Skip to main content
Log in

Combining multiple information sources for ellipsis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Research on Language and Computation

Abstract

What knowledge sources are necessary in the interpretation and generation of ellipsis? After a short background on earlier approaches we compare and discuss each of the four papers selected for this special issue, examining how they approach ellipsis generation or interpretation. We highlight areas where more research needs to be done: outlining how pragmatics affects ellipsis, empirical studies, and theoretical work on what the effect of ellipsis is in context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcantara M., Bertomeu N. (2005). Ellipsis in spontaneous spoken language. In Spenader J., Hendriks P.(eds) Proceedings of the ESSLLI workshop on cross-modular approaches to ellipsis. Edinburgh, UK, Heriot-Watt University

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple M. (2005). Against reconstruction in ellipsis. In Elugardo R., Stainton R.(eds) Ellipsis and non-sentential speech, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Berlin, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple M., Shieber S.M., Pereira F.C.N. (1991). Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14(4): 399–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elugardo R., Stainton R. (2005). Introduction. In Elugardo R., Stainton R.(eds) Ellipsis and non-sentential speech, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, S. (2005). Information enriched constituents in dialogue. Ph.D. thesis, University of Gothenburg.

  • Ericsson, S. Optimising elliptical utterances in dialogue. Research on Language and Computation, doi: 10.1007/s11168-006-9021-z.

  • Fiengo R., May R. (1994). Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier L., Clifton C., Jr. (2000). On bound variable interpretations: The LF-only hypothesis. Journal of Pyscholinguistics Research 29, 125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier L., Clifton C., Jr. (2001). Parsing coordinates and ellipsis: Copy α. Syntax 4(1): 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankamer J. (1979). Deletion in coordinate structure. New York, Garland Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, D. (1999). VPE as proform: Some consequences for binding. Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 2: Selected papers from the colloque de syntaxe et semantique a Paris, The Hague: Thesus.

  • Hendriks P. (2004). Coherence relations, ellipsis and contrastive topics. Journal of Semantics 21(12): 132–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks P., de Hoop H. (2001). Optimality theory semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks P., Spenader J. (2005). Why be silent? Some functions of ellipsis in natural language. In Spenader J., Hendriks P. (eds) Proceedings of the ESSLLI workshop on cross-modular approaches to ellipsis. Edinburgh, UK: Heriot-Watt University

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J. Pseudogapping. Its syntactic analysis and cumulative effects on its acceptability. Research on Language and Computation, doi: 10.1007/s11168-006-9023-x.

  • Kehler A. (2000). Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis. Linguistic and Philosophy 23, 533–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. (2000). Gradience in grammar: Experimental and computational aspects of degrees of grammaticality. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.

  • Kennedy, C. (2003). Ellipsis and syntactic representation. In K. Schwabe, & S. Winkler (Eds.), The interfaces. Deriving and interpreting omitted structures. (pp 29–53). John Benjamins.

  • Merchant J. (2001). The syntax of silence: Sluicing, Islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C. F. (1995). Coordination ellipsis in spoken and written American English. Language Sciences, 17.

  • Miller, P. (1990). Pseudogapping and do so substitution. In Proc. CLS 26, Chicago, pp. 293–305

  • Repp, S. \({\neg}\) (A & B). Gapping, negation and speech act operators. Research on Language and Computation, doi: 10.1007/s11168-006-9022-y.

  • Sag, I. (1976). Deletion and logical form. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Shapiro L.P., Hestvik A. (1995). On-line comprehension of VP-ellipsis: Syntactic reconstruction and semantic influence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24, 517–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorace A., Keller F. (2005). Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua 115(11): 1497–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spenader J., Hendriks P. (eds) (2005). Proceedings of the ESSLLI workshop on cross-modular approaches to ellipsis. Edinburgh, UK: Heriot-Watt University

    Google Scholar 

  • Stainton, R. J. (2006). Neither fragments nor ellipsis. In L. Progova, K. Paesani, Casielles-Suarez, & E. Barton (Eds.) The syntax of nonsententials: Multi-disciplinary perspectives (pp 93–116). John Benjamins.

  • Theune, M., Hielkema, F., & P. Hendriks. Performing agggregation and ellipsis using discourse structure. Research on Language and Computation, doi: 10.1007/s11168-006-9024-9.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Spenader.

About this article

Cite this article

Spenader, J., Hendriks, P. Combining multiple information sources for ellipsis. Research Language Computation 4, 327–333 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-006-9025-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-006-9025-8

Keywords

Navigation