Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Notion of “Cultural Heritage” in the International Field: Behind Origin and Evolution of a Concept

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The introduction of the concept of ‘cultural heritage’ is a relatively recent achievement of international law. Over the years, the enthusiasm for the protection of cultural property has enriched the term of new shades of meaning, while maintaining the older ones. At the same time, ‘cultural heritage’ is only one of the terms used in international treaties and other normative instruments. Hence, its comprehension needs to pass through a comparison of the other legal terminologies adopted. In such a context, the paper aims at providing a broad understanding of the idea of ‘cultural heritage’ by investigating its origin and evolution in the legal framework. In order to do so, the analysis begins with a brief discussion of the notion of ‘culture’ by analyzing how it has come to convey the current meanings. The paper then describes the main aspects influencing the linguistic choice within the field of Cultural Heritage Law. The central part of the paper deals with the different terminologies used to refer to cultural property within the international legal instruments (among them, 1954 Hague Convention, 1970 UNESCO Convention, and 1972 World Heritage Convention). Finally, the paper explores the existence of constructions of belongings in the legal terminologies examining the impact of territorial or communitarian linkage in the cultural legal discourse. The aim of this work is to reveal the inner system of interconnections in an effort to shed light on the multiple meanings of the term ‘cultural heritage’ by exploring how the concept evolved within the socio-legal context over time and space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “No brilliant young man on seeing the Jupiter in Pisa or the Hera in Argos has ever desired to be Phidias or Polycletus nor [has ever desired to be] Anacreon o Philetas or Archilochus for having enjoyed their poems. Indeed, appreciating a work as gracefulness does not implies any equal esteem for its creator” [Author’s translation].

References

  1. Abbagnano, Nicola. 1971. Cultura. In Dizionario di filosofia, Turin: Unione Tipografico Editrice.

  2. Angelini, Massimo. 2011. Alle radici della parola « cultura » . Montesquieu archive. http://www.montesquieu.it/biblioteca/Testi/Angelini_cultura.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2020.

  3. Banfi, Emanuele. 2011. «Imperfezione » vs « perfezione » dei sistemi linguistici’. L’analisi linguistica e letteraria 19 (2): 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bellori, Giovanni Pietro. 1672. Le vite de’ pittori, scultori et architetti moderni. Roma.: per il success al Mascardi

  5. Blake, Janet. 2015. International Cultural Heritage Law. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cluzeau, Taïna. 2019. Combien vaut réellement un fossile de dinosaure ?—Nouvelle tendance dans les salles de vente: les fossiles de dinosaures. Décryptage de ce marché en plein essor. National Geographic 16 October 2019. National Geographic archive. https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/animaux/2019/10/combien-vaut-reellement-un-fossile-de-dinosaure. Accessed 21 Jan 2020.

  7. Contel, Raphael Bandle, Anne Laurel Renold, Marc-André. 2012. Affaire Manuscrits Coréens—France et Corée du Sud. Archive: ArThemis (http://unige.ch/art-adr): https://plone.unige.ch/art-adr/cases-affaires/affaire-manuscrits-coreens-2013-france-et-coree-du-sud-1. Accessed 26 Jan 2020.

  8. De Falco, Vincenzo. 2005. Funzioni pubbliche e cultura. In eds Amirante, Domenico; De Falco, Vincenzo Tutela e valorizzazione dei beni culturali—Aspetti sovranazionali e comparati. Turin: Giappichelli.

  9. Fadda, Carlo. 1894. L’arte e gli artisti nel diritto romano. Genova: Regio Stabilimento Tipo Litografico Pietro Martini.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Francastel, Pierre. 1945. L’histoire de l’art, instrument de la propagande germanique. Paris: Libr. De Médicis.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Francastel, Pierre. 1970. Études de sociologie de l’art. Paris: Denoël-Gonthier.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Francioni, Francesco, and Federico Lenzerini. 2008. The 1972 World Heritage Convention—A Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Francioni, Francesco. 2007. Des biens culturels au patrimoine culturel: l’évolution dynamique d’un concept et de son extension. In Elaboration de règles internationales sur l’éducation, la science et la culture, vol. 5, ed. A.A. Yusuf, 231–247. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff et Editions UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Garbini, Riccardo. 2007. Che cos’è la cultura. In Contaminazioni—Studi sull’Intercultura, ed. D. Costantino. Milan: Franco Angeli Edizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gombrich, Ernst Hans. 1999. L’uso delle immagini. Studi sulla funzione sociale dell’arte e sulla comunicazione visiva. Milan: Leonardo Arte.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Graziadei, Michele, and Barbara Pasa. 2017. Patrimoni culturali, tesori nazionali: il protezionismo degli Stati membri dell’UE nella circolazione dei beni culturali. Contratto e impresa/Europa 22 (1): 121–159.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gros, Pierre. 1983. Statut social et rôle culturel des architectes (période hellénistique et augustéenne). Architecture et société. De l’archaïsme grec à la fin de la République. Actes du Colloque international organisé par le Centre national de la recherche scientifique et l’École française de Rome (Rome 2-4 décembre 1980) 66: 425–452.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hauser, Arnold. 1955–1956. Storia sociale dell’arte—Preistoria Antichità Medioevo Rinascimento Manierismo Barocco, vol. I. Turin: Einaudi.

  19. Héritier, Annie. 2015. Le marché de l’art et le patrimoine culturel—Une histoire juridique européenne. In Droit et marché de l’art en Europe—Régulation et normalisation du risque. Entre champs culturels et économie réelle : quelles régulations ?, ed. G.C. Giorgini and S. Perez. Bruxelles: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hristov, Romeo, and Santiago Genovés. 1999. Mesoamerican Evidence of Pre-Columbian Transoceanic Contacts. Ancient Mesoamerica 10 (2): 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jacq, Christian. 2002. L’Egitto dei grandi faraoni. Milan: Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Karmon, David. 2011. The Ruin of the Eternal City—Antiquity & Preservation in Renaissance Rome. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kubler, George. 1962. The Shape of Time. Remarks on the History of Things. London: Yale University Press/Londra.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lenzerini, Federico. 2011. Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Living Culture of Peoples. The European Journal of International Law 22 (1): 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Leopardi, Giacomo. 1973. Zibaldone di pensieri. Turin: Einaudi Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mather, Lynn. 2013. Law and Society. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, ed. R. E. Goodin. Oxford University Press archive. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199604456-e-015#oxfordhb-9780199604456-bibliography-15. Accessed 23 Jan 2020.

  27. Mayo, Margaret Ellen. 2007. Collecting Ancient Art—An Historical Perspective. In Who Owns the Past?—Cultural Policy, Cultural Property and the Law, ed. K. Fitz Gibbon. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Merryman, John Henry, Albert E. Elsen, and Stephen K. Ulrice. 2007. Law, Ethics and the Visual Arts. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Merryman, John Henry. 1986. Two Ways of Thinking About Cultural Property. The American Journal of International Law 80 (4): 831–853.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Merryman, John Henry. 1994. The Nation and the Object. International Journal of Cultural Property 3 (1): 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Merryman, John Henry. 2001. Cultural Property, International Trade and Human Rights. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 19: 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Merryman, John Henry. 2005. Cultural Property Internationalism. International Journal of Cultural Property 12 (1): 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Morel, Jean-Paul. 1997. L’artigiano. In L’uomo romano, ed. A. Giardina. Rome: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Morris, Desmond. 2014. La scimmia artistica. L’evoluzione dell’arte nella storia dell’uomo. Milan: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  35. O’Keefe, Patrick J. 1999. The meaning of ‘cultural property’ under the 1954 Hague Convention. Netherlands International Law Review 46: 26–56.

    Google Scholar 

  36. O’Keefe, Patrick J. 2000. Commentary on the 1970 Unesco Convention on the Illicit Trade. Leicester: Institute of Art and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  37. O’Keefe, Patrick J. 2017. Protecting Cultural Objects: Before and After 1970. Builth Wells: Institute of Art and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pommier, Édouard. 1991. L’art de la liberté—Doctrines et débats de la Révolution française. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pommier, Édouard. 2007. L’invenzione dell’arte nell’Italia del Rinascimento. Turin: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Prott, Lyndel V. 2000. Biens culturels volés ou illicitement exportés—Commentaire relativf à la Convention d’Unidroit (1995). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Prott, Lyndel V. 2005. The International Movement of Cultural Objects. International Journal of Cultural Property 12 (2): 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Przyborowska-Klimczak, Anna. 1989–1990. Les notions des “biens culturels” et du “patrimoine culturel mondial” dans le droit international. Polish Yearbook of International Law 18: 47–72.

  43. Romme, Gilbert. 1894. Rapport au nom du Comité d’Instruction publique. In Procès-verbaux du Comité d’Instruction Publique de la Convention Nationale, vol. II, ed. M.J. Guillaume. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sacco, Rodolfo. 2015. Il diritto muto—Neuroscienze, conoscenza tacita, valori condivisi. Bologna: per gli eredi del Dozza: il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schaaf, Peter, and Günther A. Wagner. 2001. Comments on “Mesoamerican Evidence of Pre-Columbian Transoceanic Contacts” By Hristov and Genovés, in Ancient Mesoamerica 10:207–213, 1999. Ancient Mesoamerica 12 (1): 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stewart, James. 1814. Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Vice-Admiralty, at Halifax, in Nova-Scotia, From the Commencement of the Was, in 1803, to the End of the Year 1813, in the Time of the Alexander Croke, LL.D. Judge of the Court. London: Butterworth and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stott, Peter H. 2011. The World Heritage Convention and the National Park Service, 1962–1972. The George Wright Forum 28 (3): 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Toman, Jiří. 1996. The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. Paris: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tylor, Edward Burnett. 1920. Primitive Culture—Researches into Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art, and Custom, vol. I. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  50. UNIDROIT Secretariat. 2001. UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects: Explanatory Report. Uniform Law Review 6 (3): 476–564.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vasari, Giorgio. 1647. Le vite de’ più eccellenti architetti, pittori, et scultori italiani. Bologna: per gli eredi del Dozza.

  52. Verde, Simone. 2014. Cultura senza capitale. Storia e tradimento di un’idea italiana. Venice: Marsilio Editori.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Voulgaris, Ioannis. 2003. Les principaux problèmes soulevés par l’unification du droit régissant les biens culturels. Uniform Law Review 8 (1–2): 541–550.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Vygotsky, Lev. 1986. Thought and Language. London: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wagner, Anne, and Sophie Cacciaguidi-Fahy (eds.). 2008. Obscurity and Clarity in the Law: Prospects and Challenges. London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zanker, Paul. 1989. Augusto e il potere delle immagini. Turin: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zanker, Paul. 1997. In Search of the Roman Viewer. Studies in the History of Art 49: 178–191.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zanker, Paul. 2002. Un’arte per l’impero. Funzione e intenzione delle immagini nel mondo romano. Milan: Electa.

    Google Scholar 

International Legal Instruments (Chronological Order)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Verona, School of Law, Via Carlo Montanari, no. 9, 37122, Verona, Italy

    Sabrina Ferrazzi

Authors
  1. Sabrina Ferrazzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina Ferrazzi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrazzi, S. The Notion of “Cultural Heritage” in the International Field: Behind Origin and Evolution of a Concept. Int J Semiot Law 34, 743–768 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09739-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09739-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation