Skip to main content
Log in

Proof Systems for Reasoning about Computation Errors

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the paper we examine the use of non-classical truth values for dealing with computation errors in program specification and validation. In that context, 3-valued McCarthy logic is suitable for handling lazy sequential computation, while 3-valued Kleene logic can be used for reasoning about parallel computation. If we want to be able to deal with both strategies without distinguishing between them, we combine Kleene and McCarthy logics into a logic based on a non-deterministic, 3-valued matrix, incorporating both options as a non-deterministic choice. If the two strategies are to be distinguished, Kleene and McCarthy logics are combined into a logic based on a 4-valued deterministic matrix featuring two kinds of computation errors which correspond to the two computation strategies described above. For the resulting logics, we provide sound and complete calculi of ordinary, two-valued sequents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avron A., Konikowska B.: Proof Systems for Logics Based on Nondeterministic Multiple-valued Structures. Logic Journal of the IGPL 13, 365–387 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Avron A., Ben-Naim J., Konikowska B.: Cut-free Ordinary Sequent Calculi for Logics Having Generalized Finite-Valued Semantics. Logica Universalis 1, 41–69 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avron, A., and I. Lev, ‘Canonical Propositional Gentzen-Type Systems’, in R. Gor´e, A Leitsch, T. Nipkow (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2001), LNAI 2083, Springer Verlag, 2001, pp. 529--544.

  4. Avron A., Lev I.: Non-deterministic Multiple-valued Structures. Journal of Logic and Computation 15, 241–261 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barringer H., Chang J.H., Jones C.B.: A logic covering undefinedness in program proofs. Acta Informatica 21, 251–269 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blikle A.: Three-valued predicates for software specification and validation. Fundamenta Informaticae 14, 387–410 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hogevijs A.: Partial predicate logic in computer science. Acta Informatica 24, 381–393 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleene, S.C., Introduction to Metamathematics, North-Holland, 1952.

  9. Konikowska B., Tarlecki A., Blikle J.: A three-valued logic for software specification and validation. Fundamenta Informaticae 14(4), 411–453 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Konikowska B.: Two over three: a two-valued logic for software specification and validation over a three-valued predicate calculus. Journal for Applied Nonclassical Logic 3(1), 39–71 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Konikowska, B., A Four-Valued Logic for Reasoning about Finite and Infinite Computation Errors in Programs, accepted to: W. A. Carnielli, M. E. Coniglio, I. M. Loffredo D’ Ottaviano (eds.), The Many Sides of Logic, Series Studies in Logic, College Publications, London.

  12. McCarthy, J., A basis for a mathematical theory of computation, Computer Programming and Formal Systems, North-Holland, 1967.

  13. Owe, O., An approach to program reasoning based on first order logic for partial functions, Res. Rep. Institute of Informatics, University of Oslo, no. 89, 1985.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnon Avron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avron, A., Konikowska, B. Proof Systems for Reasoning about Computation Errors. Stud Logica 91, 273–293 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-009-9175-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-009-9175-4

Keywords

Navigation