Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Federalism in science — complementarity vs perspectivism: Reply to Harré

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Andler D., Fagot-Largeault A., Saint-Sernin B. (2003). Philosophie des sciences. Paris, Gallimard

    Google Scholar 

  • Auyang S.Y. (1998). Foundations of complex-system theories. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cournot A. A. (1875). Matérialisme, vitalisme, rationalisme. Paris, Hachette

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré J. (1993). The disorder of things. Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel E. (1961). The structure of science. New York, Harcourt Brace and World

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré H. (1906). La science et l’hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion, Engl. transl. Science and hypothesis. New York: Dover.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Département d’Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 45 rue d’ulm, 75005, Paris, France

    Daniel Andler

Authors
  1. Daniel Andler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Andler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andler, D. Federalism in science — complementarity vs perspectivism: Reply to Harré. Synthese 151, 519–522 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9022-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9022-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation