Abstract
Women are surrounded by sexualized imagery as well as cultural narratives that dictate their sexual behavior. These diverse cultural narratives include: women are sexually passive, women should desire sex and be sexually empowered, and women are expected to navigate ambivalent societal messages regarding their sexuality. In our study, we explored how college-aged young women describe and understand their first exposure to a sexual image. This mixed methods study, guided by critical feminism, addresses how young women, reflecting on their experiences since girlhood, have navigated changing cultural standards for female sexuality in light of complex negotiations among varying expectations. We examined 445 young women’s written reflections on seeing a sexual image for the first time. Most of the women reported that this experience occurred when they were in elementary school, and at home with friends, family, or alone. We found four themes of reactions to seeing the image for the first time: unwanted, intrigued, ambivalent, and neutral. Implications for comprehensive sex education include the need for teachers, parents, and other trusted adults to provide accurate and age-appropriate knowledge and opportunities for discussion about sexuality. Limitations and future directions are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, M. (2009). Engendering family past: 19th-century pro-family discourse through a feminist historical lens. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 234–248). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Allison, R., & Risman, B. J. (2013). A double standard for “hooking up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research, 42, 1191–1206. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.006.
Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L. T., Armstrong, E. M., & Seeley, J. L. (2014). “Good girls”: Gender, social class, and slut discourse on campus. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 100–122. doi:10.1177/0190272514521220.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2015). The agency line: A neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73, 279–291. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0452-6.
Bell, L. C. (2013). Hard to get: Twenty-something women and the paradox of sexual freedom. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Boone, T. L. (2015). Messages about sexuality: An ecological perspective. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society, and Learning, 15, 437–450. doi:10.1080/14681811.2015.1036981.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Budgeon, S. (2012). The contradictions of successful femininity: Third-wave feminism, postfeminism and “new” femininities. In R. Gill & C. Scharff (Eds.), New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism, and subjectivity (pp. 279–292). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26. doi:10.1080/00224490309552163.
Delgado-Infante, M. L., & Ofreneo, M. A. P. (2014). Maintaining a “good girl” position: Young Filipina women constructing sexual agency in first sex within Catholicism. Feminism & Psychology, 24, 390–407. doi:10.1177/0959353514530715.
Emmerink, P. M. J., Vanwesenbeeck, I., van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., & ter Bogt, T. F. M. (2016). Psychosexual correlates of sexual double standard endorsement in adolescent sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 286–297. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1030720.
England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24, 149–166. doi:10.1177/0891243210361475.
Erchull, M. J., & Liss, M. (2014). The object of one’s desire: How perceived sexual empowerment through objectification is related to sexual outcomes. Sexuality & Culture, 18, 773–788. doi:10.1007/s12119-013-9216-z.
Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 29–53. doi:10.17763/haer.58.1.u0468k1v2n2n8242.
Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 297–338. doi:10.17763/haer.76.3.w5042g23122n6703.
Freixas, A., Luque, B., & Reina, A. (2012). Critical feminist gerontology: In the back room of research. Journal of Women & Aging, 24, 44–58. doi:10.1080/08952841.2012.6388891.
Friedman, T. L. (2016). Thank you for being late: An optimist’s guide to thriving in the age of accelerations. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18, 35–60. doi:10.1177/0959353507084950.
Halpern, C. T., & Kaestle, C. E. (2014). Sexuality in emerging adulthood. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 487–522). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Jackson, S. (2005). “I’m 15 and desperate for sex”: “Doing” and “undoing” desire in letters to a teenage magazine. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 295–313. doi:10.1177/0959-353505054717.
Jackson, S. M., & Cram, F. (2003). Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women’s talk about heterosexuality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 113–127. doi:10.1348/014466603763276153s.
Jackson, S., & Vares, T. (2012). Media “sluts”: “Tween” girls’ negotiations of postfeminist sexual subjectivities in popular culture. In R. Gill & C. Scharff (Eds.), New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism, and subjectivity (pp. 134–146). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Jackson, S., & Westrupp, E. (2010). Sex, postfeminist popular culture and the pre-teen girl. Sexualities, 13, 357–376. doi:10.1177/1363460709363135.
Jackson, S., Vares, T., & Gill, R. (2013). “the whole playboy mansion image”: Girls’ fashioning and fashioned selves within a postfeminist culture. Feminism & Psychology, 23, 143–162. doi:10.1177/0959353511433790.
Joshi, S. P., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011). Scripts of sexual desire and danger in US and Dutch teen girl magazines: A cross-national content analysis. Sex Roles, 64, 463–474. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9941-4.
Lamb, S. (2001). The secret lives of girls: What good girls really do—Sex play, aggression, and their guilt. New York: Free Press.
Lamb, S. (2010). Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles, 62, 294–306. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9698-1.
Lamb, S., & Peterson, Z. D. (2012). Adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles, 66, 703–712. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9995-3.
Lamb, S., & Plocha, A. (2014). Sexuality in childhood. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 415–432). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lorde, A. (1984). Uses of the erotic: The erotic as power. In A. Lorde (Ed.), Sister outsider: Essays and speeches (pp. 53–59). Freedom: Crossing Press.
Martin, K. A. (1996). Puberty, sexuality, and the self: Girls and boys at adolescence. New York: Routledge.
Milnes, K. (2010). Challenging the sexual double standard: Constructing sexual equality narratives as a strategy of resistance. Feminism & Psychology, 20, 255–259. doi:10.1177/0959353509351182.
O’Sullivan, L. F., & Thompson, A. E. (2014). Sexuality in adolescence. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 433–486). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Orenstein, P. (2016). Girls & sex: Navigating the complicated new landscape. New York: Harper Collins.
Paasonen, S., Kyrola, K., Nikunen, K., & Saarenmaa, L. (2015). “We hid porn magazines in the nearby woods”: Memory-work and pornography consumption in Finland. Sexualities, 18, 394–412. doi:10.1177/1363460714550911.
Peterson, Z. D. (2010). What is sexual empowerment? A multidimensional and process-oriented approach to adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment. Sex Roles, 62, 307–313. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9725-2.
Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2011). Schizoid subjectivities? Re-theorizing teen girls’ sexual cultures in an era of “sexualization”. Journal of Sociology, 47, 389–409. doi:10.1177/1440783311420792.
Risman, B., & Schwartz, P. (2002). After the sexual revolution: Gender politics in teen dating. Contexts, 1, 16–24. doi:10.1525/ctx.2002.1.1.16.
Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) (2004). Guidelines for comprehensive sexuality education: Kindergarten through 12th grade (3rd ed.). Retrieved from www.siecus.org.
Smith, S. H. (2012). Scripting sexual desire: Cultural scenarios of teen girls’ sexual desire in popular films, 2000-2009. Sexuality & Culture, 16, 321–341. doi:10.1007/s12119-012-9126-5.
Sprague, J. (2005). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Thompson, S. (1996). Going all the way: Teenage girls’ tales of sex, romance, and pregnancy. New York: Hill and Wang.
Tolman, D. L. (1994). Doing desire: Adolescent girls’ struggles for/with sexuality. Gender & Society, 8, 324–342. doi:10.1177/089124394008003003.
Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tolman, D. L. (2006). In a different position: Conceptualizing female adolescent sexuality development within compulsory heterosexuality. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 112, 71–91. doi:10.1002/cd.163.
Tolman, D. L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Feminist Forum, 66, 746–757. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0122-x.
Tolman, D. L., Anderson, S. M., & Belmonte, K. (2015). Mobilizing metaphor: Considering complexities, contradictions, and contexts in adolescent girls’ and young women’s sexual agency. Sex Roles, 73, 298–310. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0.
Trinh, S. L. (2016). “enjoy your sexuality, but do it in secret”: Exploring undergraduate women’s reports of friends’ sexual communications. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 96–107. doi:10.1177/0361684315596914.
Ward, L. M. (2003). Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23, 347–388. doi:10.1016/S0273-2297(03)00013-3.
Acknowledgements
The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article. We thank Michelle Murray and anonymous reviewers for their suggestions on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lavender-Stott, E.S., Allen, K.R. Young Women’s Reflections of Viewing a Sexual Image for the First Time. Sex Roles 77, 628–638 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0764-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0764-9