Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Listening to Distant Voices

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The “digital revolution”, which the juridical observer is asked to tackle, as well as the consequences that legal experts have to deal with, is not an abstract phenomenon. Digitalisation is a consequence and the latest manifestation of the Western culture of the machine. This framework shapes the various concepts of language, political community, and justice, on which, in turn, the diverse current views of the interpreter depend. The twentieth century’s globalisation of legal civilisation has perfected the machinery of legal talk. The mechanics of legal decision rules are based upon the automatism of the sentence, the predicative language. Law appears as a “black box”. The increase of law’s authority and persuasive power depends exactly on this. As the function of rhetoric is to make us see the means of persuasion around each argument, the analysis of law is a matter of rhetoric. Rhetoric analyses particular forms of legal talk as contents. The paper suggests that the basic question of the interpreter’s reasonableness is of how to speak of law and justice without coming under the sway of a world-view that treats all law in the terms of the instrumental strategies and technologies typical of the modern society of control. In my opinion, the interpreter’s role demands him to become a speaker of a real lingua franca, a language appropriate for making distant voices communicate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wiener, Norbert. 1989. The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society (1950). London: Free Association.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agamben, Giorgio. 2014. Come l’ossessione della sicurezza fa mutare la democrazia. Una cittadinanza ridotta a dati biometrici. Le Monde diplomatique, 25Feb.

  3. Barbrook, Richard and Andy Cameron. The Californian ideology. A critique of West Coast cyber-libertarianism. http://www.hrc.wmin.ac.uk/theory-californianideology-main.html. Accessed 02 December 2019.

  4. Treccani. 2019. Entry ‘macchina’. Vocabolario on line della Enciclopedia Italiana. http://www.treccani.it/vocabolario/macchina/. Accessed 02 December 2019.

  5. Peirce, Charles S. 1887. Logical machines. The American Journal of Psychology 1: 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schauer, Frederick. 1991. Playing by the rules: A philosophical examination of rule-based decision-making in law and in life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barthes, Roland. 1978. Leçon. Texte de la leçon inaugurale prononcée le 7 janvier 1977 au Collège de France. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

  8. Heidegger, Martin. 1957. Der Satz vom Grund. Neske, Pfullingen (transl. The Principle of Reason, Bloomington 1991).

  9. Heidegger, Martin. 1989. Überlieferte Sprache und technische Sprache (Vortrag, Comburg 18.7. 1962). St. Gallen: Erker.

  10. Netz, Reviel. 2009. Ludic proof. Greek mathematics and the Alexandrian aesthetic. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cover, Robert M. 1983. The Supreme Court, 1982 term. Foreword: Nomos and narrative. Harvard Law Review 97 (4): 4–68.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deleuze, Gilles and Felix Guattari. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus. London: Athlone (or. Mille Plateaux. Paris 1980).

  13. Lintermann, Bernd and Peter Weibel. 2017. YOU:R:CODE. https://zkm.de/de/yourcode. Accessed 02 December 2019.

  14. Grass, Robert N. and R. Heckel/M. Puddu/D. Paunescu/W. J. Stark: Robust chemical preservation of digital information on DNA in silica with error-correcting codes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54, 8: 2552–2555.

  15. Paskoski, Dimce. 2003. Foucaults Archäologie und der Diskurs der Literatur. Diskursanalyse und Literaturtheorie. Diss, Universität Konstanz.

  16. Finley, Moses I. 2002. The world of Odysseus (1978). New York: New York Review of Books.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ludwig, Otto. 2005. Geschichte des Schreibens. Vol.1: Von der Antike bis zum Buchdruck. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  18. Messner, Claudius. 1998. Das Subjekt als Horizont. Zur Repräsentation von Individuum und Gesellschaft im philosophischen Diskurs. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

  19. Plato. 1981, Theätet, ed. Ekkehard Martens. Stuttgart: Reclam.

  20. Graham, Daniel, and Justin Barney. 2014. Γραμματικ™ (Grammatike) in Plato and Aristotle. Apeiron 47 (4): 513–525.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leclercq, Jean. 1974. Zeiterfahrung und Zeitbegriff im Spätmittelalter. In Antiqui und Moderni. Traditionsbewußtsein und Fortschrittsbewußtsein im späten Mittelalter, ed. Albert Zimmermann, 1–20. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kantorowicz, Ernst H. 1990. Die zwei Körper des Königs. Eine Studie zur politischen Theologie des Mittelalters. München: dtv. (or. The Two Bodies of the King, Princeton 1957).

  23. Elias, Norbert. 1992. Arbeiten zur Wissenssoziologie, vol 2. Über die Zeit, 4. ed. (1984). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

  24. Galilei, Galileo. 1991. Il saggiatore (1623), ed. Giorgio Giorello. Milano: Feltrinelli.

  25. Messner, Claudius. 2004. Icaro, per esempio. La sofferenza e l’immagine. Sociologia del diritto XXXI 3: 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Burckhardt, Martin. 2018. Philosophie der Maschine. Berlin: Matthes and Seitz.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Couturat, Louis. 1901. La logique de Leibniz. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Trendelenburg, Adolf. 1856. Leibnizens Entwarf einer allgemeinen Charakteristik. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Burckhardt, Martin. 2018. Eine kurze Geschichte der Digitalisierung. München: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Boole George. 1854. An investigation of the laws of thought, on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities. Project Gutenberg: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/15114/15114-pdf.pdf.

  31. Lem, Stanisław. 2013. Summa Technologiae. Minneapolis: Univ. Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. The Shift Project. 2019. Report, March 2019/Lean ICT—Towards digital sobriety. https://theshiftproject.org/en/lean-ict-2/. Accessed 02 December 2019.

  33. Cray Inc. 2019. How Frontier measures up. understand the speed and size of an exascale supercomputer. https://www.cray.com/resources/how-frontier-measures-up. Accessed 02 December 2019.

  34. Snyder, Timothy. 2019. And we dream as electric sheep on humanity, sexuality and digitality. Eurozine, 6 May 2019.

  35. Constable, Marianne. 2017. Law and language as information systems: Perish the thought. In Searching for contemporary legal thought, ed. Justin Desautels-Stein and Christopher Tomlins, 155–176. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Foucault, Michel. 1977. Le jeu de Michel Foucault. In Dits et écrits, text n. 206.

  37. MacKenzie, Donald. 2019. How algorithms interact: Goffman’s ‘interaction order’ in automated trading. Theory, Culture & Society 36 (2): 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Marsh, Sarah. 2019. Ethics committee raises alarm over ‘predictive policing’ tool. Algorithm that predicts who will reoffend may give rise to ethical concerns such as bias. The Guardian, Sat 20 April.

  39. Rahwan, Iyad, et al. 2019. Machine behaviour. Nature 568: 477–486.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lyon, David, and Elia Zureik (eds.). 1996. Computers, surveillance and privacy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hill, Robin. 2016. What an algorithm is. Philosophy & Technology 29 (1): 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kowalski, Robert. 1979. Algorithm = Logic + Control. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 22 (7): 424–435.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mittelstadt, Brent, et al. 2016. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society 3 (2): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Passig, Kathrin. 2018. The black box is a state of mind. Eurozine 2 Feb 2018.

  45. Sneha, Puthiya P. 2014. Reading from a distance—data as text. Centre for Internet & Society. https://cis-india.org/raw/digital-humanities/reading-from-a-distance. Accessed 02 December 2019.

  46. Roberge, Jonathan, and Robert Seyfert. 2016. What are algorithmic cultures? In Algorithmic cultures essays on meaning, performance and new technologies, ed. R. Seyfert and J. Roberge, 1–25. Abingdon New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Campion, Baptiste. 2018. Platforms are not neutral. Online debate and the rules of interaction. Eurozine 6 August.

  48. Teubner, Gunther. 2018. Digitale Rechtssubjekte? Zum privatrechtlichen Status autonomer Softwareagenten. Ancilla Iuris (anci.ch) 35: 36–78.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Luhmann, Niklas. 1984. Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp (transl. Social systems, Stanford 1995).

  50. Esposito, Elena. 2017. Artificial communication? The production of contingency by algorithms. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 46: 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Four Essays, ed. Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.

  52. Petrilli, Susan, and Augusto Ponzio. 2008. Lineamenti di semiotica e di filosofia del linguaggio. Bari: B.A. Graphis.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Shannon, Claude E., and Warren Weaver. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, Ill: Illinois UP.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fuchs, Peter. 1997. Adressabilität als Grundbegriff der soziologischen Systemtheorie. Soziale Systeme 3 (1): 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Luhmann, Niklas. 2002. Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Messner, Claudius. 2009. Diritto, politica, tortura e altri “states of concern”. Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica 39 (2): 525–543.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Messner, Claudius. 2018. Il diritto, il linguaggio, la musica. Riflessioni sullo statuto estetico del diritto. In Multimodal argumentation, Pluralism and images in law—Studies on argumentation & legal philosophy/3, ed. Maurizio Manzin/Federico Puppo/Serena Tomasi, 317–342. Trento: Università degli Studi di Trento.

  58. Luhmann, Niklas. 2005. Was ist Kommunikation (1986). In Soziologische Aufklärung 6, 109–120. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

  59. Wägenbaur, Thomas. 1999. Emergenz Der Sprung von der Evolutions- in die Kommunikationstheorie und Ästhetik. Parapluie 7: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Constable, Marianne. 2005. Just silences: The limits and possibilities of modern law. Princeton: Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Cesarini Sforza, Widar. 2018. Il diritto dei privati (1929). ed. Michele Spanò. Macerata: Quodlibet.

  62. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1982. Ce que parler veut dire. L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard.

  63. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal 38: 814–853.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Humphreys, Sally. 1985. Law as discourse. History and Anthropology 1: 241–264.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Althusser, Louis. 1995. Idéologie et appareils idéologiques d’État. In Sur la reproduction, 269–314. Paris: PUF.

  67. Rosenstock-Huessy, Eugen. 1970. Speech and reality. Norwich: Argo.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Latour, Bruno. 2002. La fabrique du droit. Une ethnographie du Conseil d’état. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zimmermann, Reinhard. 1990. The law of obligations. Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Baslez, Marie-Françoise. 1984. L’étranger dans la grèce antique. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Aristotle. 1965. Politik, ed. Nelly Tsouyopoulos/Ernesto Grassi. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

  72. Freadman, Anne. 2004. The Machinery of talk: Charles Peirce and the sign hypothesis. Stanford CA: Stanford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hamacher, Werner. 2018. Sprachgerechtigkeit. Frankfurt: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Messner, Claudius. 2014. Luhmann’s judgment. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 27: 359–387.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Deleuze, Gilles. 2000. Schluss mit dem Gericht. In Kritik und Klinik, 171–183. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

  76. Arendt, Hannah. 1981. Vita activa oder Vom tätigen Leben. München: Piper (or. The Human Condition, Chicago, 1958).

  77. Aristotle. 1974. In Kategorien. Lehre vom Satz, ed. Eugen Rolfes. Hamburg: Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Aristotle. 1996. In Retorica, ed. Marco Dorati. Milano: Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Arendt, Hannah. 1955. Elemente und Ursprünge totaler Herrschaft. Frankfurt: EVA (or. The Origins of Totalitarianism, Cleveland 1951).

  80. Kennedy, Duncan. 2006. Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000. In The new law and economic development: A critical appraisal, ed. David M. Trubek and Alvaro Santos. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Weiss, Gunther A. 2000. The enchantment of codification in the common-law world. Yale Journal of Int’l Law 25 (2): 435–532.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Legrand, Pierre. 1994. Strange power of words: Codification situated (review article on Csaba Varga). Tulane European and Civil Law Forum 9: 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. Habitus, code et codification. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 64: 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Messner, Claudius. 2016. Orientamenti del diritto. Napoli: ESI.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Bellucci, Patrizia. 2002. A onor del vero. Fondamenti di linguistica giudiziaria. Torino: UTET.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Vismann, Cornelia. 2000. Akten. Medientechnik und Recht. Frankfurt: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  87. D’Orta, Maurizio. 2011. “L’idea di ‘progresso’ del diritto dall’antichità alla modernità. Teoria e Storia del Diritto Privato IV. http://www.teoriaestoriadeldirittoprivato.com/index.php?com=statics&option=index&cID=228. Accessed 02 December 2019.

  88. Hymes, Dell. 1972. Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, ed. Joseph J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 38–71. New York: Holt, Rinehart, &Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Luhmann, Niklas. 1993. Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp (transl. Law as a social system, Oxford 2004).

  90. Hymes, Dell. 1972. On communicative competence. In Sociolinguistics, ed. J.B. Pride and Janet Holmes, 269–285. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Messner, Claudius. 2017. Now this: On the gradual production of justice Whilst doing law and music. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 31: 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Karen, Petroski. 2014. Visual legal commentary. In Law, culture and visual studies, ed. Anne Wagner and Richard K. Sherwin, 671–696. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  93. White, James Boyd. 1985. Law as rhetoric, rhetoric as law: The arts of cultural and communal life. The University of Chicago Law Review 52 (3): 684–702.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Rubinelli, Sara. 2003. Τ⌠ποι e ι′δια nella “Retorica” di Aristotele. Phronesis 48 (3): 238–247.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Bachelard, Gaston. 1978. Die Bildung des wissenschaftlichen Geistes. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp [or. La formation de l’esprit scientifique, Paris: Vrin, 1938].

  96. Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2005. Overcoming the myth of the mental: how philosophers can profit from the phenomenology of everyday expertise. APA Pacific Division Presidential Address.

  97. Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1966. Trattato dell’argomentazione. La nuova retorica. Torino: Einaudi (or. La Nouvelle Rhetorique. Traité de l’argumentation. Paris 1958).

  98. Lantella, Lelio, Emanuele Stolfi, and Mario Deganello. 2004. Operazioni elementari di discorso e sapere giuridico. Torino: Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  99. White, James Boyd. 2002. Legal knowledge. Harvard Law Review 115 (5): 1396–1431.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Blumenberg, Hans. 1998. Begriffe in Geschichten. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Aristotle. 1999. Etica Nicomachea, ed. Carlo Natali. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

  102. Ayer, Alfred J. 1936. Language, Truth, And Logic. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Schanze, Helmut. 2006. Anpassungen. Neue Theorie-Biologie-Kognition. Perelman und Maturana. In Die neue Rhetorik. Studien zu Chaim Perelman, ed. Jürgen Kopperschmidt, 297–305. München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Freadman, Anne. 2012. The traps and trappings of Genre theory. Applied Linguistics 33 (5): 544–563.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Austin, John L. 1979. Performative utterances. In Philosophical papers, ed. James O. Urmson and Geoffrey J. Warnock, 233–252. Oxford: Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words: The William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Cambridge: Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Zorzetto, Silvia. 2015. Reasonableness. The Italian Law Journal 1 (1): 108–139.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Blumenberg, Hans. 2006. Arbeit am Mythos. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Baecker, Dirk. 2018. Der Geist wirkt, wo er will. FAZ, 02 December.

  110. Vogl, Joseph. 2007. Über das Zaudern. Zürich: Diaphanes.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Sen, Amartya. 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Oppermann, Jan Patrick. 2003. Anaximander’s rhythm and the question of justice. Law and Critique V 14: 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  113. White, James Boyd. 2006. Interview with J. B. White. Michigan Law Review 105: 1403–1419.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Greimas, Algirdas J. 2014. Analyse sémiotique d’un discours juridique. Rimini: Guaraldi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dip. di Scienze Giuridiche, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy

    Claudius Messner

Authors
  1. Claudius Messner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudius Messner.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Messner, C. Listening to Distant Voices. Int J Semiot Law 33, 1143–1173 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09735-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09735-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation