Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Images of Objective Knowledge Construction in Sexual Selection Chapters of Evolution Textbooks

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Textbooks provide a rich site within which to investigate how members of a scientific discipline choose to represent their research to general audiences. We used critical contextual empiricism as a framework for interrogating how a scientific community is depicted via images in evolution textbook chapters on sexual selection. Textbooks that exhibit science within the tenets of critical contextual empiricism will depict uptake of disciplinary change and acknowledge the inseparability of the social and rational aspects of scientific knowledge construction. Sexual selection is an exemplary arena for this work because the field has undergone substantial change in the past few decades that has been driven by critique from within and among disciplines. We used quantitative methods and content analysis to examine images from the textbook editions and from a time series of editions to examine the portrayal of updated understandings of sexual selection. We found that most textbook images did not reflect the shift happening in the scientific community. Images highlighted primarily the classic view of sexual selection focused on males. Examples typical of a more realistic, complicated understanding received little attention even though the scientific literature on these topics appeared decades before these textbooks were published. Images of males were more common than images of females, females were depicted for fewer concepts than males, and images of males and females reinforced stereotypical sex roles. This study highlights an opportunity for acknowledging the inseparability of the social and the rational in scientific knowledge construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ah-King, M. (2013a). The sex role concept: an overview and evaluation. Evolutionary Biology, 40, 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ah-King, M. (2013b). Queering animal sexual behavior in biology textbooks. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy, and Politics, 1(2), 46–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (2014). From science studies to scientific literacy: a view from the classroom. Science & Education, 23(9), 1911–1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49(3), 227–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen, T. (2000). Why are female birds ornamented? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15, 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1990). The text and cultural politics. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET)/Revue de la Pensée Educative, 24(3A), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. (1994). Bateman's principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. American Naturalist, 144, S126–S149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, G., Rogers, W., & Cappeto, R. (1977). Incompatibility and assortative mating in the Midas cichlid. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2(1), 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, A., & Rosenqvist, G. (1993). Selective males and ardent females in pipefishes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32(5), 331–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, A., Widemo, M., & Rosenqvist, G. (2005). Sex-role reversal revisited: choosy females and ornamented, competitive males in a pipefish. Behavioral Ecology, 16(3), 649–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: theory, research, critique. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertomeu-Sánchez, J. R., García-Belmar, A., Lundgren, A., & Patiniotis, M. (2006). Introduction: scientific and technological textbooks in the European periphery. Science & Education, 15(7), 657–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bro-Jørgensen, J. (2007). Reversed sexual conflict in a promiscuous antelope. Current Biology, 17(24), 2157–2161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown Blackwell, A. (1875). The sexes throughout nature. New York: G. P. Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, H., & Schumacher, P. (2006). The relevance of attention for selecting news content. An eye-tracking study on attention patterns in the reception of print and online media. Communications, 31(3), 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, R., & Levin, J. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C., DeVries, A., & Getz, L. (1995). Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: the prairie vole model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 19(2), 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. (2007). Sexual selection in males and females. Science, 318, 1882–1885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. (2009). Sexual selection in females. Animal Behaviour, 77, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T., & Huchard, E. (2013). Social competition and selection in males and females. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 368, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T., Hodge, S., Spong, G., Russell, A., Jordan, N., Bennett, N., & Manser, M. (2006). Intrasexual competition and sexual selection in cooperative mammals. Nature, 444(7122), 1065–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, J., Dey, C., Delhey, K., Kempenaers, B., & Valcu, M. (2015). The effects of life history and sexual selection on male and female plumage colouration. Nature, 527, 367–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damschen, E., Rosenfeld, K., Wyer, M., Murphy-Medley, D., Wentworth, T., & Haddad, N. (2005). Visibility matters: Increasing knowledge of women’s contributions to ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(4), 212–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Digby, L. (2000). Infanticide by female mammals: implication for the evolution of social systems. In C. van Schaik & C. Jansen (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 423–446). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DiGiuseppe, M. (2014). Representing nature of science in a science textbook: exploring author–editor–publisher interactions. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 1061–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimopoulos, K., Koulaidis, V., & Sklaveniti, S. (2003). Towards an analysis of visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science technology. Research in Science Education, 33, 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, L., Burdfield-Steel, E., & Shuker, D. (2013). Sexual stereotypes: the case of sexual cannibalism. Animal Behaviour, 85, 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P., & Lifjeld, J. (1994). Can extra-pair copulations be used to predict extra-pair paternity in birds? Animal Behaviour, 47(4), 983–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, E. (2003). Talking visual histories: introduction. In L. Peers & A. Brown (Eds.), Museums and source communities, a Routledge reader (pp. 83–99). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S., & Oring, L. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S. & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing nature of science for science education. In S. Erduran & Z. R. Dagher (Eds.), Reconceptualizing nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estep, D., & Bruce, K. (1981). The concept of rape in non-humans: a critique. Animal Behaviour, 29, 1272–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, A., Gowaty, P., & Zuk, M. (1997). Evolutionary psychology and Darwinian feminism. Feminist Studies, 23, 403–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J., Collison, D., Power, D., & Stevenson, L. (2006). Accounting textbooks: exploring the production of a cultural and political artefact. Accounting Education: an International Journal, 15(3), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulford, J. M., & Rudge, D. W. (2016). The portrayal of industrial melanism in American college general biology textbooks. Science Education, 25(5–6), 547–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuselier, L., Jackson, J. K., & Stoiko, R. (2016). Social and rational: the presentation of nature of science and the uptake of change in evolution textbooks. Science Education, 100(2), 239–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, E. (1894). In ) (Ed.), The evolution of woman: an inquiry into the dogma of her inferiority to man. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. (1982). Sexual terms in sociobiology: emotionally evocative and, paradoxically, jargon. Animal Behaviour, 3, 630–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. (Ed.). (1995). Feminism and evolutionary biology. New York: Chapman Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P., Kim, Y., & Anderson, W. (2012). No evidence of sexual selection in a repetition of Bateman’s classic study of Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 11740–11745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasswick, H. (2010). Scientific and lay communities: earning epistemic trust through knowledge sharing. Synthese, 177(3), 387–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, K., & Madijdian, J. (2011). Active males, reactive females: Stereotypic sex roles in sexual conflict research? Animal Behaviour, 81, 901–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (2011). Becoming undone: Darwinian reflections on life, politics, and art. Durham: Duke University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gullicks, K. A., Pearson, J. C., Child, J. T., & Schwab, C. R. (2005). Diversity and power in public speaking textbooks. Communication Quarterly, 53(2), 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallgren, K. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, K. (2014). From eve to evolution: Darwin, science, and women’s rights in gilded age America. Chicago: The University of Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, M., & Waterman, C. (1997). Are all of your students represented in their textbooks? A content analysis of coverage of diversity issues in introductory psychology textbooks. Teaching of Psychology, 24(2), 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsanova, J., Rahm, H., & Holmqvist, K. (2006). Entry points and reading paths on newspaper spreads: comparing a semiotic analysis with eye-tracking measurements. Visual Communication, 5(1), 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houde, A. (2001). Sex roles, ornaments, and evolutionary explanation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(23), 12857–12859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. (1979). Infanticide among animals: a review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1(1), 13–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. (1981). The woman that never evolved. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. (1986). Empathy, polyandry, and the myth of the coy female. In R. Bleier (Ed.), Feminist approaches to science (pp. 119–146). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. (1999). Mother nature: natural selection and the female of the species. London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. (2013). The ‘one animal in all creation about which man knows the least. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368(1631), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. (1979). Have only men evolved? Reprinted in the politics of women’s biology (1990). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 999–1021). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, R., Reynolds, J., & Deutsch, J. (1996). Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution, 50, 1382–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., Walker, D., & Avise, J. (2001). Genetic evidence for extreme polyandry and extraordinary sex-role reversal in a pipefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 268, 2531–2535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. (2014). Inquiry teaching and learning: philosophical considerations. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1363–1380). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S., Ortman, P., Campbell, P., Greenberg, S., Hollingsworth, S., Jacobs, J., & Sadker, D. (1994). Continuing the journey toward gender equity. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijeveld, K., Kraaijeveld-Smit, F., & Komdeur, J. (2007). The evolution of mutual ornamentation. Animal Behaviour, 74(4), 657–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: the grammar of visual design. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (1991). The egg and the sperm: how science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male-female roles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(3), 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metoyer, A., & Rust, R. (2011). The egg, sperm, and beyond: gendered assumptions in gynecology textbooks. Women's Studies, 40(2), 177–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milam, E. (2010). Looking for a few good males: Female choice in evolutionary biology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L., & Clarke, A. (1995). Clitoral conventions and transgressions: Graphic representations in anatomy texts, c1900-1991. Feminist Studies, 21(2), 255–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, G. (1988). Every picture tells a story: illustrations in EO Wilson’s sociobiology. Human Studies, 11(2), 235–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf, K. (2011). A methodological primer for gender research. Sex Roles, 64, 276–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M., & Maza, A. (2011). Nature of science in general chemistry textbooks. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paczolt, K., & Jones, A. (2010). Post-copulatory sexual selection and sexual conflict in the evolution of male pregnancy. Nature, 464(7287), 401–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R., Larkin, T., & Cockburn, J. (2017). A visual analysis of gender bias in contemporary anatomy textbooks. Social Science & Medicine, 180, 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, L. (2006). Visual cultures of science: rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, S., & Kroner, T. (1992). Gender biases in textbooks for introductory psychology and human development. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16(1), 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, E., & Rosser, S. (1992). Factors in life science textbooks that may deter girls’ interest in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(7), 669–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prum, R. (2017). The evolution of beauty: how Darwin’s forgotten theory of mate choice shapes the animal world- and us. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, H., & Sherman, P. (1991). Intracolonial aggression and nepotism by the breeding female naked mole-rat. In P. Sherman, J. Jarvis, & R. Alexander (Eds.), The biology of the naked mole-rat (pp. 337–357). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, E. (2017). Darwin and the making of sexual selection. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J. (2012). The social selection alternative to sexual selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367, 2294–2303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, T. (1967). A quantitative comparison of the behaviour of a wild and a caged baboon group. Animal Behaviour, 15(4), 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuster, S., Briggs, W., & Dennis, P. (2013). How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 368(1613), 20120046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps, J. (1997). The role of females in extrapair copulations in socially monogamous territorial animals. In P. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: boundaries, intersections, and frontiers (pp. 294–319). New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, W. (1985). Chance can produce sex differences in mating success and explain Bateman’s data. Animal Behaviour, 33, 1339–1352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang-Martínez, Z. (2016). Rethinking Bateman’s principles: challenging persistent myths of sexually reluctant females and promiscuous males. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 532–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavris, C. (1993). The mismeasure of woman. Feminism and Psychology, 3(2), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasser, S. (Ed.). (1983). Social behavior of female vertebrates. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, P., & Weber, S. (1976). The effect of female color, size, dominance and early experience upon mate selection in male convict cichlids, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum Günther (Pisces, Cichlidae). Behaviour, 56(1), 116–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M. (1979). Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 123(4), 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M. (1983). Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Quarterly Review of Biology, 58(2), 155–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woyshner, C. (2006). Picturing women: gender, images, and representation in social studies. Social Education, 70(6), 358–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasukawa, K., & Searcy, W. (1982). Aggression in female red-winged blackbirds: a strategy to ensure male parental investment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 11(1), 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuk, M. (1993). Feminism and the study of animal behavior. BioScience, 43(11), 774–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. St. Clair, R. Stoiko, and K. Abney for their help with data input and organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA

    Linda Fuselier, Perri K. Eason & Sarah Spaulding

  2. West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA

    J. Kasi Jackson

Authors
  1. Linda Fuselier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Perri K. Eason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Kasi Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sarah Spaulding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Fuselier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuselier, L., Eason, P.K., Jackson, J.K. et al. Images of Objective Knowledge Construction in Sexual Selection Chapters of Evolution Textbooks. Sci & Educ 27, 479–499 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9978-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9978-7

Search

Navigation