Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Developing a Phenomenographic Argument for Science Teacher Educators’ Conceptions Regarding Question-Asking

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study developed a phenomenographic argument regarding science teacher educators’ (STEs) question-asking conceptions. Question-asking in teaching how to teach science concepts to prospective science teachers is a fundamental strategy. However, STEs’ conceptual understanding of the question-asking phenomenon is uncharted territory. The present study aimed to explore the STEs’ question-asking conceptions based on complexity around a newly proposed classroom discourse-based conceptual taxonomy that can be used to think about what-aspects and how-aspects of STEs’ question-asking. The participants were 29 STEs. The participants’ experienced-based conceptions of question-asking were categorized as monological, declarative, dialogical, and dialectical in the outcome space. From a monological to a dialectical conceptual stance, the STEs externalized their question-asking conceptions by the following themes: questions are intellectual traps, questions are pre-organizers, questions should be used for control and evaluation, questions are feedback systems, questions are effective communicative tools, questions fluctuate students’ cognition, questions ensure students’ concept formation, questions are enacted for students’ conceptual change, and questions are triggering for argumentative discourse. Finally, educational recommendations were offered regarding pedagogic noticing and professional development of STEs regarding question-asking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so due to the sensitive nature of the research supporting data is not available.

References

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2003). Growing and developing as a university teacher-variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). A phenomenographic approach to developing academics’ understanding of the nature of teaching and learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(6), 633–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2012). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(1), 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. (2000). Culture and pedagogy. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. J. (2017). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (5th ed.). Dialogos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, J. (2013). Educating for intellectual virtues: From theory to practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(2), 248–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, G. (2018). Teacher discursive moves: Conceptualising a schema of dialogic discourse in science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1891–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., Dalege, J., Kievit, R. A., & Haig, B. D. (2021). Theory construction methodology: A practical framework for building theories in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 756–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, M., & Rubin, D. (2006). How contingent questioning promotes extended student talk: A function of display questions. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(2), 141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. C. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice. Teachers College Press.

  • Candela, A. (1998). Students’ power in classroom discourse. Linguistics and Education, 10(2), 139–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, T. C. (1965). The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses: With this method the dangers of parental affection for a favorite theory can be circumvented. Science, 148(3671), 754–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. C., Park, S., & Hand, B. (2016). Examining the use of talk and writing for students’ development of scientific conceptual knowledge through constructing and critiquing arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 34(2), 100–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Zhang, J., Chan, C. K., Michaels, S., Resnick, L. B., & Huang, X. (2020). The link between student-perceived teacher talk and student enjoyment, anxiety and discursive engagement in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students‘ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1315–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Re-Search in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). Teacher educators’ conceptions of learning to teach and related teaching strategies. Research Papers in Education, 26(2), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, L. P., & Brook, B. W. (2007). Revisiting Chamberlin: Multiple working hypotheses for the 21st century. BioScience, 57(7), 608–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrella, S., Zakaryan, D., Olfos, R., & Espinoza, G. (2020). How teachers learn to maintain the cognitive demand of tasks through Lesson Study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(3), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. (2008). “Grasp of practice” as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science and Education, 17(2), 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. J. (2012). A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30(3), 207–245.

  • Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinath, A. S., & Southerland, S. A. (2019). Applying the ambitious science teaching framework in undergraduate biology: Responsive talk moves that support explanatory rigor. Science Education, 103(1), 92–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallman-Thrasher, A., & Spangler, D. A. (2020). Purposeful questioning with high cognitive–demand tasks. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 113(6), 446–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, S., Calcagni, E., Leung, A., & Mercer, N. (2021). An analysis of the forms of teacher-student dialogue that are most productive for learning. Language and Education, 1–26.

  • Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Janiel, K., Miller, B. W., Kim, I. H., & Kuo, L. J. (2011). Influence of a teacher’s scaffolding moves during child-led small-group discussion. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 194–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayima, F., & Jakobsen, A. (2021). Exploring the situational adequacy of teacher questions in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 437–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayima, F., & Mkimbili, S. T. (2021). How do chemistry teachers deal with students’ incorrect/undesired responses to oral classroom questions? Exploring Effective Feedback Practices. Research in Science Education, 51(Suppl 2), 647–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7, 225–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. Y., & Wilkinson, I. A. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 70–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefstein, A., Snell, J., & Israeli, M. (2015). From moves to sequences: Expanding the unit of analysis in the study of classroom dis-course. British Educational Research Journal, 41(5), 866–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking: Putting talk to work. Routledge.

  • Macaro, E., & Han, S. (2020). English medium instruction in China’s higher education: Teachers’ perspectives of competencies, certification and professional development. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(3), 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. M., & Hand, B. (2009). Factors affecting the implementation of argument in the elementary science classroom. A longitudinal case study. Research in Science Education, 39, 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E., & Ramsden, P. (1992). An expanding awareness: How lecturers change their understanding of teaching. In M. S. Parer (Ed.), Research and Development in Higher Education (Vol. 15, pp. 148–155). HERDSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (2000). The structure of awareness. In J. Bowden & E. Wlash (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 102–116). RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (2014). The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970s until the 2010s. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 430–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meschede, N., Fiebranz, A., Möller, K., & Steffensky, M. (2017). Teachers’ professional vision, pedagogical content knowledge and beliefs: On its relation and differences between preservice and in-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 158–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2012). Talk science primer. TERC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinari, L., Mameli, C., & Gnisci, A. (2013). A sequential analysis of classroom discourse in Italian primary schools: The many faces of the IRF pattern. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 414–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning Making In Secondary Science Classrooms. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

  • Mortimer, E. F., Scott, P., & El-Hani, C. N. (2012). The heterogeneity of discourse in science classrooms: The conceptual profile approach. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 231–246). Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Murray, J., & Kosnik, C. (2011). Academic work and identities in teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(3), 243–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (1997). Opening dialogue (pp. 30–61). Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, C., & Michaels, S. (2019). Supporting teachers in taking up productive talk moves: The long road to professional learning at scale. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. F. (2019). Not “hands on” but “minds on”: A response to Furtak and Penuel. Science Education, 103(5), 1280–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrosa-de-Jesus, M. H., & da Silva Lopes, B. (2011). The relationship between teaching and learning conceptions, preferred teaching approaches and questioning practices. Research Papers in Education, 26(2), 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrosa-de-Jesus, H., da Silva Lopes, B., Moreira, A., & Watts, M. (2012). Contexts for questioning: Two zones of teaching and learning in undergraduate science. Higher Education, 64(4), 557–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and Knowledge. UK, Edinburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D. S., & McNeill, K. L. (2013). Conducting talk in science classrooms: Investigating instructional moves and teachers’ beliefs. Science Education, 97(3), 367–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4, 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjostrom, B., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2002). Applying phenomenography in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(3), 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. B., & Marshall, J. C. (2013). Interactions between classroom discourse, teacher questioning, and student cognitive engagement in middle school science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(2), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soysal, Y. (2021). Exploring elementary and middle school science teachers’ metadiscourse moves: A Vygotskian analysis and interpretation. Learning Research and Practice, 7(1), 70–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soysal, Y., & Radmard, S. (2020). Research into teacher educators’ discursive moves: A Vygotskian perspective. Journal of Education, 200(1), 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soysal, Y., & Yilmaz-Tuzun, O. (2021). Relationships between teacher discursive moves and middle school students’ cognitive contributions to science concepts. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 325–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soysal, Y. (2022). Science teachers’ challenging questions for encouraging students to think and speak in novel ways. Science & Education, 1–41.

  • Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press.

  • Tang, K. S. (2017). Analyzing teachers’ use of metadiscourse: The missing element in classroom discourse analysis. Science Education, 101(4), 548–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Veen, C., Michaels, S., Dobber, M., van Kruistum, C., & van Oers, B. (2021). Design, implementation, and evaluation of dialogic classroom talk in early childhood education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 29, 100515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (2012). Reframing the classical approach to conceptual change: Preconceptions, misconceptions and synthetic models. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 119–130). Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. (2008). Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue. British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. (2013). Dialogic: Education for the internet age. Routledge.

  • Wells, C. G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry (pp. 137–141). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 85–100). American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, R. (2017). ‘This game is not easy to play’: A narrative inquiry into a novice EFL teacher educator’s research and publishing experiences. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 474–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, R. (2020). Promoting EMI teacher development in EFL higher education contexts: A teacher educator’s reflections. RELC Journal, 51(2), 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Department of Elementary Education, Istanbul Aydin University, Beşyol Mah. İnönü Cad. No: 38 Sefaköy-Küçükçekmece, Istanbul, Turkey

    Yilmaz Soysal

Authors
  1. Yilmaz Soysal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yilmaz Soysal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Some examples of leading questions and prompts as sub-questions asked in the phenomenographic interviews Table.

Table 2.

Table 2 Some examples of leading questions and prompts as sub-questions asked in the phenomenographic interviews
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soysal, Y. Developing a Phenomenographic Argument for Science Teacher Educators’ Conceptions Regarding Question-Asking. Sci & Educ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00440-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00440-9

Search

Navigation