Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing the Impact of Two Science-as-Inquiry Methods on the NOS Understanding of High-School Biology Students

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study compared the effectiveness of two methods in biology teaching that are based on the science-as-inquiry approach: visits to authentic university laboratories (AULs) and analyzing adapted primary literature (APL). The methods’ effectiveness was measured in terms of high-school students’ increased understanding following a 6-week intervention that emphasized five major aspects of the nature of science (NOS): the tentativeness of scientific understanding, the cooperative nature of the scientific process, methodological diversity, the sociocultural embeddedness of scientific knowledge, and the aims of scientific inquiry. A quasi-experimental, pre-post control design was applied, utilizing quantitative evaluation methods. Findings indicate that teaching NOS in biology high-school classes using science-as-inquiry methods is an effective approach for enhancing NOS understanding. Both of the proposed methods appear to be promising; however, the AUL method was found to be more effective for enabling advanced-level high-school biology students’ understanding of these NOS aspects. In conclusion, both AUL and APL are potentially effective methods that can be adapted for teaching various biology subjects in different cultural contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Socioscientific issues in pre-college science classrooms. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 41–61). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95, 918–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (2012). The Minnesota Case Study Collection: New historical inquiry cases for nature of science education. Science & Education, 21, 1263–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: Integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2005). Text genre as a factor in the formation of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 403–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanile, M. F., Lederman, N. G., & Kampourakis, K. (2015). Mendelian genetics as a platform for teaching about Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry: The value of textbooks. Science & Education, 24(1–2), 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Chiappetta, E. L. (1997). Inquiry-based science. The Science Teacher, 64(7), 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. (2002). Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science, 69, 474–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (2011). The story behind the science: Bringing science and scientists to life in post-secondary science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 701–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 25(1–2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dass, P. M. (2005). Understanding the nature of scientific enterprise (NOSE) through a discourse with its history: The influence of an undergraduate “history of science” course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 87–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (2002). Guns, germs and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodick, J., Argamon, S., & Chase, P. (2009). Understanding scientific methodology in the historical and experimental sciences via language analysis. Science & Education, 18(8), 985–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Miller, A., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Bristol: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289–2315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing nature of science for science education. In S. Erduran, & Z. R. Dagher (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, H., Brill, G., & Yarden, A. (2008). Teaching a biotechnology curriculum based on adapted primary literature. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1841–1866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faria, C., Pereira, G., & Chagas, I. (2012). D. Carlos de Bragança, a pioneer of experimental marine oceanography: Filling the gap between formal and informal science education. Science & Education, 21, 813–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galili, I. (2012). Promotion of cultural content knowledge through the use of the history and philosophy of science. Science & Education, 21(9), 1283–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2001). The effect of a history-based course in optics on students’ views about science. Science & Education, 10(1–2), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2014). The distinction between experimental and historical sciences as a framework for improving classroom inquiry. Science Education, 98(2), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2012). Connections to support learning about science. In B. France & V. Compton (Eds.), Bringing communities together: Connecting learners with scientists or technologists (pp. 15–42). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D., & Wong, S. L. (2014). From the horse’s mouth: Why scientists’ views are crucial to nature of science understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 693, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, E. M., & Rudge, D. W. (2005). Recapitulating the history of sickle-cell anemia research: Improving students’ NOS views explicitly and reflectively. Science & Education, 14, 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, A. R. (2000). Historical case studies: Teaching the nature of science in context. Science Education, 84(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history and philosophy of science & science teaching (pp. 999–1022). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israeli Ministry of Education. (2003). Syllabus of biology studies (10-th−12 th grade). Jerusalem: State of Israel Ministry of Education Curriculum Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israeli Ministry of Education. (2010). Syllabus of biological studies for high schools from all sectors of society. Tel Aviv: The Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israeli Ministry of Education. (2017). Syllabus of biological studies for high schools from all sectors of society. Tel Aviv: The Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport.

  • Kampourakis, K. (2013). Mendel and the path to genetics: Portraying science as a social process. Science & Education, 22(2), 293–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K., & Gripiotis, C. (2015). Darwinism in context: An interdisciplinary, highly contextualized course on nature of science. Perspectives in Science, 5, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K., & McComas, W. F. (2010). Charles Darwin and evolution: Illustrating human aspects of science. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R. (2014). Explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction in the context of socioscientific issues: An effect on student learning and transfer. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 974–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. Y., & Irving, K. E. (2010). History of science as an instructional context: Student learning in genetics and nature of science. Science & Education, 19(2), 187–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1999). EJSE editorial: The state of science education: Subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2). Retrieved from http://www.scholarlyexchange.org/ojs/index.php/EJSE/article/view/7602/5369. Accessed 20 Sept 2018.

  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2004). Revising instruction to teach nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward a valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23(2), 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science (NOS) to features of science (FOS). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (2014). International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching. Boston: Springer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (1998). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. Boston: Springer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2004). Keys to teaching the nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2008). Proposals for core Nature of Science content in popular books on the history and philosophy of science: Lessons for science education. In Y. J. Leee & A. L. Tan (Eds.), Science education at the Nexus of theory and practice. Sense: Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2017). Understanding how science works: The nature of science as the foundation for science teaching and learning. School Science Review, 98(365), 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F., & Kampourakis, K. (2015). Using the history of biology, chemistry, geology, and physics to illustrate general aspects of nature of science. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 9(1), 47–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar, P. B. (1986). Is the scientific paper a fraud? In J. Brown, A. Cooper, T. Horton, F. Coates, & D. Zeldin (Eds.), Science in schools (pp. 43–47). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, C., & Kirschenbaum, S. (2009). Unscientific America: How scientific illiteracy threatens our future. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Biology Teachers (2018). https://www.bioteach.org.il/ [In Hebrew].

  • National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. F., Ratcliffe, M., Collins, S., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ‘ideas-about-science’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the ‘expert’ community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1958). The teaching of science as inquiry. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 14, 374–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. Brabdwein (Eds.), The teaching of science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1963). Biology teacher’s handbook. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1964). Structure of the disciplines: Meaning and significance. In G. W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and curriculum (pp. 6–30). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1966). The teaching of science as enquiry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (2000). Enquiry, the science teacher, and the educator. The Science Teacher, 67(1), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal, T., & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: Classroom culture and students’ performances. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), 615–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P. (1976). The Israeli high school biology—A case of curriculum adaptation. Curriculum Theory Network, 5, 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P. (1985). Content analysis focusing on inquiry. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(1), 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P. (1989). History and philosophy of science and biology education in Israel. Interchange, 20(2), 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P. (1990). Considering the invitations to inquiry in science teaching and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1(3), 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsybulsky, D., Dodick, J., & Camhi, J. (2017a). The effect of field trips to university research labs on Israeli high school students' NOS understanding. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9601-3.

  • Tsybulsky, D., Dodick, J., & Camhi, J. (2017b). High-school students in university research labs? Implementing an outreach model based on the ‘science as inquiry’ approach. Journal of Biological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1403360.

  • Wong, S. L., Hodson, D., Kwan, J., & Yung, B. H. W. Y. (2008). Turning crisis into opportunity: Enhancing student–teachers’ understanding of nature of science and scientific inquiry through a case study of the scientific research in severe acute respiratory syndrome. International Journal of Science Education, 30(11), 1417–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. L., Wan, Z., & Cheng, M. W. (2011). Learning nature of science through socio-scientific issues. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolonough, B. E. (1989). Towards a holistic view of processes in science education. In I. Willington (Ed.), Skills and processes in science education—A critical analysis (pp. 115–134). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarden, A., & Carvalho, G. S. (2011). Authenticity in biology education: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Biological Education, 45(3), 118–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarden, A., Brill, G., & Falk, H. (2001). Primary literature as a basis for a high-school biology curriculum. Journal of Biological Education, 35(4), 190–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Prof. Jeff Camhi, Dr. Jeff Dodick, and Ms. Yulia Ovtracht for their valuable contribution to this study. The author gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the Israeli Ministry of Education and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Special thanks also to the high-school students, teachers, graduate students, and administrators whose collaboration was crucial to the successful implementation of this study. I am also very grateful to the editors and three anonymous reviewers of this journal for their constructive comments on an earlier version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dina Tsybulsky.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Appendix 1. Abstracts of the adapted articles (translated from Hebrew to English)

Appendix 1. Abstracts of the adapted articles (translated from Hebrew to English)

Original article: Recent shrinkage of the range of the Eastern Spadefoot Toad, Pelobates syriacus (Amphibia: Anura): archeological evidence from the Bronze Age in Israel

Delfino Masimo, Guy Bar-Oz, & Lior Weissbrod

Published in Zoology in the Middle East, 40, 45–52 (2007)

Abstract for students: Shrinkage of the geographic distribution of the Eastern Spadefoot Toad: archeological evidence from the Bronze Age in Israel

Following Masimo, Bar-Oz, and Weissbrod, 2007.

Archeological evidence can serve to increase our understanding of the past distribution of species that have become extinct, and it sheds light on recent changes in species variability. Such evidence constitutes complex research findings, due to its uniqueness and the fact that it cannot be replicated. Comparing the distribution of current species with that of their precursor species is needed in order to accurately assess the influence and the repercussions that climate change and human activity had on the environment, and it can help us understand the population structure of current species.

This study can be considered as an example of “basic science,” because it elucidates changes in species distribution; it can also be considered an example of “applied science,” because it reveals the ways in which human activity affected environmental conditions, which in turn can lead to the development of strategies for environmental preservation. Amphibians are particularly useful for conducting such a comparison, because they are considered reliable indicators of environmental conditions both on land and in water. Hence, they provide a particularly useful way to describe what local conditions were like in a specific era, as they reflect slow-paced developmental changes that occurred over many generations. Furthermore, the particular resources for which many amphibian species rely on their environment are well known, and it is assumed that their ancient precursors had the similar needs.

This article presents findings (fossils) retrieved from the archeological site, evidence of amphibian life in different eras. The analysis of the remains collected in the Ara Burial Cave in Lower Galilee, Israel (Late Bronze Age II, c. 1300–1200 BCE), permitted the identification of 725 remains of various species of Spadefoot Toad. Despite the relative rarity of such remains (attributable to a single individual), their presence in the Ara cave testifies to a wider range of the taxon in the recent past, given that in the present, this species cannot be found in the cave. Additional evidence of the species wider dispersion in the past was found also in several Israeli Late Pleistocene archeological sites All of this evidence suggests recent environmental changes, which may be due to climatic fluctuations as well as to human impact. An accurate analysis of the shrinkage of the geographic distribution of the Eastern Spadefoot Toad and of the environmental changes that led to this shrinkage will assist in the preparation of conservation or reintroduction plans in Israel.

Conclusion: Comparing the distribution of fossils with the current species distribution can serve to gain insight into the changes in environmental conditions that occurred over time and to understand the role that human activity had in causing these changes.

Original article: Effects of eight growth factors on the differentiation of cells derived from human embryonic stem cells

Maya Schuldiner, Ofra Yanuka, Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor, Douglas A. Melton, and Nissim Benvenisty

Published in PNAS, 97, 11,307–11,312 (2000).

Abstract for students: effects of eight growth factors on the differentiation of cells derived from human embryonic stem cells

Following Schuldiner, Yanuka, Itskovitz-Eldor, Melton, and Benvenisty, 2000.

The process of embryo development begins with a single fertilized cell. Embryonic development occurs as cells divide; thus, the number of cells increases, and tissue and organs form through cell differentiation. Embryonic stem cells are harvested from embryos in very early stages of development and then are placed in a cell culture, where they can grow in vitro, that is, outside of the living organism, in the laboratory, under carefully monitored conditions.

Stem cells are characterized by two major traits:

  1. 1.

    The ability to constantly self-multiply in a cell culture

  2. 2.

    The ability to differentiate (become a mature cell with a specific role and thus different from the parent cell) into every type of cell in the human body, for example, blood cells, muscle cells, nerve cells, etc.

Cell differentiation leads to changes in cell morphology (structure) and function. In the differentiation process, specific genes are expressed that are characteristic of specific cell types, for example, genes of white blood cells or genes of antibodies.

When embryonic stem cells are grown in a cell culture under specific conditions (appropriate temperature and salinity, among other factors), cell clusters are formed, which after a few days become small droplet-shaped bodies that are called embryoid bodies. To use stem cells for purposes of basic science or applied science (for example, for medical research), scientists need to develop techniques by which to direct cell differentiation towards a particular function. One of the ways to try to accomplish this is by growing the cells in a solution that contains special proteins that influence the development and growth of the cells. These proteins are called growth factors, and different growth factors naturally induce cell differentiation into different types of cells.

This article describes a study that aimed to review the distinct effects of eight different growth factors on stem cell differentiation, to determine whether it is possible to control the cell differentiation and thus direct stem cells to differentiate into specific cell types.

The findings show that human embryonic stem cells that developed from embryoid bodies expressed a receptor for each of these growth factors, and that their different effects were evident by differentiation into cells with different morphologies. However, none of the growth factors directed differentiation exclusively to one cell type. By analyzing the resulting cell morphology, we were able to detect three categories of morphological differences associated with three groups of growth factors. This analysis is an initial step towards demonstrating that it is possible to use specific factors to direct the differentiation of human embryonic stem cells in vitro.

1.1 Appendix 2

Table 6 Examples of students’ quotes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsybulsky, D. Comparing the Impact of Two Science-as-Inquiry Methods on the NOS Understanding of High-School Biology Students. Sci & Educ 27, 661–683 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0001-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0001-0

Navigation