Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of environmental flow requirements for macroinvertebrates in a creek affected by urban drainage (Prague metropolitan area, Czech Republic)

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 15 December 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

The habitat suitability index and environmental flow requirements were assessed for ten species of macroinvertebrates in a 2 km length section of the urban Botič creek (average flow 0.4 m3 s−1) in Prague. Botič creek has been affected by two combined sewer overflows (CSO). Spring, summer and fall seasonal environmental flow requirements were identified using the Physical HABitat SIMulation System (PHABSIM) approach for the whole macroinvertebrate community: Spring – optimal flow 0.32–0.38 m3 s−1, minimal flow 0.20–0.21 m3 s−1 and maximal acceptable flow 0.91–0.93 m3 s−1; Summer - optimal flow 0.42–0.45 m3 s−1, minimal flow 0.19–0.21 m3 s−1 and maximal acceptable flow 0.95–1.00 m3 s−1; Fall - optimal flow 0.38–0.48 m3 s−1, minimal flow 0.22–0.23 m3 s−1 and maximal acceptable flow 0.95–0.98 m3 s−1. The seasonal variability of environmental flow for all three categories is approximately 10%. Environmental flow requirements of the studied species and their life stages vary with depth, velocity and bottom substratum. Due to inflow from the CSOs, the optimal and maximal acceptable flow are not maintained and the maximal flow is exceeded by more than twice its value. Although the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) was primarily designed for large impounded rivers, the study proved its applicability in small streams affected by urbanization and urban drainage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 15 December 2017

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained errors. The given name and family name of all the authors were interchanged. Dana, Jana and Tomáš are given names while Komínková, Caletková and Vitvar are family names respectively.

References

  • Acreman M, Dunbar MJ (2004) Defining environmental flow requirements – a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8:861–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovee KD (1982) A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper 12. FWS/OBS-82/6. USDI Fish and Wildlife Services, Office of Biology Services, Washington, DC

  • Bovee KD, Lamb CJ, Bartholow M, Stalnaker CB, Taylor J, Henriksen J (1998) Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental technology, U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD

  • Brandes D, Cavallo GJ, Nilson ML (2005) Base flow trends in urbanizing watersheds of the Delaware River basin. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41:1377–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manag 30:492–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns D, Vitvar T, McDonnell J, Hassett J, Duncan J, Kendall C (2005) Effects of suburban development on runoff generation in the Croton River basin, New York, USA. J Hydrol 311:266–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caletková J (2007) Ecologically acceptable range of flows for macrozoobenthos in urban creeks. Dissertation, Czech Technical University in Prague (in Czech)

  • Caletková J, Komínková D (2004) PHABSIM as an instrument for identification a range of the ecological discharges for bentic community. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, September 12–17, 2004, Madrid, p 449–455

  • Caletková J, Komínková D (2005) Urban streams and necessity of ecological discharge identification. In: 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, p 8

  • Caletková J, Klímová M, Komínková D (2012) Determination of ecological flow for macroinvertebrate communities in streams affected by urban drainage – case study of Prague. The Open Environmental & Biological Monitoring Journal 5:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campana N, Tucci CEM (2001) Predicting floods from urban development scenarios: case study of the Dilúvio basin, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Urban Water 3:113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi W, Deal BM (2008) Assessing hydrological impact of potential land use change through hydrological and land use change modeling for the Kishwaukee River basin (USA). J Environ Manag 88:1119–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleton J, Thomas KV (2004) A review of factors affecting release and bioavailability of contaminants during sediment disturbance events. Environ Int 30:973–980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Extence CA, Balbi DM, Chadd RP (1999) River flow indexing using British bentic macroinvertebrates: a framework for setting hydroecological objectives. Regul River 15:543–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier RC, Jenkins A (2010) The catchment management concept. In: Ferrier RC, Jenkins A (eds) Handbook of catchment management. Blackwell Publications, Oxford, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick F, Diebel MW, Harris MA, Arnold TL, Lutz MA, Richards KD (2005) Effects of urbanization on the geomorphology, habitat, hydrology, and fish index of biotic integrity of streams in the Chicago Area, Illinois and Wisconsin. American Fisheries Society Symposium 47: Environmental Management, p 87–115

  • Fletcher TD, Andrieu H, Hamel P (2013) Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: a state of the art. Adv Water Resour 51:261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García de Jalón D, Gortázar J (2007) Evaluation of instream habitat enhancement options using fish habitat simulations: case-studies in the river pas (Spain). Aquat Ecol 41:461–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore JA (1982) Benthic invertebrate colonization: source distance effects on community composition. Hydrobiologia 94:183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore JA, Netler JM (1988) Instream flow studies perspective. Regul River 2:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Walsh CJ, Taylor SJ (2004) The influence of urban density and drainage infrastructure on the concentrations and loads of pollutants in small streams. Environ Manag 34:112–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jowett IG, Richardson J (2008) Microhabitat preferences of benthic macroinvertebrates in a New Zealand River and the development of in-stream flow-habitat models for Deleatidium spp. New Zeal J Mar Fresh 24:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlavičiene V, Švediene S, Marčiulionine DE, Randerson P, Rimeika M, Hogland W (2009) The impact of storm water runoff on a small urban stream. J Soils Sediments 9:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King AJ, Tonkin Z, Mahoney J (2009) Environmental flow enhances native fish spawning and recruitment in the Murray River, Australia. River Res Appl 25(10):1205–1218

  • Komínková D, Nábělková J (2007) Effect of urban drainage on bioavailability of heavy metals in recipient. Water Sci Technol 56:43–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komínková D, Stránský D, Šťastná G, Caletková J, Nábělková J, Handová Z (2005) Identification of ecological status of stream impacted by urban drainage. Water Sci Technol 51:249–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komínková D, Nábělková J, Vitvar T (2016) Effects of combined sewer overflows and storm water drains on metal bioavailability in small urban streams (Prague metropolitan area, Czech Republic). J Soils Sediments 16:1569–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Choi MJ, Kim YY, Lee KK (2005) Evaluation of hydrological data obtained from a local groundwater monitoring network in a metropolitan city, Korea. Hydrol Process 19:2525–2537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Zhao C, Xia J, Sun C, Wang R, Liu T (2011) An instream ecological flow method for data-scarce regulated rivers. J Hydrol 398:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay RJ (1992) Colonization by lotic macroinvertebrates: a review of processes and patterns. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:617–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques Couceiro SR, Hamada N, Forsberg BR, Padovesi-Fonseca C (2009) Effects of anthropogenic silt on aquatic macroinvertebrates and abiotic variables in streams in the Brazilian Amazon. J Soils Sediments 10:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JL (2013) Hydroenvironmental analysis: freshwater environment. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JL, Paul MJ, Taulbee WK (2005) Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscape. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:602–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milhouse RT, Updike MA, Schneider DM (1989) Physical habitat simulation system reference manual – Version 2. Instream Flow Information Paper 26. Biological Report 89(16). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, p 403

  • Miltner RJ, White D, Yoder C (2004) The biotic integrity of streams in urban and suburbanizing landscape. Landsc Urban Plan 69:87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountouris A, Voutsas E, Tassios D (2002) Bioconcentration of heavy metals in aquatic environments: the importance of bioavailability. Mar Pollut Bull 44:1136–1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munksgaard NC, Lottermoser BG (2010) Mobility and potential bioavailability of traffic-derived trace metals in a 'wet-dry' tropical region. Northern Australia. Environ Earth Sci 60(7):1447–1458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakano D, Nakamura F (2007) The significance of meandering channel morphology on the diversity and abundance of macroinvertebrates in a lowland river in Japan. Aquat Conserv 18:780–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbeibu AE, Oribhabor BJ (2002) Ecological impact of river impoundment using benthic macro-invertebrates as indicators. Water Res 36:2427–2436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ourso RT, Frenzel SA (2003) Identification of linear and threshold responses in streams along a gradient of urbanization in anchorage, Alaska. Hydrobiologia 501:17–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires AM, Cowx IG, Coelho MM (2000) Benthic macroinvertebrate communities of intermittent streams in the middle reaches of the Guadiana Basin (Portugal). Hydrobiologia 435:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollert J, Komínková D, Handová Z. (2004) Impact of floods on technical and ecological stability of small urban streams. Final report of the project GAČR 103/03/Z017, Prague (in Czech)

  • Quinn JM, Hickey CW (1994) Hydraulic parameters and benthic invertebrate distributions in two gravel-bed New Zealand rivers. Freshw Biol 32:489–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie L (2000) A literature review and data analysis of benthic macroinvertebrate habitat suitability for the Goquitlam River. Report prepared for BC Hydro, Burnaby, B.C., pp 46. https://www.watershed-watch.org/publications/files/Ritchie_2000.pdf

  • Sonneman JA, Walsh CJ, Breen PF, Sharpe AK (2001) Effects of urbanization on streams of the Melbourn region, Victoria, Australia II. Benthic diatom community. Freshw Biol 46:553–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker CB, Lamb L, Henriksen J, Bovee KD, Bartholow M (1995) The instream flow incremental methodology: a primer for IFIM, Biological report 29. U.S. Department of Interior, National Biological Service Biological report 29, Washington, DC, pp 45

  • Stalnaker CB, Bovee KD, Waddle TJ (1996) Importance of the temporal aspects of habitat hydraulics to fish population studies. Regul River 12:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharme RE, King JM (1998) Development of the building block methodology for instream flow assessments and supporting research on the effects of different magnitude flows on riverine ecosystems. Pretoria, Water Research Commission Report No. 576/1/98. p 452

  • Walsh CJ (2000) Urban impacts on the ecology of receiving waters: a framework for assessment, conservation and restoration. Hydrobiologia 431:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh CJ, Sharpe AK, Breen PF, Sonneman JA (2001) Effects of urbanization on streams of the Melbourne region, Victoria, Australia. I. Benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Freshw Biol 46:535–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh CJ, Fletcher TD, Ladson AR (2005a) Stream restoration in urban catchment through redesigning stormwater systems: looping to the catchment to save the stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:690–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP II (2005b) The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:706–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the project of the Czech Grant Agency No. 205/05/0426, and projects of Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Environmental Science 42220/1322/3243 and 4200/1312/3166. We thank Dr. Peter Kumble and Dr. James Shanley for language corrections.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Komínková Dana.

Additional information

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0723-9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dana, K., Jana, C. & Tomáš, V. Analysis of environmental flow requirements for macroinvertebrates in a creek affected by urban drainage (Prague metropolitan area, Czech Republic). Urban Ecosyst 20, 785–797 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0649-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0649-2

Keyword

Navigation