Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Birth of a New Paradigm: Rethinking Education and School Leadership with a Metamodern ‘Lens’

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metamodernism, which is used synonymous with post-postmodernism or neo-modernism, has come forward in response to postmodernism and the emerged crises, instabilities, and uncertainties in all areas of this epoch. Metamodernism is a perspective situated epistemologically with (post)modernism, ontologically between (post)modernism and historically beyond (post)modernism. It seeks an oscillation between modernism and postmodernism with mediating between them and responding to existing cultural modes. Thus, metamodernism is a paradigm beyond modernism and postmodernism, trying to explain today’s cultural and intellectual developments which are not sufficiently criticized by modernism nor postmodernism. This paper questions and discusses the understanding of this paradigm and its reflections on education, school leadership, and schooling in the Nordic countries. By reviewing education related reports, survey reports, books and articles about these countries, comprehending their philosophy of education throughout the years, and analyzing the ongoing educational developments, the main notion of metamodernism and its influences on schooling, leadership implications, classroom activities and research in education are focused on this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R.E., and S. Dexter. 2005. School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly 41(1): 49–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04269517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, V.N., and I. Helgøy. 2007. Education reforms in Denmark and Norway: Restricting or enhancing the role of the state and the professions in education governance. Workshop 11, Reforming education policy: Internalisation-privatisation- governance, Helsinki Joint Session, 7–12 May. https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/899c7405-7755-4fd9-a787-dcef691e84a5.pdf.

  • Andreasson, U., and M. Lundqvist. 2018. Nordic leadership. Denmark: Rosendahls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antikainen, A. 2006. In search of the Nordic model in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 50(3): 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B.J., and W.L. Gardner. 2005. Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 16(3): 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 2000. What is globalization?. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, A., M. Cummins, A. Freeman, and K. Rose. 2017. 2017 NMC technology outlook for Nordic Schools: A horizon project regional report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley, P.T. 2010. In pursuit of authentic school leadership practices. International Journal of Leadership in Education 4(4): 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120110078043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beldarrain, Y. 2007. Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education 27(2): 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600789498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, N. 2018. Trailing postmodernism: David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas, Zadie Smith’s NW, and the metamodern. English Studies 99(7): 723–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2018.1510611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria, D. 1995. Modernism, postmodernism, and contemporary grading practices. Journal of Management Education 19(4): 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299501900403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J., and M. Verleger. 2013. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In Proceedings of the ASEE National Conference. Atlanta, GA: ASEE.

  • Blossing, U., G. Imsen, and L. Moos. 2014. The Nordic education model: ‘A School for All’ encounters neo-liberal policy. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, L.G., and T.E. Deal. 2000. People and organisation. In The Jossey–Bass reader on: Educational leadership, ed. M. Fullan, 59–69. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottia, M.C., E. Stearns, R.A. Mickelson, S. Moller, and A.D. Parker. 2015. The relationships among high school STEM learning experiences and students’ intent to declare and declaration of a STEM majör in college. Teachers College Record 117(3): 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud, N. 2009. Altermodern: Tate Triennial 2009. London: Tate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, M., C. Howe, N. McCredie, A. Robinson, and D. Grover. 2014. Augmented reality in education—Cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International 51(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.889400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunton, J. 2018. Whose (meta)modernism?: Metamodernism, race, and the politics of failure. Journal of Modern Literature 41(3): 60–76. https://doi.org/10.2979/jmodelite.41.3.05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, T. 2018. Distributed leadership and bureaucracy: Changing fashions in educational leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 47(1): 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218806704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R.W. 2010. Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher 70(1): 30–35. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.523220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coessens, K., and J.P. Van Bendegem. 2007. On the position of the educationalist intellectual in the information age: Shouldn’t we become meta-modern artists? In Educational research: Networks and technologies, ed. P. Smeyers and M. Depaepe, 71–84. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J. 2011. The end of neoliberalism?: What is left of the left. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 637(1): 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211406846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constas, M.A. 1998. The changing nature of educational research and a critique of postmodernism. Educational Researcher 27(2): 26–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P.M. 2010. On school educational technology leadership. Management in Education 24(2): 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020610363089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digital Economy and Society Index [DESI]. 2019. The Digital Economy and Society Index 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi.

  • Dovemark, M., S. Kosunen, J. Kauko, B. Magnúsdóttir, P. Hansen, and P. Rasmussen. 2018. Deregulation, privitisation and marketisation of Nordic comprehensive education: Social changes reflected in schooling. Education Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2018.1429768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu, A. 2014. Towards a metamodern literature (Doctoral dissertation). https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/4925/DumitrescuAlexandra2014PhD.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y.

  • Eguchi, A. 2014. Robotics as a learning tool for educational transformation. In Proceedings of 4th International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics & 5th International Conference Robotics in Education, Padova (Italy), 18 July. Retrieved from https://www.robolab.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/00_WFr1_04.pdf.

  • Elstad, E. 2016. Educational technology in schools: Policymaking and policy enactment. In Digital expectations and experiences in education, ed. E. Elstad, 47–58. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. 1996. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. 2005. Education and equal life-chances: Investing in children. In Social policy and economic development in the Nordic countries, ed. O. Kangas and J. Palme, 147–163. England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field Waite, S., and K. Robbins. 2017. The question of creativity for the field of educational leadership. In The Wiley international handbook of educational leadership, ed. D. Waite and I. Bogotch, 29–44. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon, trans. C. Gordon, L. Marshal, J. Mepham & K: Sober. New York: Pantheon.

  • Fransson, G., J. Holmberg, O.J. Lindberg, and A.D. Olofsson. 2018. Digitalise and capitalise? Teachers’ self-understanding in 21st-century teaching contexts. Oxford Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1500357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, J.A. 2017. “It takes a village”—(Catholic) education in the 21st century. In Schools in transition: Linking past, present, and future in educational practice, ed. P. Siljander, K. Kontio, and E. Pikkarainen, 241–254. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H.A. 1983. Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H.A. 1988. Border pedagogy in the age of postmodernism. Journal of Education 170(3): 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748817000310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. 2008. The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration 46(2): 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. 2011. Hybrid configurations of leadership. In The SAGE handbook of leadership, ed. A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson, and M. Uhl-Bien, 437–454. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., and L.F. Katz. 2008. The race between education and technology. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T., and E. Lahelma. 1996. “School is like an Ants’ Nest”: Spatiality and embodiment in school. Gender and Education 8(3): 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540259621548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J., and S. Blömeke. 2018. Development of school achievement in the Nordic countries during half a century. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 62(3): 386–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1434829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. 2009. Creative leadership: Developing future leaders. Management in Education 23(1): 9–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020608099076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, S.T., R.L. Woolfolk, and R.G. Lord. 2009. Leader self-structure: A framework for positive leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior 30(2): 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J.F., H. Huang, and S. Wang. 2019. Changing world happiness. In World Happiness Report 2019, Chp 2, ed. J.F. Helliwell, R. Layard, and J.D. Sachs, 11–46. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himanen, P. 2005. The Nordic model of the information society: The Finnish case. In Social policy and economic development in the Nordic countries, ed. O. Kangas and J. Palme, 265–280. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultén, M., and B. Larsson. 2016. The flipped classroom: Primary and secondary teachers’ views on an educational movement in schools in Sweden today. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, L. 2002. The politics of postmodernism, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imsen, G., U. Blossing, and L. Moos. 2017. Reshaping the Nordic education model in an era of efficiency Changes in the comprehensive school Project in Denmark since the millennium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 61(5): 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. 2018. Cultural evolution: People’s motivations are changing, and reshaping the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., and C. Welzel. 2005. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kara, H. 2015. Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., D. Kim, J. Yuan, R.B. Hill, P. Doshi, and C.N. Thai. 2015. Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education 91: 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, A. 2009. Digimodernism: How new technologies dismantle the postmodern and reconfigure our culture. New York, London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, J. 2016. Posthumanism and the MOOC: Opening the subject of digital education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 35: 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9516-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontio, K., E. Pikkarainen, and P. Siljander. 2017. A modern idea of the school. In Schools in transition: Linking past, present, and future in educational practice, ed. P. Siljander, K. Kontio, and E. Pikkarainen, 1–18. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathan, M. 2015. A poetics of postmodernism and neomodernism: Rewriting Mrs Dalloway. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. 2012. Augmented reality in education and training. TechTrends 56(2): 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0559-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leffel, G. 2017. The missiology of trouble: Liberal discontent and metamodern hope. Missiology: An International Review 45(1): 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091829616676193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipovetsky, G. 2005. Hypermodern times. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundahl, L. 2016. Equality, inclusion and marketization of Nordic education: Introductory notes. Research in Comparative & International Education 11(1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499916631059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannay, D. 2016. Visual, narrative and creative research methods: Applications, reflection and ethics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxcy, S.J. 1994. Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, J. (2018). Scandinavian approaches to school leadership. In Invited Presentation at the International Conference Improving School Leadership, Copenhagen, 14–15 April. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/40553301.pdf.

  • Mortimore, P. 2013. Peter Mortimore: Nordic leadership: Something worth keeping. In L. Moos (Ed.), Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic Model? (Forewords, pp. vi–viii). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Moore, M.G., and G. Kearsley. 2012. Distance education: A systems view of online learning, 3rd ed. USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L., B. Hansen, G. Björk, and O. Johansson. 2013a. Leadership for democracy. In Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic Model? (Chp 8, ed. L. Moos, 113–132. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L., O. Johanson, and G. Skedsmo. 2013b. Successful Nordic school leadership. In Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic Model? (Chp 10), ed. L. Moos, 159–172. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L., K.K. Kofod, K. Hjort, and P.H. Raae. 2013c. Denmark: New links between education. In Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic Model? (Chp 2), ed. L. Moos, 19–30. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, D.K. 1996. Feminism, postmodernism, and organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly 9(3): 259–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318996009003001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, D.K. 1997. Modernism, postmodernism, and communication studies: A rereading of an ongoing debate. Communication Theory 7: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00140.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, H. 2017. What is evidence required for and who generates that evidence in the Finnish education system? In Evidence and public good in educational policy, research, and practice (Educational Governance Research, vol. 6, ed. M.Y. Eryaman and B. Schneider, 43–62. Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg, K. 2001. The constitutive vales of Swedish schooling: A challenge to the inner life of schools. Pedagogy Culture and Society 9(3): 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360100200125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantelidis, V.S. 2009. Reasons to use virtual reality in education and training courses and a model to determine when to use virtual reality. Themes in Science and Technology Education 2(1–2): 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. 2014. Capital: In the twenty-first century. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, R. 2010. Die Effizienz der Bildungssysteme und die Sinnkrise des schulischen Lernens. In Schule zwischen Effizienzkriterien und Sinnfragen, ed. J. Warwas and D. Sembill, 1–16. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringarp, J. 2013. From Bildung to entrepreneurship: Trends in education policy in Sweden. Policy Futures in Education 11(4): 456–464. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.4.456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudrum, D., and N. Stavris. 2015. Introduction. In Supplanting the postmodern: An anthology of writings on the arts and culture of the early 21st century (np), ed. D. Rudrum and N. Stavis. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. 2013. Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education 39(1): 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.764761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2011. Lessons from PISA for the United States: Strong performers and successful reformers in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oelkers, J. 1994. Influence and development: Two basic paradigms of education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 13(2): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Øygardslia, K. 2018. But this ısn’t school: Exploring tensions in the intersection between school and leisure activities in classroom game design. Learning, Media & Technology 43(1): 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2017.1421553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saba, F. 2006. Critical issues in distance education: A report from the United States. Distance Education 26(2): 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500168892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. 2010. Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society. Journal of Educational Change 11: 15–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9098-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. 2015. Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salminen, J., L. Tornberg, and P. Venäläinen. 2016. Public institutions as learning environments in Finland. In Miracle of Education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools, ed. H. Niemi, A. Toom, and A. Kallioniemi, 253–266. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salo, P., E.M. Furu, and K. Rönnerman. 2008. Education policies and reforms: A Nordic perspective. In Nurturing praxis: Action research in partnerships between school and university in a Nordic light, vol. 3, ed. K. Rönnerman, E.M. Furu, and P. Salo, 11–20. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, R. 2008. Auto-modernity after postmodernism: Autonomy and automation in culture, technology, and education. In Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected, ed. T. McPherson, 219–240. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönig, W. 2017. The transformation of school in a changing society—A German example. In Schools in transition: Linking past, present, and future in educational practice, ed. P. Siljander, K. Kontio, and E. Pikkarainen, 213–228. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shwab, K. 2016. The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheninger, E. 2014. Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurðardóttir, H.D.I. 2016. Concern, creativity and compliance: The phenomenon of digital game-based learning in Norwegian Education (Ph.D. dissertation). Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siljander, P. 2017. School in transition: The case of Finland. In Schools in transition: Linking past, present, and future in educational practice, ed. P. Siljander, K. Kontio, and E. Pikkarainen, 191–212. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siljander, P., and A. Sutinen. 2012. Introduction. In Theories of Bildung and Growth: Connections and controversies between continental educational thinking and American pragmatism, ed. P. Siljander and A. Kivelä, 1–18. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R., S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R.H. Lazarowitz, C. Webb, and R. Schumuck. 2013. Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn. New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snee, H., C. Hine, Y. Morey, H. Roberts, and H. Watson. 2016. Digital methods for social science: An interdisciplinary guide to research innovation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., and J. Temperley. 2009. Creative leadership: A challenge of our times. School Leadership and Management 29(1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430802646404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, L.M., and S. Vaala. 2014. Level up learning: A national survey on teaching with digital games. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telhaug, A.O., O.A. Mediås, and P. Aasen. 2006. The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 50(3): 245–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer-Bacon, B.J. 2019a. Living during a technological revolution. Studies in Philosophy and Education 38(6): 577–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09684-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer-Bacon, B.J. 2019b. Redefining work and education in the technological revolution. Studies in Philosophy and Education 38(6): 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09649-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, L. 2011. The metamodernist manifesto. Retrieved from http://www.metamodernism.org.

  • World Economic Forum. 2017. The Global Human Capital Report 2017: Preparing people for the future of work. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Human_Capital_Report_2017.pdf.

  • Uljens, M., J. Møller, H. Ärlestig, and L.F. Frederiksen. 2013. The professionalisation of Nordic school leadership. In Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic Model? Chp 9, ed. L. Moos, 133–158. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahtivuori-Hänninen, S., and H. Kynäslahti. 2016. ICTs in a school‘s everyday life—Developing the educational use of ICTs in Finnish schools of the future. In Miracle of Education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools, ed. H. Niemi, A. Toom, and A. Kallioniemi, 241–252. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, R., A. Gibbons, and T. Vermeulen. 2017. Metamodernism: Historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartiainen, J., M. Aksela, and L. Vihma. 2016. LUMA Centre Finland. In Miracle of Education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools, ed. H. Niemi, A. Toom, and A. Kallioniemi, 267–275. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, T., and R. van den Akker. 2015. Utopia, sort of a case study in metamodernism. Studia Neophilologica 87(1): 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2014.981964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, T., and R. van den Akker. 2010. Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics and Culture 2: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. 2017. The global human capital report 2017: Preparing people for the future of work. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H., S.W. Lee, H. Chang, and J. Liang. 2013. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education 62: 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousef, T. 2017. Modernism, postmodernism, and metamodernism: A critique. International Journal of Language and Literature 5(1): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijll.v5n1a5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Turkish and Social Sciences Education, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey

    Gokhan Kilicoglu

  2. Faculty of Education, Educational Sciences, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey

    Derya Kilicoglu

Authors
  1. Gokhan Kilicoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Derya Kilicoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derya Kilicoglu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kilicoglu, G., Kilicoglu, D. The Birth of a New Paradigm: Rethinking Education and School Leadership with a Metamodern ‘Lens’. Stud Philos Educ 39, 493–514 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09690-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09690-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation