Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Action Research to Enrich Learning in e-Tutoring for Remote Schools

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because students in remote areas face unequal learning opportunities, the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan commenced a benchmark program in 2006 known as the Online Tutoring for After-School Learning project. The present study conducted action research on the Online Tutoring project with a university and two elementary schools in remote areas as co-participants. The purpose of this research was to facilitate continual interactions between tutors and tutees and to improve the tutors’ skills in teaching, providing companionship to tutees, and solving problems encountered by tutees as well as to identify teaching-material improvements that had to be made. Data were gathered and analyzed through the whole process. Several problems were identified in the early stage of the tutoring project, after the problems were clarified according to the action research process, a discussion was conducted with the participants to formulate appropriate solutions for intervention and improvement. As revealed in reflection and evaluation, the Online Tutoring project was a mutually encouraging and mutual-growth experience for both the tutors and tutees. Substantial changes were noted in tutees’ learning motivation and perspectives. Through providing tutoring services, the tutors understood the process of distance teaching and improved their skills in digital teaching-material preparation and distance teaching. The results of this action research enhance the understanding of problems in education in remote areas and the effectiveness of online tutoring, thereby reinforcing the mutual learning and development of tutors and tutees. The academic achievements and learning attitudes of remote students have changed in positive ways and the tutors have improved their practice and social responsibilities in distance teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates L (2010) Service-learning as strategy of aging and environment: developing generations of socially responsible interior designers. Master dissertation, Iowa State University, Iowa, IA. https://search.proquest.com/docview/506691047/B62716396C284DDFPQ/1?accountid=14228

  • Bell M (2010) What about our digital-divide have-nots? MultiMedia Internet@Schools 17(6):24

    Google Scholar 

  • Celano D, Neuman SB (2010) Roadblocks on the information highway. Educ Leadersh 68(3):50–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang YJ, Wang TY, Chen SF, Liao RH (2011) Student engineers as agents of change: combining social inclusion in the professional development of electrical and computer engineering students. Syst Pract Action Res 24(3):237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanlin LJ, Lin HY, Lu TH (2012) College students’ service learning experiences from e-tutoring children in remote areas. Procd Soc Behv 46:450–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CH, Liao CH, Chen YC, Lee CF (2011) The integration of synchronous communication technology into service learning for pre-service teachers’ online tutoring of middle school students. Internet High Educ 14(1):27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SH, Ho HF, Yang CC (2012) Change and dilemma of school feature development of three junior high schools in the remote and rural areas of Taiwan. Int Educ Stud 5(3):49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien CF, Liao CJ, Walters BG, Lee CY (2016) Measuring the moral reasoning competencies of service-learning e-tutors. Educ Technol Soc 19(3):269–281

  • Chien CF, Liao CJ, Walters BG (2017) Enriching service-learning by developing e-tutoring in foster homes. Syst Pract Action Res 31:221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan D, Brannick T (2014) Doing action research in your own organization, 4th edn. SAGE, London, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Delacruz EM (2009) Art education aims in the age of new media: moving toward global civil society. Art Educ 62(5):13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1933) How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1938) Experience and education. Collier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick B, Stringer E, Huxham C (2009) Theory in action research. Action Res 7(5):5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL (2010) The relationship of ‘systems thinking’ to action research. Syst Pract Action Res 23(4):269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby B (1996) Service-learning in higher education: concepts and practices. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Jill B, Penny D (2010) Library design, learning spaces and academic literacy. New Libr World 111(11/12):480–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb D (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhne GW, Quigley BA (1997) Understanding and using action research in practice settings. New Dir Adult Cont Educ 73:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin BB, Rock TC (2003) The effects of collaborative action research on preservice and experienced teacher partners in professional development schools. J Teach Educ 54(2):135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CH, Liu EZF, Ko HW, Cheng SS (2008) Combination of service learning and pre-service teacher training via online tutoring. WSEAS Transactions on Communications 7(4):258–266

  • Maebuta J, Phan HP (2011) Determinants of quality learning in rural community high schools in Solomon Islands. Int J Learn 18(1):163–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Manolis C, Burns DJ (2011) Attitudes toward academic service learning semesters: a comparison of business students with nonbusiness students. J Scholarsh Teach Learn 11(1):13–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2019) After-school E-tutoring program in Taiwan. https://etutor.moe.gov.tw/zh/about/intro

  • Mitchem K, Kossar K, Ludlow BL (2006) Finite resources, increasing demands: rural children left behind? Educators speak out on issues facing rural special education. Rural Spec Educ Q 25(3):13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noffke S, Somekh B (eds) (2009) Handbook of educational action research. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Price JN, Valli L (2005) Preservice teachers becoming agents of change: pedagogical implications for action research. J Teach Educ 56(1):57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slattery P (2013) Curriculum development in the postmodern era: teaching and learning in an age of accountability, 3rd edn. Routledge, Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer ET (1996) Action research: a handbook for practitioners. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA

  • Taiwan PISA National Center (2014) Taiwan PISA 2012 short report. http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/data/TaiwanPISA2012ShortReport.PDF

  • Tossavainen PJ (2017) Co-create with stakeholders: action research approach in service development. Action Res 15(3):276–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Zhao Z (2011) Basic education curriculum reform in rural China. Chin Educ Soc 44(6):36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young DJ (1998) Rural and urban differences in student achievement in science and mathematics: a multilevel analysis. Sch Eff Sch Improv 9(4):386–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LC, Sheu TM, Wu SC (2016) Estimating adequate funding to meet performance standards for junior high school students: adequate funding comparisons between rural and non-rural schools in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences 61:43–67

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Online Tutoring Project was sponsored by Ministry of Education in Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civic Education and Leadership, National Taiwan Normal University, No. 162, Sec. 1, Heping E. Rd., Da’an Dist, Taipei City, 106, Taiwan

    Ruo-Lan Liu

  2. Center for Holistic Education, Office of Student Affairs, National Taiwan Normal University, No.162, Sec. 1, Heping E. Rd., Da’an Dist, Taipei City, 106, Taiwan

    Yu-Chi Li

Authors
  1. Ruo-Lan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu-Chi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Chi Li.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

This research involved human participants and they were all informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, RL., Li, YC. Action Research to Enrich Learning in e-Tutoring for Remote Schools. Syst Pract Action Res 33, 95–110 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-019-09517-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-019-09517-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation