Abstract
Bridging universities are research entities that connect the international research community with their domestic peer universities, referred as bridged universities. In this paper, we study co-authorship networks using international collaborative publication data from Korean universities and investigate the structural relationships between 142 Korean universities and 105 foreign countries. The results reveal the presence of bridging universities at the center of the international R&D networks. Further, we identify a positive relationship between bridged universities’ research outcomes and their collaboration intensity with bridging universities. However, a negative correlation is also found between bridged universities’ R&D internationalization and their collaboration with bridging universities. Universities, especially in latecomer countries where access to international knowledge is limited, are advised to balance their utilization of bridging universities with contacting global partners directly for their internalization efforts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The 1981–2010 South Korea NCR, which is the source of the data used in this study, is a commercial product from Thompson Reuters. As seen in the title of this product, the information is particular to one region (Republic of Korea) over a specific time period (1981–2010). The age of the data is one limitation for this study, and we expect that further research on this theme will use more recent data.
References
Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46, 385–406.
Adams, J., & Griliches, Z. (1996). Measuring science: An exploration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 12664–12670.
Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., & Stephan, P. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999. Research Policy, 34, 259–285.
Ahn, J., Oh, D., & Lee, J.-D. (2014). The scientific impact and partner selection in collaborative research at Korean universities. Scientometrics, 100, 173–188.
Altbach, P. G. (2013). Advancing the national and global knowledge economy: The role of research universities in developing countries. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 316–330.
Beaver, D. D. (2004). Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics, 60, 399–408.
Belderbos, R., Gilsing, V. A., & Suzuki, S. (2016). Direct and mediated ties to universities: “Scientific” absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Organization, 14(1), 32–52.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). analyzing social networks. London: SAGE Publications Limited.
Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chang, C. C., Tsai, J. M., & Hung, S. W. (2013). Resolving the innovation puzzle of latecomers: The case of Taiwan. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(4), 459–472.
Choi, H. (2017). Ready-steady-go for emerging technologies in post catch-up countries: A longitudinal network analysis of nanotech in Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29, 946–959.
Choi, H., & Park, S. (2018). Network variations at the intersection of national capability orientation and technological path dependence—Patent citation network analysis of the hydrogen energy and nano-Tech sectors. Industry & Innovation, 25(8), 809–831.
Choi, H., Park, S., & Lee, J.-D. (2011). Government-driven knowledge networks as precursors to emerging sectors: A case of the hydrogen energy sector in Korea. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20, 751–787.
Choi, H., Shin, J., & Hwang, W. S. (2018). Two faces of scientific knowledge in the external technology search process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 41–50.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1–23.
Cristina, B. S., Teresa, Gı. M., & Emilio, H. A. (2002). Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: An empirical study of Spanish firms. R&D Management, 32, 321–341.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.
Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 443–475.
Foray, D., & Lissoni, F. (2010). University research and public-private interaction. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 275–314). Oxford: North-Holland.
Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 323–335.
Gazni, A., & Thelwall, M. (2016). The citation impact of collaboration between top institutions: A temporal analysis. Research Evaluation, 25(2), 219–229.
Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Olmeda-Gómez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2013). Quantifying the benefits of international scientific collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 392–404.
Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 203–215.
Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002). Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks: The efficacy of multiple contacts. Organization Studies, 23, 525–548.
Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29, 567–586.
Hobday, M., Rush, H., & Bessant, J. (2004). Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: The transition phase to leadership. Research Policy, 33, 1433–1457.
Hoch, P. K. (1987). Migration and the generation of new scientific ideas. Minerva, 25, 209–237.
Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., & Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science, 322, 1259–1262.
Jonkers, K., & Cruz-Castro, L. (2010). The internationalisation of public sector research through international joint laboratories. Science and Public Policy, 37, 559–570.
Jonkers, K., & Tijssen, R. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77(2), 309–333.
Karamanos, A. G. (2016). Effects of a firm’s and their partners’ alliance ego-network structure on its innovation output in an era of ferment. R&D Management, 46(S1), 261–276.
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.
Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kolesnikov, S., Woo, S., Li, Y., Shapira, P., & Youtie, J. (2017). Mapping the emergence of international university research ventures. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9640-6.
Kwon, K. S., Park, H. W., So, M., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 90(1), 163–176.
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 673–702.
Lee, Y.-G. (2008). Patent licensability and life: A study of U.S. patents registered by South Korean public research institutes. Scientometrics, 75, 463–471.
Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 778–788.
Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20, 1–12.
Pavitt, K. (1991). What makes basic research economically useful? Research Policy, 20, 109–119.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102.
Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509–532.
Schiller, D. (2006). Nascent innovation systems in developing Countries: University responses to regional needs in Thailand. Industry & Innovation, 13, 481–504.
Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320.
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 643–681.
Taylor, A., & Greve, H. R. (2006). Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. The Academy of Management Journal, 49, 723–740.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
von Zedtwitz, M., & Gassmann, O. (2002). Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, 31(4), 569–588.
Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34, 1608–1618.
Wang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2015). Alliance capabilities. Journal of Management, 41, 236–260.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Welsh, R., Glenna, L., Lacy, W., & Biscotti, D. (2008). Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism. Research Policy, 37, 1854–1864.
Wong, P. K. (2001). Leveraging multinational corporations, fostering technopreneurship: The changing role of S&T policy in Singapore. International Journal of Technology Management, 22, 539–567.
Wu, C.-Y., & Mathews, J. (2012). Knowledge flows in the solar photovoltaic industry: Insights from patenting by Taiwan, Korea, and China. Research Policy, 41, 524–540.
Yang, C.-H., & Hayakawa, K. (2015). Localization and overseas R&D activity: The case of Taiwanese multinational enterprises in China. R&D Management, 45, 181–195.
Yoon, J. (2015). The evolution of South Korea’s innovation system: Moving towards the triple helix model? Scientometrics, 104(1), 265–293.
Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2008). Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 37, 1188–1204.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for an editor, Wolfgang Glänzel, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions. Hyundo Choi acknowledges that this study was supported by research fund from Chosun University, 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahn, J., Choi, H. & Oh, Dh. Leveraging bridging universities to access international knowledge: Korean universities’ R&D internationalization. Scientometrics 120, 519–537 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03138-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03138-4