Abstract
Within educational philosophy and theory, there has been an international re-turn to envision study as an alternative formation to disrupt the defining learning logic. As an enrichment, this paper articulates “Daoist onto-un-learning” as an Eastern form of study, drawing upon Roger Ames’s (Confucian role ethics: a vocabulary, Chinese University Press, Hong Kong, 2011) interpretation of the ancient Chinese correlative cosmology and relational personhood thinking. This articulation is to dialogue with the conceptualizations of study (with) shared by Giorgio Agamben, Derek Ford, and Tyson Lewis, and unfolds in three steps. First, I examine how their conceptualizations of study (with) constrain the studier-doing-study logic as a commonsensical expression of “foundational individualism” (Rosemont and Ames in Confucian role ethics: a moral vision for the 21st century?, VetR Unipress, Göttingen, 2016) and anthropocentric disordering (Harari in Sapiens: a brief history of humankind, Vintage, London, 2015). Second, re-invoking the ancient Chinese wisdom, I envision “Daoist onto-un-learning” as a non-individualistic and non-anthropocentric form of study, re-configuring study and learning no longer as two disparate, if not necessarily oppositional, formations but into a Daoist bipolar yin-yang movement. Finally, I story-tell my doctoral research experience as a Daoist onto-un-learning journey, a spiralling learning-study movement, to unpack the ways it suspends and overturns the modern-Western(nized) trap/trope of anthropocentric-foundational individualism. In so doing, this paper further internationalizes and supplements the current study scholarship in relation to learning in a way so-far hardly explored yet cross-culturally provocative.
References
Agamben, G. 1995. The idea of prose. New York: SUNY Press.
Agamben, G. 1999. Potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy (Ed. and Trans. By D. Heller-Roazen). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G. 2005. The time that remains: A commentary on the letter to the Romans (P. Dailey, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G. 2009. The signature of all things: On method. New York: Zone Books.
Ames, R.T. 2011. Confucian role ethics: A vocabulary. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Agamben, G. (2015). The use of bodies. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press
Autio, T. 2016. Reactivating templates for international curriculum consciousness. In Theorizing teaching and learning in Asia and Europe, ed. J.C.K. Lee and K.J. Kerry, 38–54. London and New York: Routledge.
Biesta, G.J.J. 2006. Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Derrida, J. 1993. Aporias (T. Gutoit, Trans.). California: Stanford University Press.
Ford, D. 2016. Communist study: Education for the commons. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Ford, D. 2017. Study like a communist: Affect, the Party, and the educational limits to capitalism. Educational Philosophy and Theory 49(5): 452–461.
Foucault, M. 1973. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books.
Harney, S., and F. Moten. 2013. The undercommons: Fugitive planning and black study. New York: Minor compositions.
Harari, Y.N. 2015. Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. London: Vintage.
Lewis, T.E. 2013. On study: Giorgio Agamben and educational potentiality. New York: Routledge.
Lewis, T.E. 2014. The fundamental ontology of study. Educational Theory 64(2): 163–178.
Lewis, T.E., and D. Friedrich. 2016. Educational states of suspension. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 48(3): 237–250.
Lewis, T.E. 2018a. Inoperative learning: A radical rethinking of educational potentiality. New York: Routledge.
Lewis, T.E. 2018b. Response to Zhao. Studies in Philosophy and Education.
Lewis, T.E., and S. Alirezabeigi. 2018. Studying with the internet: Giorgio Agamben, education, and new digital technologies. Studies in Philosophy and Education 37(4): 553–566.
Masschelein, J. 2017. Some notes on the university as studium: A place of public collective study. In Reconceptualizing study in educational discourse and practice, ed. C.W. Ruitenberg, 40–53. New York and London: Routledge.
Rosemont, H., and R.T. Ames. 2016. Confucian role ethics: A moral vision for the 21st century?. Göttingen: VetR Unipress.
Ruitenberg, C.W. (ed.). 2017. Reconceptualizing study in educational discourse and practice. New York and London: Routledge.
Simons, M., and J. Masschelein. 2008. The governmentalization of learning and the assemblage of a learning apparatus. Educational Theory 58(4): 319–415.
Sousa Santos, B. 2016. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. New York: Routledge.
Tröhler, D. 2013. Languages of education: Protestant legacies, national identities, and global aspirations. New York: Routledge.
Vlieghe, J., and T.E. Lewis. 2017. Temporality, pleasure, and the angelic in teaching: Toward a pictorial-ontological turn in education. Journal of Aesthetic Education 51(2): 59–81.
Zhao, W. 2017. Review of Derek R. Ford, communist study: Education for the commons. Studies in Philosophy and Education 36(2): 217–223.
Zhao, W. 2018a. Historicizing Tianrenheyi as correlative cosmology for rethinking education in modern china and beyond. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1517646
Zhao, W. 2018b. Review of Tyson Lewis, inoperative learning: A radical rethinking of educational potentiality. Studies in Philosophy and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-018-9635-2
Zhao, W. 2019. China’s education, curriculum knowledge, and cultural inscriptions: Dancing with the wind. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, W. Daoist Onto-Un-Learning as a Radical Form of Study: Re-imagining Study and Learning from an Eastern Perspective. Stud Philos Educ 38, 261–273 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09660-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09660-5