Skip to main content
Log in

Misdiagnosing medicalization: penal psychopathy and psychiatric practice

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article offers a critique and reconstruction of the concept of medicalization. Most researchers describe medicalization as the redefinition of social problems as medical concerns, and track its spread by the proliferation of disease language and diagnostic categories. Forensic psychiatry and disorders like psychopathy are often cited in these debates. I argue that focusing on discourse overlooks how medical language can justify or mask non-medical practices and outcomes, and lead researchers to identify medicalization where it has not occurred. Building on other critiques of medicalization and recent studies of medical and legal expertise, I propose an alternative conception based on conditions for the performance of medical practice and other forms of expert labor. I distinguish the participation or intervention of medical practitioners from the medicalization of expert practice and identify several institutional factors that facilitate the latter. I illustrate this approach using a critical historical case: the first adult penal psychiatric clinic in the United States, founded by the eminent psychopathologist Bernard Glueck at New York’s Sing Sing Prison in 1916. Glueck’s extensive writings reveal little evidence of medicalization: psychopaths were largely defined and diagnosed according to penal rather than medical criteria, and they received additional punishment rather than treatment. A review of recent research confirms that psychopathy remains primarily a penal rather than medical condition. I conclude that focusing studies of medicalization on practice rather than discourse clarifies the concept and avoids reifying the notion of a medicalized society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Wacquant (2009, p. xxii) sharpens the insight by pointing out that “medicalization often [serves] as a conduit to criminalization at the bottom of the class structure as it introduces a logic of individual treatment” that resembles the assignation of criminal guilt.

  2. Psychiatry was not a primary focus of the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1910s. But the Foundation did regularly support the efforts of the National Committee on Mental Hygiene, including providing ten thousand dollars to fund Glueck’s work at Sing Sing. John D. Rockefeller Jr., the Foundation’s president, was interested in the theories of eugenics that undergirded many medical and charitable interventions of the time, and used foundation funds to support eugenic efforts (Fosdick 1952; Gunn 1999; Rockefeller Foundation 1916).

  3. For these reasons, Glueck’s clinic can be considered in analytic terms a “most likely” case: if medicalization did not occur under these favorable circumstances, it is less likely to have elsewhere (Flyvbjerg 2006, p. 231).

  4. Debates over the links between psychopathy and criminality repeat themselves “as regularly as clock-work,” though unfortunately with an “extreme paucity of enlightenment” (Karpman 1948, p. 523). See, among many examples from across the decades, Blackburn 1988; Bowman and Rose 1952; Huddleston 1926; Karpman 1948.

  5. The jurisdictional distinctions between these fields were constantly at issue, with psychologists typically claiming the feebleminded and psychometric techniques and psychiatrists claiming the mentally diseased and medical techniques. For a view of the disciplinary terrain at the time, see Healy 1922.

  6. Sexual deviance and moral panic are consistent features of psychopathic criminal types, from mid-century “sexual psychopaths” to present-day “sexually violent predators” (Freedman 1987; Jenkins 1998; La Fond 1992).

  7. Some defense experts, however, have used fMRI brain scans of defendants in capital cases to argue for leniency (Phillips 2013), while one experimental study suggests that the label of psychopathy is less relevant to hypothetical juror decisions than predictions of high propensity for future violence (Cox et al. 2010).

  8. Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997); Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407 (2002).

References

  • Abbott, A. (1982). The emergence of American psychiatry, 1880–1930. PhD dissertation: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, C. J. (1993). Stigma or legitimation? A historical examination of the social potentials of addiction disease models. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 25(3), 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedikt, M. (1881). Anatomical studies upon brains of criminals. New York: William Wood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrios, G. E. (1999). J.C. Prichard and the concept of ‘moral insanity. History of Psychiatry, 10(37), 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, K. (1914). Die psychopathischen Verbrecher: die Grenzzustände zwischen geistiger Gesundheit und Krankheit in ihren Beziehungen zu Verbrechen und Strafwesen. Berlin: Langenscheidt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. (1988). On moral judgements and personality disorders: The myth of psychopathic personality revisited. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153(4), 505–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. J. R. (2003). Neurobiological basis of psychopathy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182(1), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, J., & Forth, A. E. (2014). Potential labeling effects: Influence of psychopathy diagnosis, defendant age, and defendant gender on mock jurors' decisions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(2), 116–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian, D. (2005). Sing sing: the inside story of a notorious prison. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., Clark, J. W., & Cornell, D. G. (2008). Describing, diagnosing, and naming psychopathy: How do youth psychopathy labels influence jurors? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26(4), 487–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990 [1980]). The logic of practice. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, K. M., & Rose, M. (1952). A criticism of the current usage of the term “sexual psychopath”. American Journal of Psychiatry, 109(3), 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (1990). The name game: Toward a sociology of diagnosis. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11(3/4), 385–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (1995). Naming and framing: The social construction of diagnosis and illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Extra Issue: Forty Years of Medical Sociology: The State of the Art and Directions for the Future: 34–52.

  • Burns, S. L., & Peyrot, M. (2003). Tough love: Nurturing and coercing responsibility and recovery in California drug courts. Social Problems, 50(3), 416–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, J. P., Skeem, J. L., Barchard, K., Lillenfeld, S. O., & Poythress, N. G. (2013). Psychopathic predators? Getting specific about the relation between psychopathy and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(3), 467–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. (2012). Medicalization and biomedicalization: Does the diseasing of addiction fit the frame? In J. Netherland (Ed.), Critical perspectives on addiction (pp. 3–25). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castel, R. (1988 [1976]). The regulation of madness: The origins of incarceration in France. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, R. W. (1935). There is no truce: A life of Thomas Mott Osborne. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E., Shim, J. K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., & Fishman, J. R. (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 161–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P. (1975). The discovery of hyperkinesis: Notes on the medicalization of deviant behavior. Social Problems, 23(1), 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P. (1979). Types of medical social control. Sociology of Health and Illness, 1(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P. (1992). Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 209–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P. (2005). The shifting engines of medicalization. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P. (2008). The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. W. (1992 [1980]). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (1999). Psychopathy across cultures: North America and Scotland compared. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108(1), 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Clark, D. A. (2004). Reconstructing psychopathy: Clarifying the significance of antisocial and socially deviant behavior in the diagnosis of psychopathic personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(4), 337–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. J. (1976). Phrenology and British alienists, c. 1825–1845, parts 1 and 2. Medical History, 20(1–2), 1–21 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtwright, D. T. (2010). The NIDA brain disease paradigm: History, resistance. and spinoffs. BioSocieties, 5(1), 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. D. (2009). The big house: Image and reality of the American prison. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J., DeMatteo, D. S., & Foster, E. E. (2010). The effect of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in capital cases: Mock jurors’ responses to the label of psychopathy. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28(6), 878–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J., Edens, J. F., Rulseh, A., & Clark, J. W. (2016). Juror perceptions of the interpersonal-affective traits of psychopathy predict sentence severity in a white-collar criminal case. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(8), 721–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dain, N., & Carlson, E. T. (1962). Moral insanity in the United States 1835–1866. American Journal of Psychiatry, 118(9), 795–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: how psychology found its language. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. E. (2006). How medicalization lost its way. Society, 43(6), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. E. (2010). Medicalization, social control, and the relief of suffering. In W. C. Cockerham (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to medical sociology (pp. 211–241). Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMatteo, D., & Edens, J. F. (2006). The role and relevance of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised in court: A case law survey of U.S. courts (1991–2004). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12(2), 214–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMatteo, D., Edens, J. F., Galloway, M., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., & Formon, D. (2014). The role and reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised in U.S. sexually violent predator evaluations: A case law survey. Law and Human Behavior, 38(3), 248–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, M. (1994). Psychopathy—A neurobiological perspective. British Journal of Psychiatry 165(2), 151–159.

  • Edens, J. F., Davis, K. M., Fernandez Smith, K., & Guy, L. S. (2013). No sympathy for the devil: Attributing psychopathic traits to capital murderers also predicts support for executing them. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4(2), 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eghigian, G. (2015). A drifting concept for an unruly menace: A history of psychopathy in Germany. Isis, 106(2), 283–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, J. P. (2010). Diagnosing homicidal mania: Forensic psychiatry and the purposeless murder. Medical History, 54, 433–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elam, M. (2015). How the brain disease paradigm remoralizes addictive behavior. Science as Culture, 24(1), 46–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyal, G. (2013). For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 863–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C., & Kennett, J. (2004). Mental impairment, moral understanding and criminal responsibility: Psychopathy and the purposes of punishment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27(5), 425–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A. E. (1938). Causes of crime: Biological theories in the United States, 1800–1915. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follis, L. (2008). Ordering penal space: New York state prison governance in nineteenth century America. The New School: PhD dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosdick, R. B. (1952). The story of the Rockefeller Foundation. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1970 [1966]). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972 [1969]). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1973 [1963]). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977a [1975]). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977b [1971]). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 139–164). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). About the concept of the ‘dangerous individual’ in 19th-century legal psychiatry. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003 [1999]). Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974–1975. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2006a [1961]). History of madness. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2006b [2003]). Psychiatric power: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1973–1974. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2015 [2013]). The Punitive society: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1972–1973. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. R., Kvaran, T. H., & Fontaine, R. G. (2013). Psychopathy and culpability: How responsible is the psychopath for criminal wrongdoing? Law & Social Inquiry, 38(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, E. B. (1987). “Uncontrolled desires”: The response to the sexual psychopath, 1920–1960. Journal of American History, 74(1), 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, S. I. (1999). On treatment, punishment, and the civil commitment of sex offenders. University of Colorado Law Review, 70, 73–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. (1970). The profession of medicine: A study in the sociology of applied knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanek, J. D. (2013). The cultural construction of mental illness in prison: A perfect storm of pathology. Culture, Medicine, & Psychiatry, 37, 195–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garton, S. (2010). Criminal propensities: Psychiatry, classification and imprisonment in New York State 1916–1940. Social History of Medicine, 23(1), 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildemeister, G. A. (1987). Prison labor and convict competition with free workers in industrial America, 1840–1890. New York: Garland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, B. (1916). Studies in forensic psychiatry. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, B. (1917). Types of delinquent careers. Mental Hygiene, 1(2), 171–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, B. (1918a). Concerning prisoners. Mental Hygiene, 2(2), 177–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, B. (1918b). Psychiatric aims in the field of criminology. Mental Hygiene, 2(4), 546–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, B. (1918c). A study of 608 admissions to Sing Sing Prison. Mental Hygiene, 2(1), 85–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, B. (1919). Review of: Die psychopathischen Verbrecher. (The psychopathic criminal.) by Karl Birnbaum. Mental Hygiene, 3(1), 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. E. (1987). Console and classify: The French psychiatric profession in the nineteenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, N. (2017). “That proves you mad, because you know it not”: Impaired insight and the dilemma of governing psychiatric patients as legal subjects. Theory and Society, 46, 201–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowan, T., & Whetstone, S. (2012). Making the criminal addict: subjectivity and social control in a strong-arm rehab. Punishment & Society, 14(1), 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grob, G. N. (1973). Mental institutions in America: Social policy to 1870. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grob, G. N. (1983). Mental illness and American society, 1875–1940. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, T. M. (1999). Kansas v. Hendricks: The diminishing role of treatment in the involuntary civil confinement of sexually dangerous persons. New England Law Review, 33(2), 475–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, J. (1999). A few good men: The Rockefeller approach to population, 1911–1936. In T. Richardson & D. Fisher (Eds.), The Development of the Social Sciences in the United States and Canada: The Role of Philanthropy (pp. 97–114). Stamford: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J. R. (1963). Symbolic crusade: Status politics and the American temperance movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1991). The making and molding of child abuse. Critical Inquiry, 17(2), 253–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfmann, D. (2012). Recognizing medicalization and demedicalization: Discourses, practices, and identities. Health, 16(2), 186–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. R., & Benning, S. D. (2006). The “successful” psychopath: Adaptive and subclinical manifestations of psychopathy in the general population. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 459–480). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, W., Carter, A., & Forlini, C. (2015). The brain disease model of addiction: Is it supported by the evidence and has it delivered on its promises? The Lancet Psychiatry, 2, 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halleck, S. (1965). American psychiatry and the criminal: A historical review. American Journal of Psychiatry, 121(9), i–xxi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1998). Psychopaths and their nature. In Millon, T., E. Simonsen, M. Birket–Smith, & R. D. Davis (Eds.), Psychopathy: antisocial, criminal, and violent behavior (pp. 188–212). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (2003). Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2005). Structural models of psychopathy. Current Psychiatry Reports, 7(1), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2010). The role of antisociality in the psychopathy construct: Comment on Skeem and Cooke (2010). Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 446–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D., Harpur, T. J., Hakstian, A. R., Forth, A. E., Hart, S. D., & Newman, J. P. (1990). The Revised Psychopathy Checklist: Reliability and factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 2(3), 338–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfeld, Y. (1972). People processing organizations: An exchange approach. American Sociological Review, 37(3), 256–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydu, J. (1998). Making use of the past: Time periods as cases to compare and as sequences of problem solving. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 339–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, W. (1915). The individual delinquent. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, W. (1922). Psychiatry, psychology, psychologists, psychiatrists. Mental Hygiene, 6(2), 248–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, E. R. (1980). The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16(2), 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, C. A. (1991). Psychopathic disorder: A category mistake? Journal of Medical Ethics, 17(2), 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horley, J. (2014). The emergence and development of psychopathy. History of the Human Sciences, 27(5), 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, J. H. (1926). The part of conduct disorders in the concept of constitutional psychopathic inferiority. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 64(2), 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huertas, R. (1993). Madness and degeneration, III: Degeneration and criminality. History of Psychiatry, 4(2), 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1976). Medical nemesis: The expropriation of health. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, P. (1998). Moral panic: changing concepts of the child molester in modern America. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutel, A. G. (2009). Sociology of diagnosis: A preliminary review. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(2), 278–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutel, A. G. (2011). Putting a name to it: Diagnosis in contemporary society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpman, B. (1948). The myth of the psychopathic personality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 104(9), 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiehl, K. A. (2006). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on psychopathy: Evidence for paralimbic system dysfunction. Psychiatry Research, 142(2-3), 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittrie, N. N. (1971). The right to be different: Deviance and enforced therapy. Baltimore: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, H. A. (1914). A scale, based on the work at Ellis Island, for estimating mental defect. Journal of the American Medical Association, 62(10), 741–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraepelin, E., & Diefendorf, A. R. (1907). Clinical psychiatry: A text-book for students and physicians. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvaale, E. P., Haslam, N., & Gottdiener, W. H. (2013). The “side effects” of medicalization: A meta-analytic review of how biogenetic explanations affect stigma. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 782–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Fond, J. Q. (1992). Washington’s sexually violent predator law: A deliberate misuse of the therapeutic state for social control. Puget Sound Law Review, 15(3), 655–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S. D. (2014). Pathologist of the mind: Adolf Meyer and the origins of American psychiatry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, H. R., & Weinberger, L. E. (2005). The shift of psychiatric inpatient care from hospitals to jails and prisons. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33(4), 529–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, H. R., Weinberger, L. E., & DeCuir, W. J., Jr. (2002). The police and mental health. Psychiatric Services, 53(10), 1266–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebensohn, Z. M. (1973). In memoriam: Bernard Glueck, Sr. 1884–1972. American Journal of Psychiatry, 130(3), 326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, K. (2011). Dangerous psychopaths: Criminally responsible but not morally responsible, subject to criminal punishment and to preventative detention. San Diego Law Review, 48, 1299–1395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C. D., Clark, H. L., & Forth, A. E. (2010). Psychopathy, expert testimony, and indeterminate sentences: Exploring the relationship between psychopathy checklist–revised testimony and trial outcome in Canada. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 323–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombroso, C. (2006 [1876]). The criminal man. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, P. J., & Hutson, D. J. (2011). Sociology of diagnosis. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern, C. M. (1985). Masters of madness: Social origins of the American psychiatric profession. Hanover: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKim, A. (2017). Addicted to rehab: Race, gender, and drugs in the era of mass incarceration. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, R. M. (2008). The crisis of imprisonment: Protest, politics, and the making of the American penal state, 1776–1941. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzl, J. M. (2010). The protest psychosis: How schizophrenia became a black disease. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzl, J. M., & Kirkland, A. (Eds.). (2010). Against health: how health became the new morality. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T., Simonsen, E., Birket–Smith, M., & Davis, R. D. (Eds.). (1998). Psychopathy: Antisocial, criminal, and violent behavior. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, R. (1992 [1980]). Medicine and crime: The search for the born criminal and the medical control of criminality. In P. Conrad & J. W. Schneider (Eds.), Deviance and medicalization (pp. 215–240). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Glover, N. G., Derefinko, K. J., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2010). The search for the successful psychopath. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 554–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (2015). Illness or deviance? Drug courts, drug treatment, and the ambiguity of addiction. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelhoffer, T., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. P. (2013). Is psychopathy a mental disease? In N. A. Vincent (Ed.), Neuroscience and legal responsibility (pp. 229–255). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. (1916). Sing sing will be country’s first clinic of crime. 16 July, p. 1.

  • New York Times. (1917). Prison at Beekman for feeble-minded. 19 January, p. 4.

  • New York Times. (1922). Crime clinics growing: New experiments to check young delinquents yield good results. 18 June, p. 75.

  • New York Times. (1924). Expert says Loeb admitted he was the actual slayer. 7 August, p. 1.

  • Nolan, J. L. (2001). Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. B. (1984). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), 126–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, T. M. (1914). Within prison walls: Being a narrative of personal experience during a week of voluntary confinement in the state prison at Auburn, New York. New York: D. Appleton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panetta, R. (1999). Up the river: A history of Sing Sing in the nineteenth century. PhD dissertation, City University of New York.

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, G. E. (1930). Current conceptions of psychopathic personality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 87(1), 53–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petchesky, R. P. (1993). At hard labor: Penal confinement and production in nineteenth century America. In D. F. Greenberg (Ed.), Crime and capitalism: Readings in Marxist criminology (pp. 595–611). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, S. J. (1977). The “discovery” of child abuse. Social Problems, 24(3), 310–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, K. D. (2013). Empathy for psychopaths: Using fMRI brain scans to plea for leniency in death penalty cases. University of Alabama Law & Psychology Review, 37, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, D. (1993). Faces of degeneration: A European disorder, c. 1848 – c. 1919. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickersgill, M. (2009). Between soma and society: Neuroscience and the ontology of psychopathy. BioSocieties, 4(1), 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickersgill, M. (2011). Ordering disorder: Knowledge production and uncertainty in neuroscience research. Science as Culture, 20(1), 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisciotta, A. W. (1994). Benevolent repression: Social control and the American reformatory–prison movement. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J. D. (1998). Last resort: psychosurgery and the limits of medicine. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, N. H. (1992). Criminal anthropology in the United States. Criminology, 30(4), 525–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, N. (1997). Psychopathy and the evolution of criminological knowledge. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 235–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, N. (2004). The unrepentant horse-slasher: Moral insanity and the origins of criminological thought. Criminology, 42(4), 979–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, N. (2005). The murderous Dutch fiddler: Criminology, history, and the problem of phrenology. Theoretical Criminology, 9(1), 65–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, N. (2008). The criminal brain: Understanding biological theories of crime. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A. (2013). The anatomy of violence: The biological roots of crime. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinarman, C. (2005). Addiction as accomplishment: The discursive construction of disease. Addiction Research & Theory, 13(4), 307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. A. (2002). Psychopathy and the face of control in supermax. Ethnography, 3(4), 442–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. A. (2004). Total confinement: Madness and reason in the maximum security prison. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. A. (2007). Ethnography “inside”: Acknowledging the 2005 Anthony Leeds prize for Total confinement. City & Society, 19(1), 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockefeller Foundation. (1916). Psychopathic clinic at sing sing prison. The Rockefeller Foundation, 1(3), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1989). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2007a). Beyond medicalisation. Lancet, 369, 700–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2007b). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D., & Hall, J. A. (2006). Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: Improving communication in medical visits. Westport: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D. J. (1971). The discovery of the asylum: Social order and disorder in the new republic. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D. J. (1980). Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternatives in progressive America.

  • Schneider, J. W. (1985). Defining the definitional perspective on social problems. Social Problems, 32(3), 232–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnittker, J. (2017). The diagnostic system: Why the classification of psychiatric disorders is necessary, difficult, and never settled. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scull, A. (1975). From madness to mental illness: Medical men as moral entrepreneurs. European Journal of Sociology, 16(2), 218–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scull, A. (1979). Moral treatment reconsidered: Some sociological comments on an episode in the history of British psychiatry. Psychological Medicine, 9, 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scull, A. (1989). Social disorder/mental disorder: Anglo-American psychiatry in historical perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scull, A. (2005). Madhouse: a tragic tale of megalomania and modern medicine. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (2000). The ‘society of captives’ in the era of hyper-incarceration. Theoretical Criminology, 4(3), 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skålevåg, S. A. (2006). The matter of forensic psychiatry: A historical enquiry. Medical History, 50, 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010a). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 433–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010b). One measure does not a construct make: Directions toward reinvigorating psychopathy research--reply to Hare and Neumann (2010). Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 455–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. T., Edens, J. F., Clark, J., & Rulseh, A. (2014). “So, what is a psychopath?” Venireperson perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes about psychopathic personality. Law and Human Behavior, 38(5), 490–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofaer, S., & Firminger, K. (2005). Patient perceptions of the quality of health services. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 513–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaulding, E. R. (1923). An experimental study of psychopathic delinquent women. Montclair: Patterson Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, D. J. (1996). The philosophy of psychopathy. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 39(4), 569–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, F. (2016). Down, out, and under arrest: Policing and everyday life in skid row. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S. (1958a). Men and machines. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 8(32), 310–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S. (1958b). Psychiatry, ethics, and the criminal law. Columbia Law Review, 58(2), 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S. (1961). The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of personal conduct. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S. (1970). The manufacture of madness: A comparative study of the inquisition and the mental health movement. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S. (1977). Psychiatric slavery. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S. (1994). Cruel compassion: Psychiatric control of society’s unwanted. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S. (2002). Liberation by oppression: A comparative study of slavery and psychiatry. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S. (2007). The medicalization of everyday life: Selected essays. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiger, R. (2012). Judging addicts: Drug courts and coercion in the justice system. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tighe, J. A. (1983). A question of responsibility: The development of American forensic psychiatry, 1838–1930. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Tighe, J. A. (2005). “What’s in a name?”: A brief foray into the history of insanity in England and the United States. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33(2), 252–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen, J. L., MacDougall, E. A. M., Gagnon, N. C., & Douglas, K. S. (2010). Psychopathy evidence in legal proceedings involving adolescent offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(3), 254–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2002). The curious eclipse of prison ethnography in the age of mass incarceration. Ethnography, 3(4), 371–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington Post. (1916). Dr. Glueck guest of honor: Tendered a farewell dinner on eve of departure to new post. 13 July, p. 10.

  • Werlinder, H. (1978). Psychopathy: A history of the concepts. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetstone, S., & Gowan, T. (2017). Carceral rehab as fuzzy penality: Hybrid technologies of control in the new temperance crusade. Social Justice, 44(2/3), 83–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, F. A. (1967). Prichard and the concept of moral insanity. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1(2), 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1983 [1976]). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. New York: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willrich, M. (2003). City of courts: Socializing justice in progressive era Chicago. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootten, B. (1959). Social science and social pathology. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinger, I., & Forth, A. E. (1998). Psychopathy and Canadian criminal proceedings: The potential for human rights abuses. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 237–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zola, I. K. (1972). Medicine as an institution of social control. The Sociological Review, 20(4), 487–504.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to Bernard Harcourt and Kristen Schilt for advising the undergraduate thesis that formed the original basis for this article. I also thank Alex Barnard, Lindsay Berkowitz, Leah Jacobs, Christopher Muller, Josh Seim, Loïc Wacquant, discussants at UC Berkeley, UC Irvine, and the 111th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, and the Editors and reviewers at Theory and Society for their extensive and incisive comments. This research was partially supported by a Graduate Research Fellowship from the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Showalter.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Showalter, D. Misdiagnosing medicalization: penal psychopathy and psychiatric practice. Theor Soc 48, 67–94 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-09336-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-09336-y

Keywords

Navigation