Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ecosystem services deficits in cross-boundary landscapes: spatial mismatches between green and grey systems

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitative analyses of the influence of boundary lines on ecosystem services distributions remain rare. Approaches towards integrative assessments of green and grey landscape systems, particularly in cross-boundaries contexts, remain underdeveloped. This study aims to close that knowledge gap. This study was carried out in the cross-boundary landscape of the cities of Cieszyn (in Poland) and Český Těšín (in the Czech Republic), which form one urban system that is divided by a national boundary. The study proposes a novel quantitative method to (1) assess and analyse the spatial structure of urban green and grey systems and (2) analyse the potential provision of ecosystem services (ES) in cross-boundary landscapes. The methodology could be useful for various types of cross-boundary landscapes. A spatial analysis using technomass (Ψ) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) indicators was performed and combined with population data. The ratio between technomass and number of inhabitants to NDVI, used as a proxy indicator for the provision of ES, was implemented for the identification of areas of deficits in ecosystem services provision. The study shows significant spatial asymmetries, indicated inter alia by the share of grey and green systems and distribution of ES deficit areas. The spatial asymmetries of the urban cross-boundary landscape indicate the need for environmental governance covering green and grey systems located on both sides of a boundary as a spatial unit. This challenges current planning frameworks based mostly on “static” Euclidean land-use zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen J, Cochrane A (2007) Beyond the territorial fix: regional assemblages, politics and power. Reg Stud 41(9):1161–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baoyan S, Xue-fei Z (2015) Optimal allocation of service area of urban elusion and dispersion based on GIS. In: Spatial Data Mining and Geographical Knowledge Services (ICSDM), 2015 2nd IEEE International Conference Fuzhou: IEEE, p 99–103

  • Birch CPD, Oom SP, Beecham JA, Dhv BV, Box PO, Amersfoort BC (2007) Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology. Ecol Model 206:347–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.03.041

  • Brüll A, Wirth TM, Lohrberg F, Kempenaar A, Brinkhuijsen M, Godart F, Nielsen M (2017) Territorial cohesion through cross-border landscape policy? The European case of the Three Countries Park ( BE-NL-DE ). CASES: Change and Adaptation of Socjoecological Systems 3:68–92

  • Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic 21:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan A (2015) Connecting cities and their environments: harnessing the water-energy-food nexus for sustainable urban development. Chang Adapt Socio Ecol Syst 2(1):103–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin K, Asner GP, Field CB (2014) Linking vegetation patterns to environmental gradientsand human impacts in a mediterranean-type island ecosystem. Landsc Ecol 29:1571–1585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0076-1

  • Faehnle M et al (2014) Scale-sensitive integration of ecosystem services in urban planning. GeoJournal 80(3):411–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman R, Gordon M (1986) Landcape ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank S, Spyra M, Fürst C (2017) Requirements for cross-border spatial planning technologies in the European context. Chang Adapt Socio Ecol Syst 3(1):39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürst C, Frank S, Witt A, Koschke L, Makeschin F (2013) Assessment of the effects of forest land use strategies on the provision of ecosystem services at regional scale. J Environ Manag 127:S96–S116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garmendia E, Apostolopoulou E, Adams WM, Bormpoudakis D (2016) Land use policy biodiversity and green infrastructure in Europe : boundary object or ecological trap ? Land Use Policy 56:315–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geneletti D, Rosa D, La Spyra M, Cortinovis C (2017) A review of approaches and challenges for sustainable planning in urban peripheries. Landsc Urban Plan 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.013

  • Habartová D, Havlínová E, Novotná V, Skružná Ih (2011) Statistická ročenka České republiky - 2011. Prague. Retrieved from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/statisticka-rocenka-ceske-republiky-2011-idioienvk3. Accessed Sept 2016

  • Inostroza L (2014a) Measuring urban ecosystem functions through “Technomass”—a novel indicator to assess urban metabolism. Ecol Indic 42:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inostroza L (2014b) Open spaces and urban ecosystem services. Cooling effect towards urban planning in South American cities. TeMA J Land Use Mobil Environ SI:523–534

  • Inostroza L (2016a) Climate change adaptation responses in Latin American urban areas. Challenges for Santiago de Chile and lima. In: Nail S (ed) Cambio climático. lecciones de y para ciudades de América Latina. Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogota, pp 391–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Inostroza L (2016b) Informal urban development in Latin American urban peripheries. Spatial assessment in Bogotá, Lima and Santiago de Chile. Landsc Urban Plan 165:267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inostroza L, Baur R, Csaplovics E (2010) Urban sprawl and fragmentation in Latin America: a comparison with European cities. The myth of the diffuse Latin American city, Cambridge, pp 1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Inostroza L, Baur R, Csaplovics E (2013) Urban sprawl and fragmentation in Latin America: a dynamic quantification and characterization of spatial patterns. J Environ Manag 115:87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inostroza L, Palme M, De La Barrera F (2016a) A heat vulnerability index: spatial patterns of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity for Santiago de Chile. PLoS One 11(9):e0162464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inostroza L, Zasada I, König HJ (2016b) Last of the wild revisited: assessing spatial patterns of human impact on landscapes in southern Patagonia, Chile. Reg Environ Chang 16(7):2071–2085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inostroza L, König HJ, Pickard B, Zhen L (2017) Putting ecosystem services into practice: trade-off assessment tools, indicators and decision support systems. Ecosyst Serv 26(b):303–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JAG, Bertiller R, Schwick C, Kienast F (2010) Suitability criteria for measures of urban sprawl. Ecol Indic 10(2):397–406 Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470160X09001265. Accessed 26 May 2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jim C (2004) Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities. Cities 21(4):311–320 Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S026427510400054X. Accessed 11 April 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczorowska A, Kain JH, Kronenberg J, Haase D (2015) Ecosystem services in urban land use planning: integration challenges in complex urban settings—Case of Stockholm. Ecosyst Serv 22:204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyttä M, Broberg A, Haybatollahi M, Schmidt-Thomé K (2015) Urban happiness: contextsensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settings. Environ Plann B 47:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515600121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa D, Spyra M, Inostroza L (2015) Indicators of cultural ecosystem services for urban planning: a review. Ecol Indic. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470160X1500206X

  • Lafortezza R, Chen J (2016) The provision of ecosystem services in response to global change: evidences and applications. Environ Res 147:576–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.02.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Wu J (2004) Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landsc Ecol 19:389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Xiong L, Hu X, Shan J (2015) A progressive buffering method for road map update using OpenStreetMap data. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 4:1246–1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4031246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck M, Wu J (2002) A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landsc Ecol 17(4):327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinico F, La Rosa D, Privitera R (2014) Green oriented urban development for urban ecosystem services provision in a medium sized city in southern Italy. IForest 7(7):385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHarg I (1969) Design with nature. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukul SA, Sohel MSI, Herbohn J, Inostroza L, König H (2017) Integrating ecosystem services supply potential from future land-use scenarios in protected area management: a Bangladesh case study. Ecosyst Serv 26:355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson E, Polasky S, Lewis DJ, Plantinga AJ, Lonsdorf E, White D, Bael D, Lawler JJ (2008) Efficiency of incentives to jointly increase carbon sequestration and species conservation on a landscape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(28):9471–9476 Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2474525&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman D, Paasi A (1998) Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: boundary narratives in political geography. Prog Hum Geogr 22(2):186–207 Available at: http://phg.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/22/2/186. Accessed 18 July 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning F (2015) Using surface fitting and buffer analysis to estimate regional geoidal undulation. BCG - Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - On-Line Version 21:624–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poławska H, Węgłowska M, Hanna W, Orlik W (2014) Informator GUS 2014. Warszawa. Retrieved from http://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/inne-opracowania/inne-opracowania-zbiorcze/informator-gus-2014-r-folder,15,2.html. Accessed Sept 2016

  • Roces-díaz JV et al (2015) A multiscale analysis of ecosystem services supply in the NW Iberian peninsula from a functional perspective. Ecol Indic 50:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayre NF (2008) Scale. In: Castree N. Demeritt D, Liverman D, Rhoads B (eds.) A companion to environmental geography. Blackwell, West Sussex, pp 95–108

  • Scott JW, van Houtum H (2009) Reflections on EU territoriality and the “bordering” of Europe. Polit Geogr 28(5):271–273 Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0962629809000444. Accessed 19 July 2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Guo X, Xiao K (2015) Spatiotemporally characterizing urban temperatures based on remote sensing and GIS analysis: a case study in the city of Saskatoon. Open Geosci 7:27–39. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2015-0005

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyra M (2014a) Ecosystem services and border regions. Case Study from Czech–Polish Borderland. TeMA J Land Use Mobil Environ 7(3) Available at: http://www.tema.unina.it/index.php/tema/article/view/2543

  • Spyra M (2014b) The feasibility of implementing cross-border land-use management strategies: a report from three upper Silesian Euroregions. iForest 7:396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner F (2014) Frontiers in urban ecological design and planning research. Landsc Urban Plan :1–8. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169204614000425. Accessed 30 March 2014

  • Sung H, Lee S (2015) Residential built environment and walking activity: empirical evidence of Jane Jacobs’ urban vitality. Transp Res Part D 41:318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syrbe R-U, Walz U (2012) Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol Indic 21:80–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termeer CJAM, Dewulf A, van Lieshout M (2010) Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 15(4):29. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssn080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Pattern and process. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vimal R, Geniaux G, Pluvinet P, Napoleone C, Lepart J (2012) Landscape and urban planning detecting threatened biodiversity by urbanization at regional and local scales using an urban sprawl simulation approach : application on the French Mediterranean region. Landsc Urban Plan 104(3–4):343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E, Piper J (2008) Spatial planning for biodiversity in Europe’s changing climate. Eur Environ 151:135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Odeh IOA, Han C (2009) Bi-temporal characterization of land surface temperature in relation to impervious surface area, NDVI and NDBI, using a sub-pixel image analysis. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 11(4):256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann E, Bracalenti L, Piacentini R, Inostroza L (2016) Urban flood risk reduction by increasing green areas for adaptation to climate change. Procedia Eng 161:2241–2246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the guest editors of this special issue of Urban Ecosystems journal and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany

    Marcin Spyra

  2. Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland

    Marcin Spyra

  3. Institute of Geography, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Luis Inostroza

  4. Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Luis Inostroza

  5. Central Mining Institute, Katowice, Poland

    Adam Hamerla & Jan Bondaruk

Authors
  1. Marcin Spyra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luis Inostroza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adam Hamerla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jan Bondaruk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Spyra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spyra, M., Inostroza, L., Hamerla, A. et al. Ecosystem services deficits in cross-boundary landscapes: spatial mismatches between green and grey systems. Urban Ecosyst 22, 37–47 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0740-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0740-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation