Abstract
In this paper I reconstruct the central concept of the young Lukács’s and Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge, as they present it in their writings in the early decades of the twentieth century. I argue that this concept, namely Weltanschauung, is used to refer to some conceptually unstructured totality of feelings, which they take to be a condition of possibility of intellectual production, and this understanding is contrasted to an alternative construal of the term that presents it as logically structured, quasi-theoretical background knowledge. This concept has Kantian reminiscences: it is a condition of possibility of intellectual production in general. The young Mannheim and Lukács rely on ‘Weltanschauung’ so understood as a phenomenon mediating between the facts of society and individual intellectual production and reception: it is seen as being conditioned by sociological facts and therefore as a historical and sociological category through which, and therefore indirectly, society enters into intellectual production.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. L. (2003). The debate over the Geisteswissenschaften in German philosophy. In T. Baldwin (Ed.), The cambridge history of philosophy (pp. 1870–1945). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bloor, D. (1973). Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the sociology of mathematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2, 173–191.
Demeter, T. (2008). The sociological tradition of Hungarian philosophy. Studies in East European Thought, 60, 1–16.
Demeter, T. (2009). Can the strong program be generalized? Review of Sociology, 15, 5–16.
Geuss, R. (1981). Ideology. In T. Eagleton (Ed.), Ideology. London: Longman.
Hacking, I. (1985). Styles of scientific reasoning. In J. Rajchman & C. West (Eds.), Post-analytic philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hanna, R. (2005). Kant and nonconceptual content. European Journal of Philosophy, 13, 247–290.
Lukács, G. (1971). The theory of the novel. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Lukács, G. (1977). Megjegyzések az irodalomtörténet elméletéhez. In Á. Tímár (Ed.), Ifjúkori Művek. Budapest: Magvető.
Lukács, Gy. (1978). A modern dráma fejlődésének története. Budapest: Magvető.
Mannheim, K. (1952). On the interpretation of ‘Weltanschauung’. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
Mannheim, K. (1954). Ideology and utopia. London: Routledge.
Mannheim, K. (1980). Strukturen des Denkens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Mannheim, K. (1986). Conservatism: A contribution to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mannheim, K. (1993). The ideological and the sociological interpretation of intellectual phenomena. In K. H. Wolff (Ed.), From Karl Mannheim. New Brunswick: Transactions.
Reill, P. H. (2003). The legacy of the ‘scientific revolution’. In R. Porter (Ed.), Cambridge history of science: Eighteenth-century science (Vol. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seidel, M. (2011). Karl Mannheim, relativism and knowledge in the natural sciences—A deviant interpretation. In R. Schantz & M. Seidel (Eds.), The problem of relativism in the sociology of scientific knowledge. Frankfurt: Ontos.
Simmel, G. (1904). Kant. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.
Simmel, G. (2009). Conflict. In A. J. Blasi, A. K. Jacobs & M. Kanjirathinkal (Eds.), Sociology: Inquiries into the construction of social forms (Vol. 1).
Acknowledgment
I am indebted to István M. Fehér, Ferenc L. Lendvai, and Kristóf Nyíri for helpful comments and discussions. This paper and the collection have been financially supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA 79193).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Demeter, T. Weltanschauung as a priori: sociology of knowledge from a ‘romantic’ stance. Stud East Eur Thought 64, 39–52 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-012-9158-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-012-9158-2