Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Principal-Teacher Gender Similarity on Teacher’s Trust and Organizational Commitment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many Western public primary school systems, the gender composition of the principals is more heterogenic than that of the teachers, but research on the effect of gender on social psychological processes related to school leadership is scarce. The present work aims to address this lacuna by exploring the effects of principal-teacher gender similarity in the Israeli public primary school system, where most teachers are women, on teachers’ trust in their principals and on organizational commitment. Data from 594 female public primary teachers working with male and female principals were analyzed. The results show that when the principal and teacher are of the same gender, both affective and cognitive trust in the principal are higher. Moderation analysis indicated that female teachers’ affective trust in male principals increases with relational duration. A second moderation effect that was found indicated that gender similarity and cognitive trust in principal have a negative interactive effect on teachers’ continued commitment to school, countering the positive effect of gender similarity on commitment. The results and their implications are discussed, and future research is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. (1994). Anomaly as exemplar: The meanings of role-modeling for men elementary teachers. Dubuque: Tri-College Department of Education, Loras College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252–276. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (1998). Gender relations and identity at work: A case study of masculinities and femininities in an advertising agency. Human Relations, 51(8), 969–1005. doi:10.1177/001872679805100801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angle, H. L., & Perry, J. L. (1981). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 1–14. doi:10.2307/2392596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., & Wilson, D. C. (2008). What are the odds? How demographic similarity affects the prevalence of perceived employment discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 235–249. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, D. R., Wang, M., Volpone, S. D., & Zhou, L. (2013). Different strokes for different folks: The impact of sex dissimilarity in the empowerment-performance relationship. Personnel Psychology, 66(3), 757–784. doi:10.1111/peps.12032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2010). Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. American Psychologist, 65(3), 157–170. doi:10.1037/a0018806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barkol, R. (2005). Management of a school as a second career: The case of (retired) IDF officers- from command to management in the education system. In I. Kupferberg & E. Olshtain (Eds.), Discourse in education (pp. 306–331). Tel Aviv: The Mofet Institute. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. H., & Karson, M. J. (1989). Managers, values, and executive decisions: An exploration of the role of gender, career stage, organizational level, function, and the importance of ethics, relationships and results in managerial decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(10), 747–771. doi:10.1007/BF0038377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barty, K., Thomson, P., Blackmore, J., & Sachs, J. (2005). Unpacking the issues: Researching the shortage of school principals in two states in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 1–18. doi:10.1007/BF03216824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of a leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538–1567. doi:10.2307/257068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkovich, I. (2014). Neo-liberal governance and the “new professionalism” of Israeli principals. Comparative Education Review, 58(3), 428–456. doi:10.1086/676403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (1996). Doing “emotional labour” in the education market place: Stories from the field of women in management. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 17(3), 337–349. doi:10.1080/0159630960170304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–289. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1992). Leading and managing: Effects of context, culture, and gender. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 314–329. doi:10.1177/0013161X92028003005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. Z., Mossholder, K. W., Feild, H. S., & Armenakis, A. A. (2014). Transformational leadership, interactional justice, and organizational citizenship behavior: The effects of racial and gender dissimilarity between supervisors and subordinates. Group & Organization Management, 39(6), 691–719. doi:10.1177/1059601114551605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chusmir, L. H. (1990). Men who make nontraditional career choices. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69(1), 11–16. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1990.tb01446.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S., & Bagilhole, B. (2002). Girls’ jobs for the boys? Men, masculinity and non-traditional occupations. Gender, Work and Organization, 9(2), 204–226. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRue, D. S., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Stability and change in person-team and person-role fit over time: The effects of growth satisfaction, performance, and general self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1242–1253. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duck, S. W. (1977). The study of acquaintance. Farnborough: Saxon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Johnson, B. T. (1992). Gender and leadership style among school principals: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1), 76–102. doi:10.1177/0013161X92028001004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 474–493. doi:10.5465/amle.2010.0046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, S., Linnehan, F., Greenhaus, J. H., & Weer, C. H. (2006). The impact of gender similarity, racial similarity, and work culture on family-supportive supervision. Group & Organization Management, 31(4), 420–441. doi:10.1177/1059601106286884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, G. (2005). All in a day’s work: Primary teachers “performing” and “caring.” Gender and Education, 17(3), 271–287. doi:10.1080/09540250500145114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, P. B., Adams, C. M., & Hoy, W. K. (2011). Collective trust: Why schools can't improve without it. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C. B., Riordan, C., & Schaffer, B. S. (2010). Does social identity theory underlie relational demography? A test of the moderating effects of uncertainty reduction and status enhancement on similarity effects. Human Relations, 63(7), 903–926. doi:10.1177/0018726709347158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. doi:10.2307/2092623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillaume, C., & Pochic, S. (2009). What would you sacrifice? Access to top management and the work–life balance. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(1), 14–36. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00354.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handford, V., & Leithwood, K. (2013). Why teachers trust school leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 194–212. doi:10.1108/09578231311304706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107. doi:10.2307/256901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. M., & Borders, L. D. (2001). Twenty-five years after the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A reassessment and new issues regarding classification variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(1), 39–55. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2001-06272-004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools. In W. K. Hoy & M. F. DiPaola (Eds.), Essential ideas for the reform of American schools (pp. 87–114). Greenwich: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2010). How distributed leadership can make a difference in teachers’ organizational commitment? A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 565–575. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IISL. (2012). School principals: Situation report and future trends. Jerusalem: Israel Institute for School Leadership [In Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, G., & Zyphur, M. J. (2008). Concepts and directions in critical industrial/organizational psychology. In D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, & S. Austin (Eds.), Critical Psychology: An Introduction (2nd ed., pp. 110–135). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. E., Chang, C.-H., & Rosen, C. C. (2010). “Who I am depends on how fairly I’m treated”: Effects of justice on self-identity and regulatory focus: Justice and motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(12), 3020–3058. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00691.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelan, E. K. (2010). Gender logic and (un)doing gender at work. Gender, Work & Organization, 17(2), 174–194. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00459.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, U. (1999). “Our best boys”: The gendered nature of civil-military relations in Israel. Men and Masculinities, 2(1), 47–65. doi:10.1177/1097184X99002001004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M., & Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 319–333. doi:10.1002/job.4030160404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B., & Cioci, M. (1993). Teachers and principals: Gender-related perceptions of leadership and power in secondary schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 153–180. doi:10.3102/01623737015002153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. doi:10.1080/15700760500244769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 662–674. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, M. F., & Haven, C. (1968). Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 20–30. doi:10.2307/2092237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y. (2003). “Said and done” versus “saying and doing”: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society, 17(3), 342–366. doi:10.1177/0891243203017003002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. doi:10.2307/256727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (2002). Socialization and trust in work groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5(3), 185–201. doi:10.1177/1368430202005003001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moye, M. J., Henkin, A. B., & Egley, R. J. (2005). Teacher-principal relationships: Exploring linkages between empowerment and interpersonal trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(3), 260–277. doi:10.1108/09578230510594796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCES. (2013a). Characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary school teachers in the United States: Results from the 2011–12 schools and staffing survey. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCES. (2013b). Characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary school principals in the United States: Results from the 2011–12 schools and staffing survey. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Conor, L. (2015, February 11). Where are all the female headteachers? The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com.

  • Oplatka, I. (2001). ‘I changed my management style’: The cross-gender transition of women headteachers in mid-career. School Leadership & Management, 21(2), 219–233. doi:10.1080/13632430120054781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papa Jr., F., & Baxter, I. A. (2005). Dispelling the myths and confirming the truths of the imminent shortage of principals: The case of New York State. Planning and Changing, 36(3/4), 217–234. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ737684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, G. (2013, February 5). Teaching in primary schools ‘still seen as a woman’s job.’ The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk.

  • Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Research, 42(3), 237–249. doi:10.1080/001318800440579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603–609. doi:10.1037/h0037335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, H. E. (2012). Principal–teacher interactions: How affective relationships shape principal and teacher attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 39–85. doi:10.1177/0013161X11417126 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, W. S. (2003). Social psychology: Experimental and critical approaches. Maiddenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, J. M., Scheu, C. R., Ryan, A. M., & Schmitt, N. (2003). An investigation of race and sex similarity effects in interviews: A multilevel approach to relational demography. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 852–865. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Hucles, J. V., & Davis, D. D. (2010). Women and women of color in leadership: Complexity, identity, and intersectionality. American Psychologist, 65(3), 171–181. doi:10.1037/a0017459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. (2004). Transforming retired military officers into school principals in Israel (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leicester, Leicester, England.

  • Shakeshaft, C. (1989). The gender gap in research in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(4), 324–337. doi:10.1177/0013161X89025004002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, M. E. (1971). Investments and involvements as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2), 143–150. doi:10.2307/2391824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. (2004). Masculinity at work: The experiences of men in female dominated occupations. Work, Employment and Society, 18(2), 349–368. doi:10.1177/09500172004042773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, J., & Stokoe, E. H. (2005). Discourses of work-life balance: Negotiating “genderblind” terms in organizations. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(2), 147–168. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00267.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46–56. doi:10.2307/2391745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, J. P., & Wilson, D. G. (1984). The inventory of socially supportive behaviors: Dimensionality, prediction, and gender differences. American Journal of Community Psychology, 12(1), 53–69. doi:10.1007/BF00896928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, W. K. (1988). The context of trust: Teachers and the principal. The High School Journal, 72(1), 17–24. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40364817?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarter, C. J., Bliss, J. R., & Hoy, W. K. (1989). School characteristics and faculty trust in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(3), 294–308. doi:10.1177/0013161X89025003005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetrick, L. E., & Farkas, A. J. (1988). A longitudinal examination of the dimensionality and stability of the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(3), 723–735. doi:10.1177/0013164488483021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2017, July 12). Primary education, teachers (% female), 2014: Israel. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.TCHR.FE.ZS?locations=IL.

  • Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust matter: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B., Dougherty, T. W., & Lee, F. K. (2002). Gender, race, and perceived similarity effects in developmental relationships: The moderating role of relationship duration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 240–262. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Hoboken: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valmer, T. (2012, July 25). 15 minutes and you got the job: This is how school principals are choose. YNET. (Hebrew). Retrieved from http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4259494,00.html.

  • Vaux, A. (1985). Variations in social support associated with gender, ethnicity, and age. Journal of Social Issues, 41(1), 89–110. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01118.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P., & Bullis, R. C. (2001). Moderators of the influence of supervisor–subordinate similarity on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 884–896. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.884.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkenburg, C. J., van Engen, M. L., Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2011). An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women’s promotion? The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. R. (2001). Unrecognized exodus, unaccepted accountability: The looming shortage of principals and vice principals in Ontario public school boards. Toronto: Ontario Principals' Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Mossholder, K. W., & Peng, T. K. (2009). Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 143–154. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonah, Y. (2005). Israel as a multicultural democracy: Challenges and obstacles. Israel Affairs, 11(1), 95–116. doi:10.1080/1353712042000324472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeinabadi, H. (2014). Principal-teacher high-quality exchange indicators and student achievement: Testing a model. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(3), 404–420. doi:10.1108/JEA-05-2012-0056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeinabadi, H., & Salehi, K. (2011). Role of procedural justice, trust, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment in organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) of teachers: Proposing a modified social exchange model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1472–1481. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izhak Berkovich.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berkovich, I. Effects of Principal-Teacher Gender Similarity on Teacher’s Trust and Organizational Commitment. Sex Roles 78, 561–572 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0814-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0814-3

Keywords

Navigation