Abstract
Distributed cognition, as it considers how technologies augment cognition, informs technology integration in education. Most educational technologists interested in distributed cognition embrace a representational theory of mind. As this theory assumes cognition occurs in the brain and depends on the internal representation of external information, it is informed by a mind/body dualism that separates the individual student from material things. Alternatively, the theory of the extended mind describes the mind as a dynamic system of interactions inclusive of human agents, technologies and other material things. Refusing the mind/body dualism, if one element is removed, the quality of cognitive activity declines. Across the cognitive sciences, there are debates between these representational and extended theories that have implications for what it means to be a student and for technology integration. However, distributed cognition research in educational technology ignores these debates. Instead, this research is conditioned by the discursive practices of a neoliberal assemblage of political, commercial and pedagogical institutions. In this era of high stakes testing, as the individual student is measured, evaluated and otherwise made subject through these practices, this assemblage expresses a tacit commitment to, and is productive of, the subjectivity of the individual student and thus benefits from the representational theory of mind. In this way, regardless of the recognized legitimacy of the theory of the extended mind, sustained by neoliberalism the field of educational technology will not soon question the veracity of the representational theory of mind or the mind/body dualism upon which it depends.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The theory of the extended mind is one choice from among many and it has many variations. What I discuss may be closer to “radical embodied cognitive science” (see: Chemero 2013).
Neoliberalism, as a theory of political economy, emphasizes market deregulation, privatization, reduced government spending, matters of accountability and market-driven competition (De Lissovoy 2013; Egea 2014; Peters 2011). Neoliberalism is associated with the economic policies of President Reagan and Prime Minister Thatcher in the 1980s. In the field of education, neoliberalism is associated with efforts to privatize public schooling, the deskilling of teachers and with the accountability movement.
In discourse analysis, to “trace” is to consider the relations of power through which contemporary discourses emerge from and appropriate aspects of, historically specific discourses (Olssen 2014).
Across the cognitive sciences, there are proponents of an extended mind that entertain theories of representationalism—theories of mind that assume an embodied subject (Spackman and Yanchar 2014). Such positions are consistent with an intellectual history of distributed cognition that takes little notice of this contradiction. It combines aspects of cognitive psychology and the representational theory of mind, tracing to Descartes, with an ecological psychology, tracing to Charles Darwin and Henry James (Chemero 2013).
Needing to forge some kind of connection between mind and body for explanatory purposes, there are historical references to the pineal gland. More recent references are to the cerebral cortex (Toulmin 1982).
References
Adams, Frederick, and Kenneth Aizawa. 2008. The bounds of cognition. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Angeli, Charula. 2008. Distributed cognition: A framework for understanding the role of computers in classroom teaching and learning. Journal of Research On Technology In Education 40(3): 271–279.
Arribas-Ayloon, Michael, and Valerie Walkerdine. 2017. Foucauldian discourse analysis. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, ed. C. Willig and W. Stainton-Rogers, 110–123. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Bertucio, Brett. 2017. The Cartesian heritage of Bloom’s taxonomy. Studies in Philosophy and Education 36(4): 477–497.
Chemero, Anthony. 2009. Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Chemero, Anthony. 2013. Radical embodied cognitive science. Review of General Psychology 17(2): 145–150.
Clark, Andy. 2011. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press.
Clark, Andy, and David Chalmers. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58: 7–19.
Crossley, Nick. 2001. The social body: Habit, identity and desire. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De Lissovoy, Noah. 2013. Pedagogy of the impossible: Neoliberalism and the ideology of accountability. Policy Futures in Education 11(4): 423–435.
Egea, Oscar Moltó. 2014. Neoliberalism, education and the integration of ICT in schools. A critical reading. Technology, Pedagogy & Education 23(2): 267–283.
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The history of sexuality. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/knowledge selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel. 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry 8(4): 777–795.
Gibson, James. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hammond, Michael. 2010. What is an affordance and can it help us understand the use of ICT in education? Education & Information Technologies 15(3): 205–217.
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simian, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ingold, Tim. 2000. The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. New York, NY: Routledge.
Klein, Elise. 2017. Developing minds: Psychology, neoliberalism and power. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Lewin, David. 2016. The pharmakon of educational technology: The disruptive power of attention in education. Studies in Philosophy & Education 35(3): 251–265.
Martin, Lee. 2012. Connection, translation, off-loading, and monitoring: A framework for characterizing the pedagogical functions of educational technologies. Technology, Knowledge & Learning 17(3): 87–107.
Menary, Richard. 2007a. Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Menary, Richard. 2007b. Writing as thinking. Language Sciences 29(5): 621–632.
Menary, Richard. 2010a. The extended mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Menary, Richard. 2010b. The holy grail of cognitivism: A response to Adams and Aizawa. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9(4): 605–618.
Morgan, Michael, Gwyn Brickell, and Barry Harper. 2008. Applying distributed cognition theory to the redesign of the ‘copy and paste’ function in order to promote appropriate learning outcomes. Computers & Education 50(1): 125–147.
Newhouse, C.Paul. 2015. Using digital technologies to improve the authenticity of performance assessment for high-stakes purposes. Technology, Pedagogy And Education 24(1): 17–33.
Olssen, Mark. 2014. Discourse, complexity, normativity: Tracing the elaboration of Foucault’s materialist concept of discourse. Open Review of Educational Research 1(1): 28–55.
Pea, Roy. 1993. Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, ed. G. Salomon, 47–87. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pea, Roy. 2004. The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13(3): 423–451.
Peters, Michael. 2011. Neoliberalism and after: Education, social policy, and the crisis of Western capitalism. New York: Peter Lang.
Popkewitz, Thomas. 1992. Cartesian anxiety, linguistic communism, and reading texts. Educational Researcher 21(5): 11–15.
Rose, Nikolas. 1996. Inventing ourselves: Psychology, power, and personhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Salomon, Gavriel. 1993. No distribution without individuals’ cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, ed. Gavriel Salomon, 111–138. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Salomon, Gavriel, David Perkins, and Tamar Globerson. 1991. Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher 20(3): 2–9.
Sawyer, R.Keith, and James G. Greeno. 2009. Situativity and learning. In The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, ed. Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede, 347–367. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, Neil H. 2008. Exploiting the use of technology to teach: The value of distributed cognition. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 40: 389–404.
Shapiro, Lawrence. 2011. Embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.
Shutkin, David. 1997. Schooling in an age of information: Governmental rationality & the care of the child. Quarterly Journal of Ideology 20(3&4): 99–166.
Shutkin, David 2004. Thinking of the other: Constructivist discourse and cultural difference in the field of educational technology. Journal of Educational Thought 38(1): 67–93.
Sørensen, Estrid. 2012. The mind and distributed cognition: The place of knowing in a maths class. Theory & Psychology 22(6): 717–737.
Spackman, Jonathan, and Stephen Yanchar. 2014. Embodied cognition, representationalism, and mechanism: A review and analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44(1): 46–79.
Spring, Joel. 2016. American education, 17th ed. New York: Routledge.
Toulmin, Stephen. 1982. The return to cosmology: Postmodern science and the theology of nature. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
Valanides, Nicos, and Charoula Angeli. 2008. Distributed cognition in a sixth-grade classroom: An attempt to overcome alternative conceptions about light and color. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 40(3): 309–336.
Valsiner, Jaan, and Alberto Rosa. 2007. The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Van Gelder, Tim. 1995. What might cognition be, if not computation? The Journal of Philosophy 92(7): 345–381.
Vassallo, Stephen. 2013. Critical pedagogy and neoliberalism: Concerns with teaching self-regulated learning. Studies in Philosophy & Education 32(6): 563–580.
Venn, Couze. 1984. The subject of psychology. In Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity, ed. Jules Henriques, Wendy Hollway, Cathy Urwin, Couze Venn, and Valerie Walkerdine, 119–152. New York: Methuen.
Youdell, Deborah. 2006. Impossible bodies, impossible selves: Exclusions and student subjectivities. London: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shutkin, D. Representationalism and Power: The Individual Subject and Distributed Cognition in the Field of Educational Technology. Stud Philos Educ 38, 481–498 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09674-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09674-z