Abstract
Norway is perceived as an egalitarian society, providing freedom for diverse minority groups to live their lives without facing discriminatory practices. However, the lived experiences of groups who simultaneously occupy multiple minority positions might be testimony to the complex ways a society enables or hinders identity formation. Taking an intersectional approach and drawing upon in-depth, semi-structured interviews with nine queer individuals with an ethnic minority background, we explored how they negotiate where they belong, relating to social and structural elements of Norwegian society. We also examined how having multiple minority positions may affect belonging to a collective where they are or are not problematized. We developed five themes from the participants’ interviews: 1) exclusion based on being visibly different, 2) having to explain oneself, 3) struggling with heteronormativity, 4) non-acceptance by family and ethnic ingroup, and 5) majority queer community as a place of exclusion. Our analysis underlines the potentially dilemmatic ‘nature’ of having multiple minority identities. Dealing with both majority’s expectations and demands and tackling the norms and demands of family and ethnic ingroup is construed as a problem by our participants. We detail and discuss the ways in which our participants experience and relate to majority culture, racism, and heteronormativity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data associated with the paper is available and can be accessed upon request by the editors/reviewers.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Anderssen, N., & Hellesund, T. (2009). Heteronormative consensus in the Norwegian same-sex adoption debate? Journal of Homosexuality, 56(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360802551597
Battle, J., & Crum, M. (2007). Black LGB health and well-being. In H. Meyer & M. Northridge (Eds.), The health of sexual minorities: Public health perspectives on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations (pp. 320–352). Springer Press.
Bowleg, L., Huang, J., Brooks, K., Black, A., & Burkholder, G. (2003). Triple jeopardy and beyond: Multiple minority stress and resilience among Black lesbians. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 7(4), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1300/J155v07n04_06
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Brooks, V. R. (1981). Minority stress and lesbian women. Lexington Books.
Bufdir (2014). Summary of research on living conditions and quality of life for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in Norway. https://bibliotek.bufdir.no/BUF/101/Lgbt_status_2014_Factbooklet.pdf
Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564
Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersections of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, Vol. 1989, Article 8. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8/
Dhamoon, R. K. (2011). Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910379227
Dowling, M. (2008). Reflexivity. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 748–749). Sage.
Eggebø, H., Stubberud, E., & Karlstrøm, H. (2018). Levekår blant skeive med innvandrerbakgrunn i Norge [Living conditions among queers with an immigrant background in Norway]. Nordlandsforskning Reports. https://www.kun.no/uploads/7/2/2/3/72237499/levek%C3%A5r_blant_skeive_med_innvandrerbakgrunn.pdf
Equaldex (2022). LGBT rights in Norway. https://www.equaldex.com/region/norway
Hagai, E. B., Annechino, R., Young, N., & Antin, T. (2020). Intersecting sexual identities, oppressions, and social justice work: Comparing LGBTQ Baby Boomers to Millennials who came of age after the 1980s AIDS epidemic. Journal of Social Issues, 76(4), 971–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12405
Fladmoe, A., Nadim, M., & Birkvad, S. R. (2019). Erfaringer med hatytringer og hets blant LHBT-personer, andre minoritetsgrupper og den øvrige befolkningen [Hate speech. Experiences among LGBT-people and other minority groups]. Oslo: Institutt for Samfunnsforskning Reports. https://www.bufdir.no/Global/Erfaringer_med_hat_ytringer_og_hets_blant_LHBT_personer_andre_minoritetsgrupper_og_den_ovrige_befolkningen.pdf
Frost, D. M. (2011). Social stigma and its consequences for the socially stigmatized. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(11), 824–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00394.x
Fuhrer, L. (2021). “The social meaning of skin color”: Interrogating the interrelation of phenotype/race and nation in Norway [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Oslo.
Giertsen, M. (2019). Heteronormativity prevails: A study of sexuality in Norwegian social work bachelor programs. Journal of Social Work Education, 55(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2018.1498415
Goldberg, A. (2016). The SAGE encyclopedia of LGBTQ studies. Sage.
Gullestad, M. (2002). Invisible fences: Egalitarianism, nationalism and racism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00098
Ibrahim, H. (2019). Racism in Norway: Africans and Norwegian-Africans understanding and experiences [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Ås, Norway. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2628334
ILGA-Europe (2022). Annual review of the human rights situation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and intersex people in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: ILGA-Europe. https://www.ilga-europe.org/annualreview/2022
Jacobsen, C. M. (2018). The (in)egalitarian dynamics of gender equality and homotolerance in contemporary Norway. In S. Bendixsen, M. Bringslid, & H. Vike Eds.), Egalitarianism in Scandinavia. Approaches to social inequality and difference (pp. 313–335). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59791-1_14
Judge, M. (2018). Blackwashing homophobia: Violence and the politics of sexuality, gender and race. Routledge.
Kaiser-Kalatran, H. (2021). Queer citizens and the perils of the neoliberal city: Racialized narratives of homophobic hate crime in Oslo. Norway. Sexualities, 26(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607211019365
Khan, M., Ilcisin, M., & Saxton, K. (2017). Multifactorial discrimination as a fundamental cause of mental health inequities. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0532-z
Kifo. (2022). Kartlegging av rasisme og diskriminering i møte med Oslo kommune [Mapping of racism and discrimination meeting with Oslo municipality]. https://www.kifo.no/ny-kifo-rapport-kartlegging-av-rasisme-og-diskriminering-i-mote-med-oslo-kommune/
Lehavot, K., Balsam, K. F., & Ibrahim-Wells, G. D. (2009). Redefining the American quilt: Definitions and experiences of community among ethnically diverse lesbian and bisexual women. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20305
Lick, D. J., Durso, L. E., & Johnson, K. L. (2013). Minority stress and physical health among sexual minorities. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 521–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613497965
Martiny, S., Froehlich, L., Soltanpanah, J., & Haugen, M. S. (2019). Young immigrants in Norway: The role of national and ethnic identity in immigrants’ integration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(2), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12594
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771-1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
Meyer, I. H. (2010). Identity, stress, and resilience in lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals of color. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(3), 442–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009351601
Midtbøen, A. H. (2019). Discrimination at work: The case of Norway. In J. Vassilopoulou, J. Brabet, & V. Showunmi (Eds.), Race discrimination and management of ethnic diversity and migration at work (Vol. 6) (pp. 153-173). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-233320190000006008
Mink, M. D., Lindley, L. L., & Weinstein, A. A. (2014). Stress, stigma, and sexual minority status: The intersectional ecology model of LGBTQ health. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 26(4), 502–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2014.953660
Myers, J. E., Sweeney, T. J., & White, V. E. (2002). Advocacy for counseling and counselors: A professional imperative. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80(4), 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00205.x
Norweigian Ministry of Children, Equality and Social Inclusion (2015). Likestilling i praksis –Like muligheter for kvinner og menn No. 7 (2015–2016) [White paper on gender equality in practice - Equal opportunities for women and men]. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-7-20152016/id2456562/sec1
Phelps, J. M., Blakar, R. M., Carlquist, E., Nafstad, H. E., & Rand-Henriksen, K. (2011). Symbolic boundaries and ideology in the Norwegian multicultural society: A longitudinal study of public discourse. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22(3), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1126
Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Duke University Press.
Rosenthal, L. (2016). Incorporating intersectionality into psychology: An opportunity to promote social justice and equity. American Psychologist, 71(6), 474–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040323
Røthing, Å. (2008). Homotolerance and heteronormativity in Norwegian classrooms. Gender and Education, 20(3), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802000405
Røthing, Å. (2017). Sexual orientation in Norwegian science textbooks: Heteronormativity and selective inclusion in textbooks and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67(1), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.005
Røthing, Å., & Svendsen, S. H. B. (2010). Homotolerance and heterosexuality as Norwegian values. Journal of LGBT Youth, 7(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361651003799932
Skjeie, H., & Langvasbråten, T. (2009). Intersectionality in practice? Anti-discrimination reforms in Norway. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11(4), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740903237483
Stetsenko, A. (2012). Personhood: An activist project of historical becoming through collaborative pursuits of social transformation. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.11.008
Straiton, M. L., Aambø, A. K., & Johansen, R. (2019). Perceived discrimination, health and mental health among immigrants in Norway: The role of moderating factors. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6649-9
Ummak, E., Türken, S., & Akin, D. (2022). Understanding intimate partner violence among ethnic and sexual minorities: Lived experiences of queer women in Norway. Women Against Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780122211479
Verkuyten, M., & Thijs, J. (2010). Ethnic minority labeling, multiculturalism, and the attitude of majority group members. Journal of Language and Social Psychology., 29(4), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X10377992
Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed.). Open University Press.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conception and design: Esra UMMAK; data collection: Esra UMMAK; analysis and interpretation of results: Esra UMMAK, Salman TURKEN, Serap KELES; draft manuscript preparation: Esra UMMAK, Salman TURKEN, Serap KELES; All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
The project was conducted under all relevant ethical standards and all requirements of Norwegian Center for Research Data (NSD), Norway.
Consent to Participate
Participants agreed to participate after they signed an informed consent form separately from the main documents.
Consent for Publication
Participants gave consent for the publication of their data.
Conflicts of interest
We have no conflicts of interest that might affect the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
In-depth Interview Research Questions
-
1.
Background
First, I would like to ask some general background questions:
1.1 How old are you?
1.2 Where do you live? (the city, specifically)? How long have you lived there?
1.3 Do you originally come from a different country or region?
1.4 What do you do for a living?
1.5 How do you identify your gender identity and sexual orientation?
-
2.
Current life situation
2.1 Are you open about your sexual orientation? To whom? Do you feel safe?
2.2 How much contact do you have with other queer people with immigrant background ? How do you experience this contact?
2.3 How much contact do you have with hetero-people with immigrant background? How do you experience this contact?
2.4 How much contact do you have with queer people with non-immigrant background? How do you experience this contact?
2.5 How much contact do you have with your family? How do you experience this contact? Do you feel loved and accepted?
-
3.
Minority stress and intersectionality leading to specific vulnerabilities
3.1 Could you please list for me all the difficulties, if any, associated with having immigrant background and belonging to the LGBTQ community. What are the biggest difficulties for you?
3.2 Would you say you feel more connected to the LGBTQ community or the community with the immigrant background? Do you ever feel like you have to choose between the two communities? How do you experience here?
3.3 Can you remember the first time you heard a word in your mother language for_____ (use gender or sexuality term chosen by research participant to describe themselves under question 1.5)? How was it used? How did you feel about the word when you realized that some people might apply it to you?
3.4 Have you ever experienced prejudice and/or discrimination because of having immigrant background identity and/or queer identity? If yes, in what context? And how did it make you feel? Does it happen often? What do you think about the society’s (or specific groups’) opinion regarding LGBTQ?
The work presented here was performed partly while the first author was a visiting researcher at Oslo University [and is now at VID Specialized University]. The project was conducted under all relevant ethical standards and all requirements of the Norwegian Center for Research Data (NSD), Norway. Participants were agreed to participate after they signed an inform consent separately from the main documents. The manuscript is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. We have no conflicts of interest that might affect the study.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ummak, E., Türken, S. & Keles, S. Where to Belong: Being a Sexual and Ethnic Minority Group Member in Norway. Sex Roles 89, 35–47 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01370-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01370-0