Abstract
Fierce debates over standardized assessments in teacher preparation have revolved around flaws in implementation and the politics of privatization. While important, this focus obscures the philosophical divide between proponents and opponents of standardized assessments. This article examines how faculty in New York State argue for and against a controversial performance assessment for teacher candidates, the edTPA. Revealing the distinctive ways that teacher educators on opposing sides of this debate understand the nature of knowledge, human development, professionalism, and social justice clarifies what is at stake in debates over how to prepare teachers. Such clarification can deepen the discussion on how to evaluate learning and growth as well as enrich the conversation on how to protect the integrity of educational professions and practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For an example of such a conference, see the conference on which this article draws: “EdTPA: Challenges, Initiatives, Questions” at Barnard College, March 8, 2014, https://ourtc.wordpress.com/2014/03/07/edtpa-conference-tomorrow-at-barnard/. For faculty and student networks and boycotts see for example #ResistedTPA from the University of Illinois and Can’t Be Neutral (cantbeneutral.org) at the University of Massachusetts.
For example see New York State Assembly Bill A09207B http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld=&bn=A09207&term=2013&Summary=Y&Mmo=Y&Text=Y.
References
AACTE. n.d. About edTPA. http://edtpa.aacte.org/about-edtpa. Last accessed 10 Aug 15.
AACTE-b n.d. Frequently asked questions. http://edtpa.aacte.org/faq#51. Last accessed 10 Aug 15.
Badgett, K., J. Decman, and C. Carman. 2013. National implications: The impact of teacher graduate degrees on student math assessments. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal 23(3): 1–18.
Ballou, D., and M. Podgursky. 2000. Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: What is the evidence? Teachers College Record 102(1): 5–27.
Bruun, H. 2012. Science, values and politics in Max Weber’s methodology: New expanded edition. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). 2013. CAEP accreditation standards and evidence: Aspirations for educator preparation. http://edsource.org/wp-content/uploads/commrpt.pdf. Last accessed 10 Aug 15.
Cochran-Smith, M., and M. Fries. 2001. Sticks, stones, and ideology: The discourse of reform in teacher education. Educational Researcher 30(8): 3–15.
Crowe, E. 2011. Race to the top and teacher preparation. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education/report/2011/03/01/9329/race-to-the-top-and-teacher-preparation/. Last accessed 10 Aug 15.
Darling-Hammond, L. 2000. Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: Debating the evidence. Teachers College Record 102(1): 28–56.
Darling-Hammond, L., R. Chung, and F. Frelow. 2002. Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education 53(4): 286–302.
DeMoss, K. forthcoming. New York’s edTPA: A long, unwinding road towards solving the wrong problem. In Taking [on] the exams: Teacher performance assessment in an age of accountability, ed. J. Carter and H. Lochte. London: Palgrave McMillan.
Duncan, A. 2009. Teacher preparation: Reforming the uncertain profession. Remarks of Secretary Arne Duncan at Teachers College, Columbia University. United States Department of Education. http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/teacher-preparation-reforming-uncertain-profession. Last accessed 10 Aug 15.
Goldhaber, D. and S. Liddle. 2012. The gateway to the profession: Assessing teacher preparation programs based on student achievement. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
Habermas, J., and T. McCarthy. 1985. The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason, vol. 2. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hansen, D.T. 2001. Exploring the moral heart of teaching: Toward a teacher’s creed. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hersh, R. 2004. Assessment and accountability: Unveiling the student learning factor in higher education. In Presentation for AAHE national assessment conference Denver. http://www.teaglefoundation.org/teagle/media/library/documents/resources/200406_hersh.pdf. Last accessed 10 Aug 15.
Higgins, C. 2011. The good life of teaching: An ethics of professional practice, vol. 22. New York: Wiley.
Hillary, A. and M. Brabeck. 2014. One hundred years of standards for teacher preparation reform: Comparisons with CAEP standards. Unpublished manuscript.
Murphy, C. 2012. The role of subject knowledge in primary prospective teachers’ approaches to teaching the topic of area. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 15(3): 187–206.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). 2010. Report of the Blue Ribbon Panel on clinical preparation and partnerships for improved student learning: Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers.
Nelson, C. 2015. Salary isn’t the only measure. Inside higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2015/09/14/essay-criticizes-obama-administrations-new-scorecard-colleges. Last accessed 10 Aug 15.
New York State Dept. of Education, Office of Teaching Initiatives. n.d. EdTPA safety net. http://www.highered.nysed.gov/tcert/certificate/certexamsedtpa.html. Last accessed 10 Aug 15.
New York State Dept. of Education. n.d.-B. Data NYSED. http://data.nysed.gov/lists.php?type=higher.
SCALE. n.d. edTPA for New York State. http://www.edtpa.com/PageView.aspx?f=GEN_NewYork.html. Last accessed 10 Aug 15.
United University Professions. n.d. UUP takes edTPA debate to AFT stage. http://uupinfo.org/communications/uupdate/1314/140414.php.
Wall, A., D. Hursh, and J. Rodgers. 2014. Assessment for whom: Repositioning higher education assessment as an ethical and value-focused social practice. Research and Practice in Assessment 9(1): 5–17.
Van Zandt, D. 22 October, 2012. Holding all universities accountable for student outcomes. The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-van-zandt/holding-all-universities-_b_2001008.html.
Acknowledgments
I gratefully acknowledge the Spencer Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation for supporting this research. I am also grateful to Mary Brabeck, Anna Hillary, Sahtiya Hammell, Lauren Ware, and Danielle Wingfield for their contribution to the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wahl, R. What Can Be Known and How People Grow: The Philosophical Stakes of the Assessment Debate. Stud Philos Educ 36, 499–515 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9525-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9525-4