Abstract
Knowing one’s past thoughts and attitudes is a vital sort of self-knowledge. In the absence of memorial impressions to serve as evidence, we face a pressing question of how such self-knowledge is possible. Recently, philosophers of mind have argued that self-knowledge of past attitudes supervenes on rationality. I examine two kinds of argument for this supervenience claim, one from cognitive dynamics, and one from practical rationality, and reject both. I present an alternative account, on which knowledge of past attitudes is inferential knowledge, and depends upon contingent facts of one’s rationality and consistency. Failures of self-knowledge are better explained by the inferential account.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
David Armstrong (1963) ArticleTitle‘Is Introspective Knowledge Incorrigible’ Philosophical Review 72 417–432
Robert Audi (1995) ArticleTitle‘Memorial Justification’ Philosophical Topics. 23 IssueID1 31–45
Michael Bratman (1987) Intentions, Plans and Practical Reason Harvard University Press Cambridge
Tyler Burge (1986) ‘Cartesian Error and the Objectivity of Perception’ P. Pettit J. McDowell (Eds) Subject, Thought and Context. Oxford University Press Oxford
Tyler Burge (1994) ‘Individualism and Self-Knowledge’ Cassam Quassim (Eds) Self-Knowledge. Oxford University Press Oxford 219
Burge Tyler. (1995). ‘Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society XCVI, 91–158
Festinger Leon (1962) ArticleTitle‘Cognitive Dissonance’ Scientific American 207 93–102 Occurrence Handle13892642
Festinger Leon (1959) Theory of Cognitive Dissonance Row and Peterson Evanston
Harman Gilbert (1999) Reasoning, Meaning and Mind Clarendon Press Oxford
Harmon-Jones Mills (1999) Cognitive Dissonance Progress on a Pivotal Theory in Social Psychology. American Psychological Association Washington, DC
Shoemaker Sydney. (1990). ‘First-Person Access’. Philosophical Perspectives 4, no. Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind, 50–73
Sydney Shoemaker (1996) The First-Person Perspective and Other Essays Cambridge University Press New York
Sydney Shoemaker (1995) ArticleTitle‘Moore’s Paradox and Self-Knowledge’ Philosophical Studies 77 211–228 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00989570
Shoemaker Sydney. (1988). ‘On Knowing One’s Own Mind’. Philosophical Perspectives 2, no. Epistemology, 183–209
Shoemaker Sydney. (1994). ‘Self-Knowledge and “Inner-Sense”’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LVI, 249–314
David Velleman (1989) Practical Reflection Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
David Velleman (2000) The Possibility of Practical Reason Clarendon Press Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lawlor, K. Reason and the Past: The Role of Rationality in Diachronic Self-Knowledge. Synthese 145, 467–495 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-6220-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-6220-3