Correction to: Urban Ecosyst (2018) 21:197–208

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0702-1

Table 3 contained an error in how the degrees of freedom are displayed. The comma separating the model (e.g., 1) and error (e.g., 121) has been deleted in the Auckland, Melbourne, and Sydney columns. Where the degrees of freedom should read “1,121”, for example, it displays as “1121”. The corrected table follows.

Table 3 Linear regressions of mean NDVI, bird species richness, and how much nature respondents said they viewed from home or work compared with wellbeing indices. Significant results are bolded
Full size table

The authors regret this error.