Abstract
In comparison to teachers from Argentina and Uruguay, Brazilian teachers face greater difficulties in teaching biological evolution, due to religion. While Argentina has an official religion set in its constitution, Uruguay and Brazil are considered secular countries. Despite being a self-proclaimed secular country, Brazil tolerates and encourages religious teaching in public schools. Acceptance of the natural origin of mankind, of origin of life, and of biological evolution were investigated in all three countries through interviews and a survey of teachers. Barbour’s categories of conflict, independence, dialogue, and integration were used in the analysis of responses. Argentinian and Uruguayan teachers’ answers pointed to Barbour’s category of independence between science and religion, while Brazilian teachers’ answers ranged between the categories of conflict and a merging between integration and dialogue, which was reinforced by high religiosity linked to knowledge gaps. The religious beliefs of Brazilian teachers appeared to influence their answers about the origin of the human species. In Brazil, religion was frequently identified as an obstacle to the teaching of biological evolution, while responses varied in Argentina and Uruguay. Conflicts in classrooms were also reported more frequently in Brazil than in Argentina and Uruguay. Combined with poor teacher training, personal internal conflicts towards biological evolution help to explain the answers of the Brazilian teachers. Argentinian and Uruguayan teachers generally reported being able to teach biological evolution as part of the curricula without interference from religion, in contrast to approximately half of the Brazilian teachers reporting the same.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alves, F. E. (2015). Theory of intelligent design. Clinical & Biomedical Research, 35(4), 250–251 https://www.seer.ufrgs.br/hcpa/article/view/59738.
Antiqueira, L. M. O. R. (2018). Biólogo ou professor de Biologia? A formação de licenciados em Ciências Biológicas no Brasil. Revista Docência do Ensino Superior, 8(2), 280–287 ISSN (online version): 2237-5864.
Attie, A. D., et al. (2006). Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 116(5), 1134–1138. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI28449.
Ayala, F. J. (1999). Adaptation and novelty: teleological explanations in evolutionary biology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 3–33 https://escholarship.org/uc/item/26s4355t.
Ayala, F. J. (2007). Darwin’s gift to science and religion (Vol. 40). National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-10231-5.
Ayala, F. J., et al. (2008). Science, evolution, and creationism. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11876.
Barbour, I. G. (1990). Religion in an age of science. Harper & Row San Francisco. http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~alfar2/cosmos/Religion-in-Age-Science.pdf
Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin’s black box: the biochemical challenge to evolution. Simon and Schuster. ISBN-10: 0743290313.
Berkman, M. B., & Plutzer, E. (2011). Defeating creationism in the courtroom, but not in the classroom. Science, 331(6016), 404–405. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198902.
Braga, Lucas. Entre a fé e a ciência: uma análise sobre a teoria do design inteligente. (2016), 154 p. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Campinas, SP. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/bitstream/REPOSIP/305055/1/Braga_Lucas_M.pdf
Carmo, R. S., Nunes-Neto, N. F., & El-Hani, C. N. (2016). Teleologia, função e ensino de Biologia. Acta Scientiae, 18(3) http://www.periodicos.ulbra.br/index.php/acta/article/view/2368.
Carvalho, G. S., & Clément, P. (2007). Projecto “Educação em biologia, educação para a saúde e educação ambiental para uma melhor cidadania”: análise de manuais escolares e concepções de professores de 19 países (europeus, africanos e do próximo oriente). Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 7(2). https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/7775/1/RBPEC_Carvalho%20%26%20Clement.pdf
Carvalho, G., Clément, P., Bogner, F., & Caravita, S. (2008). BIOHEAD-Citizen: biology, health and environmental education for better citizenship, final report. Brussels: FP6, Priority, 7. https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/results/506/506015/124856931-6_en.pdf
Cleary, E. L. (2018). Power, politics, and pentecostals in Latin America. Routledge ISBN-10: 0813321298.
Collins, F. S. (2003). Faith and the human genome. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 55(3), 142–153 Available at: http://www.asa3.org/ASA/PSCF/2003/PSCF9-03Collins.pdf.
Colonetti, M., Sanches, M. A. (2012). Percepção das relações entre religião e ciência em contexto acadêmico. In Ensaios sobre ciência e fé. (pp. 75–98). http://www.igrejasaojoseoperario.com.br/pdf/artigos/17.pdf
Cornish-Bowden, A., & Cárdenas, M. L. (2007). The threat from creationism to the rational teaching of biology. Biological Research, 40(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-97602007000200002.
Costa, L. O., Melo, P. L. C., & Teixeira, F. M. (2011). Reflexões acerca das diferentes visões de alunos do ensino médio sobre a origem da diversidade biológica. Ciência & Educação, 17(1), 115–128 https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2510/251019455008.pdf.
Cressey, D. (2016). ‘Creator’ paper sparks concern. Nature, 531(7593), 143. https://doi.org/10.1038/531143f.
Dorvillé, L. F. M., & Selles, S. L. E. (2016). Criacionismo: transformações históricas e implicações para o ensino de ciências e biologia. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 46(160), 442–465. https://doi.org/10.1590/198053143581.
Dorvillé, L. F. M., & Teixeira, P. (2015). O crescimento do criacionismo no Brasil: principais influências e avanços recentes. X Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 24-27. http://www.abrapecnet.org.br/enpec/x-enpec/anais2015/resumos/R0234-1.PDF
Engler, S. (2007). Tipos de criacionismos cristãos. Revista de Estudos da Religião, 7, 83–107 http://stevenengler.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/engler.2007.criacionismos.pdf.
Fanfani, E. T. (2013). La condición docente: análisis comparado de la Argentina, Brasil, Perú y Uruguay. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 38(135), 841–844 http://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/ojs/index.php/cp/article/viewFile/336/342.
Fiorin, J. L. (2019). Operações enunciativas do discurso da extrema-direita. Discurso & Sociedad, 3, 370–382 http://www.dissoc.org/ediciones/v13n03/DS13(3)Fiorin.pdf.
Futuyma, D. J. (2017). Evolution (4rd ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc. ISBN-10: 1605356050.
Galli, L. M. G., & Meinardi, E. N. (2011). The role of teleological thinking in learning the Darwinian model of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(1), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0272-7.
Gatti, B. A. (2010). Formação de professores no Brasil: características e problemas. Educação & Sociedade, 31(113) https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/873/87315816016.pdf.
Gatti, B. A. (2016). Formação de professores: condições e problemas atuais. Revista internacional de formação de professores, 1(2), 161–171 ISSN: 2447-8288.
Goedert, L., Delizoicov, N. C., & ROSA, V. L. (2003). A formação de professores de Biologia e a prática docente-o ensino de evolução. Atas do IV Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (ENPEC). Bauru-SP: ABRAPEC http://fep.if.usp.br/~profis/arquivos/ivenpec/Arquivos/Orais/ORAL012.pdf.
Goedert, L., Leyser, V., & Delizoicov, N. C. (2006). A Formação do Professor de Biologia na UFSC e o Ensino da Evolução Biológica. Revista Contexto & Educação, 21(76), 13–41 https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/101549/213161.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Haught, J. F. (1995). Science and religion: from conflict to conversation. Paulist Press ISBN-10: 0809136066.
Kojonen, E. V. R. (2013). Tensions in intelligent design’s critique of theistic evolutionism. Zygon®, 48(2), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12010.
Krasilchik, M. (2008). Caminhos do ensino de ciências no Brasil. Em Aberto, 11(55) http://emaberto.inep.gov.br/index.php/emaberto/article/viewFile/1851/1822.
Lacey, H. (1996). On relations between science and religion. Science & Education, 5(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00428614.
Lefevre, F., & Cavalcanti Lefevre, A. M. (2014). Discurso do sujeito coletivo: representações sociais e intervenções comunicativas. Texto & Contexto Enfermagem, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072014000000014
Licatti, F. O ensino de evolução biológica no nível médio: investigando concepções de professores de biologia. 2005. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Bauru, 2005. https://repositorio.unesp.br/bitstream/handle/11449/90884/licatti_f_me_bauru.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55 https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1933-01885-001.
Liu, M. J., Xiong, C. H., Xiong, L., et al. (2016). Biomechanical characteristics of hand coordination in grasping activities of daily living. PLoS One, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146193.
MacDowell, J. A. (2011). Evolução VERSUS criação: falso dilEma. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 56(2). https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2011.2.10842.
Machado, M. D. D. C. (2012). Evangelicals and politics in Brazil: the case of Rio de Janeiro. Religion, State and Society, 40(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2012.653137.
Mahner, M., & Bunge, M. (1996). Is religious education compatible with science education? Science & Education, 5(2), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00428612.
Malucelli, V. M. B. (2007). Formação dos professores de Ciências e Biologia: reflexões sobre os conhecimentos necessários a uma prática de qualidade. Estudos de Biologia, 29(66). https://doi.org/10.7213/reb.v29i66.22212.
Mayr, E. (1974). Teleological and teleonomic, a new analysis. In Methodological and historical essays in the natural and social sciences (pp. 91–117). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2128-9_6.
Miller, Jon D. et al. Public acceptance of evolution. Science, v. 313, n. 5788, p. 765, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126746
Moritz, J. M. (2009). Rendering unto science and God: is NOMA enough? Theology and Science, 7(4), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700903239510.
Nagel, T. (2008). Public education and intelligent design. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36(2), 187–205 https://www.jstor.org/stable/40212818.
Nicolini, L. B., Falcão, E. B. M., & Faria, F. S. (2010). Origem da vida: como licenciandos em Ciências Biológicas lidam com este tema? Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 16(2), 355–367 https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2510/251019497006.pdf.
Numbers, R. L. (2006). The creationists: from scientific creationism to intelligent design (no. 33). Harvard University Press. ISBN-10: 9780674023390.
Oleques, L. C., Bartholomei-Santos, M. L., & Boer, N. (2011). Evolução biológica: percepções de professores de biologia. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 10(2), 243–263 http://reec.webs.uvigo.es/volumenes/volumen10/ART2_VOL10_N2.pdf.
Oliveira, A. W., & Cook, K. L. (2018). Evolution education and the rise of the creationist movement in Brazil. In Evolution education around the globe (pp. 119–136). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_7.
Oro, A. P. (2007). Religião, coesão social e sistema político na América Latina. São Paulo: IFHC https://fundacaofhc.org.br/files/papers/434.pdf.
Peacocke, A. (2010). Classifications in context. Zygon, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01155.x.
Pennock, R. T. (Ed.). (2001). Intelligent design creationism and its critics: philosophical, theological, and scientific perspectives (no. 98). MIT Press. ISBN-10: 0262661241.
Pennock, R. T. (2010). The postmodern sin of intelligent design creationism. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 757–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9232-4.
Penteado, P. R., Kavalco, K. F., & Pazza, R. (2012). Influence of sociocultural factors and acceptance of creationism in the comprehension of evolutionary biology in freshman Brazilian students. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(4), 589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0456-4.
Ridley, M. (2004). Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press ISBN-10: 0199267944.
Ruse, M. (2000). Both sides now. Skeptic (Altadena, CA), 8(2), 81–81. Gale Academic Onefile, https://go.galegroup.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA70650620&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=10639330&p=AONE&sw=w Accessed 12 Nov. 2019.
Scharmann, L. C., & Harris Jr., W. M. (1992). Teaching evolution: understanding and applying the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290406.
Scott, E. C. (1999). The creation/evolution continuum. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 19(4), 16–17 http://clarkep.faculty.yosemite.edu/subjects/science/The%20Creation-Evolution%20Continuum%20%20By%20Eugenie%20C.%20Scott.pdf.
Scott, E. C., & Matzke, N. J. (2007). Biological design in science classrooms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(Suppl), 8669–8676. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701505104.
Sepulveda, C. (2004). Movimento Criacionista: Um risco à formação científica e cultural dos alunos da rede pública carioca. Boletim Da SBEnBio, 1, 4–9.
Sepulveda, C., & El-Hani, C. N. (2016). Quando visões de mundo se encontram: religião e ciência na trajetória de formação de alunos protestantes de uma licenciatura em ciências biológicas. Investigações em ensino de ciências, 9(2), 137–175 ISSN: 1518-8795.
Sepulveda, C., Nunes-Neto, N. F., & El-Hani, C. N. (2011). O valor heurístico e pedagógico da linguagem teleológica no ensino de evolução. Atas do VIII Encontro de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (ENPEC). http://www.nutes.ufrj.br/abrapec/viiienpec/resumos/R0668-1.pdf
Silva, H. M. (2017). Intelligent design endangers education. Science, 357(6354), 880.1. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3245.
Silva, H. M., & Mortimer, E. F. (2014). Rescuing Darwin Brazil. In I. Silva (Ed.), Latin American Perspectives on Science and Religion. International Perspectives on Science, Culture and Society (1st ed., Vol. 1, p. 208). London: Routledge. ISBN-10: 1848934998.
Silva, H. M., & Mortimer, E. F. (2019). Brazilian high school biology teachers’ perception of evolution and its teaching. Evolution Education and the Rise of the Creationist Movement in Brazil, Lexington Books 69. ISBN-10: 1793601488.
Silva, H. M., Sandra, E., Nabuco De Araújo, N., Machado Silva, H., & Rodrigues Da Silva, P. (2014). Perception of Brazilian citizens about Darwinism and the (non) influence of God in the evolutionary process. In: International Conference On Education And Social Sciences (intcess14), Vols I and II. Int Organization Center Acad Research, 2014. p. 1554–1563. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275100477
Silva, H. M., Mortimer, E. F., Gibram, D. E., Santos, H. D., & Carvalho, G. S. (2015). The perspective of science and religion in high school biology teachers in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay: a comparative study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(197), 780–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.180.
Silva, H. M., Carvalho, G. S., Rodrigues, P., Silva, D., Gibram, D. E., Paulista, E., & Paulo, S. (2016). A Percepção Sobre a Hipótese do Design Inteligente no Brasil A Percepção Sobre a Hipótese do Design Inteligente no Brasil (Minas Gerais). Revista Conexão Ciência I, 11 http://hdl.handle.net/1822/42386.
Silva, H. M., Mortimer, E. F., Díaz, M. A., Belloso, G. V., & Carvalho, G. S. D. (2018). Biological evolution in curricula of countries with different links between state and religion. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry (TCI), 15(1), 13–33 https://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/tci/article/view/190071.
Souza, S. (2009). A goleada de Darwin: sobre o debate criacionismo-darwinismo. Record. ISBN: 9788501086747.
Souza, R. F.; Matsuo, T.; Zaia, D. A. M. (2009) Evolucionismo X Criacionismo. Revista Ciência Hoje, vol. 43, no. 256, janeiro/fevereiro de 2009. Pág. 36–45. http://www.uel.br/pessoal/rogerio/evolucao/textos/criacionismo_evolucionismo_seculo.pdf
Spencer, N., & Alexander, D. (2009). Rescuing Darwin: God and evolution in Britain today. Theos. https://www.theosthinktank.co.uk/files/files/Reports/RescuingDarwin.pdf
Staff, T. P. O. (2016). Retraction: biomechanical characteristics of hand coordination in grasping activities of daily living. PLoS One, 11(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151685.
Tamir, P. (1985). Causality and teleology in high school biology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 3(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514850030103.
Tolentino Neto, L. C. B. D. (2008). Os interesses e posturas de jovens alunos frente às ciências: resultados do Projeto ROSE aplicado no Brasil (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo). https://roseproject.no/network/countries/brazil/bra-caldeira-tolentino-neto.pdf
Woodford, P. (2016). Neo-Darwinists and Neo-Aristotelians: how to talk about natural purpose. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 38(4), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-016-0123-0.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silva, H.M., Mortimer, E.F. Teachers’ Conceptions about the Origin of Humans in the Context of Three Latin American Countries with Different Forms and Degrees of Secularism. Sci & Educ 29, 691–711 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00124-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00124-8