Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Personal, Political, and Professional Life of Sandra Bem

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contributions of Sandra Bem, a pioneer in feminist psychology, are reviewed in the context of her life. From childhood and her early years as a second wave feminist activist in Pittsburgh, Bem challenged established gender conventions including dress codes, segregated employment ads, workplace discrimination, and marital roles. We follow the trajectory of Bem’s education and academic career, highlighting her three main contributions to feminist psychology: (a) psychological androgyny and the BSRI, (b) gender schema theory, and (c) the reproduction of sexual inequality via the lenses of gender. We also review her late life developments, such as her retraining in clinical psychology and her decision to end her own life after a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Placing Bem’s activist and academic work in the context of her personal struggle against gender expectations, we include her own voice to illustrate how she integrated the personal, political, and professional from the beginning of her life until her last days. We show that over the last four decades, Sandra Bem’s contributions to theory and research transformed the study of the psychology of women in the United States and had an international reach—adding immensely to our understanding of gender roles, stereotypes, nonconscious gender ideologies, psychological androgyny, gender schemas, and gender-aschematic parenting, as well as how androcentrism, gender polarization, and biological essentialism work systemically and psychologically to reproduce gender inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Qataee, A. (1984). The effect of exposure to western cultures on the sex-role identity of Saudi Arabians. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9(3), 303–312. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(84)90035-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1977). Sandra Lipsitz Bem: Early Career Award. American Psychologist, 32(1), 88–91. doi:10.10.1037/h0078488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. M., & Bem, S. L. (1981). Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 74–86. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.1.74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banyard, P., & Grayson, A. (1996). Introducing psychological research: Sixty studies that shape psychology. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. C., & Rivers, C. (2011). The truth about girls and boys: Challenging toxic stereotypes about our children. New York: Columbia University Press..

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, L. (2016). Everyday sexism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beere, A. (1990). Gender roles: A handbook of tests and measures. New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1967). Verbal self-control: The establishment of effective self-instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 485–491. doi:10.1037/h0024822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1975a). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643. doi:10.1037/h0077098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1975b). Androgyny vs. the tight little lives of fluffy women and chesty men. Psychology Today, 9, 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1976). Probing the promise of androgyny. In A. G. Kaplan & J. P. Bean (Eds.), Beyond sex-role stereotypes: Readings toward a psychology of androgyny (pp. 48–62). Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196–205. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.45.2.196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1979). The theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur-Tetenbaum and Locksley-Colten critiques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1047–1054. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981a). Bem Sex Role Inventory professional manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981b). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981c). The BSRI and gender schema theory: A reply to Spence and Helmreich. Psychological Review, 88, 369–371. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1982). Gender schema theory and self-schema theory compared: A comment on Markus, crane, Bernstein, and Siladi's "self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1192–1194. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1983). Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 8, 598–616. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/3173685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1985). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1984: Psychology and gender (pp. 179–226). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1989). Genital knowledge and gender constancy in preschool children. Child Development, 60, 649–662. doi:10.2307/1130730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1992). On the inadequacy of our sexual categories: A personal perspective. Feminism and Psychology, 2, 436–437. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.33.3.265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1993a). Is there a place in psychology for a feminist analysis of the social context? Feminism & Psychology, 3, 247–251. doi:10.1177/0959353593032009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1993b). On the inadequacy of our own sexual categories: A personal perspective. In S. Wilkenson & C. Kitzinger (Eds.), Heterosexuality: A feminist psychology reader (pp. 50–51). Washington, DC: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1993c). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1994). Defending The lenses of gender. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 97–101. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0501_17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1995a). Dismantling gender polarization and compulsory heterosexuality: Should we turn the volume down or up? Journal of Sex Research, 32, 329–334. doi:10.1080/00224499509551806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1995b). Working on gender as a gender nonconformist. Women and Therapy: A Feminist. Journal, 17, 43–53. doi:10.1300/J015v17n01_06.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1996). Transforming the debate on sexual inequality: From biological difference to institutionalized androcentrism. In J. C. Chrisler, C. Golden, & P. D. Rozee (Eds.), Lectures on the psychology of women (pp. 8–21). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1998). An unconventional family. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (2004). Last updated curriculum vita, provided to the first author by Daryl Bem, June 18, 2014

  • Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1970). Training the woman to know her place: The power of a nonconscious ideology. In S. Cox (Ed.), Female psychology: The emerging self (pp. 180–191). Chicago: SRA Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 6–18. doi:10.1111/j1559-1816.1973.tb01290.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. (1976). Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 48–54. doi:10.1037/h0078640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem Sex Role Inventory. (2016, July 6). Retrieved from http://garote.bdmonkeys.net/bsri.html.

  • Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., & Watson, C. (1976). Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1016–1023. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.1016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. W. (1986). Social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. M. (2003). Girlfighting: Betrayal and rejection among girls. New York. New York: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, M., & Bonnet, K. (2007). Rosie’s daughters: The “first woman to” generation tells its history. Berkeley: Iaso Books/Two Bridges Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisler, J. C., Golden, C., & Rozee, P. D. (1996). Lectures on the psychology of women. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisler, J. C., Golden, C., & Rozee, P. D. (2000). Lectures on the psychology of women (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisler, J. C., Golden, C., & Rozee, P. D. (2004). Lectures on the psychology of women (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisler, J. C., Golden, C., & Rozee, P. D. (2008). Lectures on the psychology of women (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80(5), 389–407. doi:10.1037/h0035334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. (1976). Female psychology: The emerging self. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1994). Whose debate is it anyway? Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 80–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Eagly, A. H. (1994). Bridging the gap between gender politics and the science of gender. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 83–85 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1449091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Eaton, A., Rose, S. M., Riger, S., & McHugh, M. C. (2012). Feminism and psychology: Analysis of a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist, 67(3), 211–230. doi:10.1037/a0027260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, L. (2009). Pink brain, blue brain: How small differences grow into troublesome gaps – and what we can do about it. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

  • Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, A. (1993). The five sexes: why male and female are not enough. The Sciences, 33(2), 9–24. doi:10.1002/j.2326-1951.1993.tb03081.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, A. (2012). Sex/gender: Biology in a social world. New York and. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, J., & Coelleo, M. T. (2010). Do the BSRI and PAQ really measure masculinity and femininity? The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 1000–1009. doi:10.1017/S113874160000264X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J. (1990). Thinking fragments: Psycholoanalysis, feminism, and postmodernism in the contemporary west. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frable, D. E. (1989). Sex typing and gender ideology: Two facets of the individual’s gender ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 95–108. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frable, D. E. S., & Bem, S. L. (1985). If you're gender-schematic, all members of the opposite sex look alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 459–468. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I., & Chrisler, J. (2011). Editorial policy on the use of the terms “sex” and “gender.” Sex Roles, 64, 789–790. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9988-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, M. (2012). Profile Sandra Bem. In A. Rutherford (Ed.), Psychology's feminist voices multimedia internet archive. Retrieved from http://www.feministvoices.com/sandrabem.

  • Gergen, M. (1994). Epistemology, gender, and history: Positioning The Lenses of Gender. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 86–92. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1449092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. A. (1985). Measures of psychological masculinity and femininity: A comment on Gaddy, glass, and Arnkoff. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 32, 163–166. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.32.1.163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. (2014). Obituary: Sandra Lipsitz Bem (1944-2014. The Psychologist, 27(11), 811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. (2015, May). Honoring Sandra Lipsitz Bem (1944–2014): Distinguished Career Award. Association for Women in Psychology Newsletter. Retrieved from http://www.awpsych.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/AWP-Newsletter-Spring-2015.pdf.

  • Golden, C., & McHugh, M. C. (2015). Sandra Bem (Obituary). American Psychologist, 70(3), 280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, R. (2008). Key studies in psychology (5th ed.). UK: Hachette Livre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillel Academy. (2016). Mission. Retrieved from https://hillelpgh.org/about-us/mission.

  • Hoffman, R. M., & Borders, L. D. (2001). Twenty-five years after the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A reassessment and new issues regarding classification variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, I., & Rust, J. (1989). Androgyny and openness to experience in a Chinese population. Social Behavior and Personality, 17(2), 215–218. doi:10.2224/sbp.1989.17.2.215.

  • hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Cambridge: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan-Young, R. (2010). Brain storm: The flaws in the science of sex differences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keener, E., & Mehta, C. (Eds.). (2016). The past, present, and future of masculinity, femininity and gender: Honoring feminist scholar Sandra L. Bem (1944–2014). [Special issue]. Sex Roles. Advance online publication.

  • Kerman, P. (1974). Sex discrimination in help wanted advertising. Santra Clara Law Review, 15(1), 183–209. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2329&context=lawreview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R.S. (2016). Understanding and undermining the development of gender dichotomies: The legacy of Sandra Lipsitz Bem. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0519-4.

  • MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, P., Wilkof, J., & Dambrot, F. (1981). Androgyny across two cultures: United States and Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 12(1), 95–102. doi:10.1177/0022022181121007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marantz Henig, R. (2015, May 14). The last day of her life. The New York Times Magazine, 36–41, 54–56.

  • McConnell-Ginet, S., Brumberg, J., Bem, D. J., & Golden, C. (2015). Cornell University faculty memorial statements, 2013–2014. http://theuniversityfaculty.cornell.edu/memorials/mem_main.html. Retrieved from http://theuniversityfaculty.cornell.edu/memorials/BEM.pdf.

  • Mitsui, H. (1989). Psychological androgyny: comments on Bem’s conceptualization. Japanese. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28(2), 163–169. doi:10.2130/jjesp.28.163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, P. (2004). An examination of the current usefulness of the Bem sex role inventory. Psychological Reports, 94(3), 1331–1336. doi:10.2466/PR0.94.3.1331-1336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ove, T. (2014, May 22). Obituary, Sandra Bem: Psychologist, feminist, pioneer in gender roles. Pittsburgh Post Gazette. Retrieved from http://www.post-gazette.com/news/obituaries/2014/05/23/Obituary-Sandra-Bem-Psychologist-feminist-pioneer-in-gender-roles/stories/201405230080.

  • Pei-Hui, R. A., & Ward, C. (1994). A cross-cultural perspective on models of psychological androgyny. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(3), 391–393. doi:10.1080/00224545.1994.9711745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhode, D. (2014). What women want: An agenda for the women’s movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, C., & Barnett, R. C. (2011). The truth about girls and boys: Challenging toxic stereotypes about our children. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, R., & Allen, M. J. (1984). Sex role stereotypes in northern India and the United States. Sex Roles, 11(7), 615–626. doi:10.1007/BF 00288115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, S. A. (1994). Blindsight”: Overcoming mainstream psychology’s resistance to feminist theory and research. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoak, N. (2009). Androgyny. In J. O’Brien (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gender and society (Vol. 1, pp. 33–26). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1983). Comment on Lubinski, Tellegen, and Butcher’s “masculinity, femininity, and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(2), 440–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attribute and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39. doi:10.1037/h0076857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, A. (2014, June 23). How a woman’s plan to kill herself helped her family grieve. National Public Radio, Morning Edition. http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2014/06/23/323330486/how-a-womans-plan-to-kill-herself-helped-her-family-grieve.

  • Starr, C. B., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2016). Sandra Bem’s gender schema theory after 34 years: A review of its reach and impact. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0591-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockford, M. (2004). The bellwomen: The story of the landmark AT&T sex discrimination case. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upmanyu, V., Upmanyu, S., & Lester, D. (2000). Depressive symptoms among U.S. and Indian college students: The effects of gender and gender role. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(5), 669–671. doi:10.1080/0024540009600508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C., & Sethi, R. (1986). Cross-cultural validation of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Maylasian and South Indian research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17(3), 300–314. doi:10.1177/0022002186017003004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Web of Science. (2016, July 6). Retrieved from http://thomsonreuters.com/en/products-services/scholarly-scientific-research/scholarly-search-and-discovery/web-of-science.html.

  • Whitley, B. E. (1984). Sex role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 12, 207–225. doi:10.1007/BF00288048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1988). Masculinity, femininity and self-esteem: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Sex Roles, 18, 419–431. doi:10.1007/BF00288393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., McMaster, J., Greenspan, R., Mboyi, L., Ncube, T., & Sibanda, B. (1990). Cross-cultural validation of the Bem Sex Role Inventory in Zimbabwe. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(7), 651–656. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(90)90249-Q.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarnold, P. R., Bryant, F. B., & Litsas, F. (1989). Type A behavior and psychological androgyny among Greek college students. European Journal of Personality, 3(4), 249–268. doi:10.1002/per.2410030403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Norvilitis, J., & Jin, S. (2001). Measuring gender orientation with the Bem Sex Role Inventory in Chinese culture. Sex Roles, 44(3–4), 237–251. doi:10.1023/A:1010911305338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology and Women’s and Gender Studies Program, Ithaca College, 953 Danby Road, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA

    Carla R. Golden

  2. Department of Psychology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA, 15705, USA

    Maureen C. McHugh

Authors
  1. Carla R. Golden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maureen C. McHugh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carla R. Golden.

Ethics declarations

The manuscript being submitted is a review biographical article. There were no sources of funding, no conflicts of interest, and no research was conducted using humans or animals. The authors can unequivocally state that we have conducted ourselves in the writing of this review with the highest of ethical and professional standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golden, C.R., McHugh, M.C. The Personal, Political, and Professional Life of Sandra Bem. Sex Roles 76, 529–543 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0674-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0674-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation