Skip to main content
Log in

A Simple Sequent Calculus for Angell’s Logic of Analytic Containment

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We give a simple sequent calculus presentation of R.B. Angell’s logic of analytic containment, recently championed by Kit Fine as a plausible logic of partial content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, A. R., and N. D. Belnap, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Neccessity, Vol. I. Princeton University Press, 1975.

  2. Angell, R., Three Systems of First Degree Entailment, Journal of Symbolic Logic 47: 147, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Angell, R., Analytic truth-tables, Journal of Symbolic Logic 46(3): 677, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Angell, R., Deducibility, Entailment and Analytic Containment. In J. Norman and R. Sylvan (Eds.), Directions in Relevant Logic, Chapter 8, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989, pp. 119–144.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Belnap, N. D., Rescher’s Hypothetical Reasoning: An Amendment. In E. Sosa (Ed.), The Philosophy of Nicholas Rescher: Discussion and Replies, D. Reidel, 1979, pp. 19–28.

  6. Brady, R. T., Universal Logic. Number 109 in csli Lecture Notes. Stanford: csli Publications, 2006.

  7. Correia, F., Semantics for Analytic Containment, Studia Logica 77: 87–104, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Correia, F., Grounding and Truth-Functions, Logique Et Analyse 211: 251–279, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Correia, F., On the Logic of Factual Equivalence, The Review of Symbolic Logic 9(1): 103–122, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Daniels, C., A Story Semantics for Implication, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic  27: 221–246, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deutsch, H., Paraconsistent Analytic Implication, Journal of Philosophical Logic 13: 1–11, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dragalin, A., Mathematical Intuitionism. Introduction to Proof Theory. Providence: American Mathematical Society, 1988.

  13. Ferguson, T. M., Cut-down operations on bilattices, In Proceedings of the 45th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (IEEE 2015), Los Alamitos, CA, IEEE Computer Society Press, 2015, pp. 163–172.

  14. Ferguson, T. M., Faulty Belnap computers and subsystems of FDE, Journal of Logic and Computation 26(5): 1617–1636, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fine, K., Analytic Implication, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27(2): 169–179, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fine, K., Guide to ground. In F. Correia and B. Schnieder (Eds.), Metaphysical Grounding, pp. 37–80. Cambridge University Press, 2012 pp. 37–80.

  17. Fine, K., A Note on Partial Content, Analysis 73(3): 413–419, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fine, K., Truth-Maker Semantics for Intuitionistic Logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic 43: 549–577, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fine, K., Angellic Content, Journal of Philosophical Logic 45(2): 199–226, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van Fraassen, B., Facts and Tautological Entailments, The Journal of Philosophy 66: 477–487, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Humberstone, L., False Though Partly True – An Experiment in Logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic 32: 613–665, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Negri, S., and J. von Plato, Structural Proof Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Paoli, F., Substructural Logics: A Primer, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

  24. Parry, W., Ein Axiomensystem für eine neue Art von Implikation (analytische Implikation), Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums 4: 5–6, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parry, W., Comparison of Entailment Theories, Journal of Symbolic Logic 37(2): 441–442, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pynko, A. P., Characterizing Belnap’s Logic via De Morgan’s Laws, Mathematical Logic Quarterly 41: 442–454, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Troelstra, A., and H. Schwichtenberg, Basic Proof Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Yablo, S., Aboutness. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rohan French.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

French, R. A Simple Sequent Calculus for Angell’s Logic of Analytic Containment. Stud Logica 105, 971–994 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-017-9719-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-017-9719-y

Keywords

Navigation