Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Face-ism from an International Perspective: Gendered Self-Presentation in Online Dating Sites Across Seven Countries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study analyzed whether the face-ism phenomenon, which argues that the media visually depict men with more facial prominence compared to women (whereas women are shown with greater body prominence), exists for self-selected photographs worldwide. Based on a content analysis of a sample of 6286 profile photos drawn from online dating sites in seven countries (Austria, Denmark, Hungary, Japan, Netherlands, Sweden, and the United States) in 2013, we did not find any overall gender differences in facial prominence. However, further analysis showed gender differences in facial prominence for certain age groups: whereas there were no gender differences in the 25–41 year-old age group, young women between 18 and 24 had a higher facial prominence than men, and men older than 41 had higher facial prominence than women. These changes by age are driven by a pattern wherein facial prominence generally remains stable for men, but declines for women with age. In short, older users follow more traditional gender depictions in accordance with the face-ism phenomenon, whereas among younger people, women sport an even higher facial prominence than men do. In contrast to this significant interaction between gender and age in facial prominence, we found no significant interaction between culture (as measured by Hofstede’s masculinity dimension) and gender, which indicates that culture plays no discernible role in gender differences in facial prominence, possibly because macro-level sexism (Hofstede’s masculinity dimension) and micro-level sexism (photographs of individuals online) are not the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, D., Iritani, B., Kimes, D. D., & Barrios, M. (1983). Face-ism: Five studies of sex differences in facial prominence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 725–735. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 94–124). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200. doi:10.1037/h0024835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bornholt, J. J., Goodnow, J. J., & Cooney, G. H. (1994). Influences of gender stereotypes on adolescents' perceptions of their own achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 675–692. doi:10.3102/00028312031003675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C., & Steiner, L. (2004). Introduction to critical readings: Media and gender. In C. Carter & L. Steiner (Eds.), Critical readings: Media and gender (pp. 1–10). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. L. (2011). Content analysis of gender roles in media: Where are we now and where should we go? Sex Roles, 64, 290–298. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9929-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, S. C., & Smith, L. R. (2013). Presenting me! An examination of self-presentation in US and Russian online social networks. Russian Journal of Communication, 5, 176–190. doi:10.1080/19409419.2013.805671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, G. A. (1989). Face-ism and primetime television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 33, 209–214. doi:10.1080/08838158909364075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, M., & Bitti, P. E. R. (2000). Face-ism effect and head canting in one's own and others' photographs. European Psychologist, 5, 293–301. doi:10.1027//1016-9040.5.4.293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415–441. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrich, C. G., Denmark, F. L., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2004). Cross-cultural differences in gender egalitarianism: Implications for societies, organizations, and leaders. In R. J. House, M. Javidan, V. Gupta, P. Dorfman, & P. J. Hanges (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 343–394). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, A. T., & Donath, J. S. (2005). Homophily in online dating: When do you like someone like yourself? In CHI EA '05 CHI '05 Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1371–1374). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

  • Fiore, A. T., Taylor, L. S., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Hearst, M. (2008). Assessing attractiveness in online dating profiles. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 797–806). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1976). Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. C. I., & Crum, M. J. (1994). Women and "body-ism" in television beer commercials. Sex Roles, 31, 329–337. doi:10.1007/BF01544592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A., Park, N., Song, H., & Cody, M. J. (2010). Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 117–135. doi:10.1177/0265407509349633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2009). Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs. Journal of Communication, 59, 367–386. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01420.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., Bekhouche, Y., & Zahidi, S. (2014). Global Gender Gap Report. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GGGR14/GGGR_CompleteReport_2014.pdf.

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 709–722. doi:10.3758/BF03192961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.3.924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., & Arieli, D. (2010). What makes you click? Mate preferences in online dating. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 8, 393–427. doi:10.1007/s11129-010-9088-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). A quarter century of Culture’s Consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 285–320. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrath, S., & Schwarz, N. (2007). Do male politicians have big heads? Face-ism in online self-representations of politicians. Media Psychology, 10, 436–448. doi:10.1080/15213260701533219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrath, S., Au, J., & Ramsey, L. R. (2012). Cultural differences in face-ism: Male politicians have bigger heads in more gender-equal cultures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 476–487. doi:10.1177/0361684312455317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, S., Watson, B. R., Riffe, D., & Lovejoy, J. (2015). Issues and best prectices in content analysis. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 92, 791–811. doi:10.1177/1077699015607338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lammers, H. B., & Lammers, M. L. (1993). Face-ism in photographs: Sex and status differences. In W. F. Van Raaij & G. J. Bamossy (Eds.), European advances in consumer research (pp. 444–448). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, R. W. (2004). Demystifying the nonconscious: Unintentional discrimination in society and the media. In J. D. Williams, W.-N. Lee, & C. P. Haugtvedt (Eds.), Diversity in advertising: Broadening the scope of research directions (pp. 59–73). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, J., & Helgeson, J. G. (2011). Fifty years of advertising images: Some changing perspectives on role portrayals along with enduring consistencies. Sex Roles, 64, 238–252. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9782-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthes, J., Prieler, M., & Adam, K. (2016). Gender-role portrayals in television advertising across the globe. Sex Roles, 75, 314–327. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0617-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. L. (2007). Hidden sexism: Facial prominence and its connections to gender and occupational status in popular print media. Sex Roles, 57, 515–525. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9276-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigro, G. N., Hill, D. E., Gelbein, M. E., & Clark, C. L. (1988). Changes in the facial prominence of women and men over the last decade. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 225–235. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00938.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently ... and why. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paek, H.-J., Nelson, M. R., & Vilela, A. M. (2011). Examination of gender-role portrayals in television advertising across seven countries. Sex Roles, 64, 192–207. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9850-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, M., & Chesla, C. (2007). Revisiting Confucianism as a conceptual framework for Asian family study. Journal of Family Nursing, 13, 293–311. doi:10.1177/1074840707304400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. (2001). Stereotyping: The politics of representation. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prieler, M., Ivanov, A., & Hagiwara, S. (2015). Gender representations in East Asian advertising: Hong Kong, Japan, and South Korea. Communications & Society, 28(1), 27–41. doi:10.15581/003.28.1.27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, L. D. (2010). Confucius & Confucianism: The essentials. Malden: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, J. E., & Borgerson, J. L. (2005). An ethics of representation for international marketing communication. International Marketing Review, 22, 578–600. doi:10.1108/02651330510624408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Kurz, E. (1989). What's in a picture? The impact of face-ism on trait attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 311–316. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420190405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. R., & Cooley, S. C. (2012). International faces: An analysis of self-inflicted face-ism in online profile pictures. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41, 279–296. doi:10.1080/17475759.2012.728771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Duggan, M. (2013). Online dating & relationships. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/21/online-dating-relationships/.

  • Sparks, G. G. (2006). Media effects research: A basic overview (2nd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, G. G., & Fehlner, C. L. (1986). Faces in the news: Gender comparisons of magazine photographs. Journal of Communication, 36, 70–79. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01451.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, S. A., Fitzsimons, G. F., Lynch, J. G., & McClelland, G. H. (2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 277–288. doi:10.1509/jmr.12.0420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szillis, U., & Stahlberg, D. (2007). The face-ism effect in the internet: Differences in facial prominence of women and men. International Journal of Internet Science, 2, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tifentale, A., & Manovich, L. (2015). Selfiecity: Exploring photography and self-fashioning in social media. In D. M. Berry & M. Dieter (Eds.), Postdigital aesthetics: Art, computation and design (pp. 109–122). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37, 335–351. doi:10.1177/0093650209356437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023–1036. doi:10.1177/0146167208318067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Who visits online dating sites? Exploring some characteristics of online daters. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 849–852. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M. T. (2008). Revealing the "real" me, searching for the "actual" you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1707–1723. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multinational study. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wondergem, T. R., & Friedlmeier, M. (2012). Gender and ethnic differences in smiling: A yearbook photographs analysis from kindergarten through 12th grade. Sex Roles, 67, 403–411. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0158-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1986). On the meaning and implications of facial prominence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10, 215–229. doi:10.1007/BF00987481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Kieffer, S. C. (1994). Race differences in face-ism: Does facial prominence imply dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 86–92. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2013S1A5A8020741).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Media and Communication, Hallym University, Dasan Hall #507, Hallym University Road 1, Chuncheon, 24252, South Korea

    Michael Prieler

  2. The Economist Intelligence Unit, Economist Corporate Network North Asia, Tokyo, Japan

    Florian Kohlbacher

Authors
  1. Michael Prieler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Florian Kohlbacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Prieler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prieler, M., Kohlbacher, F. Face-ism from an International Perspective: Gendered Self-Presentation in Online Dating Sites Across Seven Countries. Sex Roles 77, 604–614 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0745-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0745-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation