Abstract
The first section of the paper establishes the minimal properties of so-called consequential implication and shows that they are satisfied by at least two different operators of decreasing strength (symbolized by \(\rightarrow \) and \(\Rightarrow \)). Only the former has been analyzed in recent literature, so the paper focuses essentially on the latter. Both operators may be axiomatized in systems which are shown to be translatable into standard systems of normal modal logic. The central result of the paper is that the minimal consequential system for \(\Rightarrow \), CI\(\Rightarrow \), is definitionally equivalent to the deontic system KD and is intertranslatable with the minimal consequential system for \(\rightarrow \), CI. The main drawback ot the weaker operator \(\Rightarrow \) is that it lacks unrestricted contraposition, but the final section of the paper argues that \(\Rightarrow \) has some properties which make it a valuable alternative to \(\rightarrow \), turning out especially plausible as a basis for the definition of operators representing synthetic (i.e. context-dependent) conditionals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angell, R. B., A Propositional Logic with Subjunctive Conditionals, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 27: 327–343, 1962.
Åqvist, L., Modal Logic with Subjunctive Conditional and Dispositional Predicates, Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 1–76, 1973.
Duncan Jones, A. E., Is strict implication the same as entailment? Analysis 2: 70–78, 1935.
Johnson, W. E., Logic, Cambridge U.P. (reprint Dover 1964), 1921.
Kneale, W. C., and M. Kneale, The Development of Logic, Clarendon U.P., 1962.
Mccall, S., Connexive Implication, Journal of Symbolic Logic 31: 415–433, 1966.
Mccall, S., Connexive Class Logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic 32: 83–90, 1967.
Mccall, S., Connexive Implication, in A. R. Anderson and N. Belnap, Entailment, vol. I, Princeton U.P., 1975, pp. 434–452.
Montgomery, M. and R. Routley, On systems containing Aristotle’s Thesis, Journal of Symbolic Logic 33: 82–96, 1968.
Nasti De Vincentis, M., Connexive Implication in a Chrysippean Setting, in C. Cellucci, M. Di Maio, and G. Roncaglia (eds.), Logica e filosofia della scienza: problemi e prospettive, Pisa, ETS, 1994, pp. 595–603.
Nasti De Vincentis, M., Logiche della connessività, Verlag Paul Haupt, Bern, 2002.
Parry, W. T., Ein Axiomsystem fur eine neue Art von Implikation, Ergebnisse eindes Mathematischen Kolloquims 4: 5–6, 1933.
Pizzi, C., Una procedura di decisione mediante tableaux per una logica connessiva debole, Boll. Un.Calabria 4: 131–142, 1982–83.
Pizzi, C., Decision Procedures for Logics of Consequential Implication, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 32: 618–636, 1991.
Pizzi, C., Weak vs Strong Boethius’ Thesis: a Problem in the analysis of Consequential implication, in A. Ursini and P. Aglianò (eds.), Logic and Algebra, M. Dekker Inc. NY, 1996, pp. 646–654.
Pizzi, C., A Modal Framework for Consequential Implicaton and the Factor Law, Contemporary Mathematics 235: 313–326, 1999.
Pizzi, C., Aristotle’s Thesis between Paraconsistency and Modalization, Journal of Applied Logic 3: 119–131, 2005.
Pizzi, C., and T. Williamson, Strong Boethius’ Thesis and Consequential Implication, Journal of Philosophical Logic 26: 569–588, 1997.
Wansing, H., Connexive Logic, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/logic--connexive/.
Williamson, T., Verification, Falsification and Cancellation in KT, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31: 286–290, 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pizzi, C.E.A. Two Kinds of Consequential Implication. Stud Logica 106, 453–480 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-017-9749-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-017-9749-5