Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Eclipse of Imagination Within Educational ‘Official’ Framework and Why It Should be Returned to Educational Discourse: A Deweyan Perspective

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent decades, the shift towards the “learnification” of educational discourse has de facto reframed educational purposes and schooling practice, thus reframing what students should know, strive for, and, in a sense, be. In this paper, given the efforts to disrupt the dominance of learning discourse, I seek to engage regarding a specific concern, namely, the progressive removal of imagination within educational official framework. Indeed, imagination has virtually disappeared from the documents, publications, web pages and recommendations of major educational agencies and institutions worldwide, with important and potentially damaging consequences for schooling, teaching and learning. Employing a Deweyan perspective, I argue that imagination plays a crucial role in the creation of pivotal educational features and phenomena, such as knowledge, inquiry, choice and deliberation, critical agency, meaning creation, and, importantly, the openness of possibilities. Therefore, the eclipse of imagination becomes, at the very same time, the eclipse of education; nurturing imagination is about nurturing education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a detailed analysis of the sentence “[t]he engagement of the imagination is the only thing that makes any activity more than mechanical” and the relation between imagination and judgment, refer to Rømer (2012, p. 141).

  2. Even recognizing what might initially appear to be ‘basic’ elements of our environment and culture—for instance, the differences between a smile and a smirk or between a computer and a television—requires, at an early age, a learning process composed of continuous cultural interactions and trial and error.

  3. For a thoughtful analysis of leaping as related to education see Ramaekers and Vlieghe (2014).

  4. A suitable example is PISA’s questionnaire, especially the part concerning questions about students’ families (OECD 2012).

References

  • Alexander, R. 2011. Evidence, rhetoric and collateral damage: the problematic pursuit of ‘world class’ standards. Cambridge Journal of Education 41(3): 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, W. 2011. Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the twenty-first century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies 43(1): 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.J. 2003. The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy 18: 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R.J. 1961. John Dewey’s metaphysics of experience. The Journal of Philosophy 58(1): 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R.J. 2010. Pragmatism and hermeneutics. In John Dewey and the continental philosophy, ed. P. Farfield, 148–160. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 1994. Pragmatism as a pedagogy of communicative action. Studies in Philosophy and Education 13: 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2004. Against learning. Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik 23: 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2006. Beyond learning democratic education for a human future. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2007a. Towards the knowledge democracy? Knowledge production and the civic role of the university. Studies in Philosophy and Education 26: 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2007b. Why ‘what works’ won’t work. Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit of educational research. Educational Theory 57(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2009. Witnessing deconstruction in education: Why quasi-transcendentalism matters. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43(3): 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2010a. Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 29: 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2010b. Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2011. Philosophy, exposure, and children: How to resist the instrumentalisation of philosophy in education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45(2): 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2013. Interrupting the politics of learning. Power and Education 5(1): 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2014. The beautiful risk of education. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2015a. What is education for? on good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education 50(1): 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2015b. Freeing teaching from learning: Opening up existential possibilities in educational relationships. Studies in Philosophy and Education 34: 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J., and N.C. Burbules. 2003. Pragmatism and educational research. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisvert, R.D. 1998. John Dewey: Rethinking our time. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. 2012. The (absent) politics of neo-liberal education policy. Critical Studies in Education 53(3): 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. 2013. The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education 54(2): 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1910. How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath & Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1913. Interest and effort in education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1917. The need for a recovery of philosophy. In Creative intelligence. Essays in the pragmatic attitude, ed. J. Dewey, et al., 3–69. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1922. Human nature and conduct. An introduction to social psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1929 [1925]. Experience and nature. London: George Allen & Unwin.

  • Dewey, J. 1929b. The quest for certainty: A study of the relation between knowledge and action. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1930 [1916]. Democracy and education. An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The MacMillan Company.

  • Dewey, J. 1938. Logic. The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1980 [1934]. Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.

  • EU 2000. A memorandum on lifelong learning Commission of European Communities. http://arhiv.acs.si/dokumenti/Memorandum_on_Lifelong_Learning.pdf.

  • EU 2012. Rethinking education. http://ec.europa.eu/languages/policy/strategic-framework/rethinking-education_en.htm. European Commission homepage. http://ec.europa.eu/education/.

  • EU 2015. Education and training. http://ec.europa.eu/education/.

  • Fielding, M., and P. Moss. 2011. Radical education and the common school: A democratic alternative. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. 1994. Realism, Deweyan pragmatism and educational research. Educational Researcher 23(1): 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. 1998. Foucault, Dewey and self-creation. Educational Philosophy and Theory 30(2): 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. 2003. Dewey, Derrida and the ‘double bind’. Educational Philosophy and Theory 35(3): 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, D. 2006. John Dewey, Robert Pirsig, and the art of living: revisioning aesthetic education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. 1995. Releasing the imagination: Essay on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grierson, E. 2011. Art and creativity in the global economies of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43(4): 336–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammershöj, M.J. 2009. Creativity as a question of Bildung. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43(4): 545–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D.T. 2009. Dewey and Cosmopolitanism. E&C/Education & Culture 25(2): 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, G. 2008. Exploring the imagination to establish frameworks for learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education 27: 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helström, T.G. 2011. Aesthetic creativity: Insights from classical theory on creative learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43(4): 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, L.A. 2007. Pragmatism as post-postmodernism: Lessons from John Dewey. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, C. 2009. Modest beginnings of a radical revision of the concept of imagination. In The imagination in education: Extending the boundaries of theory and practice, ed. S. Blenkinsop, 2–19. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, P. 2010. The new significance of learning: Imagination heartwork. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. 2014. The fundamental ontology of study. Educational Theory 64(2): 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. 2015. Suspending the ontology of effectiveness in education. Reclaiming the theatrical gestures of the ineffective teacher. In Art’s teaching, teaching arts. Philosophical, critical and educational musings, ed. T. Lewis, and M. Laverty, 165–178. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. 1966 [1955]. Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into freud. Boston: Beacon Press.

  • Marginson, S. 2008. Academic creativity under new public management. Educational Theory 58(3): 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masschelein, J., and M. Simons. 2008. The governmentalization of learning and the assemblage of apparatus. Educational Theory 58(4): 391–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N. 2013. Creativeness and creativity. Educational Philosophy and Theory 10(1): 1265–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD 2012. PISA’s questionnaire. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pdf/MS12_StQ_FormA_ENG_USA_final.pdf.

  • OECD 2014. PISA 2012 results in focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf.

  • OECD homepage 2015. http://www.oecd.org/edu/.

  • Pinar, W.P. 1998. The passionate mind of maxine greene ‘I am… not yet’. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, S., and J. Whitty. 1996. Teaching new subjects? The hidden curriculum of marketised education systems. Melbourne Studies in Education 37(2): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaekers, S., and J. Vlieghe. 2014. Education, childhood and language in Agamben and Cavell. Ethics and Education 9(3): 292–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rømer, T.A. 2012. Imagination and judgment in John Dewey’s philosophy: intelligent transactions in a democratic context. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44(2): 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rømer, T.A. 2013. Nature, education and things. Studies in Philosophy and Education 32: 641–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. 2003. Deleuze’s new image of thought, or Dewey revisited. Educational Philosophy and Theory 35(1): 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, M. 2006. Learning as investment: Notes on governmentality and biopolitics. Educational Philosophy and Theory 38(4): 523–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeyers, P., and M. Depaepe (eds.). 2006. Educational research: Why ‘what works’ doesn’t work. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer-Bacon, B. 2008. Democracies-always-in-the-making: Maxine Greene’s influence. Educational Studies 44: 256–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, S. 2009. Toward an imperfect education: Facing humanity, rethinking cosmopolitanism. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education homepage 2015. http://www.ed.gov/.

  • Vlieghe, J. 2010. Judith Butler and the public dimension of the body: education, critique and corporeal vulnerability. Journal of Philosophy of Education 44(1): 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • What Works Clearinghouse, 2015a. Homepage. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.

  • What Works Clearinghouse, 2015b. WWC intervention report. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/interventionreport.aspx?sid=638.

  • Wilshire, B. 1993. Body–mind and subconsciousness: Tragedy in Dewey’s life and work. In Philosophy and the reconstruction of culture, ed. J.J. Stuhr, 257–272. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasco d’Agnese.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

d’Agnese, V. The Eclipse of Imagination Within Educational ‘Official’ Framework and Why It Should be Returned to Educational Discourse: A Deweyan Perspective. Stud Philos Educ 36, 443–462 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9511-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9511-x

Keywords

Navigation