Skip to main content
Log in

Proof-Theoretic Semantics for Subsentential Phrases

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper briefly surveys the sentential proof-theoretic semantics for fragment of English. Then, appealing to a version of Frege’s context-principle (specified to fit type-logical grammar), a method is presented for deriving proof-theoretic meanings for sub-sentential phrases, down to lexical units (words). The sentential meaning is decomposed according to the function-argument structure as determined by the type-logical grammar. In doing so, the paper presents a novel proof-theoretic interpretation of simple type, replacing Montague’s model-theoretic type interpretation (in arbitrary Henkin models). The domains of derivations are collections of derivations in the associated “dedicated” natural-deduction proof-system, and functions therein (with no appeal to models, truth-values and elements of a domain). The compositionality of the semantics is analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ben-Avi, Gilad, and Nissim Francez, ‘A proof-theoretic reconstruction of generalized quantifiers’. In preparation, 2010.

  2. Francez, Nissim, and Gilad Ben-Avi, ‘Proof-theoretic semantic values for logical operators’, Synthese, 2009. Under refereeing.

  3. Francez, Nissim, and Roy Dyckhoff, ‘Proof-theoretic semantics for a natural language fragment’, in Proceedings of the 10th and 11th meetings of the Association for Mathematics of Language (MOL), July 2007, to appear. Full version under refereeing for Linguistics and Philosophy.

  4. Frege, Gottlob, Grundlagen der Aritmetik, 1884, translated as The Foundations of Arithmetic, J. L. Austin (trans.), (2nd edition) Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1953.

  5. Hodges Wilfrid (2001) ‘Formal features of compositionality’. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 10: 7–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moortgat, Michael, ‘Categorial type logics’, in Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, North Holland, 1997, pp. 93–178.

  7. Moss, Lawrence, ‘Syllogistic Logics with Verbs’, Journal of Logic and Computation, 2008. doi:10.1093/logcom/exn086.

  8. Pagin Peter (2009) ‘Compositionality, understanding, and proofs’. Mind 118: 713–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peregrin Jaroslav (2009) ‘Inferentialism and the compositionality of meaning’. International Review of Pragmatics 1(1): 154–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stainton, Richard J., ‘Context principle’, in Keith Brown (editor-in chief), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 3, Elsevier, 2006, pp. 108–115. Second edition.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nissim Francez.

Additional information

Work started while the author was on leave at St Andrews university.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francez, N., Dyckhoff, R. & Ben-Avi, G. Proof-Theoretic Semantics for Subsentential Phrases. Stud Logica 94, 381–401 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-010-9241-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-010-9241-y

Keywords

Navigation