Abstract
The press and scholars alike often bemoan the failure of civil public deliberation. Yet this insistence on civility excludes people who engage in adversarial tactics, limiting the ideas that are heard within deliberation. Drawing on a deliberative dialogue that occurred in Charlottesville, Virginia, in the aftermath of the deadly White Supremacist rally of 2017, this article reveals how the capacity of deliberation to be inclusive of diverse voices depends upon deliberators’ orientation to learn from people who do not participate in deliberation. While much scholarship attends to learning for democracy, as in the preparation of young citizens, this article shows the significance of learning in democracy, as in the capacity of adults to learn in the midst of political strife.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“Privilege” is a popular but complex construct. It can be reductive, seeming to collapse complex personal histories into one-dimensional characteristics such as race or sex. However I refer to it here to acknowledge that (particularly non-Jewish and non-Muslim) White men experience a different relationship to the threat of violence posed by the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville than do groups who were targeted. Deliberative theorists have also written extensively on how dominant groups occupy a higher status position within public discourse (e.g. Mansbridge et al. 2010; Young 2002).
References
Allen, D. 2006. Talking to strangers: Anxieties of citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Allen, D. 2016. Education and equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Arcilla, R. 2018. Education without learning. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
Beinhardt, P. 2017. A violent attack on free speech at Middlebury. The Atlantic Monthly. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/middlebury-free-speech-violence/518667/. Accessed May 2019.
Boler, M. 2004. All speech is not free: The ethics of affirmative action pedagogy. Counterpoints 240: 3–13.
Burbules, N.C. 2004. Introduction. In Democratic dialogue in education: Troubling speech, disturbing silence, ed. M. Boler. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Burbules, N.C. 2018. Philosophy of education. In International handbook of philosophy of education, ed. P. Smeyers, 1417–1427. Cham: Springer.
Davidson, K.L., and M.S. Moses. 2015. Speaking across difference in community dialogues on affirmative action policy. In Intergroup dialogue: Engaging difference, social identities and social justice, ed. X. Zúñiga, G. Lopez, and K.A. Ford, 217–236. London: Routledge.
Dewey, J. 1916. Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Retrieved from http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/DewDemo.html.
Dewey, J. 1939. Creative democracy: The task before us, 227–233. www.fairfield.edu/faculty/hodgson/courses/progress/Dewey.pdf. Accessed May 2019.
de Souza, N. 2017. An interview with Charles Taylor. In Herder: Philosophy and anthropology, eds. A. Waldow, and N. DeSouza, 13–29. Oxford University Press.
Dobson, A. 2014. Listening for democracy: Recognition, representation, reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J.S. 2005. Deliberative democracy in divided societies: Alternatives to agonism and analgesia. Political Theory 33(2): 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704268372.
Elliott, D. 2019 ‘Hear me by any means necessary’: Charlottesville City Council forced to redefine civility. National Public Radio, Special Series: Civility Wars. https://www.npr.org/2019/03/20/704902802/hear-me-by-any-means-necessary-charlottesville-is-forced-to-redefine-civility. Accessed May 2019.
Ferkany, M. 2018. Open-mindedness and reasonable charity, or how to be open-minded without your brains falling out, paper presented at 2018 Educational Theory. Champaign, Urbana, IL: Fall Institute.
Fraser, N. 1990. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25/26: 56–80.
Fung, A. 2005. Deliberation before the revolution: Toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world. Political Theory 33(3): 397–419.
Godwin, P. 2017. Charlottesville hatred and violence a disgrace to the United States of America [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.listenfirstproject.org/listen-first-blog/2017/8/14/charlottesville-hatred-and-violence-a-disgrace-to-the-united-states-of-america.
Habermas, J. 1975. Legitimation crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action: Vol. I: Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1981).
Habermas, J. 2018. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (W. Rehg, Trans). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. (Original work published 1992).
Hess, D.E., and P. McAvoy. 2014. The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Honig, B. 2014. What is agonism for? Reply to Woodford, Finlayson. Stears. Contemporary Political Theory 13(2): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2013.40.
Jones, A. 2004. Talking cure: The desire for dialogue. Counterpoints 240: 57–67.
Kohn, M. 2000. Language, power, and persuasion: Toward a critique of deliberative democracy. Constellations 7(3): 408–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00197.
Levinson, M. 2003. Challenging deliberation. School Field 1(1): 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878503001001003.
Listen First. (n.d.). Listen First in Charlottesville. Retrieved from http://www.listenfirstproject.org/listen-first-in-charlottesville-event/.
Lynch, C. 2017. Stop the hatred on both sides. Retrieved from http://cissiegrahamlynch.com/stop-hatred-sides/.
Mansbridge, J., J. Bohman, S. Chambers, D. Estlund, A. Føllesdal, A. Fung, and J.L. Martí. 2010. The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1): 64–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00344.x.
McCoy, M.L., and P.L. Scully. 2002. Deliberative dialogue to expand civic engagement: What kind of talk does democracy need? National Civic Review 91(2): 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.91202.
Mouffe, C. 1999. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social research 745–758.
Mouffe, C. 2000. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Vienna: Institut für Höhere Studien (HIS)/Institute for Advanced studies. Retrieved from https://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_72.pdf.
Parker, W.C. 2010. Listening to strangers: Classroom discussion in democratic education. Teachers College Record 112(11): 2815–2832.
Parkinson, J., and J. Mansbridge (eds.). 2012. Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, J. 1971/2009. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rubin, H.J., and I.S. Rubin. 2011. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Ruitenberg, C. 2009. Educating political adversaries: Chantal Mouffe and radical democratic citizenship education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 28(3): 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-008-9122-2.
Sanders, L.M. 1997. Against deliberation. Political Theory 25(3): 347–376.
Stolberg, S. 2017. Hurt and angry, Charlottesville tries to regroup from violence. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/13/us/charlottesville-protests-white-nationalists.html?action=click&module=RelatedCoverage&pgtype=Article®ion=Footer. Accessed May 2019.
Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Valentini, L. 2012. Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: A conceptual map. Philosophy Compass 7(9): 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00500.x.
Wahl, R., and S.K. White. 2017. Deliberation, accountability, and legitimacy: A case study of police-community forums. Polity 49(4): 489–517.
Wells, A. S., Holme, J. J., & Scott, J. T. (n.d.). AERA 2019 annual meeting call for submissions. Retrieved from http://www.aera.net/Portals/38/AERA_AM2019_CallforSubmissions_FINAL_1.pdf.
Wilson, T.S., and D.A. Santoro. 2015. Philosophy pursued through empirical research: Introduction to the special issue. Studies in Philosophy and Education 34(2): 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-015-9460-9.
Young, I.M. 2001. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory 29(5): 670–690.
Young, I.M. 2002. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
Zimmerman, J., and E. Robertson. 2017. The case for contention: Teaching controversial issues in American schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wahl, R. Learning in Democracy: Deliberation and Activism as Forms of Education. Stud Philos Educ 38, 517–536 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09671-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09671-2