Abstract
Through an educational reading of Édouard Glissant and Peter Sloterdijk, this article draws out and develops latent pedagogical philosophies that bear distinct relationships to colonialism and struggles against and beyond colonialism. In particular, it identifies two related educational philosophies that propel colonization and, in turn, proposes a theory of errant learning that might undergird decolonization. It focuses on Glissant’s minor remarks about different conceptions of understanding in order to identify the grasping drive (and its relationship to opacity and transparency) as the educational foundation of the colonizing apparatus. After articulating the other form of understanding he offers, giving-on-and-with (which turns away from enclosures and opens into Relation), I point to a potential contradiction in this division as it relates to his overall project. By freeing grasping from the grasping drive, I reconfigure the relationship between grasping and giving-on-and-with in a way that allows for certain kinds of enclosures. This introduces the question of pedagogical form, a question explored in Sloterdijk’s sphereological investigations. Reading the colonizing phase of globalization through Sloterdijk’s notion of lordly imagining—which I link with the grasping drive—the article draws out how different educational processes produce different kinds of spheres. Finally, it articulates errant learning as a pneumatic process of grasping and giving-on-and-with that values opacity over transparency to produce foam formations with attention to the history of inequality and injury through immune deprivation.
Notes
“Grasping” and “giving-on-and-with” are Betsy Wing’s translations (see Wing 1997, p. xiv).
For more on Glissant and his reworking or “bypassing” of Hegelian dialectics, see Leupin (2013).
For more on this, see Ford and Lewis (2018).
For the classroom as a bubble, see Ford and Zhao (2018).
It’s worth (foot)noting that for Sloterdijk (1999/2014) this lordly imagining and the resulting spheric expansion only developed in full in China, India, and Greece (p. 159).
Hopefully the present article demonstrates the progressive potential of Sloterdijk’s sphereology. Detloff and Bernico (2017) provide another example in their article about the Flint water crisis.
References
Britton, C.M. 2009. Globalization and political action in the work of Édouard Glissant. Small Axe 13(3): 1–11.
Detloff, D., and M. Bernico. 2017. Atmoterrorism and atmodesign in the 21st century: Mediating Flint’s water crisis. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 13(1): 156–189.
Ford, D.R., and T.E. Lewis. 2018. On the freedom to be opaque monsters: Communist pedagogy, aesthetics, and the sublime. Cultural Politics 14(1): 95–108.
Ford, D.R., and W. Zhao. 2018. Toward an educational sphereology: Air, wind, and materialist pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory 50(5): 528–537.
Glissant, É. 1990/1997. Poetics of relation, trans. B. Wing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Leupin, A. 2013. The slave’s jouissance. Callaloo 36(4): 891–901.
Nesbitt, N. 2013. Early Glissant: From the destitution of the political to Antillean ultra-leftism. Callaloo 36(4): 932–948.
Murdoch, H.A. 2013. Éduoard Glissant’s creolized world vision: From resistance and relation to opacité. Callaloo 36(4): 875–889.
Sloterdijk, P. 1998/2011. Spheres I: Bubbles: Microsphereology (trans. by W. Hoban). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Sloterdijk, P. 1999/2014. Spheres II: Globes: Macrosphereology (trans. by W. Hoban). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Sloterdijk, P. 2004/2016. Spheres III: Foams: Plural sphereology (trans. by W. Hoban). Los Angeles: Semiotext(w).
Willinsky, J. 1998. Learning to divide the world: Education at empire’s end. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wing, B. 1997. Translators introduction. In Poetics of relation, ed. É. Glissant, xi–xx. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ford, D.R. Errant Learning for a Foam World: Glissant, Sloterdijk, and the Foam of Pedagogy. Stud Philos Educ 39, 245–256 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09719-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09719-8