Abstract
The relationship between students and their academic institution is based on exchange. However, we have limited knowledge regarding how many exchanges students perceive, who (or what) the perceived exchange partners are, and what the perceived terms of those exchanges contain. To address this gap, we utilized a mixed-method approach to explore and describe the psychological contracts of two sets of undergraduate university students: newly entering freshman, and experienced university students. Results clearly demonstrated that students perceive numerous psychological contracts relevant to their education with a variety of partners both inside and at the boundaries of the institution. Results also demonstrated that these contracts are qualitatively and quantitatively distinct. The overarching implication of these findings is that students navigate a web of diverse exchange partners, and it would be a mistake for educators and researchers to focus exclusively on one or few relationships presupposed to be most important.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, J. (1996). The psychological contract: A concept in need of closer scrutiny? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 511–520.
Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Bordia, S., Bordia, P., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2015). Promises from afar: A model of international student psychological contract in business education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 212–232.
Bordia, S., Hobman, E. V., Restubog, S. L. D., & Bordia, P. (2010). Advisor-student relationship in business education project collaborations: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(9), 2360–2386.
Bunderson, J. S. (2001). How work ideologies shape the psychological contracts of professional employees: Doctors’ responses to perceived breach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(7), 717–741.
Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Coyle-Shapiro, J. (2002). A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(8), 927–946.
Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Kessler, I. (2000). Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: A large scale survey. Journal of Management Studies, 37(7), 903–930.
Crisp, G., Palmer, E., Turnbull, D., Nettelbeck, T., Ward, L., Le Couteur, A., et al. (2009). First year student expectations: Results from a university-wide student survey. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 69(1), 11–26.
De Vos, A., De Stobbeleir, K., & Meganck, A. (2009). The relationship between career-related antecedents and graduates’ anticipatory psychological contracts. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(3), 289–298.
Douglas, J. A., Douglas, A., McClelland, R. J., & Davies, J. (2015). Understanding student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: An interpretive study in the UK higher education context. Sudies in Higher Education, 40(2), 329–349.
Dziuban, C. D., & Shirkey, E. C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Psychological Bulletin, 81(6), 358–361.
Freese, C., & Schalk, R. (2008). How to measure the psychological contract? A critical criteria-based review of measures. South African Journal of Psychology, 38(2), 269–286.
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.
Herriot, P., Manning, W. E. G., & Kid, J. M. (1997). The content of the psychological contract. British Journal of Management, 8(2), 151–162.
Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: Investigating generalizability and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 311–321.
Kickul, J. R. (2001). When organizations break their promises: Employee reactions to unfair processes and treatment. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(4), 289–307.
Koskina, A. (2013). What does the student psychological contract mean? Evidence from a UK business school. Studies in Higher Education, 38(7), 1020–1036.
Longden, B. (2006). An institutional response to changing student expectations and their impact on retention rates. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(2), 173–187.
Marks, A. (2001). Developing a multiple foci conceptualization of the psychological contract. Employee Relations, 23(5), 454–467.
Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256.
Raja, U., Johns, G., & Ntalianis, F. (2004). The impact of personality on psychological contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 350–367.
Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal Study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137–152.
Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 2(2), 121–139.
Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Psychological contract inventory (Tech. Rep. No. 2000-02). Pittsburgh, PA: The Heinz School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University. Retrieved from September 9, 2016. http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/rousseau/0_reports/PCI.pdf.
Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contracts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 511–541.
Rousseau, D. M., & Parks, J. M. (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 1–43.
Rousseau, D. M., & Tijoriwala, S. A. (1998). Assessing psychological contracts: Issues, alternatives and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(S1), 679–695.
Shih, C. T., & Chen, S. (2011). The social dilemma perspective on psychological contract fulfillment and organizational citizenship behavior. Management and Organization Review, 7(1), 125–151.
Shore, L. M., & Tetrick, L. E. (1994). The psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (pp. 91–103). New York: Wiley.
Taylor, M. S., & Tekleab, A. G. (2004). Taking stock of psychological contract research: Assessing progress, addressing troublesome issues, and setting research priorities. In J. Coyle-Shapiro, L. M. Shore, M. S. Taylor, & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), The employment relationship (pp. 253–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, H. D. C., & Anderson, N. (1998). Changes in newcomers’ psychological contracts during organizational socialization: A study of recruits entering the British army. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(S1), 745–767.
Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention, 8(1), 1–19.
Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C., Lester, S. W., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2003). The impact of psychological contract fulfillment on the performance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 29(2), 187–206.
Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Rousseau, D. M., & Li, M. (2006). Managing relationships across generations of academics: Psychological contracts in faculty-doctoral student collaborations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17(1), 4–33.
Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647–680.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knapp, J.R., Masterson, S.S. The Psychological Contracts of Undergraduate University Students: Who Do They See as Exchange Partners, and What Do They Think the Deals Are?. Res High Educ 59, 650–679 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9477-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9477-8