Skip to main content
Log in

Leveraging bridging universities to access international knowledge: Korean universities’ R&D internationalization

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bridging universities are research entities that connect the international research community with their domestic peer universities, referred as bridged universities. In this paper, we study co-authorship networks using international collaborative publication data from Korean universities and investigate the structural relationships between 142 Korean universities and 105 foreign countries. The results reveal the presence of bridging universities at the center of the international R&D networks. Further, we identify a positive relationship between bridged universities’ research outcomes and their collaboration intensity with bridging universities. However, a negative correlation is also found between bridged universities’ R&D internationalization and their collaboration with bridging universities. Universities, especially in latecomer countries where access to international knowledge is limited, are advised to balance their utilization of bridging universities with contacting global partners directly for their internalization efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The 1981–2010 South Korea NCR, which is the source of the data used in this study, is a commercial product from Thompson Reuters. As seen in the title of this product, the information is particular to one region (Republic of Korea) over a specific time period (1981–2010). The age of the data is one limitation for this study, and we expect that further research on this theme will use more recent data.

References

  • Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46, 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J., & Griliches, Z. (1996). Measuring science: An exploration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 12664–12670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., & Stephan, P. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999. Research Policy, 34, 259–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, J., Oh, D., & Lee, J.-D. (2014). The scientific impact and partner selection in collaborative research at Korean universities. Scientometrics, 100, 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G. (2013). Advancing the national and global knowledge economy: The role of research universities in developing countries. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D. (2004). Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics, 60, 399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., Gilsing, V. A., & Suzuki, S. (2016). Direct and mediated ties to universities: “Scientific” absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Organization, 14(1), 32–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). analyzing social networks. London: SAGE Publications Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. C., Tsai, J. M., & Hung, S. W. (2013). Resolving the innovation puzzle of latecomers: The case of Taiwan. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(4), 459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H. (2017). Ready-steady-go for emerging technologies in post catch-up countries: A longitudinal network analysis of nanotech in Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29, 946–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H., & Park, S. (2018). Network variations at the intersection of national capability orientation and technological path dependence—Patent citation network analysis of the hydrogen energy and nano-Tech sectors. Industry & Innovation, 25(8), 809–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H., Park, S., & Lee, J.-D. (2011). Government-driven knowledge networks as precursors to emerging sectors: A case of the hydrogen energy sector in Korea. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20, 751–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H., Shin, J., & Hwang, W. S. (2018). Two faces of scientific knowledge in the external technology search process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristina, B. S., Teresa, Gı. M., & Emilio, H. A. (2002). Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: An empirical study of Spanish firms. R&D Management, 32, 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 443–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D., & Lissoni, F. (2010). University research and public-private interaction. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 275–314). Oxford: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazni, A., & Thelwall, M. (2016). The citation impact of collaboration between top institutions: A temporal analysis. Research Evaluation, 25(2), 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Olmeda-Gómez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2013). Quantifying the benefits of international scientific collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002). Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks: The efficacy of multiple contacts. Organization Studies, 23, 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29, 567–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M., Rush, H., & Bessant, J. (2004). Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: The transition phase to leadership. Research Policy, 33, 1433–1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, P. K. (1987). Migration and the generation of new scientific ideas. Minerva, 25, 209–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., & Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science, 322, 1259–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers, K., & Cruz-Castro, L. (2010). The internationalisation of public sector research through international joint laboratories. Science and Public Policy, 37, 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers, K., & Tijssen, R. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77(2), 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamanos, A. G. (2016). Effects of a firm’s and their partners’ alliance ego-network structure on its innovation output in an era of ferment. R&D Management, 46(S1), 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kolesnikov, S., Woo, S., Li, Y., Shapira, P., & Youtie, J. (2017). Mapping the emergence of international university research ventures. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9640-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, K. S., Park, H. W., So, M., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 90(1), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-G. (2008). Patent licensability and life: A study of U.S. patents registered by South Korean public research institutes. Scientometrics, 75, 463–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 778–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1991). What makes basic research economically useful? Research Policy, 20, 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, D. (2006). Nascent innovation systems in developing Countries: University responses to regional needs in Thailand. Industry & Innovation, 13, 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 643–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., & Greve, H. R. (2006). Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. The Academy of Management Journal, 49, 723–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Zedtwitz, M., & Gassmann, O. (2002). Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, 31(4), 569–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34, 1608–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2015). Alliance capabilities. Journal of Management, 41, 236–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, R., Glenna, L., Lacy, W., & Biscotti, D. (2008). Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism. Research Policy, 37, 1854–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. K. (2001). Leveraging multinational corporations, fostering technopreneurship: The changing role of S&T policy in Singapore. International Journal of Technology Management, 22, 539–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-Y., & Mathews, J. (2012). Knowledge flows in the solar photovoltaic industry: Insights from patenting by Taiwan, Korea, and China. Research Policy, 41, 524–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C.-H., & Hayakawa, K. (2015). Localization and overseas R&D activity: The case of Taiwanese multinational enterprises in China. R&D Management, 45, 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, J. (2015). The evolution of South Korea’s innovation system: Moving towards the triple helix model? Scientometrics, 104(1), 265–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2008). Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 37, 1188–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for an editor, Wolfgang Glänzel, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions. Hyundo Choi acknowledges that this study was supported by research fund from Chosun University, 2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyundo Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahn, J., Choi, H. & Oh, Dh. Leveraging bridging universities to access international knowledge: Korean universities’ R&D internationalization. Scientometrics 120, 519–537 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03138-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03138-4

Keywords

Navigation