Abstract
The purpose of the present studies was to examine whether the associations that the desire for power had with perceptions of the romantic relationship (e.g., relationship satisfaction, commitment) were moderated by perceived power and gender. Study 1 examined these associations in a sample of 376 U.S. heterosexual participants. Results showed that the desire for power had negative indirect associations with commitment through relationship satisfaction, investment, and quality of alternatives. Further, the association that the desire for power had with relationship satisfaction was moderated by perceived power and gender such that this association was especially strong for women who perceived themselves as having low levels of power. In addition, there was a significant negative association between the desire for power and commitment for men but not women. Study 2 examined both members of 74 U.S. heterosexual romantic couples. Results of dyadic analyses revealed that the desire for power reported by women was especially important for the perceptions of the romantic relationship for both members of the couple. For example, women who desired more power in their relationships reported less commitment and had male partners who were less committed to the relationship as well. Discussion focuses on the implications of these results for understanding the connections between power and perceptions of romantic relationships.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aida, Y., & Falbo, T. (1991). Relationships between marital satisfaction, resources, and power strategies. Sex Roles, 24, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288702.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London, UK: Sage.
Baumeister, R. F., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997). Psychology Bulletin, 122, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.38.
Bentley, C. G., Galliher, R. V., & Ferguson, T. J. (2007). Associations among aspects of interpersonal power and relationship functioning in adolescent romantic couples. Sex Roles, 57, 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9280-7.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press.
Bosson, J. K., & Vandello, J. A. (2011). Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402669.
Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1984). The balance of power in lesbian relationships. Sex Roles, 10, 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287267.
Cann, A., & Siegfried, W. D. (1990). Gender stereotypes and dimensions of effective leader behavior. Sex Roles, 23, 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00289229.
Carli, L. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00106.
Centers, R., Raven, B. H., & Rodrigues, A. (1971). Conjugal power structure: A reexamination. American Sociological Review, 36, 264–278. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094043.
Cromwell, R. E., & Olson, D. (Eds.). (1975). Power in families. New York: Wiley.
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5.
Davis, L., & Strube, M. J. (1993). An assessment of romantic commitment among black and white dating couples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01083.x.
Duffy, S. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (1986). Satisfaction and commitment in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1300/j082v12n02_01.
Dunbar, N. E. (2004). Dyadic power theory: Constructing a communication-based theory of relational power. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2004.9670133.
Dunbar, N. E., & Burgoon, J. K. (2005). Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 207–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505050944.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The development of social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ehrensaft, M. K., & Vivian, D. (1999). Is partner aggression related to appraisals of coercive control by a partner? Journal of Family Violence, 14, 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022862332595.
Ehrensaft, M. K., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & Heyman, R. E. (1999). Feeling controlled in marriage: A phenomenon specific to physically aggressive couples? Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1037//0893-3200.13.1.20.
Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.618.
Farrell, A. K., Simpson, J. A., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). The relationship power inventory: Development and validation. Personal Relationships, 22, 387–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12072.
Felmlee, D. H. (1994). Who's on top? Power in romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 31, 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01544589.
Filson, J., Ulloa, E., Runfola, C., & Hokoda, A. (2010). Does powerlessness explain the relationship between intimate partner violence and depression? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509334401.
Frieze, I. H., & McHugh, M. C. (1992). Power and influence strategies in violent and nonviolent marriages. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00268.x.
Gabriel, S., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 642–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.642.
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453.
Galliher, R. V., Rostosky, S. S., Welsh, D. P., & Kawaguchi, M. C. (1999). Power and psychological well-being in late adolescent romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 40, 689–710. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018804617443.
Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2013). Does power help or hurt? The moderating role of self-other focus on power and perspective-taking in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1097–1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213490031.
Gray-Little, B. (1982). Marital quality and power processes among black couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 44, 633–646. https://doi.org/10.2307/351585.
Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.93.3.513.
Halloran, E. C. (1998). The role of marital power in depression and marital distress. American Journal of Family Therapy, 26, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189808251082.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Howard, J. A., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1986). Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.102.
Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, & …. D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 169–219). New York: W. H. Freeman.
Kaura, S. A., & Allen, C. M. (2004). Dissatisfaction with relationship power and dating violence perpetration by men and women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 576–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504262966.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.265.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00035.
Lin, Y. H. W., & Rusbult, C. E. (1995). Commitment to dating relationships and cross-sex friendships in America and China. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407595121002.
Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.23.
Neff, K. D., & Suizzo, M. A. (2006). Culture, power, authenticity and psychological well-being within romantic relationships: A comparison of European American and Mexican Americans. Cognitive Development, 21, 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.06.008.
Overall, N. C., Hammond, M. D., McNulty, J. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men’s aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000059.
Peplau, L. A., & Campbell, S. M. (1989). Power in dating and marriage. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective 4th ed., (pp. 121–137). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
Perry, N. S., Huebner, D. M., Baucom, B. R. W., & Hoff, C. C. (2016). The complex contribution of sociodemographics to decision-making power in gay male couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 977–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000234.
Rampage, C. (1994). Power, gender, and marital intimacy. Journal of Family Therapy, 16, 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.1994.00783.x.
Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844–872. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.844.
Richard, F. D., Bond Jr., C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331.
Rogers, W. S., Bidwell, J., & Wilson, L. (2005). Perceptions of and satisfaction with relationship power, sex, and attachment styles: A couples level analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-5988-8.
Rollins, B. C., & Bahr, S. J. (1976). A theory of power relationships in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 619–627. https://doi.org/10.2307/350682.
Ronfeldt, H. M., Kimerling, R., & Arias, I. (1998). Satisfaction with relationship power and the perpetration of dating violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/353442.
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1004.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239.
Rudman, L. A., & Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315–1328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200263001.
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4.
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101.
Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295216002.
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x.
Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009.
Simpson, J. A., Farrell, A. K., Orina, M. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). Power and social influence in relationships. In M. Mikulincer & P. Shaver (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Interpersonal relations (Vol. 3, pp. 393–420). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspectives. Sex Roles, 37, 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025601423031.
Sprecher, S., Schmeeckle, M., & Felmlee, D. (2006). The principle of least interest: Inequality in emotional involvement in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1255–1280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x06289215.
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
Vandello, J. A., & Bosson, J. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 14, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029826.
Waller, W. (1938). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Gordon.
Williams, M. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Guillory, L. E. (2017). Sexual aggression when power is new: Effects of acute high power on chronically low-power individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000068.
Woolf, S. E., & Maisto, S. A. (2008). Gender differences in condom use behavior? The role of power and partner-type. Sex Roles, 58, 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9381-3.
Zeigler-Hill, V., & Myers, E. M. (2009). Is high self-esteem a path to the white house? The implicit theory of self-esteem and the willingness to vote for presidential candidates. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.018.
Zeigler-Hill, V., & Myers, E. M. (2011). An implicit theory of self-esteem: The consequences of perceived self-esteem for romantic desirability. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 147–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491100900202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The current research complies with all applicable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 321 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Traeder, C.K., Zeigler-Hill, V. The Desire for Power and Perceptions of Heterosexual Romantic Relationships: The Moderating Roles of Perceived Power and Gender. Sex Roles 82, 66–80 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01037-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01037-9