Skip to main content
Log in

Culture in transnational Interaction: how Organizational Partners Coproduce Sesame Street

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the extraordinary politicization of culture in an era of globalization, it is surprising that Sesame Street has gained acceptance and legitimacy in more than fifty countries during the last five decades. Sesame Street’s ubiquity around the world presents us with the question I address in this article: how do partner organizations work together, on the ground, to locally adapt a hybrid cultural product? Using data from real-time interactions between NY staff and partners, I show how teams from different cultures who do not share collective representations are able to create them through transnational interaction by: (1) constructing value to align their interests (2) exchanging complex cultural knowledge to customize and build alliances together. The Sesame Street case, then, allows us to grapple with “culture in interaction” at the transnational level, shedding light on culture in transnational interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the data presented here, I edited quotations for clarity and brevity.

  2. ““Maybe an Astronaut” The Measurable Impact of Alam Simsim”, p. 10.

  3. Thanks to a reviewer for this insight.

  4. Thanks to a reviewer for this insight.

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (2005). Dramas of Nationhood: The Politics of Television in Egypt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

  • Acharya, A. (2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, M. G. (2019). The Charisma Machine: The Life, Death, and Legacy of One Laptop per Child. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, I. (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. Methuen & Co

  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity At Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

  • Berman, E. (2019). Talking Like Children: Language and the Production of Age in the Marshall Islands. New York: Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge

  • Binder, A. (2007). For Love and Money: Organizations’ Creative Responses to Multiple Environmental Logics. Theory and Society, 36(6), 547–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, T. (2003). Dubbing Culture: Indonesian Gay and Lesbian Subjectivities and Ethnography in an Already Globalized World. American Ethnologist, 30(2), 225–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boli, J., and George Thomas (1997). World Culture in the World Polity: A Century of International Non-Governmental Organization. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 171–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brienza, & Casey and Matthias Revers. (2016). The Field of American Media Sociology: Origins, Resurrection, and Consolidation. Sociology Compass, 10(7), 539–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. (2009). Cultural Hybridity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press

  • Campbell, C. (2003). Letting them Die: Why HIV/AIDS Prevention Programmes Fail. Bloomington: Indiana University Press

  • Canclini, N. G. (2005). Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

  • Cole, J., & Durham, D. (Eds.). (2007). Generations and Globalization: Youth, Age, and Family in the New World Economy. Bloomington: IN: Indiana University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J., & Durham, D. (Eds.). (2008). Figuring the Future: Globalization and the Temporalities of Children and Youth. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press

  • Cole, M. (2005). “Culture in Development.”. In M. H. Bornstein, & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental Science: An Advanced Textbook (pp. 45–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D., Kawashima, N., & Ken’ichi, K. (2002). Global Culture: Media, Arts, Policy, and Globalization. New York: Routledge

  • Davis, K. (2002). Feminist Body/Politics as World Traveler: Translating our Bodies, Ourselves. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 9(3), 223–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph, N. and Paul Lichterman (2003). Culture in Interaction. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 735–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (1994). The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindstaff, L. (2002). The Money Shot: Trash, Class, and the Making of TV Talk Shows. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

  • Griswold, W. (1987). The Fabrication of Meaning: Literary Interpretation in the United States, Great Britain, and the West Indies. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1077–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillén, M. F. (2000). Business Groups in Emerging Economies: A Resource-Based View. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 362–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haedicke, M. A. (2012). ““Keeping our Mission, Changing our System”: Translation and Organizational Change in Natural Foods Co-Ops.“. The Sociological Quarterly, 53(1), 44–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, T., and Amelia Hawbaker (2021). The Case for an Inhabited Institutionalism in Organizational Research: Interaction, Coupling, and Change Reconsidered. Theory and Society, 50, 1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, T. and Marc Ventresca (2006). Inhabited Institutions: Social Interactions and Organizational Forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theory and Society, 35, 213–236

  • Hannerz, U. (1996). Transnational Connections Culture, People, Places. London: Routledge

  • Haraway, D. (1985). Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 15(2), 65–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1976). Crystals, Fabrics, and Fields: Metaphors That Shape Embryos. New Haven: Yale University Press

  • Kaufman, J., and Orlando Patterson (2005). Cross-National Cultural Diffusion: The Global Spread of Cricket. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 82–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraidy, M. M. (2005). Hybridity, or The Cultural Logic of Globalization. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, G. (2015). How National Institutions Mediate the Global: Screen Translation, Institutional Interdependencies, and the Production of National Difference in Four European Countries. American Sociological Review, 80(5), 985–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2007). Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern, translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

  • Latour, B. (2000). When Things Strike Back: A Possible Contribution of ‘Science Studies’ to the Social Sciences. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N., and Simone Varriale (2019). Introduction to the Special Issue on Global Tastes: The Transnational Spread of Non-Anglo-American Culture. Poetics, 75, 101388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, F., and John Boli (2005). World Culture: Origins and Consequences. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, R. A., Rebecca, S., & New (Eds.). (2008). Anthropology and Child Development: A Cross-Cultural Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, P. (2020). Becoming a ‘Cultural Destination of Choice’: Lessons on Vernacularization from Beirut and Buenos Aires. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26(6), 756–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Peggy and Sally Merry. (2009). Vernacularization on the Ground: Local Uses of Global Women’s Rights in Peru, China, India and the United States. Global Networks, 9(4), 441–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebes, T. and Elihu Katz (1990). The Export of Meaning: Cross-Cultural Readings of Dallas. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, C., & Cole, M., and Sheila Cole (2018). The Development of Children (8th ed.). New York: Macmillan Learning

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., Yanhong Hu, and Minli Liao (2009). Travelling Theory in China: Contextualization, Compromise and Combination. Global Networks, 9(4), 529–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, T. E. (2016). Best Laid Plans: Cultural Entropy and the Unraveling of AIDS Media Campaigns. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

  • Merry, S. E. (2006). Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

  • Menon, A. V. (2019). Cultural Gatekeeping in Cosmetic Surgery: Transnational Beauty Ideals in Multicultural Malaysia. Poetics, 75, 101354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. (2010). World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World Society and the Nation-State. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. (1994). and A. Michael Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE

  • Molnár, V. (2005). Cultural Politics and Modernist Architecture: The Tulip Debate in Postwar Hungary. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 111–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, C. (2008). Culture and Organization Theory. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619, 15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji, C. (2016). Modernity Reimagined: An Analytic Guide. New York: Routledge

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

  • Quintana, Stephen & Aboud, Frances & Chao, Ruth & Grau, Josefina & Cross, Jr, Wiliam & Hudley, Cynthia & Hughes, Diane & Liben, Lynn & Gall, Sharon & Vietze, Deborah. (2006). “Race, Ethnicity, and Culture in Child Development: Contemporary Research and Future Directions.” Child Development 77(5):1129–1141

  • Ritzer, G. (1996). The McDonaldization of Society: An Investigation Into the Changing Character of Contemporary Social Life. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press. Rev. ed

  • Robertson, R. (1994). Globalization and Glocalization. Journal of International Communication, 1, 33–52

  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedano, L. J. (2019). ’From Angola to the World’, From the World to Lisbon and Paris: How Structural Inequalities Shaped the Global Kizomba Dance Industry. Poetics, 75, 101360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, G. W. (2012). Regulation at Work: Globalization, Labor Rights, and Development. Social Research, 79(4), 1023–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. (2017). Disruptive Fixation: School Reform and the Pitfalls of Techno-Idealism. Princeton: Princeton University Press

  • Simmons, B. A., & Dobbin, F., and Geoffrey Garrett (2008). The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, L. (2001). The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J. (2003). Inventing Popular Culture: From Folklore to Globalization. Oxford: Blackwell

  • Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D. A., and Craig J. Russell (2005). The Effect of Cultural Distance on Entry Mode Choice, International Diversification, and MNE Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 270–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1992). Displacing Disney: Some Notes on the Flow of Culture. Qualitative Sociology, 15(1), 5–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. L. (1997). Golden Arches East: McDonald’s in East Asia. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Yúdice, G. (2004). The Expediency of Culture: Uses of Culture in the Global Era. Durham: Duke University Press Books

  • Zelizer, V. A. (1994). Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children. Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwingel, S. (2011). How Do Norms Travel? Theorizing International Women’s Rights in Transnational Perspective. International Studies Quarterly, 56, 115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I thank Peter Evans, Asad L. Asad, Joshua Bloom, Bart Bonikowski, Michael Burawoy, Jim Collins, Frank Dobbin, Roberto Fernandez, Robert Fiala, Neil Fligstein, Duana Fullwiley, Filiz Garip, Marshall Ganz, Heather Haveman, Nicole Arlette Hirsch, Simone Ispa-Landa, Isabel Jijón, Julia Kowalski, Michèle Lamont, Isaac Martin, Erin McDonnell, Terence McDonnell, Rory McVeigh, Ann Mische, Susan Ostermann, Jeff Sallaz, Sarah Soule, Jason Spicer, Sid Tarrow, Jessica Tollette, and Kim Voss for their insightful and helpful comments. An earlier version of this article was presented at the University of Pennsylvania, UCLA, the University of Arizona, Michigan State University, University of New Mexico, Yale University, Harvard University, Northwestern University, University of Michigan, and the University of Notre Dame. Many thanks to all of those who, at each of these institutions, offered invaluable suggestions and ideas. And of course, many thanks to the editors, reviewers, and production team that improved the article and made this process a pleasure.

Funding

This study was funded, in part, by: Harvard Medical School; the Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies, and; David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamara Kay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kay, T. Culture in transnational Interaction: how Organizational Partners Coproduce Sesame Street. Theor Soc 52, 711–737 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09484-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09484-2

Keywords

Navigation