Skip to main content
Log in

Autopoiesis and Darwinism

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to offer a critical approach to the theory of autopoiesis in order to see how it challenges mainstream Darwinism. In the first part of the paper, I characterize Darwinism from the concepts of natural selection, heredity, reproduction, and evolution. This characterization is absolutely schematic, and I hope not controversial at all, since my aim is to provide a general background for the discussion of the rest of the paper. The second part presents the main tenets of the theory of autopoiesis, also paying special attention to the concepts of natural selection, heredity, reproduction, and evolution. The third and final part considers some criticisms that have been directed against the theory and suggests some new ones. As I said, my intention is to offer a critical approach, so that I pretend to assess neither autopoiesis nor Darwinism. The assessment, it seems to me, would be a matter of scientific debate—not properly of philosophy. Therefore, given that my approach attempts to be a conceptual clarification, my contribution to the contemporary debate about Darwinism is twofold. On the one hand, I show that conceptually autopoiesis constitutes an important challenge to Darwinism, but on the other, I also show that some fundamental aspects of the theory appear to be both epistemologically and empirically problematic, which perhaps helps to understand why autopoiesis is not widely accepted in mainstream Darwinism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Camus P. A. (2000) Evolution in Chile: Natural drift versus natural selection, or the preservation of favoured theories in the struggle for knowledge. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 73: 215–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etxeberria A. (2004) Autopoiesis and natural drift: Genetic information, reproduction, and evolution revisited. Artificial Life 10: 347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiloff, G. D. (1981). Autopoiesis and neobiogenesis. In Zeleny (Ed.) Autopoiesis: A theory of the living organization (pp. 118–125). New York: North Holland.

  • Krohn W., Küppers G. (1989) Self-organization: A new approach to evolutionary epistemology. In: Hahlweg K., Hooker C. A. (eds) Issues in evolutionary epistemology. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 151–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Luisi P. L. (2003) Autopoiesis: A review and a reappraisal. Naturwissenschaften 90: 49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1981). Autopoiesis. In Zeleny (Ed.) Autopoiesis: A theory of the living organization (pp. 21–33). New York: North Holland.

  • Maturana H. R. (1995) La realidad: ¿objetiva o construida? Fundamentos biológicos de la realidad (Vol. 1), Fundamentos biológicos del conocimiento (Vol. 2). Anthropos, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana H. R., Mpodozis J. (2000) The origin of species by means of natural drift. Revista chilena de historia natural 73: 261–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. ([1973] 1994). De máquinas y seres vivos. Autopoiesis: La organización de lo vivo. (Santiago: Editorial Universitaria).

  • Maturana H. R., Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Reidel, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana H. R., Varela F. J. (1987a) The tree of knowledge. Shambala, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana H. R., Varela F. J. (1987b) El árbol del conocimiento. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago de Chile

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J. (1989) An introduction to autopoiesis: Implications and applications. Systems Practice 2: 159–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J. (1995) Self-producing systems: Implications and applications of autopoiesis. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheper W. J., Scheper G. C. (1996) Autopsies on autopoiesis. Behavioral Science 41: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela C. Y. (2007) Within selection. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 80: 109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela F. J. (1979) Principles of biological autonomy. North Holland-Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela F. J. (1981) Describing the logic of the living: The adequacy and limitations of the idea of autopoiesis. In Zeleny (Ed.) Autopoiesis: A theory of the living organization (pp. 36–48). New York: North Holland.

  • Varela F. J. (2000) El fenómeno de la vida. Dolmen Ensayo, Santiago de Chile

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela F. J., Maturana H. R., Uribe R. (1974) Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. BioSystems 5: 187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber B. H., Depew D. J. (2001) Developmental systems, Darwinian evolution, and the unity of science. In: Oyama S., Griffiths P. E., Gray R. D. (eds) Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 239–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M. (ed.) (1980) Autopoiesis, dissipative structures, and spontaneous social orders. Westview Press, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M. (Ed.) (1981). Autopoiesis: A theory of the living organization. New York: North Holland

  • Zolo D. (1990) Autopoiesis: Critique of a postmodern paradigm. Telos 23: 61–80

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge M. Escobar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Escobar, J.M. Autopoiesis and Darwinism. Synthese 185, 53–72 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9875-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9875-y

Keywords

Navigation