Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients without standard modifiable risk factors: a multi-ethnic retrospective cohort study Of 5400 asian patients

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A sizeable number of patients without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs), such as hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and smoking, suffer from acute coronary syndrome (ACS). These SMuRF-less patients have high short-term morbidity and mortality. We compared both short- and long-term outcomes of SMuRF-less and SMuRF ACS patients in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort.

This was a retrospective study of patients with first ACS from 2011 to 2017. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality, cardiac-mortality, unplanned cardiac readmission, cardiogenic shock, heart failure, and stroke. Subgroup analysis was carried out by sex and ACS type.

Of 5400 patients, 8.6% were SMuRF-less. The median follow-up time was 6.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 4.2–8.2 years). SMuRF-less patients were younger and tended to present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). They were more likely to require inotropic support, intubation, and have cardiac arrest. At 30 days, SMuRF-less patients had higher rates of all-cause mortality, cardiac-related mortality and cardiogenic shock, but lower rates of heart failure. At 6 years, all-cause mortality was similar in both groups (18.0% versus 17.1% respectively, p = 0.631). Kaplan–Meier curves showed increased early mortality in the SMuRF-less group, but the divergence in survival curves was no longer present in the long-term. The absence of SMuRF was an independent predictor of mortality, regardless of sex or ACS type.

In a multi-ethnic cohort of patients with ACS, SMuRF-less patients were observed to have higher mortality than SMuRF patients during the early stages which was attenuated over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verschuren WM, Jacobs DR, Bloemberg BP et al (1995) Serum total cholesterol and long-term coronary heart disease mortality in different cultures: twenty-five—year follow-up of the seven countries study. JAMA 274(2):131–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MacMahon S, Peto R, Collins R et al (1990) Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. The Lancet 335(8692):765–774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Health UDo, Services H. 1990 The health benefits of smoking cessation: a report of the surgeon general DHHS publication No. (CDC) 90–8416 Rockville, Maryland: US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health

  4. Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, Wentworth D, Group MRFITR (1993) Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Diabetes Care 16(2):434–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Piironen M, Ukkola O, Huikuri H et al (2017) Trends in long-term prognosis after acute coronary syndrome. Eur J Prev Cardiol 24(3):274–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giampaoli S, Palmieri L, Mattiello A, Panico S (2005) Definition of high risk individuals to optimise strategies for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 15(1):79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Emberson J, Whincup P, Morris R, Walker M, Ebrahim S (2004) Evaluating the impact of population and high-risk strategies for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J 25(6):484–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA et al (2019) 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 74(10):e177–e232

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Figtree GA, Vernon ST, Hadziosmanovic N et al (2021) Mortality in STEMI patients without standard modifiable risk factors: a sex-disaggregated analysis of SWEDEHEART registry data. The Lancet 397(10279):1085–1094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang JY, Goodman SG, Saltzman I et al (2015) Cardiovascular risk factors and in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndromes: insights from the canadian global registry of acute coronary events. Can J Cardiol 31(12):1455–1461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roe MT, Halabi AR, Mehta RH et al (2007) Documented traditional cardiovascular risk factors and mortality in non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 153(4):507–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kong G, Chew NW, Ng CH et al (2022) Prognostic outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients without standard modifiable risk factors: a multiethnic study of 8,680 asian patients. Front cardiovasc med. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.869168

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rott D, Leibowitz D (2007) STEMI and NSTEMI are two distinct pathophysiological entities. Eur Heart J 28(21):2685–2685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Phua K, Chew NW, Sim V et al (2021) One-year outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic. J thromb thromb 53(2):335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chew NW, Sia C-H, Wee H-L et al (2021) Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on door-to-balloon time for primary percutaneous coronary intervention-results from the singapore western STEMI network-. Circ J 85(2):139–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chew N, Zhang AA, Cheng H et al (2021) Post ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction follow-up care during the COVID-19 pandemic and the possible benefit of telemedicine: an observational study. Front Cardiovasc Med. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.755822

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS et al (2018) Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol 72(18):2231–2264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tr D, Fe M, Gv M (1957) Coronary heart disease in the framingham study. Am J Public Health Nations Health 47(4 Pt 2):4–24

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Godfrey E et al (1999) Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock: an international randomized trial of emergency PTCA/CABG—trial design. Am Heart J 137(2):313–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD et al (2016) 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the european society of cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the heart failure association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 37(27):2129–2200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vernon ST, Coffey S, D’Souza M et al (2019) ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors-how common are they, and what are their outcomes? J Am Heart Assoc 8(21):e013296–e013296

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chew NW, Zhang A, Ong J et al (2022) Long-term prognosis in patients with concomitant acute coronary syndrome and aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol 38(8):1220–1227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang AA, Chew NW, Ng CH et al (2021) Post-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction follow-up care during the COVID-19 pandemic and the possible benefit of telemedicine: an observational study. Front cardiovasc med. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.755822

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chew NW, Kong G, Venisha S et al (2022) Long-term prognosis of acute myocardial infarction associated with metabolic health and obesity status. Endocr Pract 28(8):802–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Solomon SD, Zelenkofske S, McMurray JJ et al (2005) Sudden death in patients with myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both. N Engl J Med 352(25):2581–2588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Butler J, Arbogast PG, BeLue R et al (2002) Outpatient adherence to beta-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 40(9):1589–1595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Powell LH, Shaker LA, Jones BA, Vaccarino LV, Thoresen CE, Pattillo JR (1993) Psychosocial predictors of mortality in 83 women with premature acute myocardial infarction. Psychosom Med 55(5):426–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bush DE, Ziegelstein RC, Tayback M et al (2001) Even minimal symptoms of depression increase mortality risk after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 88(4):337–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moss AJ (1979) Factors influencing prognosis after myocardial infarction. Curr Probl Cardiol 4(5):6–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakatani D, Sakata Y, Suna S et al (2012) Incidence, predictors, and subsequent mortality risk of recurrent myocardial infarction in patients following discharge for acute myocardial infarction. Circ J. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rich MW, Bosner MS, Chung MK, Shen J, McKenzie JP (1992) Is age an independent predictor of early and late mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction? Am J Med 92(1):7–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohm J, Skoglund PH, Häbel H et al (2021) Association of socioeconomic status with risk factor target achievements and use of secondary prevention after myocardial infarction. JAMA Netw Open 4(3):e211129–e211129

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas W. S. Chew.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, G., Chew, N.W.S., Ng, C.H. et al. Long-term outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients without standard modifiable risk factors: a multi-ethnic retrospective cohort study Of 5400 asian patients. J Thromb Thrombolysis 54, 569–578 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-022-02704-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-022-02704-7

Keywords

Navigation