Abstract
Sexual assault is highly prevalent and a significant public health problem. The responsibility for sexual assault lies solely with the perpetrator, yet interventions to change perpetrators’ behavior are scarce, making research focused on identifying factors that increase risk for sexual victimization a necessary complement to work on sexual aggression. The present study used mixed-method methodology to develop a measure of sexual assault risk called the Sexual Assault Script Scale (SASS). In three separate studies, we surveyed 1031 U.S. undergraduate heterosexual or bisexual women on the extent to which they believed certain contextual and interpersonal features were likely to be present during an assault. Factor analytic models replicated across studies ultimately yielded a 27-item measure with four internally consistent subscales: Stereotypical Assault Scripts, Acquaintance Assault Scripts, Assault Resistance Scripts, and Date/Friend Assault Scripts. Structural regressions revealed significant associations of the subscales with measures of prior sexual victimization, alcohol risk, number of sexual partners, and sociosexuality, providing support for the criterion validity of the measure. The SASS may prove to be a cost effective, easy-to-administer tool for assessing women’s scripts and identifying those women who may be at increased risk for victimization, thus providing opportunities for targeted prevention.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbey, A. (2011). Alcohol’s role in sexual violence perpetration: Theoretical explanations, existing evidence, and future directions. Drug and Alcohol Review, 30, 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00296.x.
Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., Buck, P. O., Clinton, A. M., & McAuslan, P. (2004). Sexual assault and alcohol consumption: What do we know about their relationship and what types of research are still needed? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(03)00011-9.
Anderson, L. A., & Whiston, S. C. (2005). Sexual assault education programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00237.x.
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204.
Bailey, J., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.537.
Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(90)90068-W.
Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. The British Journal of Psychology, part II(3), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x.
Baugher, S. N., Elhai, J. D., Monroe, J. R., & Gray, M. J. (2010). Rape myth acceptance, sexual trauma history, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 2036–2053. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354506.
Bondurant, B. (2001). University women's acknowledgment of rape. Violence Against Women, 7(3), 294–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182451.
Bowleg, L. (2004). Love, sex, and masculinity in sociocultural context: HIV concerns and condom use among African American men in heterosexual relationships. Men and Masculinities, 7, 166–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03257523.
Bowleg, L., Burkholder, G. J., Noar, S. M., Teti, M., Malebranche, D. J., & Tschann, J. M. (2015). Sexual scripts and sexual risk behaviors among Black heterosexual men: Development of the Sexual Scripts Scale. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0193-y.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2011). Criminal victimization, 2010. (publication no. NCJ-235508). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2013). Female victims of sexual violence, 1994–2010. (publication no. NCJ-240655). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. In E. S. Byers & L. F. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Sexual coercion in dating relationships (pp. 7–24). New York: Haworth.
Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S., Townsend, R., Lee, H., Bruce, C., & Thomas, G. (2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities. Retrieved from https://www.aau.edu/sites/default/files/AAU-Files/Key-Issues/Campus-Safety/AAU-Campus-Climate-Survey-FINAL-10-20-17.pdf.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
Clark, D. M., & Carroll, M. J. (2008). Acquaintance rape scripts of women and men: Similarities and differences. Sex Roles, 58, 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216631438.
Clark, M. D., Carroll, M. H., Bartoli, A. M., & Taylor, M. A. (2009). Flirting to rape: The influence of the traditional sexual script. In J. H. Ulrich & B. T. Cosell (Eds.), Handbook on gender roles (pp. 1–32). Hauppauge: Nova Science.
Classen, C. C., Palesh, O. G., & Aggarwal, R. (2005). Sexual revictimization: A review of the empirical literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6, 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838005275087.
Corbin, W. R., Bernat, J. A., Calhoun, K. S., McNair, L. D., & Seals, K. L. (2001). The role of alcohol expectancies and alcohol consumption among sexually victimized and nonvictimized college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626001016004002.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Crome, S. A., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Adult rape scripting within a victimological perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(4), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00013-6.
DeGue, S., Valle, L. A., Holt, M. K., Massetti, G. M., Matjasko, J. L., & Tharp, A. T. (2014). A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004.
Dodge, K. A. (1986). A social information processing model of social competence in children. In M. Perlmutter (Ed.), Cognitive perspectives on children’s social and behavioral development: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 77–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Edwards, K. M., Turchik, J. A., Dardis, C. M., Reynolds, N., & Gidycz, C. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65, 761–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2.
Ellsberg, M., Arango, D. J., Morton, M., Gennari, F., Kiplesund, S., Contreras, M., … Watts, C. (2015). Prevention of violence against women and girls: What does the evidence say? The Lancet, 385, 1555–1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61703-7.
Eysenck, H. J. (1976). Sex and personality. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1974). The development of inferences about others. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Understanding other persons (pp. 66–116). Oxford, England: Blackwell, Basil, Mott.
Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., Cullen, F. T., & Santana, S. A. (2007). Assessing the efficacy of the protective action-completion nexus for sexual victimizations. Violence and Victims, 22, 18–42.
Frith, H. (2009). Sexual scripts, sexual refusals and rape. In M. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 99–122). Devon, United Kingdom: Willian Publishing.
Frith, H., & Kitzinger, C. (2001). Reformulating sexual script theory - developing a discursive psychology of sexual negotiation. Theory and Psychology, 11, 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301112004.
Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20, 1408–1416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2014). Implicit and explicit evaluation: A brief review of the associative–propositional evaluation model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(8), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12124.
Goldfried, M. R., & D’Zurilla, T. J. (1969). A behavioral-analytic model for assessing competence. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 151–196). New York: Academic Press.
Greene, D. M., & Navarro, R. L. (1998). Situation-specific assertiveness in the epidemiology of sexual victimization among university women: A prospective path analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00179.x.
Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552324.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.
Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23, 589–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209345829.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Johnson, S. M., Murphy, M. J., & Gidycz, C. A. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Sexual Experiences Survey – Short forms of victimization and perpetration. Violence and Victims, 32, 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00110.
Kahn, A. S., & Mathie, V. (2000). Understanding the unacknowledged rape victim. In C. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 377–403). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10345-015.
Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00296.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575.
Katz, J., May, P., Sörensen, S., & DelTosta, J. (2010). Sexual revictimization during women’s first year of college: Self-blame and sexual refusal assertiveness as possible mechanisms. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2113–2126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354515.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual Experiences Survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.422.
Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162.
Krahe, B., Bieneck, S., & Scheinberger-Olwig, R. (2007). The role of sexual scripts in sexual aggression and victimization. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9131-6.
Krebs, C. P., Lindquist, C. H., Warner, T. D. Fisher, B. S., & Martin, S. L. (2007). The campus sexual assault (CSA) study: Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221153.pdf
Krebs, C. P., Lindquist, C. H., Warner, T. S., Fisher, B. S., & Martin, S. L. (2009). College women's experiences with physically forced, alcohol- or other drug-enabled, and drug-facilitated sexual assault before and since entering college. Journal of American College Health, 57, 639–647. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221153.pdf.
Leiting, K. A., & Yeater, E. A. (2017). Effects of victimization history and sexual attitudes on women’s hypothetical sexual assault scripts. Violence Against Women, 23, 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216637472.
Littleton, H. L. (2011). Rape myths and beyond: A commentary on Edwards and colleagues. Sex Roles, 65, 792–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9982-8.
Littleton, H. L., & Breitkopf, C. (2006). Coping with the experience of rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00267.x.
Littleton, H. L., & Dodd, J. C. (2016). Violent attacks and damaged victims: An exploration of the rape scripts of European American and African American U.S. college women. Violence Against Women, 22, 1725–1747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216631438.
Livingston, J. A., Testa, M., & VanZile-Tamsen, C. (2007). The reciprocal relationship between sexual victimization and sexual assertiveness. Violence Against Women, 13(3), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206297339.
Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths. In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x.
Maier, S. L. (2008). “I have heard horrible stories . . .”: Rape victim advocates’ perceptions of the revictimization of rape victims by the police and medical system. Violence Against Women, 14, 786–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208320245.
Marsh, H. W. (2007). Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport/exercise psychology. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 774–798). New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118270011.ch35.
Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700.
Marx, B. P., Calhoun, K. S., Wilson, A. E., & Meyerson, L. A. (2001). Sexual revictimization prevention: An outcome evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.1.25.
Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: Continuity and change. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.661102.
McFall, R. M. (1982). A review and reformulation of the concept of social skills. Behavioral Assessment, 4, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321377.
Meneses-Gaya, C., Zuardi, A. W., Loureiro, S. R., & Crippa, J. A. (2009). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): An updated systematic review of psychometric properties. Psychology & Neuroscience, 2(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2009.1.12.
Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1996). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script-based approach. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 19 (pp. 49–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc..
Morokoff, P. J., Quina, K., Harlow, L. L., Whitmire, L., Grimley, D. M., Gibson, P. R., & Burkholder, G. J. (1997). Sexual Assertiveness Scale (SAS) for women: Development and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 790–804.
Nason, E. E., & Yeater, E. A. (2012). The relationship between sexual victimization history and women’s responses to high and low risk situations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2565–2581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512436393.
Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x.
Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experience. Sex Roles, 51, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037758.95376.00.
Razack, S. (1994). What is to be gained by looking white people in the eye? Culture, race, and gender in cases of sexual violence. Signs, 19, 894–923. https://doi.org/10.1086/494944.
Rinehart, J. K., Yeater, E. A., Treat, T. A., & Viken, R. J. (2018). Cognitive processes underlying the self-other perspective in women’s judgments of sexual victimization risk. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 1381–1399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517713365.
Robbins, R. N., & Bryan, A. D. (2004). Relationships between future orientation, impulsive sensation seeking, and risk behavior among adjudicated adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 428–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403258860.
Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles' contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28(9–10), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289677.
Rowe, L. S., Jouriles, E. N., McDonald, R., Platt, C. G., & Gomez, G. S. (2012). Enhancing women’s resistance to sexual coercion: A randomized controlled trial of the DATE program. Journal of American College Health, 60, 211–218.
Ryan, K. M. (2011). The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape. Sex Roles, 65, 774–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0033-2.
Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., & de la Fuente, J. R. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption: II. Addiction, 88(6), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Knowledge and memory: The real story (pp. 1–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Seal, D. W., Smith, M., Coley, B., Perry, J., & Gamez, M. (2008). Urban heterosexual couples’ sexual scripts for three shared sexual experiences. Sex Roles, 58, 626–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9369-z.
Senn, C. Y., Eliasziw, M., Barata, P. C., Thurston, W. E., Newby-Clark, I. R., Radtke, H. L., & Hobden, K. L. (2015). Efficacy of a sexual assault resistance program for university women. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 2326–2335. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1411131.
Shields, A. L., & Caruso, J. C. (2003). Reliability generalization of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403063003004.
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870.
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22, 53–60.
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542219.
Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Testa, M. (2002). The impact of men’s alcohol consumption on perpetration of sexual aggression. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 1239–1263.
Testa, M., Hoffman, J. H., & Livingston, J. A. (2010). Alcohol and sexual risk behaviors as mediators of the sexual victimization-revictimization relationship. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018914.
Testa, M., Livingston, J. A., & VanZile-Tamsen, C. (2011). Advancing the study of violence against women using mixed methods: Integrating qualitative methods into a quantitative research program. Violence Against Women, 17(2), 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210397744.
Testa, M., VanZile-Tamsen, C., & Livingston, J. A. (2007). Prospective prediction of women’s sexual victimization by intimate and nonintimate male perpetrators. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.1.52.
Turchik, J. A., Probst, D. R., Irvin, C. R., Chau, M., & Gidycz, C. A. (2009). Prediction of sexual assault experiences in college women based on rape scripts: A prospective analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(2), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015157.
Ullman, S. E. (2007). A 10-year update of “review and critique of empirical studies of rape avoidance.” Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854806297117.
VanZile-Tamsen, C., Testa, M., & Livingston, J. A. (2005). The impact of sexual assault history and relationship context on appraisal of and responses to acquaintance sexual assault risk. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 813–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505276071.
Yeater, E. A., Treat, T., Viken, R. J., & McFall, R. M. (2010). Cognitive processes underlying women’s risk judgments: Associations with sexual victimization history and rape myth acceptance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019297.
Yeater, E. A., Viken, R. J., Hoyt, T., & Dolan, J. L. (2009). Self-other perspective and sexual attitudes affect estimates of sexual risk. Sex Roles, 61(1–2), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9618-4.
Yeater, E. A., Viken, R. J., McFall, R. M., & Wagner, L. R. (2006). Sexual attitudes and instructional set affect estimates of risk and response effectiveness. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 28(4), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-9018-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
All participants in the study gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 35 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yeater, E.A., Leiting, K.A. & Witkiewitz, K. Assessing College Women’s Perception of Putative Risk for Being Sexually Victimized by a Man: Development of the Sexual Assault Script Scale (SASS). Sex Roles 82, 688–703 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01081-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01081-5