Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Small business, innovation, and entrepreneurship

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this special issue is to examine small businesses, innovation, and entrepreneurship, and show that, although these three concepts have their own specific literature and can be dealt with independently, they are closely related. From Schumpeter to the present, a stream of literature unites the concept of entrepreneurship with its ability to make new combinations of factors and corresponding innovations in processes and products; similarly, in a broad stream of literature, the most characteristic dimension of entrepreneurship is closely linked to small businesses. Small and large companies have different advantages and drawbacks with innovation, but small businesses provide the most conducive environment for entrepreneurship and innovation that are not necessarily sustained by the know-how and resources characteristic of large-scale production, but require commitment and close cooperation between company members. In this introduction, we show how the three topics converge in four articles dealing with micro-start-ups and innovation, institutional determinants of entrepreneurship, and determining factors in entrepreneurs’ individual characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Paréntesis nuestros.

References

  • Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2008). Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 656–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, C., & Urbano, D. (2011). Environmental factors and entrepreneurial activity in Latin America. Academia, Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 48, 126–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2004). Potential benefits of the cognitive perspective: expanding entrepreneurship’s array of conceptual tools. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 169–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., & Bird, B. J. (2010). The successful intelligence of high-growth entrepreneurs: links to new venture growth Organization Science, 21(2), 397–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R., & Kovalainen, A. (2009). Researching small firms and entrepreneurship: Past, present and future. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(2), 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H.-L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (Ed.). (1964). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D, Jr, & Hikino, T. (1997). The large industrial enterprise and the dynamics of modern economic growth. In A. D. Chandler Jr, F. Amatori, & T. Hikino (Eds.), Big business and the wealth of nations (pp. 24–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chell, E. (2008). The nascent entrepreneur, business development and the role of human resources. In R. Barret & S. Mayson (Eds.), International handbook of entrepreneurship and HRM (pp. 21–46). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1986). The development and testing of an organizational-level entrepreneurship scale. In R. Ronstadt, J. Hornaday, R. Peterson, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 628–639). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J. C. (2005). Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management practices: a review of empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J. C. (2006). A competency-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 407–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E. (2000). Guest editor introduction to the special issue: The evolution of firm capabilities. Strategic Management Review, 21, 955–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, R., & Jorgenson, D. W. (eds.) (1986). Technology and economic policy. Cambridge, Mass: Harper and Row.

  • Lassen, A. H., Gertsen, F., & Riis, J. E. (2006). The nexus of corporate entrepreneurship and radical innovation. Journal Compilation, 15(4), 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 135–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Discovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P. (2009). Technology management education: Innovation and entrepreneurship at MINES Paris Tech, a leading French engineering school. Academy of Management learning and Education, 8(3), 418–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nga, J. K. H., & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 259–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka y Takeuchi. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinillos, M. J., & Reyes, L. (2011). Relationship between individualist–collectivist culture and entrepreneurial activity: Evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data. Small Business Economics, 37(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, P. J. A., Haugh, H. E., & Obeng, B. A. (2009). Entrepreneurship and innovation in Ghana: Enterprising Africa. Small Business Economics, 32, 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, D. S. (1990). Level of entrepreneurship and scanning source usage in very small businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(2), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2007). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade Award: Delivering on the promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, I. H., & Woodworth, W. P. (2012). Developing social entrepreneurship and social innovators: A social identity and self-efficacy approach. Academy of Management learning and Education, 11(3), 390–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, J. L., & Rottner, R. M. (2008). Innovation policy and nanotechnology entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 791–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zotto, C. D., & Gustafsson, V. (2008). Human resource management as an entrepreneurial tool? In R. Barret & S. Mayson (Eds.), International handbook of entrepreneurship and HRM (pp. 89–110). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Michel Sahut.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sahut, JM., Peris-Ortiz, M. Small business, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 42, 663–668 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9521-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9521-9

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation