roberts for his assistance with field surveys and Eli S. Bridge and Jeff F. Kelly for comments on a draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Patten.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 726 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hjalmarson, E.A., Patten, M.A. Win–win urban ecology: near-home fishing promotes diversity of Odonata. Urban Ecosyst 22, 1201–1206 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00896-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00896-0

Keywords

Navigation